Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Antu Xie +1.979.229.2702 Modelling Concepts for Fracture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 1. How to model: physical grounds
Advertisements

BIOSYST-MeBioS. Model-based approach Purpose Improve understanding Optimization Control Macroscale approach (Ho et al., 2006) Geometry: intact fruit Gas.
Analytical Solutions for a Composite, Cylindrical Reservoir with a Power-Law Permeability Distribution in the Inner Cylinder Ryan Sawyer Broussard Department.
Aug 9-10, 2011 Nuclear Energy University Programs Materials: NEAMS Perspective James Peltz, Program Manager, NEAMS Crosscutting Methods and Tools.
University of Western Ontario
Application of Bayesian Statistical Methods for the Analysis of DSMC Simulations of Hypersonic Shocks James S. Strand and David B. Goldstein The University.
Section 7: Confidence Bounds on Component Reliability COMPONENT RELIABILITY CONFIDENCE BOUNDS Confidence bounds on component reliability are calculated.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
1 FEM study of the faults activation Technische Universität München Joint Advanced Student School (JASS) St. Petersburg Polytechnical University Author:
Flow Visualization & Pore Network Simulation of Immiscible/ Miscible Displacement with Gravity Domination M. Haghighi M. Haghighi09/09/09.
Development of a Full Range Multi-scale Modeling to Obtain Elastic Properties of CNT/Polymer M. M. Shokrieh *, I. Zibaei Composites Research Laboratory,
Generalization of Heterogeneous Multiscale Models: Coupling discrete microscale and continuous macroscale representations of physical laws in porous media.
U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA IMPACT Project Drag coefficients of Low Earth Orbit satellites.
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments David Kohlstedt Brian Evans Stephen Mackwell.
Reliability Prediction of a Return Thermal Expansion Joint O. Habahbeh*, D. Aidun**, P. Marzocca** * Mechatronics Engineering Dept., University of Jordan,
An Introduction to Multiscale Modeling Scientific Computing and Numerical Analysis Seminar CAAM 699.
Peipei Li - Civil Engineering Shule Hou - Civil Engineering Jiaqi Qu - Civil Engineering Coupled Atomistic.
Peyman Mostaghimi, Prof. Martin Blunt, Dr. Branko Bijeljic 16 January 2009, Imperial College Consortium on Pore-Scale Modelling The level set method and.
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Geometric Parameters on Liquid Single-Phase Pressure Drop in Micro- Scale Pin-Fin Arrays Valerie Pezzullo,
FRACTURE MECHANICS II Sara Ferry NSE|H.H.Uhlig Corrosion Lab 22.71| October 23, 2012 recap:
Hydraulic Fracture: multiscale processes and moving interfaces Anthony Peirce Department of Mathematics University of British Columbia Nanoscale Material.
Basic FEA Concepts. FEA Project Outline Consider the physics of the situation. Devise a mathematical model. Obtain approximate results for subsequent.
Permeability Prediction of Shale Gas by the Monte Carlo Molecular Simulations at Pore Scale Jun Li Research Engineer ||| Center for Petroleum & Mineral,
Two-Phase Heat Transfer Laboratory Texas A&M University Experimental Study of Condensation on Micro Grooved Plates R. Barron-jimenez, H. Y. Hu, G. P. Peterson.
Overburden Pressure Affects Fracture Aperture and Permeability in a Stress- Sensitive Reservoir Vivek Muralidharan.
Direct numerical simulations of droplet emulsions in sliding bi-periodic frames using the level-set method See Jo Wook Ryol Hwang*
Analysis of Production Data
Vivek Muralidharan Simulation and imaging experiments of fluid flow through a fracture surface: a new perspective.
Measuring Effective Wellbore Permeability Sarah Gasda, Princeton University Michael Celia, Princeton University Jan Nordbotten, Univ. of Bergen.
A general pore-to-reservoir transport simulator Matthew E. Rhodes and Martin J. Blunt Petroleum Engineering and Rock Mechanics Group Department of Earth.
Thesis Defense College Station, TX (USA) — 05 September 2013 Landon RISER Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
By Paul Delgado Advisor – Dr. Vinod Kumar Co-Advisor – Dr. Son Young Yi.
Principal Investigators: Ding Zhu and A. D. Hill
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering A one-field discontinuous Galerkin formulation of non-linear Kirchhoff-Love shells Ludovic Noels Computational.
We greatly appreciate the support from the for this project Interpreting Mechanical Displacements During Hydromechanical Well Tests in Fractured Rock Hydromechanical.
Effective Inelastic Response of Polymer Composites by Direct Numerical Simulations A. Amine Benzerga Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University With:
Ramesh Talreja Aerospace Engineering Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
A Multi-Scale Mechanics Method for Analysis of Random Concrete Microstructure David Corr Nathan Tregger Lori Graham-Brady Surendra Shah Collaborative Research:
DRAFT INFLUENCE OF PHYSICS OF TABLET COMPRESSION Small-Scale Presenter: Alberto Cuitino November 3 rd, 2010.
14th Crisp user meeting at UCL1 Numerical analysis of a piled foundation in granular material using slip element Yongjoo Lee Soil Mechanics Group Department.
Bin Wen and Nicholas Zabaras
Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations — Montney Shale Case Histories Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum.
Free flow  Stokes equationPorous media  Darcy‘s law Transport equations Coupling conditions 2 Mechanical equilibrium: Normal forces Coupling of micro-
Numerical simulations of thermal counterflow in the presence of solid boundaries Andrew Baggaley Jason Laurie Weizmann Institute Sylvain Laizet Imperial.
Web-based Class Project on Rock Mechanics REPORT PREPARED AS PART OF COURSE CEE 544: ROCK MECHANICS WINTER 2015 SEMESTER INSTRUCTOR: PROFESSOR DIMITRIOS.
Final Presentation College Station, TX (USA) — 11 August 2015 Chulhwan SONG Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
INFLUENCE OF PHYSICS OF TABLET COMPRESSION
Micromechanical motivations of generalised continuum models
DER Program Weibull Strength Parameter Requirements for Si 3 N 4 Turbine Rotor Reliability Steve Duffy & Eric Baker Connecticut Reserve Technologies, LLC.
February 13-15, 2006 Hydromechanical modeling of fractured crystalline reservoirs hydraulically stimulated S. Gentier*, X. Rachez**, A. Blaisonneau*,
CFD Lab 1 Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow Seong Mo Yeon, Timur Dogan, and Michael Conger 10/07/2015.
Does the Scaling of Strain Energy Release with Event Size Control the Temporal Evolution of Seismicity? Steven C. Jaumé Department of Geology And Environmental.
Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Hybrid Models For Protein-Membrane Interactions At Mesoscale: Bridge to Intracellular Signaling.
Linear hydraulic fracture with tortuosity: Conservation laws and fluid extraction M. R. R. Kgatle and D. P. Mason School of computational and applied mathematics.
27 May, 2011 — College Station, TX Study of Nonideal and Secondary Fractures O.M. Olorode Slide — 1/18 A Numerical Study of Nonideal and Secondary Fractures.
Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Slide — 1/80 Rate-Decline.
Production Analysis of Eagle Ford Shale Gas Wells using Time-Rate Relations Avery DAVIS Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College.
1 Mary F. Wheeler 1, Sanghyun Lee 1 With Nicholas Hayman 2, Jacqueline Reber 3, Thomas Wick 4 1 Center for Subsurface Modeling, University of Texas at.
SPE What Factors Control Shale Gas Production Decline Trend: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation HanYi Wang, The University of Texas at Austin.
Final Presentation College Station, TX (USA) — 11 August 2015 Chulhwan SONG Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination
Extreme Value Prediction in Sloshing Response Analysis
On calibration of micro-crack model of thermally induced cracks through inverse analysis Dr Vladimir Buljak University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical.
Energy Resources Engineering Department Stanford University, CA, USA
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Presentation transcript:

Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Antu Xie Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 1/12

● Estimating the production rate and EUR after fracturing is often quite difficult Shale: Certainly Uncertain Slide — 2/12 Production History – Vaca Muerta (STB/D)Normalized EUR Estimates (%) Example: EUR estimate from 100 days of production history of a horizontal multi-fractured well (Collins et al. 2015) Using assumptions of a SRV with a set of bi-wing fractures, there is a 64% spread in EUR estimates 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie

● At all size scales, shale structure is heterogeneous and random ● Goal: Use micro-scale data to reduce macro-scale uncertainty ● Method: A framework that uses micro-scale shale structures into an estimate of stimulated volume length and permeability, with shale composition and fracturing conditions and parameters A Reason for Uncertainty: Multi-scale Shale Heterogeneity Slide — 3/12 (SEM Image of Shale) (Fuentes-Cruz et al. 2014) 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie

Framework Overview Material Parameters (Moduli, Fracture Constant) Mechanical Deformation & Flow Simulation Localized Pressure-Stress Relationship & Deformation Micro-scale Simulation Generated Shale Structures, Stress Regimes Multiple Simulation Runs Estimate SRV as a function of fracturing pressure and time Experimental Framework 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 4/12

● Assumption: Still in continuum mechanics (linear elastic) regime ● Energy of a pressurized crack: ● Treat fracture propagation as phase change problem ■ Computationally feasible to model ■ Fracture pathway not pre-arranged, determined by moduli and fracture energy Modeling – Deformation, Fracturing Two Propagating Pressurized Fractures (Heister et al. 2015) 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 5/12

● Finite-Element Library of choice: ● For any time step, seek a displacement vector and phase value that minimizes deformation energy ● Can translate raw 3D scan data into meshes for deal.II Implementation – Mechanical Simulation ● Can then deform and fracture in deal.II 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 6/12

Implementation – Video of deformation Red: Elastic Modulus = 1000 G c = 0.27 Blue: Elastic Modulus = 500 G c = Fracture initiates in weaker section 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 7/12

● Assumption: Laminar flow in continuum regime (Re < 2300) ● Use Knudsen number (λ / L) to determine flow regime model ■ Continuum flow:Kn ≤ ■ Slip flow:0.001 < Kn < 0.1 ■ Transition flow:0.1 < Kn < 10 ● Intended solution for < Kn: Discrete Monte Carlo (DSMC) Modeling – Flow Knudsen diffusion dominates in very small capillaries (Javadpour 2009) DSMC flow streamlines, more accurate than continuum for ‘high’ Kn (Bobzin et al. 2014) 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 8/12

● Fluid flow simulation library of choice: ■ Finite volume simulation ■ Open-source, reliable, modifiable ■ Pre-existing packages for continuum CFD and DSMC ■ Can be coupled with deal.II Implementation – Flow Extracted flow “channel” (phase threshold set high for illustration purposes) OpenFOAM-generated flow through 3D channel (Christou 2015) 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 9/12

● Complete fluid simulation ● Complete 1-step coupling of mechanical deformation/fracturing with fluid flow simulation ● Begin studying fracturing under near-stress wall conditions Next Steps: Generated Shale Structures, Stress Regimes Multiple Simulation Runs Estimate SRV as a function of fracturing pressure and time Experimental Framework ● Simulated/Extract structure ● P = 3000 – 5000 psi ● Fractured volume ● effective permeability ● Estimate effective strength ● Reduce uncertainty 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 10/12

● Goal: Create a framework to use shale microstructure data to model fracture performance and reduce reservoir uncertainty ● What's been developed so far? ■ Conversion utility of FIB/SEM shale structure into 3D mesh ■ A 3D phase-field fracture model ● What remains to be done? ■ Accurate flow modeling in OpenFOAM ■ Run simulation experiments Conclusion 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie Slide — 11/12 Normalized EUR Estimates (%)

2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2015 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Slide — 12/12 Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Antu Xie Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Modelling Concepts for Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Shales Antu Xie