Improving the Education Outcomes of Looked After Children November 2014 Slide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Supporting the education of looked after learners Rob Mills LAC Education Coordinator.
Child Safeguarding Standards
The Draft SEN Code of Practice November What the Code is Nine chapters Statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3.
Joint Training for Social Workers and Designated Teachers
Webinar: A Headteacher's Guide to Performance Management with PRP Presented by Josephine Smith.
Education, Health and Care Plans Conversions. Background  We currently have over 800 pupils with Statements in West Berkshire  We also provide funding.
People Directorate Learning City - Strategic Overview September 2014 Paul Jacobs Service Director – Education & Skills.
Designated teachers for looked after children Conference - Suffolk Looked after children Improving learning and achievement Marianick Ellender-Gelé HMI.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
The Virtual School Annual Report Introduction by the Headteacher This Virtual School Annual Report has been designed to give an insight into the.
Narrowing the gap and the effective use of the Pupil and Service Premium with SEN young people Glyn Wright Autumn Term 2013.
Evaluating the impact of careers guidance for continuous improvement
SEN and Disability Green Paper Update on draft legislation and pathfinder programme.
The effective use of tests and tasks to support teacher assessment in Y2 4 th February 2014 Karen Samples.
Draft Code of Practice – General Consultation / Implementation Sue Woodgate.
Trying To Make Sense Of It All An Exercise in Futility? Dave Farrow Head of Commissioning – Educational Outcomes.
Sarah Rivers Head Teacher of The Virtual School for Looked After Children “Ensure all Looked after Children receive a good education”
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
Essex Virtual School March / April 2011 Designated Teacher for Children Looked After Training.
C H I L D R E N A N D A D U L T S – L E A R N I N G A N D C A R I N G Education of Children in Care Betty Earl Virtual Headteacher for Children in Care,
Webinar: New Code, new role for the Senco? Natalie Packer The webinar slides can be downloaded and printed.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
DCSF/DFE Guidance for Children in Care - Nov ’09 School-based Training to Headteacher, Governor & DT. Ceri May – Teacher, Haringey Virtual School of Children.
Bradfield CE (VA) Primary School School Development Priorities
Framework for the Inspection of services for children in need of help and protection, children looked after and care leavers. Gani Martins Assistant Director.
Managing, mapping and evaluating successful intervention programmes. Provision Management.
September 2015 Focus – OfSTED Changes and Curriculum requirements
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from September 2012.
Demonstrating Effectiveness Background and Context.
An overview of the O-25 SEN and Disability Service in South Gloucestershire March 2015 Mark Nesden Service Manager 0-25 Disability Service.
Countdown to April 2012 Ensuring all students get quality careers education and guidance.
Helping School to Improve Challenge and Support! mtfl –More Time for Learning Maria Landy School Improvement Adviser.
Ofsted inspections of local authority arrangements for supporting school improvement Matthew Coffey, Her Majesty’s Inspector National Director for FE and.
Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice 0 – 25 Years.
Reducing the impact of child poverty Vanessa Housley Senior Adviser Inclusion 18 th September 2013.
Quality First Teaching for All SENJIT 21 st May 2013.
Halton Inspection Planning - Journey of the Child Unannounced Ofsted Inspection Mark Grady Principal Policy Officer, Children & Enterprise.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
The New Ofsted Framework Pupil Achievement Quality of Leadership and Management Quality of Teaching Behaviour and Safety.
November 2015 Common weaknesses in local authorities judged inadequate under the single inspection framework – a summary.
Governors’ Conference Pupil Premium – The Role of Governors Saturday 3 rd October 2015 This session will look at ways in which Governors can effectively.
Raising standards, improving lives
Stakeholder Advisory Forum 8 July 2013 Kingsway Hall Hotel, 66 Great Queen Street, London, WC2B 5BX.
Personal Education Plan Designated Teacher Guidance.
Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Social Services CSSIW Performance Evaluation Report 2014–15.
A Better Education for Children in Care Sue Steven Regional Adviser, Education Protects Team, DfES Head of Looked After Children Education Service, Calderdale.
What works: The role of LAC Education Coordinator (RCT) and Personal Education Plans (PEP) March 2016 – Inspire me! Looked After People and Care Leavers.
Educational Attainment in Hastings Presentation to the Hastings LSP Fiona Wright October 2014.
Accelerating the Achievement of Vulnerable Groups May 2016 Jo Pallett Head of Virtual School
Personal Education Plans and Pupil Premium. Personal Education Plans  What is a Personal Education Plan?  PEPs are education plans drawn up at a meeting.
Looked After Children In Dudley The Challenge and Joy Pat Finegan Headteacher of the Virtual School.
Developing Provision Management to Improve Accountability and Outcomes Natalie Packer Summer 2014.
Pupil Premium 2014/15 Donna Munday – Schools Finance Manager Tel /
Standards report Standards Report CT Board 18 th March 2016.
Preparing for the Safeguarding and looked after children inspection Tony Morrissey Head of Safeguarding Inspection & Audit Directorate for Children & Young.
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
Primary PE and Sport Premium. Outcomes of todays Session 2 Clarity on the objectives of the Primary PE and Sport Premium Understanding how schools are.
Looked After Children Monday 13 February 2017 James McNeillie
Ofsted Inspection of Children’s Services
The Role of Ofsted covering School Inspections in England
Raising standards, improving lives
Welcome - Pupil Premium
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
LA role - Schools Causing Concern
What Governors need to know about Ofsted
Wirral SEN/D Picture.
Preston & Wingham Primary Schools Federation
Virtual School Autumn 2019 Katharine Passmore
Presentation transcript:

Improving the Education Outcomes of Looked After Children November 2014 Slide 1

LAC Education Team Contacts Jane Johnson - Virtual School Head Teacher for LAC Lynn Girvan – LAC Education Officer Richard Smith - PEP Coordinator

Aims of this session: To have heard about the Local Authority Ofsted Inspection outcomes and the key points about the Education of LAC. To have heard about the main responsibilities of schools in meeting the educational needs of LAC To have heard about the Manchester process for accessing Pupil Premium for LAC.

The Inspection 25 June 2014 – 16 July Inspectors Casework led, considered cases LA Self Evaluation: RI Feedback at end of inspection: RI Moderated overall judgement: Inadequate

The judgement breakdown 1. Children who need help and protection – inadequate 2. Children looked after and achieving permanence – requires improvement 2.1 Adoption performance - inadequate 2.2 Experiences and progress of care leavers – requires improvement 3. Leadership, management & governance – inadequate. Local Safeguarding Children’s Board - inadequate

The Judgement – key findings Backlog of assessments QA, oversight and challenge of social work practice High social worker caseloads Poor understanding of thresholds and Early Help by some partners Adoption too slow Education and progression of LAC

The Judgement – key findings for Education of LAC and care leavers. 1.More work to close the gap between LAC and all pupils especially in secondary schools 2.Improvement in PEP completion and the quality of PEPs 3.Monitoring of 25 hours education per week. 4.% of LAC in schools judged to be good or better. 5.Tracking of LAC in post 16 provision 6.Discussions during inspection about exclusion of LAC

Background information - Manchester We have approximately 1,400 Looked After Children (appox 900 of school age) Some placed within Manchester some outside Placed with own parents In Foster Care or placed for adoption Residential Homes Placed with Relatives/ Friends Rest made up of Independent Living/ Young Offenders/Unaccompanied Assylum Seekers etc.

Reasons for entering Care

Age on entering Care

Closing the Gap – Key Stage 2 Area of Learning Manchester LAC 2013 Manchester LAC all M/cr Y provisional all M/cr Y provisional National Y6 Reading L %71.9%85.3%85%89% Writing L %57.3%81.8%83%85% GPS L %48.8%73.3%75.4%76% Maths L %64.6%85.2%84%86% RWM L %51.2%74.7%76%79% Provisional KS 2 LAC outcomes KS2 – 82 Year 6 pupils – final data not yet validated

Closing the Gap Key Stage 4 Measure Manchester LAC 2013 Manchester LAC all M/cr Y provisional all M/cr Y provisional national Y11 5A*-C with Eng & Maths 8.8%11%53.1%50.7%52.6% KS4 – 109 Year 11 pupils – data not yet validated Provisional KS 4 LAC outcomes

Statutory guidance for schools and local authorities

Key school responsibilities for LAC 1.Designated Teachers (DT) 2.Personal Education Plans (PEP) 3.Pupil Premium Grant for LAC (PPG) 4.Admissions 5.Exclusions

1.The Designated Teacher (DT) for LAC There is a legal requirement for every school, whether they currently have Looked After Children on their roll or not, to have a named, fully qualified teacher for LAC. This teacher is called the Designated Teacher (DT) for LAC / tandard/publicationDetail/Page1/DCSF http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ / tandard/publicationDetail/Page1/DCSF  The DT should either be on the senior management team or have ready access to it.

Governors’ responsibilities To ensure that the designated teacher is given the appropriate level of support in order to effectively fulfil their role. To ensure, in partnership with the head teacher, that the DT has the necessary knowledge, skills and understanding to carry out the role (access to training etc). To ensure that the designated teacher is a member of the teaching staff with appropriate seniority, professional experience and status.

How do governors know that the DT role is being implemented efficiently and is making a real difference? Indicators: the school has a clear overview of the educational needs and progress of all the looked after children on roll; the school’s policies are effective in reflecting the needs of looked after children; resources are allocated to support the designated teacher to carry out this role effectively and to ensure each looked after child achieves best possible outcomes. Governing bodies should, as a minimum, receive an annual report from the designated teacher

Key questions Are there any workload issues for the DT related to the number of LAC on the roll of the school? Has the DT accessed appropriate training? How many levels of progress are being made by each LAC compared to their peers? How is Pupil Premium being used to support each LAC to achieve best possible educational ? Are there any concerns in attendance and/or exclusion patterns of LAC? Are there any issues relating to the process or implementation of PEPs for each LAC? How are the needs of any LAC identified as having particular gifts or SEN being met? Has any training been delivered by the DT to all staff? Are we ensuring an appropriate focus on LAC in our school policies and development plans?

2. Personal Education Plans The Person Education Plan (PEP) is the statutory tool to ensure that everyone is actively prioritising the education of the young person, supporting them to achieve and to be aspirational.

Why do we need a PEP? It is a statutory requirement as a part of the young person’s statutory Care Plan (duty is shared by schools and LA). It captures an overview of the young person’s views, educational experiences, attainment, progress and aspirations It captures their strengths, areas of need and any barriers to learning It identifies intended outcomes and objectives….it is the educational road map for the young person

Manchester PEP timescales and submission process PEP 1 should be completed and sent to the Manchester PEP Coordinator by the end of the first half term (October). Once completed, each PEP should be password protected with a strong password, and sent via to the address below. The password should be sent in a separate , to the same address. PEP 2 should be completed and sent, in the same way, to the same address, by the end of the Spring term (April). Please do not put any sensitive information which relates to the child within the body of the or on the subject line. Thank you. Richard Smith is the Manchester PEP Coordinator and he can be contacted on or

Where do I find the PEP forms, Pupil Premium documents and other guidance? 1. Manchester City Council website. ools_and_education/4917/improving_the_ed ucation_of_looked_after_children/2 2. MEWAN

2. Ofsted Inspection of PEPs Random sample of PEPs scrutinised by education inspector. 5 PEPs selected initially, primary and secondary, 4 from Manchester schools 1 from another LA – all judged to be inadequate:  Missing basic information (year group, SEN status, date of next meeting…)  No prior attainment included and targets not SMART or focused on raising attainment  Limited information about young people’s views, wishes and feelings.  Limited information about young people’s interests and aspirations and work being undertaken to support these.  Limited information given about strategies which support the young person to learn.  Limited information about impact of interventions or support given from PEP 1 to PEP 2 Second sample of PEPs considered, evidence of improvement in quality acknowledged, PEPs still judged to require improvement.

3.Pupil Premium for LAC – it is different! “The grant allocation for Looked After Children must be managed by the designated Virtual School Head in the authority that looks after those children to be used for the benefit of the looked after child’s educational needs as described in their Personal Education Plan (PEP). The Virtual School Head should ensure there are arrangements in place to discuss with the child’s education setting – usually with the designated teacher – how the child will benefit from any pupil premium funding.” (DfE Conditions of Grant 2014/15)

Manchester Process for the Distribution of Pupil Premium for LAC 2014/15 During September 2014 schools will receive a first instalment of £800 for each LAC on their school roll. PEP 1 will be completed for each Manchester Looked After Child and submitted to the LAC Education Team by the end of half term 1 (October) along with the Pupil Premium Supplementary Form. Where a young person’s PEP 1 contains all the information a second instalment of £1,100 will be paid to the school for that young person.

The LAC Education Team will quality assure each PEP All sections of the PEP are completed including year group, date of next meeting, prior attainment… The targets are SMART and are focussed on improvements to be made in the young person’s learning. There is a clear record of how PP is being used to support the young person to achieve their PEP targets including clearly defined expected outcomes and an indication of how the impact of the PP is being measured. The young person’s views, wishes and feelings about their education and aspirations are recorded, in their own words within the PEP.

What happens if information is missing? The LAC Education Team will contact the DT in the school if: any of the required information is not recorded within the PEP the second payment of £1,100 will be paid to the school for that child once any gaps in information have been addressed. We will also be contacting schools and social workers if we do not receive a PEP for a Manchester Looked After Child.

4. School admissions “Looked after children have been given the highest priority within school admission arrangements. The admission requirements for looked after children are set out in the School Admissions Code. This Code applies to maintained schools and academies, including free schools”. Promoting the education of looked after children - Statutory guidance for local authorities

5. Discussions during inspection about exclusion of LAC Everything possible should be done by all partners to ensure that Looked After Children are never permanently excluded and that fixed term exclusions are avoided. Other strategies should be used to address any difficulties. Every effort should be made to enable the young person to continue to attend school and to minimise disruption to their learning. If as a school you feel there is any risk of exclusion please contact the LAC Education Team as early as possible to explore how this can be avoided.

Aims of this session: To have heard about the Local Authority Ofsted Inspection outcomes and the key points about the Education of LAC. To have heard about the main responsibilities of schools in meeting the educational needs of LAC To have heard about the process for accessing Pupil Premium for LAC.