NAACCR Interoperability Activities Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Overview Keith W. Boone Interoperability Architect, GE Healthcare Co-chair, IHE Patient Care Coordination PC.
Advertisements

1 Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Marc S. Williams, M.D. Director Grant M. Wood Senior IT Strategist Introduction to HL7 Clinical.
BUILDING INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS FOR VITAL RECORDS Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2012 Annual Business Meeting November 9, 2012 Michelle Williamson,
Quality Label and Certification Processes Vienna Summit 11 April 2014 Karima Bourquard Director of Interoperability IHE-Europe.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Hetty Khan Health Informatics Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Aug 18, 2010.
Hetty Khan Health Informatics Scientist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) August 7, 2012 Developing.
Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003 Public Accountability – Best Practices Accrediting Your Certification Program.
Community Information Technology Engagement (CITE): Program Overview
Riki Merrick, APHL Anna Orlova, PhD, PHDSC Lise Stevens, FDA Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA – CDC CSTE Conference June 5 th, 2012 The findings and conclusions.
COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DEVELOPING A STRATEGY FOR REGION 6 Region 6 Planning Commission 903 East Main Street Marshalltown, IA
1 VistA-Office EHR CAPT Cynthia Wark Deputy Director, Information Systems Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
Project Highlights. New Process Project Report videos available at
HL7 Webinar: Mobile Health Chuck Jaffe Austin Kreisler John Quinn 19 March 2012.
1 DoD-VA Partnership Status 22 February DoD/VA Partnership DoD/VA Mission, Vision, Authority DoD/VA Council Structure Joint Strategic Plan Current.
Working Together to Advance Terminology Tooling Presentation to OHT Board, Birmingham Jennifer Zelmer & Karen Gibson.
Incorporating Health Data from Electronic Health Record Systems and Administrative Data Sets into Public Health Systems for Administrative Uses – A Landscape.
1 Charles Parisot, GE Healthcare IHE IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Co-chair IHE and US National Health IT Initiatives.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:9 Evaluate Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Quality of Personal.
AHIMA & PHDSC A Transformational Alliance. CONFIDENTIAL AHIMA Background  Professional association founded in 1928 as the Association of Record Librarians.
1 Health Level Seven (HL7) Report Out Population Science and Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG) Riki Ohira September 22, 2011.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2004 – 2005 Directions
Data Quality Toolbox for Registrars MCSS Workshop December 9, 2003 Elaine Collins.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Public Health in Health IT Standardization Resource Center Current experience with implementation of public health information systems. HIT Adoption Stories.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Copyright OASIS, 2001 OASIS e-Government Technical Committee John Borras Office of e-Envoy Cabinet Office UK Government May 2003.
Examining the Effective Use of HL7v3 Messaging “ Where the Rubber Meets the Road” Introduction for an Open Dialogue on: Issues in Communicating the Real.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
December 8, 2005Ohio Board of Regents Articulation and Transfer Clearinghouse 1 Articulation and Transfer Clearinghouse (ATC) Articulation and Transfer.
West Virginia Information Technology Summit November 4, 2009.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
S&I Public Health Education Series: Data Provenance July 9th, 2014 Johnathan Coleman Initiative Coordinator – Data Provenance ONC/OCPO/OST (CTR)
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge -There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Virtual Hearing of the Health IT Policy Committee Clinical, Technical, Organizational and Financial Barriers to Interoperability Task Force Friday, August.
Lab Results Interface Validation Suite Workgroup and Pilots Workgroup Vision, Charter, NIST Collaboration, July 8,
1 Testing for Medical Devices Communications Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory
HL7 V2 and V3 – where next? Charlie McCay HL7UK Chair-elect
REBECCA COYLE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION CONFERENCE MARCH 31, 2011 AMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION.
Interfacing with a Health Information Exchange for Electronic Physician Reporting David Rust, MS Kentucky Cancer Registry June 11, 2013 NAACCR Annual Conference.
THE NEW WORLD OF STANDARDIZED ELECTRONIC PATHOLOGY (E-PATH) REPORTING Eric B. Durbin, MS Jovanka N. Harrison, PhD NAACCR Pathology Data Work Group NAACCR.
NAACCR Clinical Data Work Group - Pilot to Transmit the Cancer Abstract Using HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) 2007 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach,
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
ISO Datatypes Approved by Enterprise Composite Architecture team (eCAT) on July 7, 2009 Guidelines for use for CBIIT funded projects.
Electronic CAP Cancer Checklists and Cancer Registries – A Pilot Project 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, MPH, CTR Castine Verrill, MS, CTR CDC-National.
Cristian Lieneck and Eric Weaver  By the end of this class, the student should be able to:  Examine the data reporting advantages of electronic medical.
NAACCR Data Standards Activities to Achieve Interoperability Ken Gerlach, Chair NAACCR Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee June 12, NAACCR Annual.
NPCR – Advancing E-cancer Reporting and Registry Operations (NPCR-AERRO): An Update on Innovative Activities NAACCR Annual Conference June 16, 2009 Sandy.
NAACCR CDA Pilot Project - Overview, Status, and Findings 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, Co-Chair, NAACCR Clinical Data Work Group; Health Scientist,
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Joyce Sensmeier, MS, RN, BC, CPHIMS, FHIMSS Vice President, Informatics, HIMSS Charles Parisot, GE Healthcare IT infrastructure.
EDI ( ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE). Strategic Impact of EDI Business processes can become more efficient Customer-supplier relationships may change more.
NAACCR Clinical Data Work Group: Design and Implementation Issues Jim Martin Director, Virginia Cancer Registry 2007 NAACCR Annual Meeting Detroit, Michigan.
NAACCR Annual Conference Quebec City, Quebec, Canada Shannon Vann, CTR Jim Hofferkamp, CTR.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting July 18, 2011.
Cindy Vinion (Northrop Grumman Corporation)
SNOMED CT Education SIG: Strategic Plan Review
Achieving Semantic Interoperability of Cancer Registries
Public Health Laboratory Data (PH-Lab) Exchange Project: Overview
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
Rob Savage, EDS Kimiko Gosney, Arizona Department of Health Services
AB 2325 – What Registrars Should Know
Electronic Health Information Systems
eLearning Initiative: Introduction to HL7
Presentation transcript:

NAACCR Interoperability Activities Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards

Background Standards Volumes I and II Standards Volumes I and II Data exchange record layout Data exchange record layout National health information technology initiatives National health information technology initiatives

NAACCRs Number One Priority Achieve syntactic and semantic interoperability of cancer registration standards with national standards by 2010 or at the earliest possible time. Achieve syntactic and semantic interoperability of cancer registration standards with national standards by 2010 or at the earliest possible time.

Definitions Semantic Interoperability: the ability to exchange and use data; allows the exchange of both structure and meaning (of terms or vocabularies) among systems. Semantic Interoperability: the ability to exchange and use data; allows the exchange of both structure and meaning (of terms or vocabularies) among systems. Syntactic Interoperability: the ability to exchange data; refers to the ability for different systems to interpret interfaces, interchange formats, messaging standards, etc. Syntactic Interoperability: the ability to exchange data; refers to the ability for different systems to interpret interfaces, interchange formats, messaging standards, etc.

Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee Structure Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee (Chair, Ken Gerlach) Semantic Interoperability Work Group (Chair, Gary Levin) Syntactic Interoperability Work Group (Chair, Beth Anne Schmidt) Pathology Data Work Group (Chair, Eric Durbin) Clinical Data Work Group (Co-chairs, Ken Gerlach and Jim Martin)

Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee Conducted first meeting at the NAACCR annual conference. Conducted first meeting at the NAACCR annual conference. Developed goals and objectives for the ad hoc committee and the new work groups. Developed goals and objectives for the ad hoc committee and the new work groups. Reviewed goals and objectives for existing work groups. Reviewed goals and objectives for existing work groups.

Semantic Interoperability WG The Semantic Interoperability WG will review ontologies and vocabularies to ensure NAACCR data standards are either interoperable or mapable to national standards. The Semantic Interoperability WG will review ontologies and vocabularies to ensure NAACCR data standards are either interoperable or mapable to national standards.

Syntactic Interoperability WG The Syntactic Interoperability WG will assess data exchange mechanisms to ensure NAACCR is consistent with national standards. The Syntactic Interoperability WG will assess data exchange mechanisms to ensure NAACCR is consistent with national standards.

Clinical Data WG Charge Explore alternate mechanisms or messages to transmit and receive the cancer abstract. Explore alternate mechanisms or messages to transmit and receive the cancer abstract. Examine not only the steps to transmit and receive data within the cancer registry community, but also consider transmissions to organizations typically outside that community. Examine not only the steps to transmit and receive data within the cancer registry community, but also consider transmissions to organizations typically outside that community.

Clinical Data Work Group – HL7 CDA Pilot Project Pilot test transmission of cancer data using HL7 CDA from a hospital cancer registry to a central cancer registry. Pilot test transmission of cancer data using HL7 CDA from a hospital cancer registry to a central cancer registry. Participants included two central cancer registries, two hospital registry software vendors and two central registry vendors. Participants included two central cancer registries, two hospital registry software vendors and two central registry vendors.

Clinical Data Work Group Pilot Project Major Milestones Strawman – July 2007 Strawman – July 2007 Preliminary Implementation Guide – September 2007 Preliminary Implementation Guide – September 2007 Translation Tool – October 2007 Translation Tool – October 2007 Pilot Alpha Software – December 2007 Pilot Alpha Software – December 2007 Pilot Alpha Deployment – February 2008 Pilot Alpha Deployment – February 2008 Final Implementation Guide – April 2008 Final Implementation Guide – April 2008 Advantages/Disadvantages Report – May 2008 Advantages/Disadvantages Report – May 2008 Financial Costs and Non-financial Benefits Analysis Report – May 2008 Financial Costs and Non-financial Benefits Analysis Report – May 2008

Pathology Data Work Group Update Standards Volume V to HL7 version Update Standards Volume V to HL7 version Develop conformance testing tools using the HL7 Messaging Workbench. Develop conformance testing tools using the HL7 Messaging Workbench. Review CAP Cancer Checklists and the SNOMED CT Encoded CAP Cancer Checklists. Review CAP Cancer Checklists and the SNOMED CT Encoded CAP Cancer Checklists.

Health Information Technology Initiatives Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP)  Sponsored by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).  Serves as a cooperative partnership between public and private sectors for the purpose of achieving a widely accepted and useful set of standards specifically to enable and support widespread interoperability among healthcare software applications, as they will interact in a local, regional and national health information network for the U.S. (

Health Information Technology Initiatives Public Health Data Standards Consortium (PHDSC) Public Health Data Standards Consortium (PHDSC)  Promotes data standards for population health practice and research.  Committed to bring a common voice from the public health community to the national efforts of standardization of health and healthcare information. (

Health Information Technology Initiatives Health Level Seven (HL7) Health Level Seven (HL7)  ANSI accredited Standards Developing Organization.  An international community of healthcare subject matter experts and information scientists collaborating to create standards for the exchange, management and integration of electronic healthcare information. Promotes use of standards within and among healthcare organizations to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare delivery for the benefit of all. (

Health Information Technology Initiatives SNOMED Surgical Pathology Work Group SNOMED Surgical Pathology Work Group  Works closely with the CAP Cancer Committee to work on formatting of the checklists for computer systems.  Comprised of pathologists, cancer registrars, pathology and cancer registry software suppliers and CDC representatives. (

The Challenge… These interoperability activities are new to the NAACCR members and staff. These interoperability activities are new to the NAACCR members and staff. There is not an existing trail to follow…we are trail blazing. There is not an existing trail to follow…we are trail blazing.