Using higher order questioning in planning and instruction to raise student thinking and engagement Katherine Williams, PhD Advanced Learning Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Learning at Lanyon High B Davies. Groups Previously students were seated around the classroom and were not participating well in the lesson. The structure.
Getting to the Heart of Assessment & Evaluation
Explore Asia at the Zoo Planning a unit of work around bamboo. Jennifer Brown-Omichi Project Officer National Asian Languages and Studies in Schools Program.
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
Department of Mathematics and Science
Comprehensive Balanced Mathematics Model Elementary Okaloosa County School District Dr. Lynda Penry.
Division of Youth Services Oct 26, 2012 Common Core & the Content Areas.
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Inquiry. Goals Get students to think? – Think – Remember – Be life-long learners.
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Part 3: A Blueprint for Thoughtful Questioning The goal for this session is to move our work on four-style questioning deeper by examining the criteria.
“Perhaps many teachers have too little time to allow students to form and pursue their own questions and too much ground to cover in the curriculum and.
EXPLORING PURPOSE AND AUDIENCE WITH MIDDLE LEVEL WRITERS Reasons to Write Alisha Bollinger – 2015 Nebraska Reading Conference.
Activating Prior Knowledge and Interest
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Technology and Motivation
Make Connections while they read
Learning to Think Critically
Learning to Think Critically pages Objectives Define thinking & reflection Identify 3 functions of the brain Describe how thinking impacts decision.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Dr. Ronald J. Anderson, Texas A&M International University 1 Chapter 5 Designs for Problem Solving Teaching with Technology: Designing Opportunities to.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
The Areas of Interaction are…
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
K–12 Session 4.2 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 2: Student Dispositions & Teacher Actions Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Knowledge of Subject Matter OCPS Alternative Certification Program.
The Strategic Teacher and
ATL’s in the Personal Project
By Elisa S. Baccay. The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students’ development of critical thinking, problem.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
BY: MISSY MIRUS ELIZABETH SAWZIN Idealism. Idealism is the earliest philosophy known to man. It originates from ancient India in the East, and to Plato.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
How to use Thematic Units……. The key to successful thematic unit development and teaching is careful and thoughtful planning, combined with a thorough.
Think About It! How to Help Your Kids Read it and Get it!
Teaching Reading Comprehension
BY: MISSY MIRUS ELIZABETH SAWZIN Idealism. Idealism is the earliest philosophy known to man. It originates from ancient India in the East, and to Plato.
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Ken Skrzesz, Coordinator of Fine Arts All Rights Reserved, Kenneth Skrzesz, 2015.
How Students Learn College Teaching Institute Presenter: Monica McCrory The Graduate School.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Stop Learning, and Go Think! Strategies to Challenge Students’ Minds Gem Thomerson, Ed.D.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
C RITICAL T HINKING Alison Wurtz, Kathleen Womelsdorf, Kimberlee.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Inquiry is Magic AQUARIUS: Find a guide who will ask you questions you never expected. Take the road that winds with surprise. Travel with an inquiring.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Inquiry Road Map A Guidance System for 21 st Century Learning By Mary Ratzer.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
Goals and Objectives  Why Use Questioning Strategies?  Effective Questioning Techniques  Levels of Questioning…Increasing Understanding, Models for.
In the Age of Common Core. Close Reading of text involves an investigation of a short piece of text, with multiple readings done over multiple instructional.
Chapter 10:Teaching Thinking Skills
Learning Assessment Techniques
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Instructional Leadership in the Social Studies
Literacy Practice: Promoting Content Area Reading
Chapter 8: Ascending Intellectual Demand in the Parallel Curriculum Model EQ: How does Ascending Intellectual Demand (AID) impact your classroom?
Questioning Makes a Difference
Learning to Think Critically
Creating an Active Learning environment
Creating an Active Learning environment
6th Grade Language Arts and Social Studies Program
In the PYP Iman Mashaal.
Presentation transcript:

Using higher order questioning in planning and instruction to raise student thinking and engagement Katherine Williams, PhD Advanced Learning Programs Consultant

 Skilled questioning  improves a student’s communication abilities and study skills.  results in a more positive student attitude about self and school. Plus, the questioning process  stretches the curriculum vertically and deepens the quality.  stretches teachers out of a comfort level while igniting new interest in “old” subject matter/content.  involves teachers in modeling the process and practice. Why focus on questions?

 So that learners have the opportunity to  think in DIFFERENT ways  ask DIFFERENT kinds of questions  apply what they know in DIFFERENT ways Teacher becomes a Creator of Possibilities

  What is the real purpose for your questions?  Catch what students don’t know/didn’t study?  Nail the class goof-off?  Put the know-it-all in their place?  Make yourself look smarter? Never use questions to threaten, belittle, accuse or “one- up” students – they will see right through you and their performance will NOT improve. Do you teach for questions or teach for answers?

 Get your students ready and use questions to  Find out what they do know  Discover what they feel  Understand what they need  Determine how they think AND Most importantly…  To stimulate and motivate MORE questions! Do you teach for questions or teach for answers?

 Ask these questions to understand the logic and structures of thought that underlie a discipline: QUESTION:  What kinds of questions are asked? What types of problems/issues are addressed? PURPOSE:  What is the main goal of studying the subject? What are the experts within the field trying to accomplish? INFORMATION:  What sorts of information is used in settling questions within the discipline? Elements of Reasoning To learn any subject well is to actively probe its logic with questions.

INFERENCES:  What types of inferences or judgments do the experts in the discipline make? ASSUMPTIONS:  What is taken for granted in the discipline? CONCEPTS:  What are the main ideas, principles, and theories that guide thinking within the discipline? IMPLICATIONS:  How are the products or results of thinking within the discipline used in other disciplines, or in everyday life? POINT OF VIEW:  What viewpoints are fostered within the discipline? Are there multiple viewpoints within the discipline?

 Why use the 8 Elements of Reasoning?  Building blocks of productive thinking  Provide a general logic to reasoning  Assist in making sense of an author or speaker’s reasoning (in document reading or listening activity)  Assists authors and speakers to strengthen their arguments  Assists students with using the “habits of mind” of a scientist, historian, writer, or other specialist practicing in that field

 A Questioning “Balance” 1. On the Line questions (closed) 2.Between the Lines questions (open) 3.Beyond the Line questions (open/divergent)

 On the Line questions:  answers to these questions can be found directly in the text, lesson, or facts already known (Closed) On the Line

 Between the Line questions: To answer these questions  students select clues from the text or lesson, or  use prior knowledge.  some inferences made based on information  process of developing questions based on these inferences will also help shape their understanding of the content (Open or Closed) On the Line Between the Line

 Beyond the Line questions:  usually reflective in nature  questioner is making connections with the content and other concepts or ideas related to the content.  answers to these questions require thought about the implications of the facts and clues. (Open) On the Line Between the Line Beyond the Line

 Moving from On to Beyond – the Questioning Continuum  ON : What is stress?  BETWEEN: How does stress affect the human body?  BEYOND : What stress coping skills would the President utilize during a national emergency?  ON : When were health warnings first put on cigarettes?  BETWEEN : Why did the government require these warnings?  BEYOND: When might the national government be compelled to place warning labels on other products?

 Divergent Thinking:  creative thinking that may follow many lines of thought and  tends to generate new and original solutions to problems The difference is in the ‘Openness’ of the question.

 Between or Beyond? Is it Divergent? Who questions Who questions should engage the students in making choices. What questions What questions should involve students in hypothesizing. When questions When questions should require students to predict. Where questions should have students developing plans. Why questions should use analysis. Which questions should provoke the use of criteria and evidence to make decisions and reason arguments. How questions How questions should compel students to synthesize.

 As a nation, who do we depend on to guide us on health issues? For what reasons? Divergency depends on how much direct instruction has taken place on health information and policies in the US. Between or Beyond?

 What might life be like today if the fast food industry had not been created? Between or Beyond?

 When might the media have more influence on your health than your family? When might your family have more influence than the media? What about friends? Why? Between or Beyond?

 How should you make choices of meals in a restaurant? How should you make choices of foods to purchase in the grocery store?  Are they the same choice strategies? Why or why not? Between or Beyond?

 The types of questions that a teacher asks has a direct impact on student thinking and learning. Good questioning strategies give learners have the opportunity to  think in DIFFERENT ways  ask DIFFERENT kinds of questions  apply what they know in DIFFERENT ways Conclusion

 When you are planning your lessons, focus on the questions you will ask. Use a variety of starters, such as:  Who - engage the students in making choices  What - involve students in hypothesizing  When - require students to predict  Where - have students developing plans  Why – have students analyze  Which - provoke the use of criteria and evidence to make decisions and reason arguments  How - compel students to synthesize Raise the level of questioning and see what happens next! Take the challenge

  VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. (2003). Content-based curriculum for High-Ability Learner. Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press.  Curcio, F.R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, Resources

  Write two beyond questions for a topic your students will be studying next year on index cards.  Use any two starters:  Who - engage the students in making choices  What - involve students in hypothesizing  When - require students to predict  Where - have students developing plans  Why – have students analyze  Which - provoke the use of criteria and evidence to make decisions and reason arguments  How - compel students to synthesize  Share among your table mates – are the questions between or beyond ? Why? Your Turn

 Any questions? High level only!