Accidental Coincidences Learning Objectives Understand the difference between real and accidental coincidences in an experiment using  2 scintillators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.Shanidze, B. Herold, Th. Seitz ECAP, University of Erlangen (for the KM3NeT consortium) 15 October 2009 Athens, Greece Study of data filtering algorithms.
Advertisements

Test Setup for PHOBOS Hybrid/Module Testing at MIT Pradeep Sarin 31 July 98.
Measuring Cosmic Ray Flux with a trigger and CAMAC readout - Page 1 Connect the Fluke 415 HV supply output to the input of the voltage distribution box.
COSMIC RAY MUON DETECTION USING SCINTILLATION COUNTER AND WAVELENGTH SHIFTING FIBERS ARUNODAYA BHATTACHARYA VSRP-2009,TIFR,MUMBAI 6/7/09.
Digital to Analog and Analog to Digital Conversion
Shantanu Menon Thomas Irons Michael Jacoutot. Cosmic Rays  High energy particles (mainly protons) from outer space.  Have up to 10 million times more.
Experimental Method Experimental Method Kihyeon Cho Kyungpook National University Spring Semester 2005 Experimental Method and Data Process.
Design and First Results of a Cosmic Ray Telescope For Use In Testing a Focusing DIRC M. P. Belhorn University of Cincinnati The BELLE group at the University.
Particle RANGE Through Material and Particle Lifetimes Dan Claes CROP Fall 2006 Workshop Saturday, October 14, 2006.
SCIPP Summer Outreach Project July Cosmic Ray Detectors Cosmic Ray Detectors Detector Testing Detector Testing Muon Lifetime Experiment Muon Lifetime.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Progress Report Pedro Flores. Scintillator Case Set to hold four scintillator panels with instrumentation. Only three panels with instrumentation that.
PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) doped with a scintillating fluor 2 ft x 2 ft x ½ inch Read out by 10 stage EMI 9256 photomultiplier tube The Chicago Air.
Acoustic simulations in salt Justin Vandenbroucke UC Berkeley Salt Shower Array workshop SLAC, February 3, 2004.
J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.
A pocketful of change…10 pennies!...are tossed up in the air. About how many heads (tails) do you expect when they land? What’s the probability of no heads.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
Jimmy McCarthy International Cosmic Ray Day 26 th September 2012 Detecting Cosmic Rays.
Cosmic Ray Muon Detection Department of Physics and Space Sciences Florida Institute of Technology Georgia Karagiorgi Julie Slanker Advisor: Dr. M. Hohlmann.
10/13/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 191 Lecture #19 amplifier examples: comparators, op amps. Reminder: MIDTERM coming up one week from today (Monday October.
S. E. Tzamarias The project is co-funded by the European Social Fund & National Resources EPEAEK-II (PYTHAGORAS) KM3Net Kick-off Meeting, Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Cosmic Ray Observatory Project Fr Michael LieblAGU Conference Mount Michael Benedictine High SchoolDecember 6, 2005 Elkhorn Ne
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
High School Cosmic Ray Projects and Training Basalt High School Math and Science Club October 14, 2004.
Energy Distribution of Cosmic Ray Muons Paul Hinrichs With David Lee Advised by Phil Dudero.
Pulse-Height Analyzers Basic Functions Single Channel Analyzers Time Methods Multi-channel Analyzers.
1 Cosmic Rate Overview Rustem DZHELYADIN (CERN&IHEP, Protvino) The Set-up: Scintillating counters HV setting Coincidence adjustment Accidentals.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Measurement of lifetime for muons captured inside nuclei
The Cosmic Ray Observatory Project High Energy Physics Group The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Counting Random Events A “fair” coin is flipped at the.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
Programmable logic device Time-to-digital converters 5 Volt DC power To PC serial port Four analog PMT inputs Discriminator threshold adjust GPS input.
Cosmic Ray Workshop May 15, Cosmic Ray Detector Kit.
Trip-t testing progress report
Status of the ETL 9125FLB Photomultiplier Tubes Steve Bache UNC-Wilmington.
QuarkNet and Cosmic Ray Muon Flux Experiments Florida Academy of Sciences Spring Conference 2009 Alfred Menendez and Michael Abercrombie with Dr. Marcus.
The Cosmic Ray Observatory Project in Nebraska Conference on Teacher Research Experiences University of Rhode Island April 2005 An education and.
Villa Olmo Search for neutrino bursts from gravitational collapse of stars at the Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope Yu.F. Novoseltsev,
A. Zelenski a, G. Atoian a *, A. Bogdanov b, D.Raparia a, M.Runtso b, D. Steski a, V. Zajic a a Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA b.
B.G.Cheon Mini-Trigger/DAQ workshop,OCU ECL Trigger overview ByungGu Cheon (SKKU) Outline  ECL calorimeter  ECL trigger scheme & performance.
The trigger for the New Electromagnetic Calorimeter NewCal Feasibility studies Charles F. Perdrisat February 17,2012.
Performances of the KM2A prototype array J.Liu for the LHAASO Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference,
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
1 Analysis of Small RPC DHCAL Prototype Data (noise and cosmic ray) LCWA09, Albuquerque, New Mexico Friday, October 02, 2009 Qingmin Zhang HEP Division,
External Trigger System PAB To provide straight muon track efficient selection for TPC performance characterization Adjustable geometry for.
NEWCHOD construction ideas I.M. 28/08/2013. Basic considerations: Ideally the NEWCHOD should be “ thin ” and be contained in a light tight box, occupying.
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
E.Gushchin,S.Filippov(INR,Moscow) 16 April 2008Calo commissioning meeting CERN PS/SPD LED monitoring system status General status LED signal is used for.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
The VERITAS Trigger System A. Weinstein 1 for the VERITAS Collaboration 2 CFD x 499 (1 per pixel ) Pattern Trigger Shower Delay ( 1 PDM channel per trigger.
Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97. Real-time Scanning Each pulse generates one line Except for multiple focal zones frame one frame consists of many.
Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97.
Noise Analysis of CMOS Readouot Ciruits
Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97.
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
News on second coordinate readout
Pulse Processing Chapter No. 17
Signal processing Lecture: Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim
The Cosmic Ray Observatory Project (CROP) in Nebraska
Learning Theory Reza Shadmehr
Mathematical Foundations of BME
CLAS 12 Status of the test bench Calculation of the time resolution
Search for anomalous EEE
Digital Circuits for Photon-Counting Pixel Detectors
Presentation transcript:

Accidental Coincidences Learning Objectives Understand the difference between real and accidental coincidences in an experiment using  2 scintillators Understand the relevance of accidental coincidences in CROP experiments Learn how to evaluate the contribution of accidental coincidences to a measurement you are making Aim: minimize accidental vs. real coincidences

Outline Coincidence counting in CROP experiments Typical coincidence circuit set-up Mt. Michael Benedictine High School experience A careful look at accidental coincidence rates Formula for estimating accidental rate Quantitative discussion of Mt. Michael observation Power of adding 3rd, 4th detector in coincidence decision Accidental Coincidences

We will be dealing with coincidences among CROP detectors in almost all measurements. Mini-experiments during the first academic year 1. Cosmic-ray rate (coincidences per second) vs. barometric pressure Vertical telescope 2. Coincidence rate vs. detector separation Extensive air showers Optimization of detector geometry on rooftops Detectors spread horizontally

Accidental Coincidences Typical coincidence circuit set-up Det1 Det2 Analog signals Discriminator Coincidence unit Logic unit Logic pulse Digital, i.e. on or off Logic unit fires when it receives overlapping “on” signals from Det1 and Det2. Det1 Det2 Two overlapping “on” signals Coincidences come from: Real cosmic rays traversing both detectors. Accidental overlap of random triggers in Det1 and Det2. Cosmic rays hitting only one detector. Electronic noise. Each detector has its own “singles rate” which will determine the rate of accidental coincidences.

Accidental Coincidences Mt. Michael Benedictine High School Experience CROP 2000 first-year participating school Mini-experiment Coincidence rate vs. horizontal separation Two detectors only Report at April 2001 CROP meeting at UNL Note constant rate for separation > 5 meters 25 coincidences / 10 minutes  0.04 coincidences / second Real or accidental?

Accidental Coincidences Mt. Michael Benedictine High School Experience

Accidental Coincidences Discriminator threshold scans for 3 detectors Vertical scale: linear Vertical scale: log

Accidental Coincidences Mt. Michael Benedictine High School Experience Data from experiment: 2-fold coincidence rate vs. detector separation in meters

Accidental Coincidences 100 nsec Assume Det1 and Det2 fire their discriminators at random times (4 counts/second) and that the discriminator output widths are 100 nsec. For a typical second, the random firings can happen anytime within that 1 second period. Det1 and Det2 logic pulses from discriminator 1 second 100 nsec width Det 1 discriminator output Det 2 discriminator output A simple, specific example How often, on average, do the Det1 and Det2 signals happen to overlap?

If any Det2 pulse comes within a 2  100 nsec = 200 nsec window of any Det1 pulse, the coincidence unit will fire. Estimate of accidental coincidence rate: S 1 S 2  t Det1 singles rate Det2 singles rate Logic pulse width 4 counts/sec  4 counts/sec  (2  100 nsec) = 3.2  per second General formula: Accidental coincidence rate = S 1  S 2  (2  t) (coincidences/second) !! Formula assumes the two logic pulses have the same width and that the coincidence unit requires minimal overlap to fire!! Accidental Coincidences Close-up view Det1 Det2 100 nsec 200 nsec

Accidental Coincidences Confirm that Mt. Michael’s coincidence rate for separations greater than 5 m is consistent with accidental coincidences. Discuss the power of adding a 3rd and 4th detector in the coincidence decision to drastically reduce accidental coincidence rate.

Accidental Coincidences Counts per 5 minutes Approximately 50 mV threshold chosen for A and B Detector B singles rate = S 1 = 80,000/5 min = 267/sec Detector A singles rate = S 2 = 110,000/5min = 366/sec Predicted accidental coincidence rate: S 1  S 2  (2  t) = 267/sec  366/sec  2  sec = 0.02 / sec accidentals Observed: 0.04 / sec observed coincidence rate We may conclude that all or most of observed coincidences are due to accidentals!! 100 nsec