ATLAS Forward Proton Detectors ATLAS Forward Proton Detectors Michael Rijssenbeek for the ATLAS Collaboration Physics summary: Physics withSingle and Double.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Advertisements

The LHCf experiment Measurement of Photons and Neutral Pions in the Very Forward Region of LHC Letter Of Intent: May 2004 Technical report: September 2005.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
AFP STATUS REPORT – WHERE ARE WE ???? Steve Watts We have spent the last year being reviewed. Decision and letter from ATLAS EB November Proceed.
1 QUARTIC, A TOF for ATLAS/CMS Forward Protons You didn’t know that ATLAS+CMS had forward protons? FP420 = Forward Protons 420m downstream of CMS & ATLAS.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
AFP ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade Project AFP physics goals AFP where and how AFP plans Work to be done:  Integration in the LHC (ECR, specifications,
H. MatisTracking Upgrade Review – Dec. 7, SSD Update Howard Matis.
Gueorgui ANTCHEVNEC’2013 – Varna, Bulgaria 1 The TOTEM Experiment Consolidation and Upgrade G. Antchev * On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration * INRNE-BAS,
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
Fine Pixel CCD Option for the ILC Vertex Detector
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Running at Low  * and High Lumi Test insertion on 13 October 2011:
1 Tehniline ülevaade uusimast füüsikast CERN’is Endel Lippmaa 20. Detsember 2006, TTÜ.
Construction and Installation Readiness of TOTEM Roman Pots Detectors Federico Ravotti (PH/TOT) Gennaro Ruggiero (PH/TOT) LHCC minireview – 06 May 2009.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
LS2 Other LHC Experiments Mike Lamont Thanks to: Michael Rijssenbeek (AFP) Joachim Baechler (TOTEM) Karl-Heinz Hiller (ALFA)
Andrew BrandtSept 13 th 2005FP420/Cerenkov Intro 1 Location of LHC in France and Switzerland, with lake Geneva and the Alps in the background The ATLAS.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
Mike AlbrowSept 14 th 2006Time-of-Flight with GASTOFs im Test Beam 1 Fast Timing Counters for FP420/CMS and Test Beam Particle ID Mike Albrow, September.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
AFP: present status and next steps M. Bruschi – INFN Bologna (ITALY)
Some thoughts on Tracking System for Stage 1 HPS Simon Kwan Fermilab 09/19/2011.
EDR of the TOTEM Roman Pots - CERN - 24 November 2005 Beniamino Di Girolamo - CERN PH/ATT ATLAS Roman Pots at IR1 Beniamino Di Girolamo CERN.
P. 1Mario Deile – Meeting on Experiment Protection from Beam Failures Protecting TOTEM Mario Deile PH-TOT
Activities related to Experiments during TS3 and YETS th November, 2015 M. Bernardini, M. Barberan With the support of S. Chemli and Experiments.
11 June 2015 Thomas Bergauer (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD beam Test SPS 2015 SPS users meeting.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Some thoughts on Tracking System for Stage 1 HPS Simon Kwan Fermilab 09/28/2012.
ATLAS-ALFA as a beam instrument Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM and PH-ADO) on behave of the ATLAS-ALFA community LS1 LBOC meeting
Gennaro Ruggiero CERN, PH Depart. Planar Edgeless Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment On the behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
AFP Trigger DAQ and DCS Krzysztof Korcyl Institute of Nuclear Physics - Cracow on behalf of TDAQ and DCS subsystems.
Module-0 of AFP ToF Detector Libor Nozka on behalf of ATLAS Forward Proton Group Palacky University 1.
AFP – Technical Status 1.Cost estimates 2.Manpower estimates 3.First Actions AFP Kick-Off 03FEB Michael Rijssenbeek.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
1 Welcome to the mini-review of the Roman Pot mechanics for the ALFA project in ATLAS.
D.Macina TS/LEATOTEM Meeting25/02/2004 Roman Pot test at the SPS Test of the Roman Pot prototype in the SPS proposed in December 2003 (CERN/LHCC ):
Mike AlbrowSept 8 th 2005Test Beam for FP420 Vacuum Chambers/Detectors 1 Things we need to test (and why) How we could, together with BTeV people, detectors,
The ATLAS Forward Proton Detector (AFP) S. Grinstein (ICREA/IFAE) on behalf of the AFP Collaboration Introduction AFP physics Tracker detector Timing system.
FORWARD ATLAS {major contributions from Per Grafstrom (CERN), Michael Rijssenbeek (Stonybrook), Brian Cox (Manchester} Andrew Brandt Luminosity measurement.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Mike Albrow, FermilabHPS Comments, Manchester 20l0 Some random HPS comments Mike Albrow HPS is accepted in CMS as an R&D project : Physics case is accepted.
RD42 Status Report W. Trischuk for the RD42 Collaboration LHCC Meeting – June 12, 2013 Development of CVD Diamond Tracking Detectors for Experiments at.
Diffraction at LHC (How to turn LHC into a 14 TeV Gluon Factory ?) stolen from Risto Orava University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics Workshop.
Preparation & Commissioning of TOTEM for the Run-II of LHC S.Giani on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
Kreuth, 2015/10/5-9 Csörgő, T. Evidence for non-exponential pp d/dt at low t and √s = 8 TeV by TOTEM T. Csörgő for the TOTEM Collaboration.
Testbeam Planning Common to all testbeams:
The timing upgrade project of the TOTEM Roman Pot detectors
Status of the ATLAS Forward Proton Detectors Michael Rijssenbeek for the ATLAS AFP group 25FEB2016.
HPS: R&D issues Krzysztof Piotrzkowski (UCLouvain/CERN)
TC activities.
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Introduction Status before the 2009 run Results from the 2009 run
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Start Detector for pion experiments
Diffraction and Forward Physics in ATLAS: results and perspectives
Recent Results from TOTEM
LS2 LHC forward experiments
(with R. Arcidiacono, A. Solano)
2017 AFP Beam Tests AFP has 1 week as main user and will also measure together with ATLAS ITk Pixel in H6B -> 2 periods of ~3 weeks
TOTEM experiment at the LHC
Status of CMS-PPS timing detectors
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Forward Proton Detectors ATLAS Forward Proton Detectors Michael Rijssenbeek for the ATLAS Collaboration Physics summary: Physics withSingle and Double proton tags Benchmark study: DPEjj with AFP Installation & Run plans Roman pots Pots, Stations, Services Detectors Silicon Tracker, Timing Detector Run 2 and beyond LHCC 3MAR p

Summary of Single p-Tag Processes LHCC 3MAR t p p β x disappears down the beam pipe

AFP and ALFA: Complementarity AFP – Horizontal Pots:  large t acceptance  ξ range shifts with optics  high β* and low β*=0.5 m ALFA – Vertical Pots:  limited t acceptance  ξ =0 acceptance for β*≥90, elastics  only low-Luminosity, high β* runs LHCC 3MAR2015 3

Summary of Double p-Tag Processes DPE jet-jet LHCC 3MAR t1t1

Benchmark: DPEjj Processes – Fast & Full simulation of AFP + ATLAS, including pile-up generator: P YTHIA with P OM F LUX = 1, 5(MBR) 100 h (1 wk); 2808 bunches, μ=1 – Event Selections: p T (jet)> 20, 50, 100 GeV double proton tag in AFP matching with AFP vertex from timing (σ t = 30 ps) single vertex in ATLAS LHCC 3MAR2015 5

Installation: AFP 0+2  AFP 2+2 Single Arm, 2 Roman Pot Stations (204 m, 212 m) Earliest opportunity to install: Winter SSD – AFP Beam Pipe section ~9 m – RP Stations + BPM – Cables – Vacuum, Cooling Tracking detectors (SiT) – 4 planes of 3-D Silicon Pixels; edgeless (150 um) – provide L1 Trigger from FE-I4 HitOR outputs (e.g. 3 planes out of 4) – SiT can be installed during a short (6 hr) access NO Time-of-Flight (ToF) for AFP0+2 – ToF not needed/useful for 1-arm physics … only for study of time structure of backgrounds …  install only if the rest is done ! Two-Arm AFP2+2: in Winter (19 wks) LHCC 3MAR a VERY large job in VERY little time !

Closing in to the Beam: Roman Pot AFP pot very similar to TOTEM pot – cylindrical: good RF behavior (≲1% of LHC impedance) AFP detectors require a flat inside bottom in the pot – thin window machined on the beam side –different from TOTEM pot – design & simulations done – prototype in 5-6 weeks LHCC 3MAR mm maximum bulge (vacuum in LHC and 1 atm in pot)

Roman Pot station AFP Roman Pot station: – Replicate TOTEM horizontal station reliable and proven design external manufacturer – Interface to ALFA pedestal  minimal extra design needed LHCC 3MAR Beam pipe Bellow Roman pot Motor drive Rails Slide Vacuum Compensation system T OTEM A LFA

Infrastructure AFP Beam Pipe: – beam pipe RP station placeholder sections – BPM at 212 m station, beam Loss Monitors Services: – Cooling for pots and detectors – Secondary vacuum – Cables: fast foam-core cables for Trigger, Reference Clock Optical fibers TDAQ HV and LV cables DCS CanBus cables DCS: – Secondary pressure – cooling air pressure – Temperatures pots, detectors, air, crates, regulators – Voltages and currents LHCC 3MAR2015 9

3-D Silicon Pixel Tracker Requirements: – Resolution: σ x =10 μm, σ y =30 μm – Radiation hard: 5×10 15 p/cm 2 /100 fb –1 – edgeless ≲200 μm – must handle very non-uniform irradiation Use the ATLAS IBL technology: – 3-D pixel sensors: 336 × 80 of 50 μm (x) × 250 μm (y) after cut: efficient to μm – FE-I4b readout ASIC rad hard – tested up to 2.5 MGy and 5× MeV-eq n/cm 2 – non-uniform irradiation tests few×10 15 p/cm 2 successful LHCC 3MAR D CNM Pixel Sensor and Cut p/cm 2 /100 fb –1

3-D Silicon Pixel Tracker Trigger: – AND of 3 planes (FE-I4 HitOR) DAQ: – RCE-based (AdvancedTCA) – used for IBL stave testing – worked VERY well in test beam! Performance: – Efficiency ≥98%/plane (will be higher with 13° tilt) – 98% single track events, 0.4% empty triggers – Track CoG resolution: σ x =7 μm, σ y =36 μm Production Status: – Sensors cut, Under Bump Metallization done – FE-I4 in house, to be sent for UBM – Flexes to be designed  critical path – Sensor card and holder: to be designed  critical path LHCC 3MAR Setup in test beam Nov 2014 CERN SPS

Time-of-Flight Detector Requirements: – high resolution: σ t ≤10 ps – high rate: ≤5 MHz – radiation hard ( fb –1 ) – long life PMT – segmentation in x (~ξ ) – L1 Trigger capability – low mass: 1.8% λ int /bar Long-life, high-rate MCP-PMT LHCC 3MAR p diff Al mirror θCθC MCP-4×4-PMT 6 mm Design: “LQbar” – each bar σ t ≤ 30 ps tests: ps – 4 independent bars: ≤15 ps

Beam Test: Time-of-Flight Detector – Sit-ToF correllation: excellent (but some X-talk) ToF efficiency: >99% – Resolution: ~30 ps (Oscilloscope) LHCC 3MAR A B (6 mm) 1A 1B 2A 2B 3A 3B 4A 4B

Run 2 and Beyond Plans for Run 2: – AFP0+2 in 2015/16 SSD (?); AFP2+2 in 2016/17 – Special high β* runs in – Standard optics runs to measure environment Participate in Run 3 if: – standard optics works for AFP (review) – High Lumi AFP program is approved (review) LHCC 3MAR Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Backup Material LHCC 3MAR

Backup – ToF MCP-PMT MCP-PMT Life Time and Rate LHCC 3MAR

Summary of Single p-Tag Processes LHCC 3MAR t p p β x disappears down the beam pipe W/Z/γ q(')q(') q

Summary of Double p-Tag Processes DPE jet-jet LHCC 3MAR t1t1

Backup – Radiation Levels Radiation levels for 100 fb –1 – inputs: ALFA and TOTEM measurements – AFP Full simulations in minbias events (below) – early FLUKA calculations (A Mereghetti, 2009) LHCC 3MAR

Backup - Simulations LHCC 3MAR G EANT 4 model of Roman pot with Si Tracker and Timing detectors SiT 2-pot tracking efficiency vs ξ SiT hits in 2 nd Station SiT hits in 2 nd Station on a ~parallel track Vertex resolution from Timing SiT track resolution (without staggering)

Backup - 3-D Silicon Sensor Cut Edge cut by diamond saw (IFAE Barcelona) LHCC 3MAR D CNM Pixel Sensor and Cut

Backup – Test Beam – SiT LHCC 3MAR

Technical Manpower Needs 2015 Urgent: – 1 FTE of onsite TC (+ 1 FTE PL FTE RC) probably OK – 0.5 FTE of onsite Project/Mechanical Engineer: assistance with oversight of RP Station assembly, Detector integration, LHC integration, installation. To work closely also with ATLAS TC. in the works … – 1.0 FTE of a good onsite Technician with experience in UHV work and electrical work: RP Station assembly, Detector integration, installation (~50% from FD M&O B) combination of 2 technicians? – 0.2 FTE of offsite Mechanical Engineer/Designer for the Silicon Tracker Oslo/Bergen ! Not Urgent: – 0.2 FTE for 0.3 year of Mechanical Engineer/Designer for the Time-of- Flight (detector holder) ?? It would be advantageous to have a local (technical) contact in Prague to follow the RP Station production and Vortex Cooling at Vakuum Praha AS and at CTU … LHCC 3MAR