Gene Tierney Systech

Station Licensing Equipment Ownership Software Hardware Innovation!

Huge challenge in I/M programs  Detecting fraudulent testing  Obtaining sufficient evidence  Prosecuting inspectors and stations  Keeping them out of the program Systech has effective solutions to all of these problems

PIFs are subcontractors to Systech  Cherry pick the best stations Equipment is owned by Systech  No arguments over investment loss To shut down a PIF  No need to suspend, revoke, go to court  Simply remove equipment – done!  Can even remotely block testing instantly Wisconsin and Idaho are doing this  Huge savings in state resources

Dual video cameras in each test lane  One mounted on the monitor  One mounted strategically in the test lane  Observe the inspector testing the vehicle Remote covert auditing of inspectors in real time  Streaming video of inspector logging in Dual biometric login: fingerprint and facial recognition  Streaming video of inspector conducting test  Watch any test from anywhere at anytime  Extract and store still images of inspector and test  Extract and store video of inspector and test

Detect fraud as it is happening Dashboards alert auditors in real time using SysBOARD ™ Customizable dashboards alert auditors to any testing anomaly such as VIN mismatch, monitor inconsistencies and other possible fraud Initiate live video monitoring Prevent fraud Initiate live video chat in response to an alert Warn inspectors that a problem has been detected and will be investigated Stop testing if necessary Find fraud after the fact Software targets suspicious tests for priority review by audit team Records include still and video images, allowing verification of discrepancies

Other key components VIN Kernel™ allows customization of test based on VIN characters Applied Rules Tracking™ captures detailed record of rules applied to each test Statistical Process Control instantly shows when a station falls outside norms

Systech’s fraud prevention and detection far exceed 40 CFR 51 Strong basis for alternative demonstration of compliance Remote visual observation of all inspections Real time option based on trigger alerts or general suspicion Still and video images captured and recorded EPA requirement: once per year Better than traditional covert audits Real-time and after-the-fact monitoring of all inspections of both passing and failing vehicles No fraudulent test need go undetected EPA requirement: one covert audit per year with a vehicle set to fail Very expensive, hard to do, not very effective – why bother? Image and video capture Solid case for adverse action against a station or inspector Comprehensive performance record based on analysis of all vehicle tests rather than one covert test

Main tampering concern Catalyst removal Huge emission impact - dwarfs other tampering Causes MIL illumination unless defeated Two MIL defeat techniques Secondary oxygen sensor simulator sends false signal to ECU ECU is replaced with chip that ignores the secondary O 2 sensor Readily available, cheap and easy to install

Detects performance chips and O 2 simulators Software driven Transparent to inspector and motorist Field tested on over 200 cars and trucks Portland, Oregon Los Angeles, California Additional emission reductions & credits Patent pending