Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September 2011 2011 CMT Review.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

West Virginia Schools 21 st Century Learning. WV Content Standards and Objectives.

Advertisements

Creating District C.I.P. And Building S.I.P. Making Sure The Canaries Don’t Die While You Are Data Mining.

______________________________ Connecticut Mastery Test Student Information.

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?

Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.

Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.

Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.

Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?

Valentine Elementary School San Marino Unified School District Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Spring 2009 California Standards Test.

P RE - SERVICE T EACHER E DUCATION : IMPACT OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ON PUPIL MATHEMATICS PERFORMANCE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY.

Connecticut Academic Performance Test Spotlight on Assessment University of Connecticut Neag School of Education March 28, 2008.

Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.

Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments

MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.

Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.

MT. VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ADJUSTMENTS

1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.

Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.

February 27,  Gather information regarding the CMT ◦ What, when, and why?  Try some CMT-like questions ◦ math and language arts  Learn tips/strategies.

Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.

Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.

WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.

U-32 Spring 2013 NECAP Presentation March 27,

______________________________ Connecticut Mastery Test Parent Information.

Instructional Coach Training September 30, 2010 AIMS: Generating Reports to Use with CFIP 1.

Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!

End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)

1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.

APS Algebra Summit1 Algebra in APS Christina Fritz Franny Dever Mitchell Ross January 31,2008.

Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.

No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.

1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics

1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.

Math and Algebra 1 CST Proficiency Scores Panorama High School Eddy Mata, Mathematics Instructional Coach.

1 WASL Mathematics: Grade 7. 2 WASL Math: Where are we now? Questions to answer: How are we doing? How are we doing? Compared to district &

CMT Connecticut Mastery Test When: March, 2010 Direct Assessment of Writing: March 2 Reading Comprehension: March 3 Reading Comprehension: March 5 Editing.

MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.

State Assessment Parent Presentation. 05/14/03 Why is this in place? Federal legislation passed in 2001  No Child Left Behind Reauthorization of the.

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.

Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.

Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.

NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,

Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10 Note: Unless otherwise noted, these data include all students enrolled.

Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.

Parent Workshop Garnet Valley Elementary School Garnet Valley School District February 21, 2012.

GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.

1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.

GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT “HARTFORD MAGAZINE RECOGNIZED GMHS AS THE SIXTH RANKING HIGH SCHOOL IN HARTFORD COUNTY.” 2011 High School Testing.

Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!

Wells Road Intermediate School 5 Year School Improvement Plan

CMT Action Plan Beecher Road School Presentation to the Woodbridge Board of Education October 2012 Gina M. Prisco, Principal Nancy White, Assistant Principal.

GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT 2009 High School Testing Report.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

F.M. Kearns Primary School 5 Year School Improvement Plan

2011 CMT & CAPT Score Report. Grade 3 CMT Results - Reading.

Mission All students become powerful thinkers, effective collaborators, and compassionate contributors in preparation for success in a dynamic, interdependent.

1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.

Student Achievement Data Display Mathematics, Reading & Writing Grade 4 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.

Granby Memorial Middle School 5 Year School Improvement Plan

WASL Mathematics: Grade 6 Specific Title Slide for School. 7.

Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3

Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics & Reading Grade 8

NECAP PRESENTATION.

PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL

Presentation transcript:

Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review

The CMT Test Students are tested in all grades 3-8 in reading, writing, mathematics Students are tested in science in grades 5 and 8 Test results are reported in five levels: 1-Basic, 2-Below Basic, 3-Proficient, 4- Goal, 5-Advanced We are in year six of the Fourth Generation CMT Results are summative and provide us with information of students cumulative learning.

Reading Content Strands All grades assessed in Degrees of Reading Power (nationally normed for level of text) Reading comprehension strands – General understanding – Developing Interpretation – Reader/Text Connection – Examining Content/structure

Writing Content Strands All grades assessed in – Composing and revising (Direct Assessment of Writing) – Editing & Revising Modes of writing for prompt – Narrative (grades 3 & 4) – Expository (grades 5 & 6) – Persuasive (grades 7 & 8)

Math Content Strands Numerical and Proportional Reasoning Algebraic Reasoning: Patterns & Functions Geometry & Measurement Working with Data: Probability & Statistics Number of Assessed strands varies from out of 25

Science Content Strands Students in grades 5 & 8 are assessed in: Content: Earth, Physical, Life Science Scientific Inquiry

What is Adequate Yearly Progress? AYP are benchmarks for accomplishment required by Federal Legislation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) now ESEA (Elementary/Secondary Education Act)

Annual Yearly Progress Granby School District Achievement required to meet No Child Left Behind: Reading (89%) Math (91%) Writing(70%) Participation (95%) Adjusted results in comparison to requirements: Reading Math Writing Participation Whole School 97.3% 99.4% yes 100% Granby AYP Status – Achieved

District Reference Group Comparison DRG Comparison (20 Districts) MathReadingWritingScience Grade N/A Grade 47174N/A Grade Grade N/A Grade 72417N/A Grade

DRG Comparison Percentage Goal Above All 3 Tests

CMT Reading Results Percentage of students meeting goal or above (levels 4,5) Grade:

CMT Reading Results

CMT Writing Results Percentage of students reaching goal or above (levels 4,5) Grade:

CMT Writing

CMT Math Results Percentage of students meeting goal or above (levels 4,5) Grade:

CMT Mathematics

CMT Science Results Percentage of students reaching goal or above (levels 4,5) Grade

CMT Science

Granby Reading Strand Trend 3-8

Granby Writing Strand Trend 3-8

Granby Math Strand Trend 3-8 Common strands across grades needing focus include: Estimating solutions to problems Mathematical applications Several random strands by grade

Matched Cohort – All subjects

Matched Cohort Reading

Matched Cohort Writing

Matched Cohort Math

Analysis and Next Steps Significant strength in three out of four reading strands in grades 5-8 Significant number of Math strands at 90+ mastery across all grades First in DRG in grade 8 math, second in our DRG in grade 5 and 7 math Challenges persist in Reader test connections, DRP, composing and revising and Mathematical applications/estimating solutions to problems

Strategies for Continuous Student Achievement Implementation of viable LA curriculum through reader/writer workshop model K-8 Classroom modeling and coaching Specific focus placed on identified pattern of weak strands across contents and their relation to district 5 year achievement goal. Staff working as Professional Learning Communities to discuss student performance data, common formative assessments, interventions, enrichment, and effective instructional practices Timely and monitored interventions and enrichment

Questions ?