The NEMO3 Double Beta Decay Experiment Ruben Saakyan IoP meeting on Double Beta Decay Manchester 21 November 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEMO-III Status and prospects. 12 December 2005 HEP group Christmas meeting Vladimir Vasiliev.
Advertisements

NEMO-3 experiment First Results and Future Prospects Ruben Saakyan, UCL UK HEP Neutrino Forum The Coseners House, Abingdon.
SuperNEMO Thoughts about next generation NEMO experiment Ruben Saakyan UCL.
Double Beta Decay review
Neutrino masses Determination of absolute mass scale with beta decays:
SNOW 2006, StockholmNEMO 3 and SuperNEMO experiments Vladimir Vasiliev, UCL 2-6 May ’06, Stockholm on behalf of NEMO and SuperNEMO collaborations NEMO.
COBRA Kai Zuber University of Sussex 5 th SNOLAB Workshop,
 NEMO-3 Detector  Preliminary results Performance of the detector  analysis for 100 Mo, 82 Se and 150 Nd  Background study for  research ( 208.
M. Dracos 1 Double Beta experiment with emulsions?
Neutrino Mass and Mixing David Sinclair Carleton University PIC2004.
DBD matrix elements Welcome and aim of the workshop Experimental situation Outcome.
NEMO-3 Experiment Neutrino Ettore Majorana Observatory
XXIV WWND South Padre, TX, April 08 W. Bauer Slide 1 Double  Decays, DUSEL, and the Standard Model Wolfgang Bauer Michigan State University.
M. Dracos, CEA, 10/04/ Double Beta experiment with emulsions?
Search for  + EC and ECEC processes in 112 Sn A.S. Barabash 1), Ph. Hubert 2), A. Nachab 2) and V. Umatov 1) 1) ITEP, Moscow, Russia 2) CNBG, Gradignan,
Double Beta Decay Present and Future
First results from NEMO 3 Experiment V. Vasiliev (ITEP), H. Ohsumi (Saga) and Ch. Marquet Nara, Japan, June 2003 NEMO collaboration.
NEMO-3  experiment First Results and Future Prospects Ruben Saakyan, UCL UK HEP Neutrino Forum The Cosener’s House, Abingdon.
Warsaw - NEMO initiative group Zenon Janas for Search for neutrinoless double  decay in NEMO-3 and SuperNEMO experiments Warszawa,
NEMO-3 Double Beta Decay Experiment: Last Results A.S. Barabash ITEP, Moscow (On behalf of the NEMO Collaboration)
The Summery of the NEMO 3 meeting. The topic Discussed 1) Some problems in variation of the gain of the counters and resoulution of the counters (for.
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Status of R&D of the SuperNEMO experiment Gwénaëlle Broudin-Bay LAL Orsay GDR neutrino – Bordeaux – Oct
FIRST RESULTS OF THE NEMO 3 EXPERIMENT Laurent SIMARD LAL Orsay (France) HEP-EPS 2003 conference CENBG, IN2P3-CNRS et Université de Bordeaux, France CFR,
SuperNEMO Simulations Darren Price University of Manchester July, 2005.
Recent Results of the NEMO 3 Experiment Ladislav VÁLA Czech Technical University in Prague NOW2006, 9 th – 16 th September 2006, Conca Specchiulla, Italy.
Double beta decay and neutrino physics Osaka University M. Nomachi.
Probing neutrino mass with SuperNEMO Ruben Saakyan Ulisse at LSM Workshop 30 June 2008.
Results of NEMO 3 and status of SuperNEMO Ladislav VÁLA on behalf of the NEMO 3 and SuperNEMO collaborations Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics.
NEMO-3 Experiment Neutrino Ettore Majorana Observatory FIRST RESULTS Xavier Sarazin 1 for the NEMO-3 Collaboration CENBG, IN2P3-CNRS et Université de Bordeaux,
Neutrino Ettore Majorana Observatory
Neutrinoless double-beta decay and the SuperNEMO project. Darren Price University of Manchester 24 November, 2004.
Zakład Spektroskopii Jądrowej IFD UW Zenon Janas Poszukiwanie podwójnego bezneutrinowego rozpadu beta w eksperymencie NEMO-3 Warszawa,
1 TAUP - September 7, 2015S. Blot Investigating ββ decay with NEMO-3 and SuperNEMO Summer Blot, on behalf of the NEMO-3 and SuperNEMO experiments 7 September.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
VIeme rencontres du Vietnam
Tracking (wire chamber) Shield radon, neutron,  Source foil (40 mg/cm 2 ) Scintillator + PMT 2 modules 2  3 m 2 → 12 m 2 Background < 1 event / month.
IOP HEPP Matthew Kauer Double beta decay of Zr96 using NEMO- 3 and calorimeter R&D for SuperNEMO IOP HEPP April Matthew Kauer UCL London.
NEMO3 analysis and SuperNEMO development Benjamin Richards D14.
DOUBLE BETA DECAY TO THE EXCITED STATES (EXPERIMENTAL REVIEW) A.S. BARABASH ITEP, MOSCOW.
Neutrino Ettore Majorana Observatory
28 May 2008NEMO-3 Neutrino081 NEMO-3 A search for double beta decay Robert L. Flack University College London On behalf of the NEMO-3 collaboration.
NEMO3 experiment: results G. Broudin-Bay LAL (CNRS/ Université Paris-Sud 11) for the NEMO collaboration Moriond EW conference La Thuile, March 2008.
Activities on double beta decay search experiments in Korea 1.Yangyang Underground laboratory 2.Double beta decay search with HPGe & CsI(Tl) 3.Metal Loaded.
Results of the NEMO-3 experiment (Summer 2009) Outline   The  decay  The NEMO-3 experiment  Measurement of the backgrounds   and  results.
Stefano Torre University College London for NEMO3 and SuperNEMO collaborations Half day IoP Meeting 12 Oct 2011 Outline 0νββ and 2νββ Observation technique.
Double Beta Decay Experiments Jeanne Wilson University of Sussex 29/06/05, RAL.
1st Year Talk1 PEP Violation Analysis with NEMO3 and Calorimeter R&D for SuperNEMO Anastasia Freshville.
By Matthew Kauer First Year Report – 15 June 07 Measurement of 2b2ν Half-Life of Zr96 and Lightguide Studies for SuperNEMO Calorimeter Matthew Kauer UCL.
The COBRA Experiment Jeanne Wilson University of Sussex, UK On behalf of the COBRA Collaboration TAUP 2007, Sendai, Japan.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Proposal to join NEMO-3  decay experiment P. Adamson, R. Saakyan, J. Thomas UCL 27 January 2003.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi, Group Christmass Meeting December Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi Double Beta Decay Study of 150 Nd at NEMO3 (The magic isotope!!)
1 Double Beta Decay of 150 Nd in the NEMO 3 Experiment Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi (On behalf of the NEMO 3 collaboration) The University of Manchester IOP HEPP.
Scintillating Bolometers – Rejection of background due to standard two-neutrino double beta decay D.M. Chernyak 1,2, F.A. Danevich 2, A. Giuliani 1, M.
Search for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay with NEMO-3 Zornitza Daraktchieva University College London On behalf of the NEMO3 collaboration PANIC08, Eilat,
Yuri Shitov Imperial College London On behalf of the NEMO Collaboration A search for neutrinoless double beta decay: from NEMO-3 to SuperNEMO Moriond EW.
Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Werner Tornow Duke University & Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL) & Kavli-Tokyo Institute of the.
Status of 100Mo based DBD experiment
Preliminary Study of 214Bi Background in 100Mo foils
Search for 0nbb decay with SuperNEMO
Sr-84 0n EC/b+ decay search with SrCl2 crystal
• • • Ge measurements for SuperNEMO
Development of metal-loaded liquid scintillators
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
The 0-neutrino double beta decay search
Double Beta experiment using nuclear emulsions?
Double Beta experiment with emulsions?
Presentation transcript:

The NEMO3 Double Beta Decay Experiment Ruben Saakyan IoP meeting on Double Beta Decay Manchester 21 November 2007

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 2 Outline Introduction The detector Results Future

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 3 A “pragmatic” introduction >.. AA M. t N Bkg.  E ln2. N k C.L. (y) M: masse (g)  : efficiency K C.L. : Confidence level N: Avogadro number t: time (y) N Bckg : Background events (keV -1.g -1.y -1 )  E: energy resolution (keV)   NEMO3 philosophy: - Isotope choice flexibility - Focus on lowering N Bkg - Search for any lepton violating process including with continuum spectrum (e.g. Majoron) Detect  topology!

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 4 NEMO3 (Neutrino Ettore Majorana Observatory) 50 physicists, 17 institutions

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 5 3 m 4 m B (25 G) 20 sectors Source : 10 kg of  isotopes cylindrical, S = 20 m 2, e ~ 60 mg/cm 2 Tracking detector : drift wire chamber operating in Geiger mode (6180 cells) Gas: He + 4% ethyl alcohol + 1% Ar + 0.1% H 2 O Calorimeter : 1940 plastic scintillators coupled to low radioactivity PMTs Magnetic field: 25 Gauss Gamma shield: Pure Iron (e = 18 cm) Neutron shield: 30 cm water (ext. wall) 40 cm wood (top and bottom) (since march 2004: water  boron) Particle ID: e , e ,  and  The NEMO3 detector Fréjus Underground Laboratory : 4800 m.w.e.

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 6  isotope foils scintillators PMTs Calibration tube Cathode rings Wire chamber

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester Mo kg Q  = 3034 keV 82 Se kg Q  = 2995 keV 116 Cd 405 g Q  = 2805 keV 96 Zr 9.4 g Q  = 3350 keV 150 Nd 37.0 g Q  = 3367 keV Cu 621 g 48 Ca 7.0 g Q  = 4272 keV nat Te 491 g 130 Te 454 g Q  = 2529 keV  measurement External bkg measurement  search (Enriched isotopes produced by centrifugation in Russia)  decay isotopes in NEMO-3 detector

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester Mo foils Scintillator + PMT Longitudinal view Transverse view Vertex of the e  e  emission  event selection: 2 tracks with Q<0 (right curvature for electrons) 2 PMT hits associated with tracks Common vertex Internal event from the foil (ToF cut) No PMT hits without tracks (  rejection) No delayed short tracks (  rejection from 214 Bi- 214 Po)

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester Tl: Analysis channels: (e -,2  ), (e -,3  ) events coming from foils 214 Bi Analysis channel: (e -, ,  ) events from gas(Radon) or from foil NEMO 3 can measure each component of its background by using different analysis channels Internal background

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 10 Crossing electron > 4 MeV e.g neutron capture in Cu Electron – positron pair. Rejection with magnetic field External background Control and reject backgrounds Unprecedented understanding of backgrounds

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 11 1 ton of –50 o C, 9 bars air flux = 150 m 3 /h Input: A( 222 Rn) 15 Bq/m 3 Output: A( 222 Rn) < 15 mBq/m 3 !!! reduction factor of 1000 Phase I : February 2003 – September 2004 (radon background in data) ~ 1 0 -like event/y/kg with 2.8 < E 1 +E 2 < 3.2 MeV Radon trapping facility Inside the NEMO 3 tent: factor of 100 – 300 Inside NEMO 3: almost factor of 10 A( 222 Rn)  3 mBq/m 3 Phase II : since October 2004 (radon level reduced by a factor of 10)

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 12 NEMO3 Results

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 13 Cos(  ) Angular distribution events 6914 g 389 days S/B = 40 NEMO Mo E 1 + E 2 (MeV) Sum energy spectrum events 6914 g 389 days S/B = 40 NEMO Mo Background subtracted Data 2  2 Monte Carlo Data 2  2 Monte Carlo Background subtracted «  factory» → tool for precision test T 1/2 (  ) = 7.11  0.02 (stat)  0.54 (syst)  years Number of events Number of events/0.05 MeV 100 Mo  2 results Phys. Rev. Lett (2005) Phase 1: Feb – Dec “High Radon”

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester g 389 days 2750 events S/B = 4 48 Ca 82 Se Preliminary results for ~360 d Phase I data. Additional statistics are being analysed and to be published soon. 82 Se T 1/2 = 9.6  0.3 (stat)  1.0 (syst)  y 116 Cd T 1/2 = 2.8  0.1 (stat)  0.3 (syst)  y 150 Nd T 1/2 = 9.7  0.7 (stat)  1.0 (syst)  y 96 Zr T 1/2 = 2.0  0.3 (stat)  0.2 (syst)  y 48 Ca T 1/2 = 3.9  0.7 (stat)  0.6 (syst)  y Background subtracted  2 results with other nuclei  is important: 1) Experimental input to NME calculation (see next slide) 2) Ultimate background for  2) Ultimate background for 

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 15 g pp fixed from experimentally measured M 2 Error bars are from experimental errors on T 1/2 2 V.A. Rodin et al., Nucl. Phys. A 766, 107 (2006) - Erratum HSD, higher levels contribute to the decay SSD, 1  level dominates in the decay (Abad et al., 1984, Ann. Fis. A 80, 9) 100 Mo 00 100 Tc 11 HSD  2 /ndf = 254 / 42 SSD  2 /ndf = 42,3 / 42 SSD mechanism established from 100 Mo single e- spectra Ru

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 16 New results: 130 Te  S + B = 607 events 109 events 454 g 534 days S/B = 0.25 Preliminary result: 130 Te:T 1/2 = [ 7.6 ± 1.5 (stat) ± 0.8 (syst) ]  y Previous indication on effect from a direct experiment (6.1 ± 1.4 (syst) ± ) x years (Arnaboldi 2003)

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 17 How constant are coupling constants?  is sensitive to G f variations (~G f 4 )  decay was first detected in geochemical experiments ( 130 Te  130 Xe) Daughter isotope ( 130 Xe) extracted from an old mineral and number of atoms counted old minerals (~10 6 – 10 9 yr) extractor and mass-spectrometer 130 Te geochemical measurements: (25 ± 2) x yrs (Kirsten 83) (27 ± 2) x yrs (Bernatowicz 93) (8 ± 1) x yrs (Manuel 91, Takaoka 96) “old” samples (~10 9 yrs) “new” samples (few x 10 6 yrs) NEMO3 result (“present”  rate): (7.6 ± 1.7) x yrs Difference between  rates in past and present due to time dependence of Fermi constant??? Suggestion: Carry out geochemical isotope analyses with 100 Mo  100 Ru, 96 Zr  96 Mo (daughter not gas) etc and compare with direct measurements (precise NEMO3 results available).

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 18 Event topology: : 2e  in time & energy and TOF cuts : 2e  in time & energy and TOF cuts 100 Mo (540 keV) (1130 keV) (1227 keV) 0 + (g.s.) 100 Ru (1362 keV) 3034 keV 11 2 days of data (Phase I) 100 Mo  decay to excited states Decay to the excited 0 + state (1130keV) of 100 Ru T 1/2 = (stat)  0.8 (syst)  y Nuclear Physics A781 (2006) Important for NME calculations!

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 19  of 100 Mo and 82 Se 693 days of data Phase I + Phase II 693 days of data Phase I + Phase II 100 Mo 82 Se T 1/2 > 5.8 × % C.L.  m  < (0.8 – 1.3) eV [1-3] T 1/2 > 5.8 × % C.L.  m  < (0.8 – 1.3) eV [1-3] T 1/2 > 2.1 × % C.L.  m  < (1.4 – 2.2) eV [1-3] T 1/2 > 2.1 × % C.L.  m  < (1.4 – 2.2) eV [1-3] Both simple counting and likelihood methods are consistent [1] M.Kortelainen and J.Suhonen, Phys.Rev. C 75 (2007) (R). [2] M.Kortelainen and J.Suhonen, Phys.Rev. C 76 (2007) [3] V.A.Rodin et al., Nucl.Phys. A 793 (2007) 213. [5] M.Aunola et al., Nucl.Phys. A 463 (1998) 207. NME: Data until spring 2006

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 20  Search. Future. Collaboration decided to perform blind analysis. Plan to open the box and update the results ~ in April 2008 (in time for Neutrino’08) and once again at the end of the experiment ~ early expected sensitivities in 2010: 100 Mo T 1/2 (0  ) > 2 × y (90 % CL)  m  < (0.4 – 0.7) eV 82 Se T 1/2 (0  ) > 8 × y (90 % CL)  m  < (0.7 – 1.1) eV see previous slide for NME used

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 21 V+A *n=1 **n=2 **n=3 **n=7 ** Mo >3.2∙10 23 <1.8∙10 -6 >2.7∙10 22 g ee <( )∙10 -4 >1.7∙10 22 >1.0∙10 22 >7∙10 19 Se >1.2∙10 23  2.8∙10 -6 >1.5∙10 22 g ee <( )∙10 -4 >6.0∙10 21 >3.1∙10 21 >5.0∙ * PI+PII data ** PI data, R.Arnold et al. Nucl. Phys. A765 (2006) 483 World’s best limits n: spectral index, limits on half-life in years Other  mechanisms Majoron emission

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 22 Summary NEMO3 – unique approach combining tracking and calorimetry Unprecedented understanding of backgrounds  factory: precise high statistic measurement of 7 isotopes (out of 9 main candidates!). 5 publications in preparation – Experimental input for NME calculations – Understanding  as background

21/11/2007 R. Saakyan: NEMO3, IoP DBD meeting, Manchester 23 Summary(2) < eV so far. Blind analysis underway. Worlds best limits on other  modes (V+A, Majoron) Data taking until end < eV. Partly cover Klapdor’s claim, discovery possible! Ideal test bench for future generation  experiments. Exciting times. Watch this space!