1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restore and Protect Red River Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries Watershed Program.
Advertisements

Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards Regulatory Authority Review and Concepts for a Statewide Order for Composting.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.
WATER POLLUTION.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Freshwater pollution and its control Bo, Dane, Alisha, Haunz, Chelsea.
Bay Area IRWMP Public Workshop #1 July 23, OBJECTIVES I BAIRWMP-Goals and Objectives II. DWR Guidance- “Measures” III Process IV. Proposed.
HUMAN IMPACT ON WATER BY: MR. MERINGOLO. THERE IS LOTS OF WATER, SO WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Approximately 97 % of water is salty, which leaves only 3 % as.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
A Plan to Get Savvy About Urban Watersheds Dan Cloak, Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting Beau Goldie, Santa Clara Valley Water District Lorrie Gervin,
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Human Waste Disposal More than 500 pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites can travel from human or animal excrement through water. More than 500 pathogenic.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Water: Putting Resources Back Into Place Eutrophication, Pollution and Waste Water Treatment.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Need for Reliable Water Quality Monitoring / Evaluation of Impact of Water Exports on Water Quality in the Delta & Its Tributaries G. Fred Lee, PhD, PE,
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
CACHE CREEK WATERSHED Watershed Overview –Physical Description –Land Uses Present –Flow Characteristics –Beneficial Uses Point and Non-Point Source Pollutants.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
Water: Pollution and Eutrophication. Delaware River Basin Low flow in the Delaware River during the mid-1960s and in the early 1980s threatened the drinking.
Impacts of Mining, Mining Regulations & Mine Reclamation.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Water Sources & Pollutants FS Unit 5 FCS-FS-5: Students will discuss why water and pH are important factors in food preparation and preservation. C. List.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
SONOMA CREEK AND SEDIMENT: KNOWING WHAT WE DON’T KNOW MAY 2011.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
Prepared By: Amaliyar Kamleshkumar ( ) Rathod Nikunj ( ) Parmar mukesh ( ) Patel Raj ( ) Ode Kiran ( )
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
Clean Water Act Types of Pollution WATER POLLUTION.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
8/9/2011 CV-SALTS 1 Triennial Review Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior Engineer 9 August 2011.
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Wetlands.
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Triennial Review Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior Engineer 9 August /9/2011 CV-SALTS.
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Water Quality Indicators & Water Pollution
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Water Pollution.
Vineyards and Water Quality
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

2 Function of the Water Boards The primary duty of the Water Boards is to protect the quality of the waters within the state for all beneficial uses. Specific responsibilities and procedures of the Water Boards are contained in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act.

3 The Water Boards work hard to preserve, protect, enhance and restore water quality throughout the state.

4 Organization of the Water Boards  State Water Board, located in Sacramento  Nine Regional Water Boards, whose geographic boundaries are based on watersheds  Central Valley Water Board, located in Rancho Cordova, Redding and Fresno

5 What the State Board Does Protects water quality by:  Setting statewide policy  Coordinating and supporting the Regional Water Board efforts  Reviewing petitions that contest Regional Water Board actions  Allocating surface water rights

6 Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams  Adoption of principles and guidelines as part of state policy for water quality control  Preservation of instream flow needed to protect fishery resources  Applicable to specific areas that provide habitat for steelhead trout, coho salmon, Chinook salmon

7 Water Rights  Law administered by the State Water Resources Control Board  Water rights are required if you take water from lake, river, stream, or creek  Protects water for beneficial uses  Stops wasteful or unreasonable uses of water which may harm streambeds, endangered species, fisheries, fish and wildlife

8 Thermal Pollution  California Thermal Plan  Discharge of heated water from industrial processes, which kill or injure aquatic species  Water-cooled power plants, hydroelectric dams (Oroville, Shasta, Folsom), refineries, chemical plants, urban runoff

9 What the Central Valley Water Board Does Protects water quality by:  Making critical water quality decision for the Central Valley  Setting standards  Issuing waste discharge requirements and determining compliance with those requirements  Taking appropriate enforcement actions

10 Central Valley Water Board Programs  CV-SALTS Initiative  Delta Strategic Plan  Mining  Timber Harvest  CWA 303d List/Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)  Water Quality Certification  Waste Discharge to Land – Protects Groundwater  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) – Protects Surface Water  Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs)

11 CV-SALTS Initiative  Elevated salinity and nitrates in surface water and groundwater, which can impact wildlife  Conditions worsening in Central Valley  CV-SALTS is an effort to develop a long-term management plan

12 Delta Strategic Plan  State/Regional Board team coordinate with other entities to address impairments in Delta  Develop Delta Regional Monitoring Program  Helps address Pelagic Organism Decline

13 Mining Program  Oversees the discharge of waste from hundreds of active, inactive or abandoned mines in the Central Valley  Metals and salts from mining impact Central Valley rivers, streams, lakes and groundwater, which can result in fish kills

14 Timber Harvest Program  Reviews timber harvest plans to regulate public and private timber harvest activities  Excessive soil erosion and sediment delivery creates unstable stream channels, silts fish spawning habitats and wetlands, and clogs drinking water intakes

15 Clean Water Act 303d List  Section 303d of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop a list of impaired water bodies  Several water bodies are listed as impaired for mercury, which bioaccumulates in some fish species  d list has been updated and approximately 400 impaired Central Valley water bodies have been added to the d list

16 TMDL Program  Develops control programs to address impairments to water bodies listed on the Clean Water Act 303d List  TMDLs have been developed for pesticides, dissolved oxygen, mercury, sediment, metals, salts, selenium, and pathogens

17 Waste Discharge to Land Program  Regulates waste discharges to land from over 1200 Central Valley facilities which could impact underlying groundwater  Primarily focuses on measures necessary to prevent and/or mitigate groundwater degradation

18 NPDES Program  Regulates discharges to surface waters from wastewater treatment plants, industries, and storm water discharges  Polluted water can have many adverse effects on plants, fish, animals and people

19 NPDES Permits  30% of permits statewide  Approximately 220 Central Valley facilities  Addresses toxic pollutants (organics and heavy metals), and other constituents (aluminum, ammonia, hardness)  Regional Goals:  Regionalization and recycling  Minimal permit renewal backlog

20 Water Quality Certification Program  Clean Water Act Section 401/404 certification for discharge of dredged and/or fill materials  River gravel augmentation or improvement projects, including pilot gravel injection projects or salmonid spawning gravel augmentation programs  Sediment removal for maintaining fish passage

21 Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs)  During settlement negotiations over an enforcement action, the dischargers may choose to use a SEP from the list to offset a portion of the liability  Proponents can submit SEP proposals for consideration  Qualified SEP List will be posted on Central Valley Water Board’s website

22 Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs)  Any SEP meeting the criteria and deemed acceptable by the RB staff will be posted on our website for a 30 days public comment period  Projects accepted on the list are not formally approved

23 Questions?