Filter #7 control April 18, 2016 –, Cascina Paolo Ruggi.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Simulink/Front Model & MEDM Screen Mods from ECR E (For SUS’ in BSC Chambers) J. Kissel for the SUS and ISC Team G v3 1.

Advertisements

Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping G v8 1.

Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.

Locking improvements after the end of VSR1 Gabriele Vajente for the Locking Group 14 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Cascina – March 6 th 2008.

April 27th, 2006 Paola Puppo – INFN Roma ILIAS Cryogenic payloads and cooling systems (towards a third generation interferometer) part II: the Vibration.

Payload design methods versus modeling E. Majorana.

Seismic attenuation chains concept, design and advancement status Riccardo DeSalvo for the KAGRA Seismic group JGW-G September 10, 20121JGW-G

1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.

Virgo commissioning update - VSR1 first month summary E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Cascina June 20 th,2007.

Suspended Mirror control: Learning through Virgo Experience E. Majorana - I.N.F.N. Pisa Aspen GWAD February 16, 2004.

LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.

LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.

Thursday, 18 March 2004 Andrea Viceré, Urbino University 1/34 Issues in the Virgo mechanical simulation Why a mechanical simulation How the simulation.

Present Superatttenuator performance vs. AdV & ET Requirements S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group.

September 8, 2015 THE MONOLITHIC SUSPENSION STATUS FOR THE VIRGO INTERFEROMETER THE MONOLITHIC SUSPENSION STATUS FOR THE VIRGO INTERFEROMETER Helios Vocca.

1 Virgo commissioning since the end of VSR1 E. Tournefier for the commissioning team ILIAS WG1, Cascina March 5 th,2008.

Virgo Control Noise Reduction

GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,

Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule

Takanori Sekiguchi Anual Meeting of Physics Society of Japan Sep. 22nd, 2013) Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule 1.

Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…

Takanori Sekiguchi ALPS Report, Dec. 26th, 2013 Prototype Test of Type-B 1 Takanori Sekiguchi KAGRA F2F MEETING Feb

Design study for ET 3rd generation Gravitational Wave Interferometer Work Package 2 Suspension, Thermal noise and Cryogenics Piero Rapagnani

Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.

ILIAS – WG1 Hierarchical suspension control G.Losurdo INFN Firenze.

Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Alignment control servo for type-B/type-Bp (OpLev/WFS) 1 T. Sekiguchi.

Experimental tests of SA simulation Irene Fiori – Simulation Workshop – March 18, 2004 Virgo dataSiesta simulation 1. Inertial Damping simulation  test.

Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Control and tuning of suspension 1 T. Sekiguchi KAGRA 4th External Review.

SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.

1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.

Abstract The Hannover Thermal Noise Experiment V. Leonhardt, L. Ribichini, H. Lück and K. Danzmann Max-Planck- Institut für Gravitationsphysik We measure.

MSC - 18 Oct 071 LOW FREQUENCY SEISMIC NOISE: LOCKING AND SENSITIVITY ISSUE Paolo Ruggi noise meeting.

Loïc Rolland LSC-Virgo, Orsay- June 11th Virgo ‘timing’ calibration Loïc Rolland Note: Timing calibration during VSR1 in the Virgo codifier (VIR-028A-08,

Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.

ILIAS Geneva 29 March 2007 Virgo suspension control progress E. Majorana INFN Mirror Suspension Control workgroup.

The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.

MSC winter, short-term schedule Commissioning meeting Cascina 2 Oct 2006.

The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.

Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.

M. Mantovani ILIAS Cascina March 2008 Automatic Alignment system Improvements after the VSR1 M. Mantovani for the Alignment team.

Dangers of controls from the cryogenic links. The LCGT-SAS Seismic Attenuation System i-LCGT is a modern, simplified and improved version of the Virgo.

Status of Virgo GWDAW12 Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec Leone B. Bosi INFN and University of Perugia (Italy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.

CITF A. Allocca, M. Mantovani. Outline CITF schematic Resonance conditions Effect of the misalignment on the error signals Comparison with Virgo+ Effect.

LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.

Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.

Torsion Pendulum Dual Oscillator (TorPeDO) David McManus, Min Jet Yap, Robert Ward, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland.

The Mechanical Simulation Engine library An Introduction and a Tutorial G. Cella.

SAT Plans for System R&D Signal Recycling Construction and A&I Short Suspension Upgrade Roberto Passaquieti Università di Pisa and INFN-Pisa AdV Review.

Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.

Michele Punturo adVirgo and ET thermal noise meeting 1.

1 Advanced Virgo Monolithic Payloads P.Rapagnani Thermal Noise Workshop 2012_02_24-25.

Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.

Advanced SA Specifications & Scientific Motivations S.Braccini, Cascina 21 Settembre 2007.

Paola Puppo INFN – Rome Thermal Noise Meeting – “Sapienza”-Rome - February 26 th 2008.

Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E

Last stage SA F7 monitor/control

Type-A SAS Local Control Simulation (Current Status)

VIRGO–KAGRA Meeting about bottom filter damping

Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E

Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity

LCGT Seismic Attenuation System LCGT-SAS

Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec 13-16

Control of the KAGRA Cryogenic Vibration Isolation System

The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)

Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers

Weekly meeting Cascina 9 Jan 2007

HAM-SAS Mechanics Status of modeling V.Boschi, V. Sannibale.

Status at the Prague meeting

Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity

weekly meeting Cascina 28 Nov 2006

Presentation transcript:

Filter #7 control April 18, 2016 –, Cascina Paolo Ruggi

Filter #7 is the suspension last stage before the payload. A sensor-actuator system at this level allow us to see and control some suspension degrees of freedom, which are not controllable from the standard controlled stages. Moreover, it can be used to compensate an unbalanced back action of the locking force. GENERAL MOTIVATION

TORSIONAL D.O.F.(theta-y) The entire suspension is a long and soft torsion pendulum. In VIRGO the first normal mode was at 15mHz. In AdvV it is at 11 mHz. It is not easy to set correctly that d.o.f. in air; when the suspension goes in vacuum the rest position could be much different then the expected one. Filter #7 monitor fix the problem.

The suspension torsion modes can be easily excited a lot during normal operations. In that condition, the accuracy of mirror alignment cannot be the best possible one. Generally the natural damping of that oscillations takes a long time. Filter #7 control system fix the problem.

LONGITUDINAL D.O.F. There is a pendulum mode which cannot be controlled through the top stage, but is well visible by the filter #7 monitor, as pitch motion. This is the payload longitudinal oscillation against the backward motion of filter #7 center of mass, which is located much below its suspension point. The excitation of this mode can worsen the accuracy of marionette pitch control.

Last stage pendulum mode (0.42 Hz)

LOCKING PHASE Filter #7 is the stage which supports the coils used for marionette and mirror driving. It has been observed that the longitudinal force applied to the marionette for the ITF locking, even if well balanced in order to avoid yaw action on the marionette, produce a yaw back action on filter #7. The effect worsen the alignment accuracy of ITF. It can be compensated sending a component of the locking signal to the filter #7 yaw actuation.

POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL USE A combination of filter #0 and filter #7 sensing system can produce seismic free signals, able to see the residual motion of the pendulum chain due to filter #0 control lacks of accuracy. Therefore, in principle, an advanced control strategy has more powerful if the filter #7 sensor-actuator system is installed.