Click to edit Master text styles IM Maturity Assessment – An introduction to the Audit Government Information Strategy Unit (GISU) Tasmanian Archive +

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

Corporate Records Management (Practitioner) Information Governance Policy Team NHS Connecting for Health.
Creating and Submitting a Necessary Wayleave Application
Corporate Records Management (Practitioner) Information Governance Policy Team NHS Connecting for Health.
Health Records Management Practitioner
Child Safeguarding Standards
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
ALO Planning & Assurance Requirements
1 Auditing in the Public Interest Records Management in the Victorian Public Sector Audit objective Audit had two objectives : The first objective was.
Standard on records management Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government Recordkeeping Records Managers Forum, 26 November.
DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS ABOVE THE GUIDELINE SHOWN DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS BELOW THE GUIDELINE SHOWN TO EDIT GRAPHICS IN THE MASTER.
Level 2 Award in Social Networking for Business Day 2 Tutor: Alan Jarvis.
Introduction to Guideline 25 – Managing Information Risk Samara McIlroy, Consultant, Government Recordkeeping
A Framework of Quality Assurance (FQA) for Responsible Officers and Revalidation Ahead of the Curve RO conference 4 June 2014.
BRC Storage & Distribution Safety and Quality Management System Training Guide
Can records management improve governance in Government? Paul Mullon South African Records Management Forum April 2009.
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
© The Association of Independent Schools of NSW Preparing for the ASQA Audit.
Audit Program: Introduction. Our role Located within the Tasmanian Archives and Heritage Office (TAHO), the Government Recordkeeping team.
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
Preparing Scotland’s first Records Management Plan Ava Wieclawska Records Manager.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
Challenges Faced in Developing Audit Plans and Programs 21 st March, 2013.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.
Northern Metropolitan Region Ultranet Team 2008 SIPS Principal Performance Plan Teacher Performance Plan e-Plan ULTRANET Learning & Teaching ULTRANETAND.
IN YEAR MONITORING & BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP PREPARED BY BUDGET OFFICE MAY
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
1 1 BRANCH: CORPORATE AFFAIRS 1. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES To provide financial and strategic support services that enhance service delivery by the.
Emerging Technologies and Guideline 1. Subsequent screens do not need basewave or logo Font must be Gill Sans.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Recordkeeping for Councillors
Records & Information Management (RIM) Risk: Is Your Company Exposed? March 19, 2013.
Challenges Emerging Technologies present for Information Managers Allegra Huxtable Manager Government Information Strategy Unit Tasmanian Archive and Heritage.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
1 Seminar on 2008 SNA Implementation June 2010, Saint John’s, Antigua and Barbuda GULAB SINGH UN Statistics Division Diagnostic Framework: National.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Legacy Records Programme Update on the Legacy Records Programme Auckland Government Recordkeeping Forum 17/11/2009 Cheryl Pointon, Acting Manager Appraisal.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
The Government Recordkeeping Survey 2008 Natalie Dewson, Senior Advisor, Government Recordkeeping Programme, Archives New Zealand.
Practical Investment Assurance Framework PIAF Copyright © 2009 Group Joy Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved. Recommended for C- Level Executives.
Exposure draft - Standard on Digital Recordkeeping Exposure draft - General Retention and Disposal Authority for Source Records that have been Migrated.
Effective Learning Support: The key to quality and success Enhancement of Learning Support.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
National Enrolment Service (NES) Overview October 2015 – June 2016.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
A New Standard for Disposal Mark Crookston Senior Advisor Appraisal Government Recordkeeping Group.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
The National Quality Standard The National Quality Standard (NQS) is a key aspect of the NQF and sets a national benchmark for early childhood education.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
UNDERSTANDING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (IM) WITHIN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Family Assessment Service Engagement Event 21 st August 2013 NWCE-9A3GPK.
PDA IN APPLICATIONS OF ICT IN LIBRARIES Levels 7 & 8.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Agency Briefing - Overview
1 Oxford Professional Education Group Ltd Mastering Metrics An Introduction.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
Resource Allocation Strategy & Planning August 2017
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
RECORDS AND INFORMATION
What is revalidation? Every three years, at the point of your renewal of registration, you need to show that, as a professional, you are living by the.
Strategic Management and
Strategic Management and
Presentation transcript:

Click to edit Master text styles IM Maturity Assessment – An introduction to the Audit Government Information Strategy Unit (GISU) Tasmanian Archive + Heritage Office

Click to edit Master text styles Why the audit? Digital transformation has given way to digital disruption, as social media, cloud and the rapid evolution of emerging technologies change the face of information creation, capture, sharing, and collaboration. The consumerisation of IT has transformed the way our communities expect to interact with information, and access government services. Increasing pressure is being placed on service delivery, collaboration and communication channels by increasingly technologically sophisticated individuals, and tools. Exponential growth of information, and emerging technologies have made the control and governance of agency information more complex. Agencies may be feeling overwhelmed by the size of the perceived task, and under-equipped in terms of skills and capability to meet modern information challenges. Whilst government is busy trying to keep up, the business value of information being stored and shared via these new systems is typically unknown and unmanaged, opportunities are missed, process inefficiencies abound, and risk is increasing.

Click to edit Master text styles The information agenda 1 Open Data information portal for government datasets and increased community collaboration overnment_open_data_policy 2 Shared systems for internal business efficiencies, analytics, and information portability, e.g. Empower, EDI 3 Integrated information exchange in response to community expectation, e.g. “Safe Families Tasmania” 4 Shared systems to support digital service delivery, e.g. iPlan 5 Tasmanian Cloud initiative (Networking Tasmania III) asmanian_Cloud_NT_III_Information_Sheet.pdf

Click to edit Master text styles A need for incremental improvement The revision of Guideline 1 Records Management Principles, and the introduction of the information maturity assessment is intended to: Support a strategic approach to records management as agencies transition to digital business Introduce new key concepts (information governance and information risk) Promote a culture where agencies value their corporate information as a strategic business asset Cover records and information outside of ‘traditional’ recordkeeping systems Align with whole of government policies such as information security Progress foundational IM practice and governance, in order to support collaboration and government information initiatives Ensure agencies commence working towards a defined ‘minimum standard’ for RIM

Click to edit Master text styles The audit – a key piece of the puzzle Key to understanding the agency information environment and identifying ‘current state’ issues and risk exposure, includes: conducting an information maturity assessment building an inventory of information assets assessing existing organisational resources and skills These are fundamental steps for any business undergoing digital transformation, and developing Information Governance capability. Agencies may be under-resourced, or lacking the in-house capability to undertake environmental assessments unassisted. The introduction of the audit, together with the provision of an information maturity assessment and recommendations, is seen as a key support function GISU can provide to government agencies. It also provides an opportunity to derive insight that will allow us to continue to support each agency with targeted advice, specific to individual circumstances.

Click to edit Master text styles The audit process Notify & schedule audit Evidence submitted Evidence Review Onsite interview & inspections Results assessed & report compiled Audit Report presentation to agency Agency Action Plan Follow up and progress monitoring WhoWhat GISUNotify agency of intention to audit, and commence scheduling AgencyCollate and submit evidence requested to GISU GISUReview of submitted evidence GISUConduct audit interview and site inspections GISUResults reviewed and report compiled GISUAudit report presented to agency identifying key recommendations AgencyAction plan developed and submitted to GISU GISUSupport and progress monitoring

Click to edit Master text styles The evidence checklist The evidence checklist is sent to the agency with the initial ‘notification’ , outlining the audit process. A nominated officer should complete the evidence checklist, indicating where the agency has developed tools. Room for comments is provided. Copies of agency documentation, ‘screen dumps’ etc, should be submitted back to GISU along with the completed checklist by the due date specified. Review of these materials helps to inform the subsequent audit interview. Please note: there is NO requirement for the agency to retrospectively create tools in order to attempt to ‘fill gaps’ prior to interview agencies are not expected to have ALL of the examples listed (you may not have any!) agencies may have other documents (not specifically listed) that serve the same (or similar) purpose. These should be indicated where relevant on the checklist and supplied as evidence.

Click to edit Master text styles The audit interview A GISU audit officer will attend the agency to interview key personnel. Where possible, this should include the most senior officer with RIM accountability (CIO, GM, Manager – Corporate Services, etc) as well as specialist RIM staff. Where agencies operate out of multiple sites, and do not have a centralised RIM function, representatives from each site should be in attendance, either in person, or via video/phone link. The agency’s current (last 12 months) Register of Records Destroyed will be required to be produced for inspection during the interview process. The GISU audit officer will also need to undertake inspection of physical storage areas managed by the agency (either on site or offsite secondary storage), and complete an inspection checklist. Note this may require appropriate transport arrangements to be made in advance.

Click to edit Master text styles The key recommendations Whilst the audit report will also provide detailed findings, we have deliberately limited the key recommendations for each agency to three. This is to ensure adequate time is available between audit cycles to implement each of these improvements effectively. The key recommendations, once implemented, will support improved service delivery by providing the agency with foundational information management practice. Implementing robust building blocks will further support an information framework that promotes innovation and collaboration, and improves risk identification/management, legislative compliance and business efficiency.

Click to edit Master text styles The action plan In order to confirm the agency’s commitment to the incremental improvement of RIM practice, and progress the key recommendations, a template for an Agency Action plan has been developed for use The Action plan should specifically address each of the key recommendations in turn, and allocate each action with a timetable and responsible agency officer. Submission of the agency’s endorsed Action plan to GISU will enable us to provide appropriate guidance and support to the agency personnel working on action items, and monitor agency progress. Additional resources are available via the GISU website, including templates and guideline/advices, to support agencies actioning key recommendations.

Click to edit Master text styles Summary of audit requirements An evidence checklist will require completion and submission, along with copies of existing records & information management related policy, procedures, plans and other tools, currently in use. Where an agency has multiple sites that are not managed by a centralised records unit, a representative of each site needs to be in attendance. This may be arranged via video/phone link. Inspections of storage facilities for physical records maintained by the agency must be undertaken, so transport arrangements may be required (where storage is located offsite). Results will be presented to senior executive, in addition to the provision of a detailed report. Three key recommendations will be identified for agency implementation between audit cycles. An endorsed action plan in response to the audit’s key recommendations should be submitted to GISU post-audit

Click to edit Master text styles Need some advice? Contact details: Allegra Huxtable – Manager GISU Level 4, 91 Murray Street Hobart TAS 7000 e: p: