‘FLOCKTON BASIN’ BUILDING IMPACT AND LOSS ESTIMATES FOR THE MARCH 5TH 2014 CHRISTCHURCH FLOOD EVENT R. Paulik 1, G. Smart, J. Bind 1 National Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENTS OF NATURAL HAZARDS Ron Conner Corps of Engineers.
Advertisements

May 22, 2012 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Flood Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Plan ASFPM 2012 Annual Conference Timothy J. Trautman, P.E., CFM Flood Mitigation.
1 Demonstration of Methodology Expert Panel Open Meeting Austin, Texas November 12, 2014.
Christchurch City Council footer text Flood Taskforce Flood risk in Sumner and Moncks Bay.
Update on Use of Hazus for FEMA Risk MAP Flood Risk Products Shane Parson – RAMPP PTS (URS)
CHAPTER 5: PREDICTING STORM SURGE LESSONS FROM HURRICANE IKE.
Update on Hazus AAL Study and Data
Documentation and Analysis of Flash Flood Prone Streams and Subwatershed Basins in Pulaski County, Virginia Anthony Phillips Department of Geography Virginia.
USAID Africa Bureau EIA Procedures for Sub-Projects
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Public Law (PL) Advanced Measures Contingency Operations Directorate.
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation February 17, 2010.
Conclusions, planning and prospects Follow-up committee meeting 6 October, Leuven.
Session 141 Vulnerability to a natural hazard can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from that.
By virtue of the sloping topography of the region and the quality of the soil, as well as its proximity to the Dead Sea fault, region is exposed to.
TOLERATE Summary of work of VATT up to
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting February 8, 2008.
7-1 NFIRS 7 Haz-Mat Module. 7-2 Optional Haz-Mat Module The Marshal will accept this data This reporting does not take the place of mandated DEP or other.
Flood Risk Review Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
An introduction to the monitoring of forestry carbon sequestration projects Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Ecuador March, 2004 Igino.
Care Home Forum 19 th May 2015 Sarah Chittock – Merton Civil Contingencies Officer Taryn Milton – Emergency Planning Manager – Epsom St. Helier.
Private & Confidential MS Frontier Re Modeling Research Pte. Ltd. Catastrophic Risk – A Flood Perspective Kunal Jadhav 12 April 2012.
May 17, 2011 True Flood Loss Analysis: Integrating Both Depth Grid and Specific Building Inventories Jason Rutter, CFM CoreLogic.
The Diversity of Hazus Uses for Hazus Beyond Planning ASFPM 2011 National Conference Louisville, KY Tuesday, May 17, 2011 ASFPM 2011 National Conference.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
Tsunami Methodology Validation Findings and Recommendations Dr. Jawhar Bouabid and Mourad Bouhafs April 09, 2015.
Earthquake Loss Estimation
Morphum Environmental Ltd Environmental Engineers and Consultants
National Weather Service Des Moines, IA National Weather Service Des Moines, IA Iowa Weather & Flood Outlook February 10, 2010 Jeff Johnson & Jeff Zogg.
Geography and Environment 24/7 Population modelling for natural hazard assessment Alan Smith University of Southampton, UK Colloquium on Spatial Analysis,
Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM, URS (RAMPP Team)
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
ASFPM 2011 FEMA’s National Flood Mitigation Data Collection Tool (NT) Errol Garren May 19, 2011 H-4A 4:
Laurel McGinley, PE Dewberry Consultants LLC Storm Preparedness & Hazard Mitigation for Post-Sandy Red Hook, Brooklyn, NY.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
National Weather Service Des Moines, IA National Weather Service Des Moines, IA Mid American Energy Spring Flood Outlook February 16, 2010 Jeff Zogg.
MODELLING THE EXISTING BUILDING STOCK Phil Jones Welsh School of Architecture.
National-scale quantified analysis of future flood risk in the UK Paul Sayers Head of Floods and Water Management HR Wallingford, UK Jim Hall Professor.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) Cost-benefit analysis exercise RiskCity Cees van Westen
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
PALERANG COUNCIL Proposed Special Rate Variation 2016/ /21 Public Exhibition : Draft Long Term Financial Plan and Draft Delivery Program (as amended)
National Weather Service Des Moines, IA National Weather Service Des Moines, IA Iowa Spring Flood Outlook March 5, 2010 Jeff Zogg, Senior Hydrologist.
NOAA Data & Catastrophe Modeling Prepared by Steve Bowen of Impact Forecasting September 16, 2015.
Individual Assistance Preliminary Damage Assessment Preliminary Damage Assessment(PDA) 1.
EQC Increased Flooding Vulnerability CAG overview 22 July 2014.
March Urban Flood Risk Management. March Objectives Understand the Nature of Flooding & Flood Damage Alleviation Understand the Nature of.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
3 rd International Workshop on Global Flood Monitoring & Modelling Assessing Global Flood Hazards: Engineering and Insurance Applications March 6, 2013.
SURF BEACH CATCHMENT, KIAMA Floodplain Risk Management Study & Draft Plan Community Information Newsletter March 2016 The study area investigated in the.
RASP - Risk Assessment of flood and coastal defence for Strategic Planning A High Level Methodology Project partners and co-authors Paul Sayers / Corina.
Development of a High-Resolution Flood Inundation Model of Charles City, Iowa Nathan Young Associate Research Engineer Larry Weber.
Flood damage models – Scope and limitations
UPDATE REGARDING PW ADMIN BUILDING NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
Using Monitoring Data to Make a Difference: Cornwall Dune Management 6 th October 2009 Anne-Marie Moon, Dr Nigel Pontee, Dr Jonathan Rogers & Robert Webbon.
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
Overview of HAZUS for Flood Loss Estimations
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
Risk Assessment.
Flood in Austin - Economic losses assesment
QuakeCore Alpine Fault case study
Flood damage analysis: uncertainties of first floor elevations derived from LiDAR-derived digital surface models José María Bodoque (1), Estefanía Aroca-Jiménez.
Making Space for Water Risk Mapping: Coastal Erosion
Introduction to CREAT Braden Rosenberg, The Cadmus Group, Inc.
Introduction to PARTneR: Pacific Risk Tool for Resilience
Flood Forecasting as a tool for Flood Management
A Complete and Absolute Shambles
City of Ithaca Local Flood Hazard Analysis
Cindy Popplewell AMEC Hazard Mitigation & Emergency Management Program
Floods on the rise: keep calm and reinsure
Presentation transcript:

‘FLOCKTON BASIN’ BUILDING IMPACT AND LOSS ESTIMATES FOR THE MARCH 5TH 2014 CHRISTCHURCH FLOOD EVENT R. Paulik 1, G. Smart, J. Bind 1 National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 301 Evans Bay Parade, Greta Point, Wellington 6021 RiskScape Modules and Model Sequence Hazard, asset and fragility modules were used to estimate building impact and loss from the March 5th 2014 Christchurch flood event. Module application in RiskScape’s model sequence is presented in (1) to (3) below for flood impact and loss calculation (4). Conclusions The March 5th 2014 Christchurch flood event provided a valuable opportunity to collect building impact data and validate flood damage functions. Immediately following flood events, the development of flood inundation models and collection of structural and non-structural attributes from affected buildings can be used in models such as RiskScape to quickly estimate impacts and losses. This information can support the assessment or development of resource and emergency management initiatives to improve the resilience of people and property exposed to future flood hazard events. References Christchurch City Council, 2014: Mayoral Flood Taskforce Temporary Flood Defence Measures Final Report – Part C: Appendix B, Detailed Area Reports. Trim 14/ p82 RISKSCAPE Acknowledgements The authors thank the people of Christchurch who contributed to the flood inundation model development by sending their March 5th 2014 flood photos to NIWA, and those who assisted field staff with the collection of building impact data. Also, we would like to thank Sylvia Maclaren from Jacobs SKM for her assistance in identifying flood affected areas. The survey was funded by NIWA under its RiskScape Programme (2013/14 SCI). For more information RiskScape visit (2) Asset Module: Canterbury Buildings RiskScape’s national building inventory was updated with building attributes recorded during the flood impact survey. The March 5th 2014 flood inundation model raster file was overlaid on a Canterbury building point shapefile in ArcGIS, then aerial photography was used to verify and update building locations. The updated shapefile was imported into RiskScape’s asset module builder tool to build a Canterbury building asset module. Overview On March 5th 2014 a significant rainfall event caused surface and riverine flooding throughout Christchurch City. When flood waters receded, NIWA staff from Wellington and Christchurch conducted a field survey of water levels and building damage for the purpose of improving RiskScape’s flood damage functions for buildings. The data collected also allowed for a RiskScape flood impact and loss mitigation scenario to be tested in Mariehau otherwise known as the ‘Flockton Basin’, whereby building floor levels were raised above flood waters. Flood Impact Survey 125 flood inundated residential and commercial buildings were surveyed over a three day period. At each building site water levels were measured and damage estimated for the structure, contents and in case of some commercial buildings, stock and equipment. Structural and non-structural building attributes (e.g. floor level height) were also assessed and used to update RiskScape’s national building inventory. Building Impact and Loss Model Results For the modelled March 5th 2014 Christchurch flood scenario, RiskScape estimated a NZD$3.4m building reinstatement cost (asset repair, contents and clean-up) for 72 flood damaged buildings in Mariehau. The number of damaged buildings is comparable to the Christchurch City Council (2014) estimate flood waters potentially exceeded floor levels for 65 buildings. Forty seven buildings flooded above level were residential, contributing NZD$3m (88%) of the total building reinstatement cost. Public interest in implementing flood mitigation measures to reduce residential building losses from future flooding in the ‘Flockton Basin’ raised the option of raising the floor levels of affected buildings. RiskScape’s asset mitigation tool was used to estimate potential loss reduction for a repeat March 5th 2014 flood event by raising floor levels of inundated buildings. If all floor levels were raised 0.1m, only 13 of the 47 damaged buildings will be inundated and the estimated losses halved. RiskScape indicates that raising all remaining floor levels by a further 0.3m results in no flood related residential building losses in Mairehau from the flood event. If an average cost of NZD$25,000 to raise and pile a residential building is assumed, to raise all 47 buildings accounted for in the RiskScape model above flood waters would cost approximately NZD$1.15m. Figure 1 (opposite): March 5 th 2014 Flood inundation exposure and building asset repair cost estimates for the ‘Flockton Basin’ area in Mairehau, Christchurch City. (1) Hazard Module: March 5 th 2014 Flood Inundation Model Following the 5 March 2014 flood event, water levels were derived at each building by adding floor height above ground (m) and water depth above floor level (m) to LiDAR building ground elevation. Flockton Basin’s relatively small area meant water level was assumed to be uniform therefore, a 2D flood inundation model was developed from mean water level and high resolution LiDAR topography (±0.15m). (4) Impact and Loss Calculation In RiskScape, building and content reinstatement and clean-up costs ($NZD) were calculated from the March 5th 2014 Christchurch flood inundation model. (3) Fragility Module: Flood Damage Functions Surveyed buildings were classed on use, structural material, wall cladding, storeys and age. RiskScape flood damage functions for each building class were updated by plotting estimated building damage ratio and flood inundation depths (m) against ‘damage curves’. Damage curves were re-fitted to account for the new data then applied to buildings based on their attributes in order estimate an average damage ratio for the modelled flood inundation depth at each building location.