Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in the US Virginia (Ginny) Beakes-Read Executive Director, Global Regulatory Policy and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 44 Administrative Law Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Advertisements

Chapter 20 REGULATIONS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY. Regulations Are intended to allow us to safely use the benefits of biotech. Help in developing and using biotech.
Foundations of Regulation
Patients’ Perspective on HTA and Off-label use David Head MBA Chief Executive RP Fighting Blindness 25th Annual EuroMeeting 4-6 March 2013 RAI, Amsterdam.
Data Monitoring Models and Adaptive Designs: Some Regulatory Experiences Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Associate Director for Adaptive Design and Pharmacogenomics,
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Development of Guidance Documents Jennifer Scharpf, M. P. H
CFSAN’s Peer Review for Risk Assessments Robert L. Buchanan, Sherri Dennis, and Marianne Miliotis.
William H. Foster Assistant Administrator, Headquarters Operations October 27, 2008 NABCA Administrators Conference Product Labeling and Packaging.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
SCHC, 9/27/2005 US Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System The GHS Journey Continues…
ICH V1 An FDA Update Min Chen, M.S., RPh Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA January 21, 2003.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
NIMAS National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard OSEP Project Directors Conference July 31, 2006 Chuck Hitchcock Director, NIMAS TA Center.
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
Researchers’ Consulting Activities FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
FDA’s Biosimilars Guidance -- Legal and Regulatory Considerations James S. Cohen, Esq. McDermott Will & Emery DIA Webinar April 10, 2012.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
Introduction to Drug Rediscovery John Lisman Attorney-at-law Lisman Legal Life sciences Insert your logo in this area then delete this text box.
How to audit the role of the vendor in the conduct of outsourced studies Kristel Van de Voorde Director Global Quality Regulatory Compliance Bristol-Myers.
Presenter Name Title Organization Twitter Handle Insert your logo here, then delete text.
1 FDA’s Framework for Reviewing Regulations Leslie Kux Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy U.S. Food and Drug Administration March 10, 2011.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
Click to add Presentation Title Arial 32, 5 line max title space line 3, title space line 4, title space line 5 Presenter Title Organization Insert your.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
Submitting Comments on EPA’s Clean Power Plan National Tribal Air Association’s Project Director Andy Bessler.
Use of Risk-based Approach for Regulating CMC Changes to Approved Applications FDA Public Meeting February 7, 2007.
Federal Rulemaking Primer January 29, 2016 First Published: April 24, 2013 Producer: Alexander Perry Director: Afzal Bari.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN SERVICESEVALUATION and RESEARCH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVALUATION and RESEARCH Update on OCTGT Guidance.
How to successfully Implement and Leverage the Regulatory Intelligence Function Marianne Koehne EU RI Network Group; Global RI Manager Boehringer Ingelheim.
Department of Health and Human Services1 Update: October 2006 Public Meeting on Emergency Research Diane Maloney, J.D. Associate Director for Policy FDA.
Strategic Analyses and Interpretation: Regulatory Intelligence for Decision Making Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy & Science ViroPharma Incorporated.
Biotech Regulations Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office June, 2002.
Good Laboratory Practices and Inspection Readiness Paul Swidersky President/Sr. Consultant Quality Associates, Inc.
Meredith Brown-Tuttle, RAC Director APT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
DIA ERS SIAC IND CMC eCTD Submissions Part II – IND to NDA
Guidance Development Merton V. Smith, Ph.D., J.D. Director International Programs and Product Standards Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA.
Process-based Metadata From a DIA Presentation: eTMF – Migrating from Paper Trial Master Files to Electronic Eldin Rammell, Managing Director, Rammell.
Experiences from building a lessons- learned database for regulatory interactions Åsa Rembratt Sr Reg Intelligence Manager Novo Nordisk A/S 26th Annual.
Group Sequential Tests for Delayed Responses Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Bath Lisa Hampson Department of Mathematics.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in Canada, EU, Japan, and US Chairperson: Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy &
Gabor Fari Life Sciences Solution Strategist Microsoft Corporation
- A “Portable” Implementation
Mutagenic Impurities: Guidances Update w/ CMC Perspectives
Presenter Title Organization
Track 11 Symposium 27 June :30 – 3:00 PM
Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office
Perspective on GCP Warning Letters
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Molly Butler Auditor II Quality Associates, Inc.
Interactive Session: Presentation of Scenarios and Q&A
Community-Based and Cluster-Randomized Studies –‘Pragmatic’ Approaches for Life Cycle Evidence? Florian Eichmann, PhD Principal Scientific Affairs and.
FirstPoint and FirstDoc Application of the DIA EDM Reference Model
Presenter Name Title Organization.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
The Rulemaking Process
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
Presenter Name Title Organization.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
William W. Gregory for the CIOMS MLG Exploratory Team Pfizer Inc
Presentation transcript:

Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in the US Virginia (Ginny) Beakes-Read Executive Director, Global Regulatory Policy and Intelligence Eisai, Inc. Insert your logo in this area then delete this text box.

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug Information Association, Inc. (“DIA”), its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Special Interest Area Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Drug Information Association, DIA and DIA logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Drug Information Association Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Commenting Process is Critical The Agency is seeking input –Much easier to influence FDA during an open comment period than trying to get FDA to initiate a new program or change a policy Well crafted and supported comments can effectively shape Agency thinking Regulatory documents and initiatives have a huge impact on industry and public health

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Opportunities to Provide Comments Can comment directly to the Agency Can comment through a trade association, such as BIO, PhRMA, and AdvaMed –Pro: Trade Associations have collective, and therefore in ways a stronger voice –Con: May have to dilute message to get buy- in from other members Can comment both directly to FDA and through a trade association

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC US Regulatory Documents Regulations –Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Proposed Rules, Final Rules Guidance Documents Concept Papers Federal Register Notices (may announce a program or other regulatory action)

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Example of Comment to FR Notice FR Notice to withdraw CDER/CBER Intercenter Agreement of 1991 Agreement established which biologic products are regulated under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act Concern about effect on jurisdiction if ICA withdrawn –Would more biologics be regulated under the FDCA and therefore the 505(b)(2) pathway for Follow On Biologics could apply?

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Commented on FR Notice Comment filed asserting that the ICA established principles that could not be modified without notice and comment Result: ICA was not withdrawn

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Regulations Enacted to supplement/clarify laws, or to address a public health need (revision of Physician Labeling Regulation) Follow Notice and Comment Rulemaking –Agency issues proposed rule, solicits comments, has to address comments in final rule Once promulgated, regulations are binding on industry

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Guidance Documents Follow Good Guidance Practices –21 CFR , 2000 –Level One and Level Two Guidances Published in Guidance Agenda Comprehensive List of Guidances Located in various FDA websites –CDER, and other Centers –Office of Commissioner for some cross-center guidances

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC CDER Guidance Website

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Guidance Document Agenda

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Level 1 Guidances Set forth initial interpretations of statutory or regulatory requirements Set forth changes in interpretation or policy that are of more than a minor nature Include complex scientific issues, or Cover highly controversial issues

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Level 2 Guidances Set forth existing practices or minor changes in interpretation or policy Level 2 guidance documents include all guidance documents that are not classified as Level 1

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Commenting – Level 1 Guidances Level One Guidances –Publish Draft Guidance Document –Comment period Comments are considered by FDA, but FDA does need to put responses in writing –Publish Final Guidance Document

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Guidance Documents Not binding on industry –Recommendations, not requirements Guidances often used to add more detail to regulations –May be changed more easily than regulations Guidances also can be stand alone policy or scientific documents

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Example of Commenting on FDA Guidance CDRH/OIVD/CBER – In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays CDRH issued Draft Guidance in September 2006, comments submitted, public hearing held, revised Draft issued in July 2007 –Trade Association comments vs. company comments No Final Guidance to date Genentech filed Citizen Petition addressing issue Still awaiting FDA action

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Concept Papers Early step in developing a policy/program Generally have a conceptual framework, but need a greater understanding of issues Solicit feedback which can then be incorporated in a draft guidance document Increases likelihood that draft guidance more closely represents a viable approach

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Core Elements of Action after Agency Publishes Document Appropriate stakeholders/experts in company review document Decide if issues are relevant to company If relevant, find right people to address Depending on complexity of issues, may need meetings to brainstorm and arrive at consolidated response Route response through internal review and approval process

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Drafting Comments to Agency Documents or Initiatives Do: Use very clear language Provide thorough and persuasive rationale Make specific requests Don’t: Ask for clarification without giving a specific recommendation and justification Comment outside scope of document –If need to do so, explain what you are doing and why

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Global Nature of Commenting ICH documents –Released by FDA, EMA, Japan May have slightly different timelines because of need to go through own Health Authority process –Decide whether to comment in all regions and be consistent with messaging Initiatives often ongoing by more than one Health Authority –Be aware of regional initiatives and speak with consistent voice if comment on more than one

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Example of Comment on ICH Guidance – ICH S9 Nonclinical Evaluation of Oncology Products for advanced cancers Comments submitted on many specific scientific proposed requirements Justification given for comments and many comments accepted, sometimes using exact phrasing suggested Result is a more clear and precise ICH guidance

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Electronic Filing of Comments

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Rulemaking AND Guidances

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC FDA Federal Register Notices

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC FDA Docket Number

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Search for Docket Number

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Search Results

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Guidance Document – 1 st Document

46 th Annual Meeting Washington, DC Comments or Questions? Thank you for your attention.