Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education as an Alternative to Academic Failure.
Advertisements

Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Including Other Professionals In the SAT Process: Factors for Consideration by Donald J. Frazier, Ph.D.
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
The Evaluation Process Federal Law – IDEA – All eligible students, ages 3-21, are entitled to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least.
Assistance Team Procedures East Iredell Middle School Sept 15, 2010.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
The Multidisciplinary Team Testing Considerations, and Parental Participation in the Assessment Process Chapter Seven.
NC Policies Governing Services for Children with Disabilities – Administrator Updates Iredell-Statesville Schools March 2009.
Special Education Process Part I-Identification of a Suspected Disability National Association of Special Education Teachers.
The Child Study Team and Prereferral Strategies Chapter Six.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
RTI Implantation Guide Overview Fall Before we begin… Student Intervention Planning is not a pre-referral process. It is the process of collaborating.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBINAR: MARCH 27, 2012.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
The Special Education Process By Christine Shaw.  Anyone can make a referral (ages ).  Referral received in writing.  School has 15 days to “dispose”
Assistance Team Procedures Iredell-Statesville Schools.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Notice of Procedural Safeguards for Parents of Students with Disabilities Parents of exceptional students are entitled to information about their rights.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
PSRC EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Compliance issues and suggestions that will help with case management.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Understanding the IEP Process
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Beaufort County Schools Programs for Student with Disabilities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Process
Excellence in Education… Every Student Every Day
Excellence in Education… Every Student Every Day
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team

What is a Student Assistance Team?  Each school in the Richmond County School System has at least one Student Assistance Team (SAT).  These teams usually meet two times or more per month (ie. 1 st and 3 rd Tuesday of each month).  The teams work with teachers in determining why students are not progressing as expected and to make recommendations for additional support to ensure the student’s future success.

What is the mission of the Student Assistance Team? To support teachers in assisting students to achieve socially, academically, emotionally, and behaviorally to his or her fullest potential by involving parent; by effectively using school and community resources; and by utilizing scientifically based interventions.

Who is on the Student Assistance Team?  Regular Education Teachers  Exceptional Children Teachers  Administrators  Counselors  Nurses  Social Workers  Parent  Speech-Language Therapist  Literacy/Math Coaches  Other Specialists  Community Rep.  School Psychologist (when appropriate) (when appropriate)

Why would a student be referred to the Student Assistance Team?  Chronic Absenteeism  At Risk for retention  Behavioral issues  Suspension  Expulsion  Serious illness  Serious injury  Chronic health issues  Substance abuse  Violent Acts  At Risk for “dropping out”  Cognitive deficits  Mental health issues  Family crisis

What happens once a referral has been made?  The classroom teacher contacts the parents/guardians.  The SAT notifies the parents/guardians of the referral.  Information on the student is collected.  An intervention meeting is held.  The teacher uses the interventions in the classroom.  A follow-up meeting is held.  If necessary, a referral is made to the IEP team.

The Student Assistance Team Process

A referral is made. Anyone can refer a student to the SAT by contacting the SAT Chair  Parents  Teachers  Specialists  Others who know the student

The classroom teacher contacts the parents/guardians.  The student’s teacher will contact the parents requesting a conference to discuss his/her concerns about their child’s progress in school.  During the conference the teacher will discuss referring the student to the Student Assistance Team.  If the teacher is unable to schedule a direct conference, a phone conference may be held.

The SAT notifies the parents/guardians of the referral.  The SAT Chair sends a form letter to the parents/guardians.  The letter notifies the parents/guardians of the referral and asks permission to do some basic screenings.  Parents/guardians may be asked to complete a Social Developmental History form. The social worker can assist if parents/guardians have difficulty completing the forms.

Information on the student is collected.  Grades, both present and past  EOG/EOC Test Scores  Teacher Assessments  Work Samples  Attendance records  Medical Records  Vision Screening  Hearing Screening  Discipline Records

Two intervention meetings are held.  The team meets to hear the teacher’s concerns for the student, to hear a report on the parent’s concerns, and to review all information that has been gathered.  The team then uses this information to design interventions that will help the student be more successful in the classroom.

Interventions are focused on the needs of the individual student and might require changes in:  Instructional Intensity  Curriculum  Instructional Goals  Instructional Setting After discussing various interventions, the team decides on two or three that will be used for a specified length of time. They will also determine how the success of the interventions will be measured.

The teacher uses the interventions in the classroom.

A Follow-up Meeting is held. The team determines how successful the Interventions were and makes a decision:  Continue the interventions and exit the student from SAT  Continue the interventions and monitor  Implement new interventions  The IEP team conducts a referral meeting

If the student is referred to the IEP Team, the SAT process is halted until the IEP Team has completed all requirements. At this point the student may be:  Placed in an Exceptional Children’s Program, if so, the student is exited from SAT  Referred back to the SAT for more interventions  Recommended for a possible Equal Education Opportunity Plan under Section 504.

EC Referral Process

Written Referral  A referral for evaluation must be in writing. By parent, teacher……. By parent, teacher…….  90-day timeline begins when school receives the written referral.  90 calendar days from written referral to placement decision. NC (b) and (c)

Timeline  An initial referral must be completed within 90 calendar days from receipt of the written referral.  Exceptions to the 90-day Timeline Student moves to a different LEA during evaluation time frame. - does not apply if parents and LEA agree on new time frame and LEA is making progress toward compliance. - does not apply if parents and LEA agree on new time frame and LEA is making progress toward compliance.  If the parent repeatedly fails or refuses to make the student available for evaluation. NC (c-d)

Review of Existing Evaluation Data  The IEP team must review existing evaluation data on the child including: 1. Evaluations & information provided by the parents; the parents; 2. Current classroom-based, local, or State assessments, and classroom-based assessments, and classroom-based observations; and observations; and 3. Observations by teachers and related services providers. 3. Observations by teachers and related services providers. NC (a-d)

Review of Existing Evaluation Data  Therapist, psychologists or other evaluators may review the data without a meeting with the parents.  On the basis of that review, & input from the child’s parents, the IEP team must identify what additional data, if any, are needed and if the child will be evaluated. NC (a-d)

Out of State Transfers  Require a review of existing data to determine what, if any, additional information is needed to determine eligibility in North Carolina.  If any additional data is needed based on the reviews, it is considered an initial evaluation for purposes of determining eligibility and placement.

Out of State Transfers  Until the above stated process is complete, the LEA must provide comparable services in accordance with IDEA. The LEA has responsibility to expedite this process for out of state transfer students.

Consent  Informed consent must be provided by parents for each proposed area of evaluation.  IEP teams are obligated to conduct screenings and evaluations to address all areas of needs regardless of the suspected disability.  All areas of need identified on DEC1 must be included in the assessment measures found on DEC2.

Consent  In event the IEP team determines during the evaluation that other evaluations are needed, another DEC 2 must be obtained.  The team decision and consent may occur without a meeting but parents need to be notified and how the parent is notified must be documented.

Research-Based Interventions

With the revision of the Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act I 2004 and the approval of the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction’s Policies Governing Services for Children with Disabilities in November 2007, With the revision of the Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act I 2004 and the approval of the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction’s Policies Governing Services for Children with Disabilities in November 2007, research-based interventions are now required prior to determining eligibility for special education and related services in some areas of disability.

Research-Based Interventions In addition, a child must not be determined to be a child with a disability if the determination is based on a lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including the essential components of reading instructions as defined in section 1208(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), lack of appropriate instruction in math, or limited English proficiency.

Research-Based Interventions  Strategies, teaching methodologies and supports that have been shown through one or more valid research studies to help a student improve academic, behavioral/emotional or functional skills