+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.

Advertisements

Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.

Learning Outcomes By Terrence Willett. What are Learning Outcomes? n Assessment / Program Based n Outcome Based Assessment n Skills; Knowledge; Result.

Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.

QEP Presentation 1 Attorney Wesley Bishop Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs (Faculty Affairs, TRIO, and QEP) Pamela E. Wanga, Ph.D. Associate.

Tribal Colleges & Universities Chief Academic Officers 3 rd Annual Meeting 1 Wisdom Sharing: Assessment and Academic Program Review Dr. Koreen Ressler,

Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.

Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.

PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.

Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.

Department Plans for Assessment of Student Learning Teachers Talking February 16, 2011.

Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.

The Academic Assessment Process

Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.

The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.

Effective Grading and Assessment:. Strategies to Enhance Student Learning.

Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.

Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.

Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.

Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.

Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.

Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.

Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007

TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.

Assessment 101 Center for Analytics, Research and Data (CARD) United Church of Christ.

Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.

Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.

Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.

 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.

Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.

Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.

MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.

Report on the Site-Visit and Our 14-day Responses.

Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.

Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.

ASSESSMENT FOR EVIDENCE-BASED DECISION MAKING ASSESSMENT PLAN SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.

What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.

Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.

Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015

Learning Outcomesas part of the Assessment Cycle Kirsten Ogden Faculty Assessment Coach Pasadena City College 2014.

SLOAC The Skyline Way1 Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee.

Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.

A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.

QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.

Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.

SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.

Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.

Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦

Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011

Consider Your Audience

Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.

Effective Outcomes Assessment

Curriculum and Accreditation

Assessment planning: It’s the parts that make up the whole!

Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment

Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan

Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies

Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007

Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW

Critical Inquiry (Goal A):

Critical Inquiry (Goal C):

Overview of Program Review Categories

Critical Inquiry (Goal B):

Michelle Cox, Nursing Emily Garber, PTA.

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment

Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.

planning THE ASSESSMENT CYCLE

Presentation transcript:

+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013

+ Today’s Outcomes By the end of this session, you will be able to: Explain the goals of program assessment Identify the steps for developing and implementing a program assessment plan Identify the timeline for developing your program assessment plans Identify resources for developing your program assessment plans

+ Goals of Program Assessment Program Assessment should answer the following questions: What are the most important skills, knowledge or attitudes we want graduates to demonstrate when they have completed a series of courses? How do we know that students are achieving those expectations?

+ Program Assessment Vs. CAR Program Assessment Focused on degree or certificates Focused on assessing student performance related to program outcomes Recommended actions may connect to or impact CAR rec’s. Systematic opportunity for faculty to talk about the program intent A component of institutional effectiveness Directly required for accreditation Use student performance data to make curricular, programmatic decisions College Area Review Focused on areas divided by disciplines or areas of responsibility Indirect review of course offerings and resource allocation Broad focus to impact strategic planning Self evaluation process related to institutional effectiveness

+ Program Assessment Plan Components Part 1 is an overview that summarizes the plan. This part will be updated periodically over the 5 year assessment plan cycle. Part 2 is an assessment Implementation Timeline that lays out when data will be collected during the assessment plan period. Part 3 is the assessment instruments. In this part, we are looking for copies of assessments, scoring rubrics, and data collection set up information.

+ Program Assessment Plan Timeline 5 year cycle reviewed and revised, as needed, in the 6 th year reflect a cycle of assessment data review and reflection implementation of action plans updating status

+ Program Assessment Implementation Timeline YearActivity by Semester Year 1 FA- CAR SP- Assessment Plan Year 2FA and SP- Data Collection, interim data reports Year 3 FA- Data Collection SP- Review and Reflect on Comprehensive Data Report, Make Recommendations/Action Plan Year 4FA and SP- Implement Action Plan/Recommendations Year 5 FA/SP- Repeat Data Collection and/or Implement Recommendations Year 6FA-CAR SP- Assessment Plan Review/Revision

+ Developing a Program Assessment plan Step 1- Review program outcomes to ensure they reflect appropriate expectations for the program Broad Measurable Reasonably achievable Determine where in the program students can demonstrate the achievement of the outcomes Could be a culminating assignment/project in class (direct) Internship reflection (indirect) Alumni survey (indirect) Use Course Outcomes Matrix to help you

+ Developing a Program Assessment plan Step Two Determine how to assess each outcome Determine where and how the assessment will be given Determine when during the 5 year cycle Step Three Determine benchmarks, indicators (or success criteria/or scoring rubric) Determine cohort or method of data collection (which students will participate in the assessment

+ Developing a Program Assessment plan Step Four Determine implementation timeline (Part 2 of the plan form) Step Five Develop the assessment and scoring criteria

+ Program Assessment Plans – Other Info Program Assessment plans are due by April 26, 2013 to COAT team faculty can help. Each program will be assigned a COAT contact. Check in with similar programs at other cc’s or national organizations to see what types of program assessments are happening, benchmarks, etc- you don’t have to recreate the wheel. If you are going to revise program outcomes, develop the assessment plan at the same time with the new outcomes.

+ Questions?