Heavy Flavor in Hot QCD Matter Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College Station, TX USA Sapore Gravis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
Advertisements

Supported by DOE 11/22/2011 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies 1 Huichao Song 宋慧超 Seminar at the Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC.
Heavy-Flavor Interactions in Medium Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College Station, TX USA Workshop.
Open heavy-flavor and quarkonium measurements in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC E. Vercellin Università and INFN Torino, Italy Quark Confinement and the.
Analysis of transverse momentum dependence of J/ψ in Heavy-Ion Collisions Xingbo Zhao with R. Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University.
R. L. Thews Hard Probes 2004 Lisbon QUARKONIUM FORMATION IN STATISTICAL AND KINETIC MODELS R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA HARD PROBES 2004 LISBON November.
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
Heavy Quark/onium in Hot Nuclear Matter Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA INT Program (Week.
Lattice QCD at finite temperature Péter Petreczky Physics Department and RIKEN-BNL Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, March 12-18, 2006 Bulk thermodynamics.
Heavy-Quark Diffusion, Flow and Recombination at RHIC
IN-MEDIUM FORMATION OF QUARKONIUM (“RECOMBINATION”) R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA SQM2006 UCLA MARCH 26-31, 2006.
Ágnes Mócsy, Bad Honnef 08 1 Quarkonia from Lattice and Potential Models Characterization of QGP with Heavy Quarks Bad Honnef Germany, June
Heavy Flavors at FAIR Elena Bratkovskaya , WE-Heraeus-Seminar „Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks‘‘, Bad Honnef (Germany)
Nonperturbative Heavy-Quark Transport at RHIC Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA With: H. van.
Theoretical Overview of Open Heavy-Flavor at RHIC and LHC Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept of Phys & Astro Texas A&M University College Station, USA.
Quarkonia in Medium and their Fate at Future RHIC Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA Workshop.
KINETIC MODEL RESULTS FOR HEAVY-QUARK COALESCENCE R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks
Finite Size Effects on Dilepton Properties in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Trent Strong, Texas A&M University Advisors: Dr. Ralf Rapp, Dr. Hendrik.
Charmonium Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions Loïc Grandchamp Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Texas A&M, Dec. 10 th 2004 w/ R. Rapp.
IN-MEDIUM FORMATION OF J /y: PROBE OF CHARM QUARK THERMALIZATION R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA XXXV INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIPARTICLE DYNAMICS.
Uncertainties in jet event generators due to hadronizaton scheme, Other issues with energy loss on E-by-E hydro, and the extraction of transport coefficients.
TIFR Mumbai India Feb Ágnes Mócsy at RBRC 1 Quarkonium as Signal of Deconfinement Ágnes Mócsy Thanks to Sourendu, Saumen, Rajeev, Rajiv!
Precision Probes for Hot QCD Matter Rainer Fries Texas A&M University & RIKEN BNL QCD Workshop, Washington DC December 15, 2006.
Heavy Flavor in Medium Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College Station, TX USA JET Collaboration Summer.
Jet quenching and direct photon production F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano 平野哲文 University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner University.
Quarkonium Correlators in Medium Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA Quarkonium Working Group.
Thermal Kinetic Equation Approach to Charmonium Production in Heavy-Ion Collision Xingbo Zhao with Ralf Rapp Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State.
D. Kikola, ICHEP Heavy quarkonia production at STAR Daniel Kikoła for the STAR collaboration Warsaw University of Technology/ Warsaw University of.
Theory Update on Electromagnetic Probes II Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA CATHIE/TECHQM Workshop.
Olena Linnyk Charm dynamics from transport calculations Symposium and 10th CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25 – 28, 2007.
Medium Effects in Charmonium Transport Xingbo Zhao with Ralf Rapp Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University Ames, USA Purdue University,
Latest Charmonium Results from the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC Alexandre Lebedev (Iowa State University) For the PHENIX Collaboration Lake Louise Winter.
Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA With: F. Riek (Texas A&M), H. van Hees (Giessen), V. Greco.
Round Table Workshop on NICA Physics Dubna,September 9-12,20091 J/Ψ Production in Heavy Ion Collisions J/Ψ Production in Heavy Ion Collisions Pengfei ZHUANG.
Workshop on QCD and RHIC Physics, Hefei, July Heavy Flavors in High Energy Nuclear Collisions ZHUANG Pengfei (Tsinghua University, Beijing) ● J/Psi.
Ralf Averbeck Stony Brook University Hot Quarks 2004 Taos, New Mexico, July 19-24, 2004 for the Collaboration Open Heavy Flavor Measurements with PHENIX.
Loïc Grandchamp Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory “Probing QCD with High Energy Nuclear Collisions” Hirschegg, Jan ’05 with H. van Hees, S.
Theory aspects of quarkonia production in heavy ion collisions Peter Petreczky Current status of the theory:
Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter 2008.
Comprehensive Analysis of In-Medium Quarkonia at SPS, RHIC + LHC Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College.
Interactions of Heavy Flavor in Medium Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College Station, TX USA Kavli.
Heavy Quark Energy Loss due to Three-body Scattering in a Quark- Gluon Plasma Wei Liu Texas A&M University  Introduction  Heavy quark scattering in QGP.
OPEN HEAVY FLAVORS 1. Heavy Flavor 2 Heavy quarks produced in the early stages of the collisions (high Q2)  effective probe of the high-density medium.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
Heavy Flavor in the sQGP Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA With: H. van Hees, D. Cabrera (Madrid),
Heavy quarks in QCD matter D. Kharzeev BNL “Heavy quarks and quarkonia”, BNL, June 6, 2006.
QM06 - S.H.Lee 1 1.Comments on J/  dissociation by partons 2.Progress in QCD calculations: LO and NLO 3. Dissociation due to thermal gluons and quarks.
1 Cold and Hot nuclear matter effects on Charmonium production Kai Zhou (Tsinghua University,Beijing) In collaboration with: Baoyi Chen (Tsinghua University)
Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio Oct. 22,
Quarkonium Dissociation Temperature in Hot QCD medium within a quasi-particle model.
1 Joint meeting IPNO-LAL LUA9-AFTER Orsay, Novembre 2013 Roberta Arnaldi INFN Torino (Italy)
Electromagnetic Probes at the LHC Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA PANIC ‘05 Satellite Meeting.
Heavy-Flavor Interactions in Medium Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College Station, TX USA 6 th Workshop.
Heavy Flavor Theory Yukinao Akamatsu (Nagoya/KMI) 2013/07/30PHENIX PHENIX Workshop on Physics Prospects with Detector and Accelerator.
Heavy-Quark Thermalization and Resonances in the QGP Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department Texas A&M University College Station, USA With:
Review of ALICE Experiments
Theory aspects of quarkonia production in heavy ion collisions
Heavy-Flavor Transport at FAIR
Perspectives on Heavy-Flavor + EM Probes with Heavy Ions at LHCb
7/6/2018 Nonperturbative Approach to Equation of State and Collective Modes of the QGP Shuai Y.F. Liu and Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics.
Yukinao Akamatsu 赤松 幸尚 (Univ. of Tokyo)
Charmonium production in hot and dense matter Péter Petreczky
QCD (Quantum ChromoDynamics)
From Heavy-Flavor Transport to Bulk and Spectral Properties of the QGP
Heavy Quark and charm propagation in Quark-Gluon plasma
Motivation for Studying Heavy Quarks
Heavy Quarkonium production ITP,Gothe Uni.Frankfurt
Overview of Potential models at finite temperature Péter Petreczky
Charmonium dynamics in heavy ion collisions
用重味探测夸克胶子等离子体 Heavy Flavor as a Probe of Quark-Gluon Plasma
Presentation transcript:

Heavy Flavor in Hot QCD Matter Ralf Rapp Cyclotron Institute + Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Texas A&M University College Station, TX USA Sapore Gravis Workshop 2014 Padova (Italy),

1.) Introduction: A “Calibrated” QCD Force  Vacuum charm-/bottomonium spectroscopy well described Confinement ↔ linear part of potential nonperturbative treatment: potential approach in medium (?) connect quarkonia and heavy-flavor diffusion in QGP [Kaczmarek et al ‘03] V [½ GeV] r [½ fm]

1.) Introduction 2.) Heavy-Quark Interactions in QGP 3.) Open Heavy-Flavor Transport 4.) Quarkonium in p-A 5.) Conclusions Outline

2.1 Free vs. Internal Energy in Lattice QCD strong QQ potential, U = ‹H int › large m Q * ~ m Q + U 1 (∞,T)/2 [Kaczmarek +Zantow ’05] - - F 1 (r,T) = U 1 (r,T) – T S 1 (r,T) weak QQ potential small m Q * ~ m Q + F 1 (∞,T)/2 F, U, S thermodynamic quantities Entropy: many-body effects Free Energy Internal Energy

2.2 Reconstructed Potential from Lattice QCD real part ~ singlet free energy imaginary part ~ HTL perturbative  weakly coupled QGP?! Real Part Imaginary Part [Burnier et al ’14] static potential from Wilson loop correlator:

Lippmann-Schwinger equation In-Medium Q-Q T-Matrix: Thermodynamic Heavy-Quark T-Matrix in QGP thermal 2-particle propagator: single-quark selfenergy: simultaneous treatment of: - bound + scattering states - quarkonia (QQ) + open heavy flavor (Qq,Qg) QQ q,g = [Cabrera+RR ’06, Riek+RR ‘10]

2.3.2 Free Energy in Potential Approach Key ingredients: imaginary parts + their  dependence adopt heavy-quark selfenergies from previous T-matrix calculations [S.Liu+RR in progress ] Euclidean T-matrix in static limit Spectral Function Free Energy [S.Liu+RR in prep]

Free + Internal Energy from T-Matrix long-range confining force smaller in-medium quark mass relative to internal energy 1.2 T c 1.5 T c 2 T c U F V lat. F r [fm] potential ansatz:

2.3.4 Brueckner Theory of Heavy Flavor in QGP 2-body potential QQ T-matrix Qq T-matrix Q → Q 0-modes Quark selfenergy QQ evolution (rate equation) Q spectra + v 2 (Langevin) spectral fcts./ eucl. correlat. quark-no. susceptibility lattice data exp. data Input Process Output Test - - lattice-QCD free energy

1.) Introduction 2.) Heavy-Quark Interactions in QGP 3.) Open Heavy-Flavor Transport 4.) Quarkonium in p-A 5.) Conclusions Outline

3.1 Heavy-Light Scattering Amplitudes confining force induces “Feshbach resonance” in Qq T-matrix strength comparable to previous internal-energy (U) potential c-q - New Potential V U-Potential

3.2 Charm-Quark Relaxation Rates heavy-light T-matrix → HQ transport  c  [1/fm] HQ transport with V comparable to U inverted temperature dependence;  c ≈ 3 fm/c close to T c 3-momentum dependence: transition strong → weak [Riek+RR ’10, Huggins+RR ‘12] New Potential V U-Potential [Liu+RR in prep] p [GeV]

3.3 D-Meson Transport in Hadronic Matter consistent with: - unitarized HQET (pion gas) - recent works in HRG using similar methods effective D-h scattering amplitudes [He,Fries+RR ’11]  D  [fm -1 ] [Cabrera et al ‘11] hadron gas at ~T c :  D ≈ 10fm/c  D  [fm -1 ] [Tolos+Torres-Ricon ’13, Ovzechuk et al‘14]

3.4 Summary of Charm Diffusion in Matter shallow minimum near T c !? Quark-Hadron continuity!?  Hadronic Matter vs. QGP vs. Lattice QCD [He et al ’11, Riek+RR ’10, Ding et al ‘11, Gavai et al ‘11] AdS/QCD [Gubser ‘07] D s =T/m 

| | 3.5 Heavy-Quark Evolution in URHICs no “discontinuities” in interaction  diffusion toward T pc and hadronization same interaction (confining!) initial cond. (shadowing, Cronin), pre-equil. fields c-quark diffusion in QGP liquid c-quark hadronization D-meson diffusion in hadron liquid  c D  [fm/c]

3.6.1 Heavy-Flavor Electrons at √s=62GeV importance of flow + Cronin effect at lower energies

3.6.2 Heavy-Flavor Electrons at √s=62GeV uncertainties in pp baseline predict large medium effects in R AA and v 2

4.) Charmonium:  ’(3686) easy to dissociate even in hadronic matter: , ,... +  ’ →DD,  ’ → D med D med [Grandchamp +RR ‘02 ] hadronic  ’ dissociation at SPS important ingredient for transport models [Sorge et al ‘97, …] [PBM+Stachel ‘00]

4.2 Charmonium in d-Au “standard” procedure for fireball rate equation →  ’ suppression from hot medium similar in spirit to comover approach formation time effects?! [X.Du+RR,in prep ] [Ferreiro ‘14 ] [Liu et al ‘14 ]

5.) Conclusions New insights into heavy-quark potential in QGP Importance of (large) imaginary parts Remnants of confinement essential for strong coupling “Critical” consequences for heavy-flavor diffusion (quarkonia tbd) Continuity + minimum of transport coefficient through T pc No principal difference between diffusion forces + hadronization Final-state interactions for quarkonia in p-A?

3.) Quarkonium Transport in Heavy-Ion Collisions J/  D D - c - c [PBM+Stachel ’00,Thews et al ’01, Grandchamp+RR ‘01, Gorenstein et al ’02, Ko et al ’02, Andronic et al ‘03, Zhuang et al ’05, Ferreiro et al ‘11, …] J/  + g c + c + X ← → - Inelastic Reactions: detailed balance: Theoretical Input: Transport coefficients - chemical relaxation rate   - equililbrium limit N  eq (   B, m c *,  c eq ) Phenomenological Input: - J/ ,  c,  ’+c,b initial distributions [pp, pA] - space-time medium evolution [AA: hydro,...] Rate Equation: Observables

 c from fixed cc number: interplay of m c * and constrain spectral shape by lattice-QCD correlators 3.1 Thermal Charmonium Properties mc*mc* BB (a) Equilibrium  number: -  q (b) Inelastic  Width controlled by  s (parameter)

3.2 Incomplete c-Quark Thermalization regeneration sensitive to charm-quark spectra [Song,Han, Ko ‘12 ] [Zhao+RR ‘11] Relaxation time ansatz: N  eq (  ) ~ N  therm (  ) · [1-exp(-  /  c eq )] Microscopic Calculation Impact on Regeneration

3.3 Inclusive J/  at SPS + RHIC Fix two main parameters:  s ~0.3, charm relax.  c eq = 4(2) fm/c for U(F) vs. ~5(10) from T-matrix Strong Binding (U) Weak Binding (F) [Zhao+RR ‘10]

3.4 J/  Excitation Function: BES at RHIC [Grandchamp +RR ’02 ] suppression pattern varies little (expected from transport) quantitative pp + pA baseline critical to extract systematics PHENIX (forward y) STAR (central y)

3.5 J/  Predictions at LHC regeneration becomes dominant uncertainties in  cc +shadowing [Zhao+RR ‘11 ] low p T maximum confirms regeneration too much high-p T suppression?

3.6  (1S) and  (2S) at LHC sensitive to color-screening + early evolution times clear preference for strong binding (U potential) similar results by possible problem in rapidity dependence  (1S) →  (2S) → [Grandchamp et al ’06, Emerick et al ‘11] Weak Binding Strong Binding [Strickland ‘12 ]

3.7 Summary of Phenomenology Quarkonium discoveries in URHICs: - increase of J/  R AA SPS, RHIC → LHC - low-p T enhancement - sizable v 2 - increasing suppression of  ’ (  B  ’ ~  B J/  ) Implications - T 0 SPS (~230) < T diss (J/ ,  ’) < T 0 RHIC (~350) < T 0 LHC (~550) ≤ T diss (  ) - confining force screened at RHIC+LHC - marked recombination of diffusing charm quarks at LHC Fair predictive power of theoretical modeling - based on description of SPS+RHIC with 2 main parameters

3.2.2 J/  at LHC: v 2 further increase at mid-y [He et al ’12 ]

3.1.2 J/  p T Spectra + Elliptic Flow at RHIC small v 2 limits regeneration, but does not exclude it (strong binding) shallow minimum at low p T high p T : formation time, b feeddown, Cronin

3.2.2 D-Meson Thermalization at LHC to be determined…

3.3.3 J/  at LHC III: High-p t – ATLAS+CMS underestimate for peripheral (spherical fireball reduces surface effects …) [Zhao+RR ‘11 ]

3.3.4 Time Evolution of J/  at LHC finite “cooking-time” window, determined by inelastic width [Zhao+RR ‘11 ] Strong Binding (U) Weak Binding (F)

3.3 Charm-Quark Susceptibility in QGP sensitive to in-medium charm-quark mass finite-width effects can compensate in-medium mass increase [Riek+RR ‘10] 2 → →  → 0 m « T

4.3 J/  at Forward Rapidity at RHIC [Zhao+ RR ‘10]

4.2.Thermalization Rate from T-Matrix thermalization 4 (2) times faster using U (F) as potential than pert. QCD momentum dependence essential (nonpert. effect ≠ K-factor!) [Riek+RR ‘10]  c [1/fm]