© JABEE 2015 Fundamental Concept of JABEE Evaluation and Accreditation JABEE evaluation and accreditation is to confirm the engineering educational program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 CAH HF Program Group 2 Roadmap Next Steps for Phase II January – March 2007 JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC Engage Internal Stakeholders Plan/Educate.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Agency reviews: purpose and stages of the review process Achim Hopbach.
9 November 2007 Cecilia de la Rosa Head of the Internal Quality Unit How to prepare for an external review Current trends in the European Quality Assurance.
Councillor Egli Ward 9 Knoxdale- Merivale June 5, 2014.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
1 As Class Convenes u Find your team u Pick up your team’s folder; Becoming an Expert u Remove any old work and Class Process Check for Becoming an Expert.
RE-ACCREDITATION 2009 Procedures, Processes and Timeframes Tamara Bezuidenhout Project Manager: Accreditation 06 August 2008.
A Possible SE 685 Project Automated Reviewers’ Report For ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)
Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.
BUMP UP YOUR CAREER POTENTIAL WITH PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION!
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Final Deadlines for students aiming to graduate in November 2013 April 4th PGR4 submitted to Registry (to approve examiners at next GSB) July 8 th Submission.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Section Events IES Annual Planning/Reporting District Events July New Officers and Board of Managers Aug President to Schedule Section BOM Yearly Meeting.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
The AstraZeneca Research Grant Nigeria
Preparing Your Self Study
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
Hydro One Community Liaison Committee Minister’s Conditions Meeting #2 August 19, 2014 Solina Hall.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA HMEP Grant Program ~ Administrative Requirements NASTTPOAnnualConference.
Revised 2/19/07 Institutional Review Milestones FIU Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS (Leadership Orientation June 2008) Quality Enhancement Plan.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Corporate-level evaluation on efficiency
Recommendation of Texas Test Plan Team to RMS
Curriculum Development Updates
Preparing for the NWCCU 10-year Self-Study
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
CONSOLATA LANGUAGE CENTRE ACADEMIC CALENDAR
Springbrook Estates Sewer Improvement Area Informational Meeting
Terex HR Process Timetable (1st half)
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
All Wales Safeguarding Procedures Review Project
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST (LAR) CALENDAR [2016‐2017]
5 Year Program Planning Process for year
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010
New Kemper Scholar Selection Process
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Due Dates subject to change. Watch for dashboard updates.
United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Legislative Budget Office (LBO) 2-Year Workplan
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Taught Degree Awarding Powers and the British School of Osteopathy
GANTT CHART can be used for scheduling generic resources as well as project management. They can also be used for scheduling production processes and.
CPD Summary Guide 2018 Version:3.1.
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Back-End Payor Sub-Group
PLANNING LOOKING AHEAD…. Long Term Goals (Assigned to…)
ETS WG, 30 January-1 February 2006 Agenda Item
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
BPR AS Review Programme
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Last updated 11 April 2019.
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

© JABEE 2015 Fundamental Concept of JABEE Evaluation and Accreditation JABEE evaluation and accreditation is to confirm the engineering educational program which applied for evaluation and accreditation continuously meet requirements of JABEE Criteria and quality of the engineering education program which higher education institution publicized to the society is ensured based on the evidence. JABEE confirms system and rules to ensure appropriate future operation of the educational program and confirms evidence to prove operational history and possibility which can be determined for effective and appropriate operation. Term of validity of the accreditation is granted based on the applicability of the Criteria evaluated at the maximum of six years, however term of accreditation may be shortened depending on applicability.

© JABEE 2015 Evaluation & Accreditation Process Oct. - Nov. Jan. - Feb. March Early April Until April 30 July 17 August - Sept. ・ Application for Program Evaluation to JABEE ・ On-site Evaluation ・ Submission of Self-review Report by the Program ・ Evaluation Committee by fields May - June ・ Formation of Evaluation Team ・ Evaluation based on the Self-review Report Nov. - Dec. ・ Evaluation Report (First & Second) ・ Evaluation & Accreditation Coordination Committee ・ Accreditation Commission ・ JABEE Board of Directors End of April Early May ・ Delivering the Report of Evaluation & Accreditation to the Program

© JABEE 2015 Final Report for Evaluation Evaluation Team a 2nd Evaluation Report Academic Societies Field B Evaluation Committee Field A Evaluation Committee Field C Evaluation Committee Evaluation & Accreditation Coordination Committee Overall Coordination JABEE JABEE Accreditation Commission Evaluation Team b Evaluation Team c Evaluation Team d Evaluation Team d JABEE Board of Directors Accreditation Discussion/Decision JABEE Approval Coordination and Accreditation of Evaluation Result Coordination by the fields Final Report by the fields

© JABEE 2015 Task of Evaluation Team Program Review Report (Prior to the On-site Evaluation) 2nd Evaluation Report Program On-site Evaluation Review Documentations by the Evaluation Team Request for Questions / Support Documents Review for Support Documents Passed to Evaluation Committee of the field Written Opposition Improvement Report Self-review Report Support Documents Program Review Report (Final Interview at the on-site Evaluation) Executive Summary Report 1st Evaluation Report Judgment Result Notified Evaluation of Self- Review Report Activities of Evaluation Team Report for additional Explanation

© JABEE 2015 Judgment of Applicability to the Accreditation Criteria (1) Accep (A) Applicable evaluation item meets Accreditation Criteria. (2) Concern (C) Applicable evaluation item currently meets Accreditation Criteria however, improvement is expected. It is expected to take measure for continuous and complete accordance with Accreditation Criteria. (3) Weakness (W) Applicable evaluation item almost meets Accreditation Criteria currently however, degree of its accordance is low and requires improvement. Measure to increase degree of applicability is required. (4) Deficiencies (D) Applicable evaluation item fails to meet accreditation Criteria. The program is not in accordance with Accreditation Criteria.

© JABEE 2015 Relationship among each Evaluation 6

© JABEE 2015 Flow of the Evaluation ・ Evaluation Based on the Self-review Report and supporting data ・ Coordination and Inquiries with the Program ・ Evaluation Team Meeting at night before the evaluation ・ Interview with related party & investigation of documents ・ Evaluation Team Meeting at the first night of evaluation ・ Interview with related party & investigation of documents (if there is any) ・ Evaluation Team Meeting in the afternoon of second day ・ Final Interview of on-site visit (read out Executive Summary Report, hand in Program Review Report) ・ Responding report for additional explanation ・ Responding Written Opposition and Improvement Report ・ Documentation and Submission of Evaluation Report Program Review Report (at the final interview of on-site visit ) Executive Summary Report (Only reading out) 1st Evaluation Report On-site Evaluation Before After Program Review Report (Prior to on-site visit) 2nd Evaluation Report Assumed to be 2 nights and 3days. Preliminarily decide to shorten schedule if possible