CLINICAL TRIALS: Fra MITO e REALTÀ Palermo 13 Aprile 2012 SILVIO GARATTINI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the name of GOD In the name of GOD.
Advertisements

Research Study Designs
Use of Placebos in Controlled Trials. Background The traditional ‘double-blind’ RCT uses a placebo to conceal allocation. There are a number of advantages.
LA RICERCA CLINICA CONTROLLATA PER I FARMACI Milano 25 Settembre 2014 SILVIO GARATTINI.
1 Voriconazole NDAs and Empiric Antifungal Therapy of Febrile Neutropenic Patients Study 603 John H. Powers, M.D. Medical Officer Division.
NON-INFERIORITY TRIALS Perugia 20 Novembre 2009 SILVIO GARATTINI.
DRUG POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION SIVIGLIA 15 May 2007 SILVIO GARATTINI.
Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
Farxiga™ - Dapagliflozin
Critical Appraisal for MRCGP Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP trainer Editor GPnotebook (
The ONTARGET Trial Reference The ONTARGET investigators. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:15.
Improved Glucose Control With Weight Loss, Lower Insulin Doses, and No Increased Hypoglycemia With Empagliflozin Added to Titrated Multiple Daily Injections.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
Power and Non-Inferiority Richard L. Amdur, Ph.D. Chief, Biostatistics & Data Management Core, DC VAMC Assistant Professor, Depts. of Psychiatry & Surgery.
P H Y S I C I A N S ’ A C A D E M Y F O R C A R D I O V A S C U L A R E D U C A T I O N Oral drugs for type 2 diabetes and all cause mortality in General.
1 The Chemoprevention of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Issues Surrounding a Benefit/Risk Analysis in Clinical Trials Mark Avigan MD CM Medical Officer Division.
Design of Clinical Trials of Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Otitis Media
1 Informative Studies of New Therapeutic Agents in Major Depression, GAD & Panic W Z Potter, M.D., PhD. Merck Research Laboratories.
Afrezza® – inhaled human insulin
CME Disclosure Statement The North Shore LIJ Health System adheres to the ACCME's new Standards for Commercial Support. Any individuals in a position.
BIOE 301 Lecture Seventeen. Guest Speaker Jay Brollier World Camp Malawi.
Understanding the Concept of Equivalence and Non-Inferiority Trials CM Gibson, 2000.
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
Consider this Combo: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Basal Insulin Matt Heinsen, PharmD PGY2 Pharmacotherapy Resident Butler University & Community Health.
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Challenges of Non-Inferiority Trial Designs R. Sridhara, Ph.D.
Placebo-Controls in Short-Term Clinical Trials of Hypertension Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Cardiology Duke University.
Rimonabant in Obesity Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2004 Presented by Dr. Jean-Pierre Despres RIO LIPIDS Trial.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
Critical Appraisal Did the study address a clearly focused question? Did the study address a clearly focused question? Was the assignment of patients.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting November 29, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
What is a non-inferiority trial, and what particular challenges do such trials present? Andrew Nunn MRC Clinical Trials Unit 20th February 2012.
Laquinimod, a Once-Daily Oral Drug in Development for The Treatment of Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Stephen Krieger, MD Assistant Professor of.
BIOE 301 Lecture Seventeen. Progression of Heart Disease High Blood Pressure High Cholesterol Levels Atherosclerosis Ischemia Heart Attack Heart Failure.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
CR-1 Everolimus Benefit/Risk Assessment Howard J. Eisen, MD Thomas J. Vischer Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Cardiology Drexel University College.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Adding Prandial Insulin to Basal Insulin: Key Challenges
Thrice-Weekly Glatiramer Acetate for Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from the GALA Study Fred D. Lublin, MD Saunders Family Professor of.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Ethical and practical challenges of organising clinical trials in small populations.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Placebos 1.Ethical Issues 2.Problems with active control non- inferiority studies 3.Design modifications that may make placebo controls more acceptable.
1 Risk Benefit and Conclusions George Sledge, MD Indiana University School of Medicine.
Clinical Trials The Way We Make Progress Against Disease.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
CLINICAL EFFICACY STUDY OF BACLOFEN IN REDUCING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN HIGH RISK DRINKERS Study title: Alcohol Treatment : A Pragmatic Randomized, Double-blind.
1 Effect of Ramipril on the Incidence of Diabetes The DREAM Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2006;355 FM R1 윤나리.
Double-blind, randomized trial in 4,162 patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
NICE –CG 181 Continuum of CVD Risk and its treatment
Mastery of Medicine in Diabetes Management Video Roundtable
Neal B, et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:403–411
Cycloset®A Dopamine Receptor Agonist Cycloset® -Bromocriptine: Safety Trial: Post Hoc Analysis of Cumulative Percent MACE Endpoint Bromocriptine (Parlodel)
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Diabetes Journal Club Julie Shah.
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors work by blocking the reabsorption of filtered glucose in the kidneys. This leads to glucosuria and improved.
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at high risk for CV events were randomized to receive in a 1:1:1 fashion either.
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Flow of Patients Through Trial
Medical Statistics Exam Technique and Coaching, Part 2 Richard Kay Statistical Consultant RK Statistics Ltd 22/09/2019.
Presentation transcript:

CLINICAL TRIALS: Fra MITO e REALTÀ Palermo 13 Aprile 2012 SILVIO GARATTINI

To test Randomisation as the only scientific and ethical way to solve uncertainty True uncertainty What’s best for the patients? Not to treat in any case To deny possible benefits To treat in any case To expose to possible risks

METHODOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS Ask important questions… …answer them reliably The objective is the patient, the goal is his benefit Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R. Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med 1984; 3:

PATIENTS CAN BE INVOLVED IN CLINICAL TRIALS ONLY IF THERE IS A REASONABLE POTENTIAL ADVANTAGE. FOR THEM OR FOR FUTURE PATIENTS THE ADVANTAGE COULD BE INCREASED EFFICACY, DECREASED TOXICITY, DIFFERENT TOXIC PROFILES, BETTER COMPLIANCE. LONGER DURATION OF ACTION, etc.

MEDIANA0,097 QALY 51%< 0,1 QALY 12%> 1,0 QALY MIGLIORAMENTI INDOTTI DA 281 NUOVI FARMACI Basic Clin Pharmacol 2009, 105, Suppl. 1, 032 Walker et al., 2009

THE EXCESSIVE USE OF PLACEBO

PLACEBO SHOULD BE USED ONLY WHEN THERE ARE NO EFFECTIVE DRUGS FOR A GIVEN INDICATION INAPPROPIATE USE OF PLACEBO MAY LEAD TO AN OPTIMISTIC EVALUATION OF A NEW DRUG

DENOSUMAB (ANTI-RANK LIGAND MAB) HAS BEEN TESTED AGAINST PLACEBO IN POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN WHEN THERE ARE AVAILABLE SEVERAL ANTI-OSTEOPOROTIC AGENTS Scrip 19/9/08

Giovannoni et al., 2010

Kappos et al., 2010

Placebo-Controlled Trial of Oral Laquinimod for Multiple Sclerosis Giancarlo Comi, M.D., Douglas Jeffery, M.D., Ludwig Kappos, M.D., Xavier Montalban, M.D., Alexey Boyko, M.D., Maria A. Rocca, M.D., and Massimo Filippi, M.D., for the ALLEGRO Study Group* CONCLUSIONS In this phase 3 study, oral laquinimod administered once daily slowed the progression of disability and reduced the rate of relapse in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. (Funded by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT ) N ENGL J MED ;

Comi et al., 2012

RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION OF RELAPSES IN RESPECT TO PLACEBO INF  -1b28 %(1995) INF  -1a32 %(1996) GLATIRAMER29 %(1995)

EXCESS OF RELAPSES THAT COULD BE AVOIDED IF A COMPARATOR WOULD HAVE BEEN USED INSTEAD OF PLACEBO CLADRIBINE79DIRUCOTIDE21 NATALIZUMAB138TERIFLUNOMIDE123 FINGOLIMOD100LAQUIMOD130 TOTAL RELAPSES 591 Bertelè et al., 2012

ADD-ON DESIGN NEW DRUGPLACEBO BASIC TREATMENT ++

Zinman et al., 2007

A FAIR COMPARISON WOULD HAVE BEEN TO USE INSTEAD OF PLACEBO ONE OF THE MANY ANTIDIABETIC AGENTS AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET

Pratley et al., 2010

Effect of Noninsulin Antidiabetic Drugs Added to Metformin Therapy on Glycemic Control, Weight Gain, and Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Olivia J. Phung, PharmD Jennifer M. Scholle, PharmD Mehak Talwar, BS Craig I. Coleman, PharmD Conclusion When added to maximal metformin therapy, all noninsulin antidiabetic drugs were associated with similar HbA1c reductions but differed in their associations with weight gain and risk of hypoglycemia. JAMA. 2010;303(14):

Phung et al., 2010

DESIGN OF CLINICAL TRIALS

CLINICAL TRIALS MAY BE DESIGNED TO DEMONSTRATE SUPERIORITY EQUIVALENCE NON INFERIORITY

IN THE NON-INFERIOR TYPE OF TRIAL WITH AN ACTIVE CONTROL, INVESTIGATORS ARE TESTING THE NULL HYPOTHESIS THAT A NEW DRUG IS WORSE THAN THE ACTIVE CONTROL (STANDARD) AND WHEN THEY CAN REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS THEY ACCEPT THE ALTERNATIVE, THAT THE NEW DRUG IS NOT WORSE THAN THE ACTIVE CONTROL. ARAS, 2001 DRUG INFORMATION J.35,1157

SUPERIORITY EQUIVALENCE NON INFERIORITY CONTROL BETTERNEW AGENT BETTER0 - +

Are there specific reasons for allowing a non-inferiority approach? There may be non-responders to current treatments and products with comparable activity may offer a useful alternative. If the target is non-responders to current treatments, why not test their superiority over drugs with little effect in this subset of patients?

18ANTICANCER AGENTS 21INDICATIONS 12ONLY PHASE II 9PHASE III 6EQUIVALENCE OR NON INFERIORITY 3SUPERIORITY

Fueglistaler et al., 2007 ABC Therapy Efficacy %

OUT OF 383 CLINICAL TRIALS 64 % COULD DETECT A DIFFERENCE > 50 % 84 % COULD DETECT A DIFFERENCE > 25 % MOHER et al., 1994

Between 2002 and 2009, of 43 NDAs containing data from at least one noninferiority trial, the FDA approved 18 on the basis of pivotal evidence from noninferiority trials but found nine NDAs had poorly designed noninferiority trials that could not be used to establish the efficacy of the new drug. Nature Medicine 2010, 16, 1049

THE DESIGN OF N.I. TRAILS REQUIRES ALWAYS THE USE OF STANDARD AND PLACEBO WILE A SUPERIORITY DESIGN REQUIRES ONLY THE USE OF STANDARD.

Garattini S, Bertele’ V. How can research ethics committees protect patients better? BMJ 2003; 326: Draft informed consent “Let us treat you with something that at best is the same as what you would have had before, but might also reduce - though this is unlikely - most of the advantages previously attained in your condition. It might even benefit you more than any current therapy but, should that actually happen, we shall not be able to prove it. Nor have we enough chance to let you know whether the new treatment may somehow bother or even harm you more than the standard one”.

NON-INFERIORITY TRIALS FEW PATIENTS WOULD AGREE TO PARTICIPATE IF THIS MESSAGE IS CLEAR IN THE INFORMED CONSENT FORM.

THREE ARM TRIAL RANDOMIZATION PLACEBO COMPARATORNEW DRUG PLACEBO IS NOT NECESSARY IN THE DESIGN OF SUPERIORITY

INADEQUATE COMPARATOR

ACUTE RENAL REJECTIONS ARE MINIMIZED WHEN TROUGH LEVELS ARE KEPT BETWEEN ng/ml MARGREITER et al., 2002 TRIAL CYCLOSPORINE < 300 ng/ml TACROLIMUS VS CYCLOSPORINE 32.5 %51.3 % ACUTE REJECTIONS

Favours atypical Favours haloperidol Drop out rates by dose of comparator drug in trials of patients with schizophrenia or related disorders (risk difference and 95 % confidence intervals) Geddes et al., 2000 ≤ 12 mg haloperidol > 12 mg haloperidol

CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICITY DICLOFENAC1 COXIBs0.92 * ( ) * 26 RCT Psaty and Weiss, 2007

CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICITY NAPROXEN1 COXIBs1.57 * ( ) * 42 RCT Psaty and Weiss, 2007

SURROGATE END POINTS

QUALITY OF LIFE, MORBILITY, MORTALITY SHOULD BE THE FINAL OBJECTIVES OF CLINICAL TRIALS

ENCAINIDE AND FLECAINIDE DECREASE ARRHYTHMIAS BUT INCREASE MORTALITY OESTROGENS INCREASE HDL-CHOLESTEROL BUT DO NOT PREVENT CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS TORCETRAPIB INCREASES HDL-CHOLESTEROL BUT INCREASES MORTALITY

HbA1c IS NOT A SURROGATE END-POINT FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES IN TYPE 2 DIABETES SULFONYLUREASHbA 1C MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION ROSIGLITAZONEHbA 1C HEART FAILURE NEED TO EVALUATE PARAMETERS IMPORTANT FOR PATIENTS

Arguedas et al., 2009

RIMONABANT antagonist of cannabinoid-1 receptor DECREASE OF BODY WEIGHT INCREASE OF HDL, ADIPONECTIN DECREASE OF TRIGLYCERIDES, BLOOD GLUCOSE, FASTING INSULIN, LEPTIN DECREASE OF TOTAL VOLUME ATHEROMA

Topol et al., 2010 CRESCENDO TRIAL

UTILIZATION OF COMPOSITE END-POINTS

Lapostolle et al., 2007

Ferreira-Gonzàlez et al., 2007

SELECTIVE PUBLICATIONS

OF 5 SSRI 21 STUDIES SHOW DRUG BETTER THAN PLACEBO 19 PRIMARY PUBLICATIONS IN TOTAL 42 STUDIES Sweedish Drug Regulatory Authority Melander et al., BMJ 2003

SELECTIVE PUBLICATIONS OF 5 SSRI 21 STUDIES SHOW DRUG BETTER THAN PLACEBO 19 PRIMARY PUBLICATIONS IN TOTAL 42 STUDIES 21 STUDIES SHOW NEGATIVE RESULTS 6 PRIMARY PUBLICATIONS Sweedish Drug Regulatory Authority Melander et al., BMJ 2003

SELECTIVE PUBLICATIONS OF 5 SSRI 21 STUDIES SHOW DRUG BETTER THAN PLACEBO 19 PRIMARY PUBLICATIONS EVIDENCE B(I)ASED MEDICINE IN TOTAL 42 STUDIES 21 STUDIES SHOW NEGATIVE RESULTS 6 PRIMARY PUBLICATIONS Sweedish Drug Regulatory Authority Melander et al., BMJ 2003

Kirsch et al., 2008

Eyding et al., 2010

SELECTIVE REPORTING OF CLINICAL TRIALS MAY BIAS META-ANALYSES AND MISDIRECT GUIDE-LINE. IN A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF 130 TRIALS, THOSE WITH POSITIVE RESULTS WERE THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE PUBLISHED WITH A SIGNIFICANT SHORTER TIME TO PUBLICATION THAN THOSE WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. STERN, SIMES, 1997