PROMs Martin Orton – NHS Information Centre. Overview PROMs Overview IC’s central role in implementation –Matching & linking to HES & NJR –Applying the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)
Advertisements

Local Improvement following National Clinical Audit The View from a National Clinical Audit Provider – the Health & Social Care Information Centre.
Shared Decision Making – a strategic framework for commissioners 2 May 2012.
Health Information Supplier Forum ‘Open data, a platform for change’ Garry Coleman, Health & Social Care Information Centre.
Relieving distress, transforming lives Data Collection in IAPT The Importance of collecting data in IAPT-compliant services (References: The IAPT Data.
Highly Specialised Technologies Evaluations
Making Decisions in Health Care: Cost-effectiveness and the Value of Evidence Karl Claxton Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related.
28th March 2013 Debbie Newton Chief Operating & Finance Officer
Practice based commissioning in Sutton and Merton PCT George Burns Practice Based Commissioning Development Manager
National Update: The information revolution and the 2012 Caldicott Review Simon Richardson – Information Rights Manager.
Data Linkage Service Garry Coleman, Health and Social Care Information Centre.
Project Update : Claims/Clinical Linkage Project MHDO Board of Directors June 6, 2013.
Outcomes that matter to patients: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for people with renal replacement UK Renal Registry 2015 Annual Audit Meeting.
How NICE quality Standards can help drive and measure quality improvement Dylan Jones Associate Director - Quality Standards Health and social care quality.
The National Cancer Intelligence Network An overview Professor David Forman Professor of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Leeds NCIN – Lead for Information.
ISB Notice and preparing for the implementation of the new IAPT Data Standard Shaun Crowe Mental Health, Employment and IAPT Mental Health Collaborative.
Session 3: Can the Best Practice Tariff and price benchmarking lead to better care? Elaine Young Director of Operations National Joint Registry & Peter.
Mental Health Collaborative PAYMENT BY RESULTS BRIEF UPDATE.
© Institute for Fiscal Studies and Nuffield Trust, 2013 May 2013 Public payment and private provision The changing landscape of health care in the 2000s.
Copyright 2011 Right Care The Accountable Integrated Care System Sept 2011 Commissioning for Value.
Strategies for health system performance comparison: some international experience Peter C. Smith Emeritus Professor of Health Policy Imperial College.
Appropriateness of joint replacement: A multi-stakeholder approach Claudia Sanmartin, Carolyn DeCoster, Gillian Hawker March 28, 2012 Ottawa, Ontario.
National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness National Learning Disability Review Function Options Appraisal Report.
Open Data Platform Supplier Forum 13 January 2012.
Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team.
NICE Decision Making Dr Katherine Payne North West Genetics Knowledge Park The University of Manchester
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
1 Patient Outcomes & Experience Measurement in Podiatry Results from two NHS departments.
Care.data: listening to you Robin Burgess Regional Head of Intelligence
Perioperative fasting guideline Getting it into practice Getting started.
Clinical Audit as Evidence for Revalidation Dr David Scott, GMC Associate, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Lead for Children’s Services, East Sussex.
Equality and Excellence: Liberating the NHS Ian R Cumming 12th July 2010.
Relieving distress, transforming lives IAPT Payment by Results Project Update David Perton IAPT PbR Project Manager Department of Health.
Dental Public Health DWSI document: How can this help a dentist to set up a contract with the PCT? Eric Rooney Consultant in Dental Public Health.
Calculating Quality Reporting Service – an introduction Chris Brown CQRS Design, Build and Test Project Manager 05 September 2012.
Harnessing Clinical Terminologies and Classifications for Healthcare Improvement Janice Watson Terminology Services Manager 11 th April 2013.
Healthcare Resource Groups. What are HRGs? Casemix methodology underpinning system of payment to providers and contract pricing Aggregation of OPCS or.
How can Geriatricians help PCTs?. What on earth is world class commissioning? Department of health has set criteria by which it wishes PCTs to operate.
Basic Economic Analysis David Epstein, Centre for Health Economics, York.
London Specialised Commissioning Group 10 th September 2009 Major Trauma Services for London Commissioning and Finance Arrangements Sean Overett Divisional.
Healthcare data Robin Burgess, Regional Head of Intelligence, London region 17/9/2014.
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Karen Taylor Director of Health Value for Money Audit NHS Pay Modernisation: New Contracts for General Practice Services.
World Class Commissioning and World Class Informatics, the quest for quality information Jan Sobieraj - Chief Executive, NHS Sheffield.
The National CKD Audit and Quality Improvement Programme for CKD in Primary Care The project will be advised by key stakeholders, including: From BMJ Informatica,
How will we know whether this technology is appropriate? OR New procedures, NICE and Specialist Societies Bruce Campbell Chairman NICE Interventional Procedures.
Access to data for local authority public health AGW Public Health Network Training Event: Public Health Data, Information and Intelligence 11 th November.
NHS Benchmarking Data Susan Hamilton Consultant in Public Health South Gloucestershire Council.
The NIRS Programme. Presentation Objectives… Provide overview of the aims and objectives of NARS and HRSS Explain the current position and thinking behind.
Use of Resources Calderdale workshop 18 May 2009 Janet Matthews- Audit Commission Steve Brennan- Calderdale PCT.
HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.
The contribution of PROMs to health care sustainability Mark Harrison Stirling Bryan Deborah Marshall Nick Bansback.
Predicting risk of hospital admission and extracting GP data David Osborne Senior Public Health Information Analyst NHS Croydon.
PROMs Pilot for Long-Term Conditions in Primary Care Ray Fitzpatrick Department of Public Health.
Creating incentives for better quality: Lessons from the English NHS Jennifer Field, Associate Director National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
NHS Health Check. NHS Information Centre for Health and social care  Mark McDaid – Project Manager  Martin Hepplestone – Business Analyst ( starts August.
National Clinical Audit and Patients Outcome Programme (NCAPOP) Richard Arnold Clinical Programme Lead, NHS England.
Quality and Equality Impact Assessments Why and How.
How clinicians use data to make an impact on clinical outcomes Dr Mick Peake Clinical Lead, National Cancer Intelligence Network Consultant & Senior Lecturer.
South East Public Health Observatory Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) Steve Morgan - Senior Public Health Intelligence Analyst - SEPHO Day 2 – Session.
A ssociation of Public Health Observatories Hospital Activity data Roy Maxwell SWPHO & Bristol University Dr Richard Wilson Sandwell PCT.
Quality Indicators Martin Orton – NHS IC & Arun Bhoopal DH Medical Directorate.
World Class Commission – Impact on Informatics. Setting the scene... WCC Assurance System World class commissioning –Organisational competencies –1. Locally.
Title of the Change Project
Professor David Parkin King’s College London
NICOR A NICE Commissioned Pilot of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias Withers KL 1, Patrick H 2, Cunningham.
Towards UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations: UK SAFE
Tariff, pathway, outcomes
care.data: listening to you
The MSK-HQ Developing a generic Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure Policy & Public Affairs Team, Arthritis Research UK e.
Health reform in England: update and commissioning framework
Presentation transcript:

PROMs Martin Orton – NHS Information Centre

Overview PROMs Overview IC’s central role in implementation –Matching & linking to HES & NJR –Applying the scoring algorithms –Providing the data for analysis Publication and data availability –Publications of information and indicators –Extract service for the data The likely uses of PROMs

PROMs PROMs are a means of assessing effectiveness of care from the patient’s perspective: –Effectiveness of care. This means understanding success rates from different treatments for different conditions. Assessing this will include clinical measures such as mortality or survival rates and measures of clinical improvement. Just as important is the effectiveness of care from the patient’s own perspective which will be measured through patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)…[1][1] [1] High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. Department of Health. June Chapter 4.[1]

The PROMs programme Building the evidence base: electives 4. Implement 5. Evaluate 2. Pilot 1. Identify 3. Review Literature review (LSHTM 2005) Pilot study (LSHTM 2007) Procurement & guidance (DH) Cost Benefit Analysis To follow… Which areas? Which measures? Assess the evidence base How to administer? Questionnaire design? Sample sizes? Statistical power? Feasible? Cost- effective? Acceptable? How to implement? How to support implementation ? Guidance? What works well? What hasn’t worked? Where should changes be made?

National Implementation 5 ProcedureCondition-specificGeneric Unilateral Hip ReplacementOxford Hip ScoreEQ-5D* Unilateral Knee Replacement Oxford Knee ScoreEQ-5D* Groin Hernia SurgeryNoneEQ-5D* Varicose Vein SurgeryAberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire EQ-5D* *: EQ-5D TM is a trademark of the EuroQol Group ( Robust tool for health economic analysis, and comparison across procedures; Recommended by NICE More sensitive tool for intra-procedure comparisons; often more familiar to clinicians – e.g. OHS / OKS PROMs questionnaires combine 2 types of measures to maximise impact of collected data

PROMs contractual model Aggregated data PROMs “Analysis” Information Centre: “Linkage” & “Repository” identifiable Pre-op IC OtherSUSNJR Post-op Scoring, outcomes Aggregation Academic stakeholders Case-mix adjustment Develop adjustment Record-level data Healthcare stakeholders Extract Service Linked Pseud’sed Aggregated data Record level data Record level data PROMs “Administration” PROMs “Aggregation”

Linkage to HES Link to HES –Provides the demographics of the patient (very minimum collected in the PROMs questionnaires) –Provides details of the operation (OPCS-4 codes) and diagnosis (ICD-10) –Provides details of the commissioner and provider –Provides information on co-morbidities to aid casemix adjustment –Ability to link to previous episodes of care

Linkage to National Joint Registry Link to NJR (for Hip & Knee replacements) –Provides more detailed data on the procedure (techniques, prosthetics, cement etc) –Extra information on cause/reason

Matching Flowchart HES id & episode matching Pre-op Qs Q1s HES NJR Participation rates Scoring Q1s Pre-op scores Participation rates Monthly indicators

Matching Flowchart HES id & episode matching Pre-op Qs Q1s HES NJR Participation rates Scoring Q1s Pre-op scores Match to Q1s Post-op Qs Q2s Scoring Q1+Q2 pairs Response rates Participation rates Monthly indicators

Matching Flowchart HES id & episode matching Pre-op Qs Q1s HES NJR Participation rates Scoring Q1s Pre-op scores Match to Q1s Post-op Qs Q2s Scoring Q1+Q2 pairs Response rates Output for analysis & extracts Analysis & casemix adjustment Health Gain scores Participation rates Monthly indicators

IC Functions Pre-op & Post-op questionnaires scored and compared to provide health gain (using the instrument developer’s scoring algorithms) All the above provides the data for analysis Aggregation/Analysis contractor is developing and will routinely apply case-mix and risk adjustment in order to produce regularly average health gain data by commissioner (PCT) and provider

IC Publications & Management Information (monthly) Participation rates – based on the pre-op questionnaires Response rates – Completion of pre-op and post- op questionnaires Pre-op scores – unadjusted data, used for appropriateness of referrals, and exploring health inequalities Outcomes – Casemix adjusted to show health gain by provider & commissioner and maybe probability of a positive benefit

IC Extract Service PROMs data will be available through the HES data extract service, intended for providers and researchers Extra Ts & Cs to reflect PROMs licencing Anonymised or pseudonymised patient id unless with NIGB (Ethics Committee) approval Sensitive HES fields only with NIGB (DMSG) approval Expect extract service to start from early 2010, but dependent on sufficiently good data quality

Current Position Pre-op questionnaires started in April 09, for procedures in Apr, May & June First post-op questionnaires received by IC Sept 09 (3 months post op. for groin hernias & varicose veins)

Information Timing All timings will be dependent on the quality being sufficiently fit for purpose We expect to release the provisional management information on participation rates soon, and follow with response rates. Expect the extract service to start in early 2010 Expect indicators to be available later in 2010 (summer). These are new indicators, so need testing with sufficient volumes before release.

PROMs Outcomes Indicators Outcome indicators are expected to show health gain, casemix adjusted, by provider and commissioner (PCT) Will be available in Indicators for Quality Improvement (IQI) Will be supplied to NHS Choices These indicators can then be used with other indicators to provide a richer indication of the quality of care

Expected Use of PROMs Local use of data » Benchmarking against peers leading to improvements Quality Accounts » Telling the story about performance CQUIN » Financial rewards for high quality Choice » Choosing high quality providers WCC » Allocate scarce resources efficiently Tackling health inequalities » Appropriate access for given needs Regulation (CQC) » Setting minimum standards Standard contracts » Commissioners holding providers to account PROMs

Find out more