Www.city.ac.uk/law World-class legal education in the heart of London The End Product: Think Trial David Wurtzel The City Law School World-class legal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing the Met Volunteer Programme. Aims and objectives Increase understanding about the MVP Overview of MVP volunteers MVP Volunteer activities.
Advertisements

1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT /UNICEF SEMINAR ON JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN for Judiciary, Magistracy, Police and Social Workers in the Eastern Caribbean.
The Timing and the Number of Interviews Brit Tammiste Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department, Analysis division
This module: “Understanding the trial process” © Chris Snuggs 22 March, 2012 Self-testing Vocabulary Revision 1 So, the prisoner has been charged, the.
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities. OBJECTIVES The student will be able to: Identify career opportunities in the court systems. Examine the roles of.
Outline Procedure to Trial To be able to describe the procedure from charging the accused to the start of his trial To be able to describe the procedure.
Unit 5 – Juvenile Justice
Character and credit Miiko Kumar 9 February 2015.
The Baltic Sea Region Handling, protecting and testing evidence from children in legal proceedings A comparative study Anna Kaldal, Associate Professor.
Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best.
Child-friendly Environment of Interviews in Lithuania Eglė Kavoliūnaitė-Ragauskienė, Law Institute of Lithuania Tallinn, 19 February 2015.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process Presented by Katie Casada Hornberger Office of Clients’ Rights Advocacy.
What are our duties under the law? I n Canada, law and justice is not only the business of Members of Parliament, judges, lawyers and police services!
ROLES OF A MOCK TRIAL. JURY The Jury are charged with the responsibility of deciding whether, on the facts of the case, a person is guilty or not guilty.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Rights, Duties, and Responsibilities
Supporting medical students in fitness to practise hearings Toni Smerdon Principal Legal Adviser General Medical Council May 2014.
Parts with Explanations
The Court System Chapter 5.
 Generates competition between Crown and defence  Aim of both is to seek justice  Crown- Burden of proof is on the Crown to “prove case beyond a reasonable.
Trial on Indictment in the Crown Court
1 INTERMEDIARIES Gillian Harrison Head of Court Procedures and Evidence Section Better Trials Unit, OCJR 4 th Annual Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
TRUTH AND PROOF: What constitutes ‘evidence’ Professor John Hatchard School of Law, The Open University.
‘Interviewing Vulnerable & Intimidated Witnesses’ ‘The UK Experience’ Iceland Detectives Association Seminar 2008 Detective Constable Phil Morris LLB(Hons)
Chapter What would likely happen to Anthony if he turns to the courts for help in ending the discrimination? 2. Does Anthony have a duty to anyone,
Trial Process Unit 2. Preliminary Hearing Only for indictable offences only! Similar to a trial, but usually much shorter. Witness and evidence will be.
Rules on the Cross- examiner. General. Once a witness is called and sworn he is subject to cross, even if called for the sole purpose of producing a document.
Procedure Procedure at Trial. 1) Court Clerk reads the charge Indictment - if vague - quashed (struck down)
Criminal Trial Process “Innocent until proven guilty”
THE TRIAL. For next time:  Read page in Pakes.
Mock Trial. What? Who? How? Questions? Phil Sneeky took Mr. Abdel’s laptop computer from the staff room. The secretary, Ms. Bythebook, saw him do it.
1 Multi-disciplinary Seminar on How to Improve the Child Protection System in Hong Kong 13 July 2004 Duke of Windsor Social Services Building, Wanchai,
New England November 2012 Children in the Courtroom Sounds Good, BUT..... Margaret A. Burt, Esq.
Past Recollection Recorded. Basic Structure of a Simple Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true.
The Criminal Court System. The Court System Depending on the crime committed decides at what court the trial will be held. Depending on the crime committed.
Juvenile Justice. Why do we have a criminal justice system? What are the goals of the system? What are the things it is supposed to accomplish?
Working in the family courts – a guardian’s perspective Court Skills Training for Social Workers Manchester Civil Justice Centre 20 November 2015 Presentation.
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
In the Courtroom. Democratic Society Equal rights Freedom of speech Fair Trial These are just a few of the fundamental human rights.
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
JUDICIAL ETHICS AND VULNERABLE WITNESSES by Dame Linda Dobbs Not to be copied without permission of author © March
Juvenile Crime.  Juvenile: a person under the age of 18  Some states have it as 16, but regardless there are special laws that deal with juveniles who.
1 Lady Justice Hallett DBE and Dame Linda Dobbs DBE VULNERABLE WITNESSES A BALANCING ACT.
CHAPTER 7: Emond Montgomery Publications 1 Direct Examination of Witnesses.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
PROSECUTION AND CRIMINAL TRIAL PROCESS TRIAL PROCESSES.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
 Your side’s version of “what really happened”  Logical  Fit the legal requirements of the claims or defenses  Be simple to understand  Be consistent.
6/24/2016 Child abuse Helping in the court County Court of Zagreb Juvenile judge Lana Petö Kujundzic.
2016 Victims and Justice National Conference
NEED FOR CHANGES IN THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
Classification of Offences
PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF A MOCK TRIAL
Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses
YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
SmartLaw ● Running a Mock Trial.
How Witnesses are Examined
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
SmartLaw Running a Mock Trial.
The reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Articles 2, 3 and 8 of Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001.
Child sexual exploitation sessions
Section 28 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
Presentation transcript:

World-class legal education in the heart of London The End Product: Think Trial David Wurtzel The City Law School World-class legal education in the heart of London

World-class legal education in the heart of London What the Crown advocate starts with Video and transcript of the ABE But how well was it conducted? Did the officer think trial? When was the vulnerability identified? The defendant’s interview Was he vulnerable?

Defence advocate prepares A statement from the defendant Case analysis Writing your closing speech first How I am entitled to ask questions World-class legal education in the heart of London

The 3 principles of cross examination Enhance your case: counsel’s win/win Undermine the other side’s case: why is evidence in chief not so believable? Put your case. The difference between challenging and putting Lead lead lead. Tell tell tell. Never ask why The same for vulnerable witnesses but nicer World-class legal education in the heart of London

R v Barker [2010] EWCA Crim 4 ‘So you don’t tell fibs and C asked you—not in the tape—whether S had ever touched you and you said he didn’t. S never touched you with his willy, did he? Did he, X?’ None of the characteristics of childhood or of special measures carry with them ‘the implicit stigma that children should be deemed in advance to be somehow less reliable than adults’ World-class legal education in the heart of London

Understanding what is true The witness does not need to understand the special importance that the truth be told in court [paragraph 38] ‘It is not open to the judge to create or impose some additional but non-statutory criteria based on the approach of earlier generations to the evidence of small children’ World-class legal education in the heart of London

Fitting the question to the witness ‘It should not be over-problematic for the advocate to formulate short, simple questions which put the essential elements of the defendant’s case to the witness.. Advocates may have to forego much of the kind of contemporary cross examination which consists of no more than comment on matters which will be before the jury in any event from different sources’ [paragraph 42] World-class legal education in the heart of London

R v W and M [2010] EWCA Crim 1926 Complainant of 8; defendants aged 10 How often can a judge intervene? S did not pick you up at any time, did he? Do you know what I mean by saying pick you up? ‘there is undoubtedly a danger of a child witness seeing that to assent to what is put may bring the questioning process to a speedier conclusion than to disagree’ World-class legal education in the heart of London

‘I put it to you that because of the absence of light in the room, it was not possible for you to have seen what you say you saw, was it?’ ‘I put it to you that you did not see X doing any of those things, did you?’ ‘But if as you say it was dark outside, and if as you say there was no light on in the room, it would not have been possible for you to see what was happening, would it?’ World-class legal education in the heart of London Intermediary and judge intervene

Things get better Special measures under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 Witness profiling Registered Intermediaries Training for judges Advocates: the duty to ask questions that this witness can deal with World-class legal education in the heart of London

Raising the Bar: April 2011 Training: what? Ticketing: how? When? ‘It is the advocate’s professional duty to ensure witnesses can give their evidence fairly and effectively’ Witness handling of vulnerable witnesses is a specialist skill Ask as far as you are able to World-class legal education in the heart of London

News from New Zealand, Australia Before and after studies of cross examination of children Did advocates get better after learned articles and courses about children? No different in Australia The need to refocus the purpose of cross examination World-class legal education in the heart of London

Intermediaries can make a difference Success on a trial by trial, witness by witness, advocate by advocate basis Carrying the lessons forward Let us be pro active but patient In 2010, 14,897 children attended a court hearing in the magistrates court, and 6,384 in the crown court World-class legal education in the heart of London

Helping pre-trial Court familiarisation visit Liaise with witness service over witness’s needs When the witness should watch the video Timetabling of evidence Cases of particular needs World-class legal education in the heart of London

‘Special measures’ in family cases ‘There are things that the court can do but they are not things that it is used to doing at present.’ ‘One possibility is an early video’d cross examination as proposed by Pigot. Another is cross-examination via video link. But another is putting the required questions to her through an intermediary. This could be the court itself, as would be common in continental Europe and used to be much more common than it is now in the courts of this country.’ [ Re W, Para 28] World-class legal education in the heart of London

Thank you ‘the function of the criminal just system must be wider than merely dispensing justice.. We must re-establish the system so that proper dignity and respect are given to the victim and to the community’ [Jack Straw, April 1999] David Wurtzel World-class legal education in the heart of London