Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5 www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/p&g.pd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Economic Guidance Summary The Basis for Benefit-Cost Analysis in the Corps.
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
SOCIAL POLICY GUIDELINES FOR MINING SECTOR IN AFGHANISTAN Harjot Kaur Senior Social Development Advisor, Ministry of Mines.
Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
New Directions in Water Policy: Environmental Perspectives on NFIP, Floodplain Mapping and Federal Water Resource Policies David R. Conrad Sr. Water Resources.
WESTCAS 2011 Winter Conference Fort Worth, Texas February 24, 2011.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT Lecture 2
Guiding principles for the Federal acquisition system
A HISTORY OF WATER RESOURCES POLICIES AND GUIDANCE Overview Briefing for Planning Associates Class of 2011 by John C. Furry 3 March 2011.
Draft RMP/EIS. Objectives Write a draft land use plan and EIS. Issue a draft land use plan and EIS for public review.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
1 Building Strong! THE ECONOMIST’S ROLE Ken Claseman Senior Policy Advisor for Economics Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER4: Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analysis and the NER Plan BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
N AVIGATING THE T URN : F LOOD R ISK A SSOCIATED WITH L EVEES Sam Riley Medlock, J.D., CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers May 2011.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
BUILDING STRONG SM Plan Formulation: General Module G-1: What is plan formulation?
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers Watershed Authorities, Policies and Procedures Michael Greer Regional Technical.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
On visible choice set and scope sensitivity: - Dealing with the impact of study design on the scope sensitivity Improving the Practice of Benefit Transfer:
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® PLANNING GUIDANCE Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
1 Slide1 Examples in Communicating Flood Risk: National Flood Risk Management Initiative Presentation to National Flood Risk Management Policy Summit U.S.
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
PRINCIPLES & GUIDELINES
Infrastructure planning and management
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Ryo Ishikawa
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5 f

Relationship of the NEPA to the P&G LEARNING OBJECTIVE - Acquire a basic understanding of the: Relationship between the Federal government’s guidelines for civil works planning and its policy encouraging productive harmony between man and his environment How these separate approaches are related and A quick look at proposed changes in P&G 2

NEPA AND THE P&G Question: “What must the planner do to meet the requirements of NEPA and P&G? NEPA Background P & G Background Differences and Similarities 3

PURPOSE of P & G To establish principles and guidelines for use in formulating and evaluating alternative plans for water and related land resources implementation studies intended to ensure proper and consistent planning by federal agencies in contributing to national economic development (NED) consistent with protecting the natural environment. 4

P&G Principles Purpose and Scope Federal Objective State and Local Concerns International Concerns Alternative Plans Plan Selection Accounts Discount Rate Period of Analysis Risk and Uncertainty Cost Allocation Planning Guidelines 5

WRDA 2007: Changing National Planning Policy for Water Resources Section 2031(a): Water resource projects should reflect national priorities, encourage economic development and protect the environment by : maximizing sustainable economic development, avoiding unwise use of floodplains & flood prone areas and protecting and restoring the functions of natural systems and Considering Monetary and Non-Monetary benefits 6

WRDA 2007 Changes (cont) Sec 2031(b)(3). Ensure changes address: risk and uncertainty analysis, public safety in plan formulation, value of low-income communities & nonstructural approaches to water resources development, interaction on a region or watershed basis, Integrative and adaptive management and project justification by public benefits. 7

Challenge of WRDA 2007 Monetary vs. non-monetary benefits and impacts and the resulting trade-off Watershed needs vs. site-specific needs Nonstructural considerations and the avoidance of disproportionate impacts on low income and minority populations Multiple objective approaches to development of water resources. 8

Purpose of NEPA “establishes action forcing provisions to promote the general welfare and create conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill social and economic needs of present and future generations” 9

NEPA ConceptsP & G Principles Purpose and NeedPurpose & Scope Major Federal ActionFederal Objective Public and Agency ReviewState, and Local Concerns International Concerns Alternative Plans Preferred Plan SelectionPlan Selection Effects AnalysisAccounts: NED, EQ, RED, OSE Cost Benefit AnalysisDiscount Rate 10 NEPA AND THE P&G Differences and Similarities

NEPA ConceptsP & G Principles Incomplete, Unavailable Information Risk and Uncertainty CEQ Procedures for Implementation WRC Planning Guidelines Effective Date Affected environmentInventory and forecasting AlternativesAlternative plans Consequences, Effects, Impacts Effects 11 NEPA AND THE P&G Differences and Similarities

NEPA ConceptsP & G Concepts Environmental consequencesEvaluation Mitigation No action PlanWithout project condition Purpose and needProblems and opportunities Public involvementPublic participation Review and consultation Scoping Significant Human environmentAccounts: NED, EQ, RED, OSE 12 NEPA AND THE P&G Differences and Similarities

NEPA 13 Quality of the Human Environment

14 OSE NED REDEQ Quality of the Human Environment P&G Accounts Regional Economic Development Environmental Quality Other Social EffectsNational Economic Development

NEPA ChaptersP & G Planning Process Steps Cover SheetNone SummaryNone * (New Summary EC 405) Table of ContentsNone Purpose and Need for ActionProblems and opportunities Alternatives including proposed action Formulation and Comparison of Alternatives Affected EnvironmentInventory and Forecast 15 In Summary NEPA is Planning...

NEPA ChaptersP & G Planning Process Steps Environmental Consequences Evaluation List of PreparesNone List of AgenciesNone IndexNone AppendicesNone 16 NEPA is Planning (cont...)

In comparing the NEPA Regulations and the P&G… Both cover essentially the same set of ideas. NEPA’s EIS format and the P&G planning process have essentially the same requirements. NEPA and Corps Reports may be combined or integrated (ER 1105–2–60) NEPA covers all Federal actions, P&G covers water resources actions specifically 17

In comparing the NEPA Regulations and the P&G… Both recognize the repetitive (iterative) nature of the decision making process. Would we plan differently if either the NEPA regulations or the P&G were eliminated? No, answer is comply with one and generally you meet the requirements of the other. 18

Take Away Points: The planning process occurs in In steps- the steps are iterative Criteria guide decisions made in the process. The problem-solving and decision making requirements of the NEPA regulations and the P&G are essentially the same. Trust the process. 20