2016 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Department of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting February 25, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIE Annual Conference| September 24, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson,
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
TEA| Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR) The TAPR will.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
TETN Session #30124 | November 13, 2014 | 1:00-3:00 p.m. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
1.Welcome (10 minutes) 2.Federal Focus School Update (20 minutes) 3.Upcoming Sessions (30 Minutes) 4.Break (15 minutes) 5.Accountability Update (75 minutes)
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Overview of 2015 Accountability SUMMER 2015 MICKI WESLEY, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY & COMPLIANCE CINDY TEICHMAN, COORDINATOR OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
TETN Videoconference #30120| February 26, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview.
TETN Session #18319 | November 14, 2013 | 1:00-3:00 p.m. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
School Year Assessment Updates State Assessment Updates Coordinator Training November
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
2015 Performance Reports TEA Information: Texas Consolidated School Rating Report TAPR – Texas Academic Performance Report Texas Academic Dashboard.
November 19 Accountability Webinar Kim Gilson
Texas Assessment Conference| February 16, 2016 Shannon Housson, Director, Division of Performance Reporting Department of Assessment and Accountability.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
Charter School Summit| June 16, 2014 Diane J. Hernandez | Texas Education Agency Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Charter School Summit| June 30, 2015 Christopher Lucas| Texas Education Agency Department of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
MARCH 2, 2016 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBINAR Kim Gilson, Doni CashRegion 10 ESC 1.
Kim Gilson Accountability Updates Feb 19, 2016 Doni Cash
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
TETN Videoconference #36664| April 21, 2016 Texas Education Agency | Assessment and Accountability Performance Reporting Overview of 2016 Accountability.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Accountability Update
Overview of 2016 Accountability
Accountability Overview 2016
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update
State Accountability Update
State Academic Accountability: A View to the Future
A-F Rating and State Accountability System
TETN Videoconference #386|April 5, 2018
State Accountability Update
Accountability Update
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
2013 Texas Accountability System
State and Federal Accountability Overview
Accountability Updates
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
2016 – 2017 Accountability Performance Index Framework
Presentation transcript:

2016 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Department of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting February 25, 2016

2  Accountability decisions begin with the recommendations of two committees:  Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC)  Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC)  ATAC met in late September and early December  APAC met in late October 2015 and late January  Recommendations were sent to the commissioner of education.  Commissioner announced final decisions for 2016 accountability on February 12,  The administrative rule adoption process will begin in spring Accountability Development

3  The state accountability system uses ratings that indicate acceptable and unacceptable performance.  In 2016, two labels indicate acceptable performance:  Met Standard  Met Alternative Standard (assigned to charter districts and campuses that are evaluated under alternative education accountability [AEA] provisions)  The label that indicates unacceptable performance is Improvement Required. Note: These labels will also be assigned in the 2016–17 school year. Rating Labels

4  Increase in the student performance standards for STAAR grades 3–8 and end-of-course (EOC) general assessments  By commissioner’s rule, the scheduled increase in 2015–16 to the Phase-in 2 Level II passing standard has been replaced with a standard progression approach which will begin in 2015–16 and continue until 2021–22.  EOC retesters who are required to meet the phase-in I passing standard are counted as passers based on their performance relative to the phase-in 1 passing standard. Assessments Evaluated

5  Inclusion of grades 3–8 mathematics STAAR assessments  The 2016 accountability system will include the performance results for grades 3–8 mathematics in all indices, including progress measure results for grades 3–8 mathematics, where applicable.  The student performance standard for grades 3–8 mathematics will be the 2015–16 standard. Assessments Evaluated

6  STAAR A results will be included in all indices  STAAR Alternate 2 results will be included in Index 1, Index 2, and Index 3 Assessments Evaluated

Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 STAAR Grades 3–8 (all subjects) √√√√ STAAR EOC Assessments (5 tests) √√√√ STAAR EOC substitute assessments √ n/a √ STAAR L (via the ELL Progress Measure) √√ XX STAAR A √√ √√ STAAR Alternate 2 √√ √ n/a

8 In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campuses must meet targets on at least three indices: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4 Index Targets: Non-AEA Districts and Campuses 2016 Accountability Performance Index Targets for Non-AEA Districts and Campuses TargetIndex 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 All ComponentsSTAAR Component Only Districts605 th percentile 6013 Campuses Elementary 60 5 th percentile n/a12 Middle5 th percentile n/a13 High School/K – 125 th percentile 6021

9 In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campuses must meet targets on at least three indices: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4 Index Targets: AEA Charter Districts and Campuses 2016 Accountability Performance Index Targets – AEA Charter Districts and Campuses TargetIndex 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 Both ComponentsGraduation/Dropout Rate Only AEA Charter Districts and Campuses 355 th percentile 3345

10 Inclusion of English Language Learners: Index 1 Years in U.S. Schools STAAR and STAAR A Testers STAAR-L Testers STAAR Alternate 2 Testers ELLs receiving Bilingual Education or ESL Instructional Services ELL Parental Denials or ELL progress measure plan exceeders First year of enrollment in U.S. schools Not Included STAAR Level II Standard Second through fourth year of enrollment in U.S. schools Spanish STAAR 2016 Level II Standard English ELL Progress Measure STAAR 2016 Level II Standard ELL Progress Measure STAAR Level II Standard Fifth year or more of enrollment in U.S. schools STAAR 2016 Level II Standard Not IncludedSTAAR Level II Standard

11 Inclusion of English Language Learners: Index 2* Years in U.S. Schools STAAR and STAAR A Testers STAAR-L Testers STAAR Alternate 2 Testers ELLs receiving Bilingual Education or ESL Instructional Services ELL Parental Denials or ELL progress measure plan exceeders First year of enrollment in U.S. schools Not Included Student Progress Measure Second through fourth year of enrollment in U.S. schools Student Progress Measure Fifth year or more of enrollment in U.S. schools Student Progress Measure * Index 2 includes the appropriate student progress measure for which the ELL student was eligible, either the STAAR progress measure, ELL progress measure, or Spanish to English transition proxy calculation, where applicable.

12 Inclusion of English Language Learners: Index 3 Years in U.S. Schools STAAR and STAAR A Testers STAAR-L Testers STAAR Alternate 2 Testers ELLs receiving Bilingual Education or ESL Instructional Services ELL Parental Denials or ELL progress measure plan exceeders First year of enrollment in U.S. schools Not Included STAAR Level II Standard and Level III Second through fourth year of enrollment in U.S. schools Spanish STAAR 2016 Level II standard and Level III English ELL Progress Measure and STAAR Final Level II Standard STAAR 2016 Level II Standard and Level III Not Included STAAR Level II Standard and Level III Fifth year or more of enrollment in U.S. schools STAAR 2016 Level II Standard and Level III Not Included STAAR Level II Standard and Level III

13 Inclusion of English Language Learners: Index 4 Years in U.S. Schools STAAR and STAAR A Testers STAAR-L Testers STAAR Alternate 2 Testers ELLs receiving Bilingual Education or ESL Instructional Services ELL Parental Denials or ELL progress measure plan exceeders First year of enrollment in U.S. schools Not Included Second through fourth year of enrollment in U.S. schools Spanish STAAR Final Level II (Spanish test versions on any subject) English (Not tested on any Spanish versions) Not Included STAAR Final Level II Not Included Fifth year or more of enrollment in U.S. schools STAAR Final Level II Not Included

14 For 2016 accountability, two diploma plan rates will be calculated and the one that gives the district or campus the most points for the graduation plan component of Index 4 will be used. Calculation that Excludes FHSP Students (RHSP + DAP) _______________________________ (MHSP + RHSP + DAP) Calculation that Includes FHSP Students (RHSP + DAP) + (FHSP-E + FHSP-DLA) _______________________________ (MHSP + RHSP + DAP) + (FHSP + FHSP-E + FHSP-DLA) Graduation Plan

15 The results of the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) assessment will be included in the postsecondary component. Credit will be given for every student who  meets the TSI requirement in reading on the TSI assessment, SAT, or ACT and  meets the TSI requirement in mathematics on the TSI assessment, SAT, or ACT. Meeting the TSI requirement in writing on the TSI assessment or ACT will not be used for accountability in 2016 but will be reported on TAPR. Texas Success Initiative

16 Met TSI criteria in both ELA/reading and mathematics (TSI, SAT, or ACT) Or Completed and earned credit for at least two advanced/dual-credit courses in the current or prior school year Or Were enrolled in a coherent sequence of CTE courses as part of a four-year plan of study to take two or more CTE courses for three or more credits _______________________________________________________ Annual Graduates Postsecondary Component of Index 4

17 Distinction Designations  Mathematics distinction designation includes grades 3–8 mathematics.  STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 results are included in the STAAR indicators, where applicable.  College-Ready Graduates indicator includes the TSI results in reading and mathematics.  No changes in all other indicators evaluated for distinction designations.  No changes in methodology for determining campus comparison groups.

Accountability Calendar DateActivity Friday, February 12, 2016Release of Final 2016 Accountability Decisions Mid–April Accountability Manual, chapters 2–9 (public web) Late Spring Accountability Manual, all chapters (public web) March 28–April 8, 2016 AEA campus registration process (TEASE) May 2–May 13, 2016 Campus pairing process (TEASE) Friday, August 5, 2016 Preliminary Performance Index Tables without rating labels (TEASE) Thursday, August 11, 2016 Preliminary Accountability Tables with rating labels (TEASE) Friday, August 12, 2016 Preliminary Accountability Tables with rating labels, Distinction Designations, and System Safeguards (public web)

 Performance Reporting Home Page  Performance Reporting  Performance Reporting Telephone (512) Performance Reporting Resources and Contacts