Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution"— Presentation transcript:

1 Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution
draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-01 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Susan Hares (Adara Networks) Yongbing Fan (China Telecom) Christian Jacquenet (Orange) Truman Boyes (Bloomberg LP) Brendan Fee (Extreme Networks) IETF88, Vancouver

2 Virtual Subnet at a Glance: Control Plane
Prefix Next-hop Protocol / Direct / Direct / PE BGP / Direct VPN Subnet: /24 Host B: /24 MPLS/IP Backbone PE-1 DC #1 PE-2 Prefix Next-hop Protocol / Direct / PE BGP / Direct / Direct Host A: /24 VRF: DC #2 Host route distribution via L3VPN signaling Host discovery based on ARP/ND/VDP etc. 1 3 2 Host route creation for local hosts. /24 Local CE hosts are discovered based on ARP/ND, VDP or even the interaction with the data center orchestration system. Host routes for local CE hosts are created automatically on PE routers and then propagated to remote PE routers via L3VPN signaling.

3 Virtual Subnet at a Glance: Data Plane
VPN Subnet: /24 Host B: /24 PE-1 DC #1 PE-2 Host A: /24 IP(A)->IP(B) VPN Label Tunnel to PE-2 VLAN ID MAC(PE-2)->MAC(B) DC #2 2 Route look-up 3 4 ARP Proxy MAC(A)->MAC(PE-1) 1 Prefix Next-hop Protocol / Direct / PE BGP / Direct / Direct Prefix Next-hop Protocol / Direct / Direct / PE BGP / Direct VRF: /24 5 MPLS/IP Backbone IP MAC IP(B) MAC(PE-1) ARP Table: PE routers acting as ARP proxies respond with their own MAC addresses to the ARP requests messages for remote CE hosts from local CE hosts. Intra-subnet traffic across data centers is forwarded according to the L3VPN forwarding process.

4 VM (CE Host) Mobility VPN Subnet: /24 Host B /24 PE-1 PE-2 Host A /24 DC #1 DC #2 Gratuitous ARP 1 BGP route update for host C 3 IP(C)->MAC(PE-1) 5 Create local host route 2 Update host route 4 Host C moves from DC#1 to DC#2 ARP Proxy Host C /24 MPLS/IP Backbone /24 /24 The new PE router (i.e., PE-2) advertises a host route for the arriving VM upon receiving a notification of VM attachment (e.g., a gratuitous ARP ). The old PE router (i.e., PE-1) withdraws the host route for the moved VM after noticing the leave of that VM. Meanwhile, it would broadcast a gratuitous ARP on behalf of that CE host with source MAC address being one of its own.

5 Confine MAC Learning, Flooding and Failure Domains
VPN Subnet: /24 MPLS/IP Backbone MAC learning, Flooding and Failure domain #1 DC #1 DC #2 IP(A)->IP(B) VLAN ID MAC(PE-2)->MAC(B) Host D Host B Host C Host A MAC(A)->MAC(PE-1) PE-1 ARP Proxy PE-2 DC Switch MAC learning, Flooding and Failure domain #2 MAC learning domain is confined within data centers. Therefore, switches within data centers only need to learn MAC addresses of local CE hosts. Flooding and failure domains are confined within data centers. As such, multicast/broadcast protocol messages (e.g., ARP/DHCP/IGMP/STP/VRRP ) from customer networks are terminated on PE routers. In addition, no flood of unknown unicast across data centers.

6 Optimal Forwarding for North-South Traffic
VPN Subnet: /24 DC #1 DC #2 ARP Proxy PE-3 PE-1 PE-2 Cloud User Prefix Next-hop Protocol / PE BGP / PE BGP / Direct / Direct VRF: Host B: /24 GW: Host A: /24 MPLS/IP Backbone VPN Subnet: /24 VRF: Prefix Next-hop Protocol / Direct / Direct / PE BGP / Direct / PE BGP Prefix Next-hop Protocol / Direct / PE BGP / Direct / Direct / PE BGP /24 /24 Host routes for CE hosts within data centers are propagated to remote PE routers to which cloud users are connected. Therefore, north-to-south traffic would be delivered to the right data center without traffic tromboning. PE routers of each data center are default GWs. Therefore, south-to-north traffic would be forwarded to cloud users without traffic tromboning as well.

7 Considerations for Non-IP traffic
Virtual Subnet is a Layer3 overlay in which IP traffic including both intra- subnet and inter-subnet would be forwarded at Layer3. To support non-IP traffic further, the unified L2/L3 overlay approach following the idea of “route all IP traffic, bridge non-IP traffic” could be considered (e.g., IP traffic is forwarded by using the Virtual Subnet while non-IP traffic is forwarded across Layer2 overlays (e.g., VPLS) .

8 Next Steps Implementations are already available.
We co-authors believe this draft is ready for WG adoption.


Download ppt "Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google