LISP L2 and L3 EID mobility using a unified control plane draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-00 IETF 95 – Buenos Aires Vrushali Ashtaputre Dino Farinacci.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LISP Mobile Node LISP Mobile Node draft-meyer-lisp-mn-00.txt Dino Farinacci, Vince Fuller, Darrel Lewis and David Meyer IETF StockholmHiroshima LISP Working.
Advertisements

Overlay Transport Virtualization (OTV)
ARP AND RARP ROUTED AND ROUTING Tyler Bish. ARP There are a variety of ways that devices can determine the MAC addresses they need to add to the encapsulated.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 E-VPN and Data Center R. Aggarwal
Why do current IP semantics cause scaling issues? −Today, “addressing follows topology,” which limits route aggregation compactness −Overloaded IP address.
A Unified LISP Mapping Database for L2 and L3 Network Virtualization Overlays Draft-hertoghs-nvo3-lisp-unfied- control-plane Yves Hertoghs.
,< 資 管 Lee 附錄 A0 IGMP vs Multicast Listener Discovery.
Computer Networks21-1 Chapter 21. Network Layer: Address Mapping, Error Reporting, and Multicasting 21.1 Address Mapping 21.2 ICMP 21.3 IGMP 21.4 ICMPv6.
IETF 72 – July 2008 Vince Fuller, Darrel Lewis, Eliot Lear, Scott Brim, Dave Oran, Noel Chiappa, John Curran, Dino Farinacci, and David Meyer LISP Deployment.
ARP: Address Resolution Protocol
資 管 Lee Lesson 12 IPv6 Mobility. 資 管 Lee Lesson Objectives Components of IPv6 mobility IPv6 mobility messages and options IPv6 mobility data structures.
Switching Topic 4 Inter-VLAN routing. Agenda Routing process Routing VLANs – Traditional model – Router-on-a-stick – Multilayer switches EtherChannel.
 As defined in RFC 826 ARP consists of the following messages ■ ARP Request ■ ARP Reply.
TCP/IP Protocol Suite 1 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 8 Address Resolution Protocol.
MOBILITY SUPPORT IN IPv6
Oct 21, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 IP: Addressing, ARP, Routing Network Protocols and Standards Autumn
1 Reminding - ARP Two machines on a given network can communicate only if they know each other’s physical network address ARP (Address Resolution Protocol)
© 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved..
Lesson 6 Neighbor Discovery.
Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution draft-xu-virtual-subnet-10 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Susan Hares (Huawei) Yongbing Fan.
Petteri Sirén. Content Preface Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) How LISP works Methods how LISP was studied Test cases Result Summary.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ICND v2.3—1-1 Configuring Catalyst Switch Operations Introducing Basic Layer 2 Switching and Bridging Functions.
Network Redundancy Multiple paths may exist between systems. Redundancy is not a requirement of a packet switching network. Redundancy was part of the.
Chapter 4: Managing LAN Traffic
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 TCP/IP Protocols and Services Technical Reference Slide: 1 Lesson 3 Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)
1 Computer Communication & Networks Lecture 20 Network Layer: IP and Address Mapping (contd.) Waleed.
LISP Mapping Request Format And related topics Joel M. Halpern
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 TCP/IP Protocols and Services Technical Reference Slide: 1 Lesson 9 Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
Mobile IP Chapter 19. Introduction Mobile IP is designed to allow portable computers to move from one network to another Associated with wireless technologies.
Slide: 1 Neighbor Discovery. Slide: 2 Neighbor Discovery Overview Set of messages and processes that determine relationships between neighboring nodes.
LISP-Multicast draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-00.txt Dino Farinacci, Dave Meyer, John Zwiebel, Stig Venaas IETF Dublin - July 2008.
NUS.SOC.CS2105 Ooi Wei Tsang Application Transport Network Link Physical you are here.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Network Addressing Networking for Home and Small Businesses – Chapter 5 Darren Shaver – Modified Fall.
RIPE Berlin – May, 2008 Vince Fuller (for Dino, Dave, Darrel, et al) LISP: Intro and Update
Chapter 19 Binding Protocol Addresses (ARP) A frame transmitted across a physical network must contain the hardware address of the destination. Before.
ARP Address Resolution Protocol RFC 0826 ARP Request – Who has ip address ARP Reply – is mine( a6-50)
Advanced Roaming & Mobility Scenarios in IPv6 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant & Director Project Botticelli Ltd in.
Understanding IPv6 Slide: 1 Lesson 12 IPv6 Mobility.
End Host Mobility Use Cases for LISP draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases Yves Hertoghs Marc Binderberger.
Neighbor Discovery. IPv6 Terminology Additional subnets Router Host Neighbors Host Intra-subnet router Switch LAN segment Link Subnet Network.
NVO3 Framework and Data Plane Requirement Addition Lucy Yong Linda Dunbar March 2013 Orlando FL draft-yong-nvo3-frwk-dpreq-addition-00.
Address Resolution Protocol (ARP). Internet and Data Link Layer Addresses Each host and router on a subnet needs a data link layer address to specify.
: MobileIP. : r Goal: Allow machines to roam around and maintain IP connectivity r Problem: IP addresses => location m This is important for efficient.
VS (Virtual Subnet) draft-xu-virtual-subnet-03 Xiaohu Xu IETF 79, Beijing.
Network Layer 3 Application Presentation Session Transport Network Data Link Physical OSI Model.
IETF 80: NETEXT Working Group – Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts 1 Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts Telemaco Melia, Sri Gundavelli, Carlos.
NETEXT WG, th IETF, Beijing Logical Interface Support for multi-mode IP Hosts draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-01 Sri Gundavelli.
LISP Map Server LISP WG IETF-74 San Francisco draft-fuller-lisp-ms-00.txt Vince Fuller & Dino Farinacci.
XRBLOCK IETF 85 Atlanta Network Virtualization Architecture Design and Control Plane Requirements draft-fw-nvo3-server2vcenter-01 draft-wu-nvo3-nve2nve.
Scaling the Address Resolution Protocol for Large Data Centers (SARP) draft-nachum-sarp-04 Youval NachumMarvell Linda DunbarHuawei Ilan YerushalmiMarvell.
LISP Control Plane for NVO3 <draft-maino-nvo3-lisp-cp-00>
IP: Addressing, ARP, Routing
LISP Implementation Report
Draft-ermagan-lisp-nat-traversal-00 Vina Ermagan, Dino Farinacci, Darrel Lewis, Fabio Maino, Jesper Skriver, Chris White Presenter: Vina Ermagan IETF.
MAC Address Tables on Connected Switches
Anoop Ghanwani Linda Dunbar Mike McBride Vinay Bannai Ramki Krishnan
Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)
Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution
Revisiting Ethernet: Plug-and-play made scalable and efficient
Semester 2 1 JEOPARDY CHAPTER 1 REVIEW S2C01 Jeopardy Review.
ARP: Address Resolution Protocol
One Upon A Time Computer Networks
ARP: Address Resolution Protocol
© 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)
Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
ARP: Address Resolution Protocol
Applicability of EVPN to NVO3 Networks
Mobile IP Neil Tang 11/12/2008 CS440 Computer Networks.
Presentation transcript:

LISP L2 and L3 EID mobility using a unified control plane draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-00 IETF 95 – Buenos Aires Vrushali Ashtaputre Dino Farinacci Fabio Maino Victor Moreno Marc Portoles

Scope of the Draft Implications and methods for using a common control plane to concurrently support: Layer 3 overlays Layer 3 overlays w/dispersed subnets – Intra-subnet across sites Layer 2 overlays – unicast and multi-destination – Non-IP & IP intra-subnet – LISP assisted ARP resolution EID Mobility

L3 overlays w/o subnet dispersion  RFC 6830 subnet dispersion: – Subnet members dispersed across LISP sites – Hosts may roam to remote segments which host foreign subnets – Cross-site inter-subnet traffic is L3 forwarded ETRs register host EIDs for their locally attached hosts Cross site inter-subnet traffic is sent to the ITR’s router MAC (selective proxy reply for remote hosts) Layer 3/Routing lookup at the iTR TTL decrements per L3 forwarding rules IP traffic only: Intra and Inter subnet

L2 overlays Register MAC addresses as EIDs in the mapping system (EID-AFI = 6) within the scope of an Instance-ID (IID) L2 and L3 separation: – Dedicate IIDs for L2 purposes (separate from L3 IIDs) – IID scoped bridging map cache with MAC EIDs and IP RLOCs (separate from L3 Map Cache) Handle Non-IP and IP-Intra-subnet traffic

L2 overlays multi-destination traffic ETRs with the same Layer 2 overlay (same IID) configured will join a common L2 multicast group Join a replication-list for a MAC-level (S,G) per lisp-signal-free: – Broadcast: ( /0, ffff.ffff.ffff/48) – Link-local Multicast: ( /0, /8) – Used as a flood service Unknown Unicast considerations: – Unknown status may be temporary – “No Action” negative map-reply cached  Forward to Broadcast replication-list – Upon discovery of unicast destination (unknown -> known) Send SMR to sending ITRs ITRs refresh their cache and stop flooding

L2 overlays – Intra-subnet IP and ARP resolution Intra-subnet IP traffic may use the L2 overlay – Forward on MAC addresses after ARP resolution – Either operate in L3 mode or L2 mode for intra- subnet traffic Option 1: ARP requests are flooded to all RLOCs in the Layer 2 overlay. Option 2: Suppress floods, use information in the Mapping System to reply to ARP requests from the ITR

L2 Overlays – LISP assisted ARP resolution ETRs register a MAC to IP binding for each host Use the IID corresponding to the layer 2 overlay MAC as associated data with the locator - LCAF encoded: EID= RLOC = Upon Reception of ARP request, an ITR ARP agent will: – Cache ARP request – Issue Map Request for EID = IP in IID = Layer-2-overlay – Cache map-reply in ARP-cache for future replies – Assemble an ARP reply with the resolved host source addresses – On negative Map Reply fall back to flooding ARP

Next steps Review of the draft by WG Decision on where to document mobility – Part of this draft – Separate mobility draft