Annual Disbursement and Commitment Decisions LFA Finance Training 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grant Life Cycle TGF/LOG/150804/1.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
1st Meeting of the Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services Statistics - September 2008 Australia's experience (so far) in.
Karnataka Watershed Development Project Financial Management Arrangements.
 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.
Agricultural Research, Extension and Education Reform Act (AREERA) Program and Administrative Update May 25, 2011.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
Ukraine Grant Making Mission Debrief. Purpose of the mission Agree on reinvestment of savings; Clarify TRP recommendations; Agree on implementation arrangements;
Congratulations on being awarded a grant! NOW WHAT?
Grant implementation STOP TB workshop December 2005.
SPS Open Forum: The new OMB circular and grant/contract close-out.
1 ETCTN phase 2 accrual goal vs minimum requirement in UM1 parent grant supplements  Total budget is $7.2M for supplements and maximum direct costs per.
Project Financial Statements & Quarterly Reports Feb
TEMPLATE PRESENTATION BY THE CHAIR OF THE WORKING GROUP TO CONDUCT THE TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE BUDGET FEBRUARY, 2015 QMPR.
Budgets. On completing this chapter, we will be able to: Understand why financial planning is important. Analyse the advantage of setting budgets- or.
Concept Note development and modular tools
DMH1 Overview of Mental Health Services Act Funding: Collection to Expenditure Tom Greene, Chair, Mental Health Funding and Policy Committee Mark Heilman,
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
1 NEW FUNDING MODEL June New funding model cycle 2 nd GAC Concept NoteGrant Making Board TRP GAC Ongoing Country Dialogue National Strategic Plan/
South Carolina Public Charter School District Performance Framework Dana C. Reed, Assistant Superintendent of Performance Standards Courtney Mills, Director.
Financial management Management and control systems Training for Programme Operators March 2012.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Overview of New Funding Model May 17, 2013 Astana, Kazakhstan.
Release of funds The FC Award for each year releases directly to the Finance Department of the respective States. The Finance Department in turn transfers.
Open Society Institute, Public Health Program Proposal Development and Advocacy Seminar for Eastern and Southern Africa Cape Town, South Africa 18 February.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Kashif Rasheed Manager Finance. Office of inspector General (OIG) Global Fund Secretariat Country Coordination Mechanism (CCM ) Principal Recipients (PR)
February 2, 2011 Joe Yew City of Oakland California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Debt 2: Accessing the Market Debt Policy and Plan of Finance.
Global Fund Assessments Part I: Processes and Tools Geneva – December 2005.
Improvements to Child Care Business Practices CMSM/DSSAB Training - EFIS February 28, 2011.
Grant Agreement Documents (between Global Fund and Principal Recipient) Workshop for TB Experts Hosted by WHO Stop TB and the Global Fund December 2005.
Overview of the Global Fund Procurement and Supply Management Issues Workshop for LAC Consultants th July 2009 Pharmaceutical Management Advisory.
M ODULE 5 PART 1: Introduction to Consolidation of Pharmaceutical and Health Product Management (PHPM) in the SSF Context GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION.
Budget support training Module 5 Transparency and oversight of the budget (Third eligibility criterion) Version October 2013.
Role of the Secretariat The Secretariat will be responsible for the co-ordination and enhancement of research and networking activities within MariFish.
“Progress Update / Disbursement Request” (PU/DR) PSM Section PSM section, R-7 Malaria Sept 17,2011.
RECORDKEEPING & MONITORING. Required Daily Records ◦ Daily attendance rosters or sign-in sheets ◦ Number of at-risk afterschool snacks and/or meals prepared.
Portfolio Committee on Appropriations Quarter 1 Expenditure and Performance 24 August 2012 The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation.
UNICEF SD VII Overview August 2015 Vaccine Independence Initiative 1.
Global Fund Assessments Part II: Understanding Assessment Results Geneva – December 2005.
M ODULE 6 PART 1: Planning and Stakeholder Management GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP DATE.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Kick-Off Meeting, Brussels 22 October 2004.
1 Phase 2 Grant Renewals - March A- Overview A.1- Performance-based Funding Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Proposal Initial Grant Agreement(s)Extension of Grant.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
TIME AND EFFORT NEW FLEXIBILITY GUIDELINES. ALLOCATING PAYROLL COSTS: TIME DISTRIBUTION Rules set out in OMB Circular A-87  Must demonstrate that employees.
1 January 2005 Introduction to Phase 2 and General Update Lesotho CCM.
Audits of Global Fund grants LFA Finance Training Workshop October-November 2013.
Nineteenth Board Meeting Geneva, 5-6 May 2009 Report of the Finance and Audit Committee IMPORTANT INFORMATION Decisions in this presentation may have been.
Updated PU/DR Guidelines and Annual Funding Decision LFA Finance Training October – November 2013.
Board Financial Oversight Governing Board Online Training Module.
LFA expert approval - Conflict of Interest LFA training October-November 2013.
LFA Work in Countries with UN / International Organizations as PR and Fiscal Agents LFA Finance Training Workshop, 2013 October -November 2013.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Risk Differentiation in LFA Deliverables LFA Finance Training October-November 2013.
Thirteenth Board Meeting Geneva, April 2006 Report of the Finance and Audit Committee 1.
Grant Accountability and Transparency Act NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE COMPTROLLERS 2016 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CAROL A KRAUS, CPA.
Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfers (HACT) to Implementing Partners
Introduction/Background Aim of the assessment was to assess the impact of the 3 institutions MOHCDGEC, PO-RALG and MOFP in the flow of funds from national.
New Funding Model (NFM)
4.2 Contract preparation and signature
MANAGING BUDGET FUNDS IN THE REPUIBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
4.4 Procurement by grant beneficiaries
Accountability and Internal Controls – Best Practices
Financial Reporting for SCCF
Recommendations for using this ‘framework’ template
Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfers (HACT) to Implementing Partners
Africa Centers of Excellence Project Financial Management
SPOT CHECKS 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Annual Disbursement and Commitment Decisions LFA Finance Training 2013

What has changed: Grants are now funded by Annual Disbursement Decisions (ADD) with semi-annual reporting cycles (all exceptions need to be approved). The standard forecast is therefore 12 months and can include a buffer which may be extended from 3 months to 6 months to ensure sufficient funds are available for procurement. The disbursement decision process and the release of commitments is combined into one step. Staggered cash transfers are used to release funds to the PR. These are generally on a quarterly or semi-annual basis depending on the size of the grant and the risk context. Shift from milestone-driven monitoring to ongoing risk-based monitoring throughout the grant lifecycle.

Why has it changed: ADDs increase the predictability of funding and reduce the administrative burden for PRs and the GF to process large volumes of disbursement requests. Linking ADDs with annual commitments simplifies internal processes (no requests to release staggered commitments). Committing only the amount that is needed to cover the annual disbursement needs improves forecasting of uncommitted assets in the GF and increases available cash to cover additional funding needs (including the NFM). Phased cash transfers ensures better risk management - reduces cash levels in PRs accounts to support implementation and avoids dormant cash holdings.

How it changes: Place Annual Disbursement and Commitment Decisions: The ADD and commitment schedule should align with the progress reporting period (which in turn should be aligned with the national reporting cycle), plus the buffer period as seen in the diagram below.

How it has changed: Commitment amounts are approved and released at the same time as the disbursement decision is made with the adapted ADMF form. The commitment amount will be equal to the incremental funds needed to cover the disbursement amount. The Global Fund’s PBF principals will be applied when determining the ADD amount. Phased Cash Transfers: these should be used for grants where the average annual budget exceeds $3m. Single Cash Transfers: should be used for grants with annual budgets of $3m or less. Grants remaining on a semi-annual cycle will follow the same schedule and process, but with greater frequency of disbursement decisions. Timing and amount of staggered cash transfers will be established by individual CTs based on the grant risk profile and the forecasted cash transfer amounts. The PR will be notified of the approved ADD amount through a management letter, including the schedule of expected cash transfers.

How has it changed: There is flexibility in the timing and amounts of actual cash transfers as these can be scheduled as: –PR: Quarterly recurring, –PR: Subject to conditions, management actions or pre-approvals, –Direct payments for fiscal agents, auditors fees etc –Direct payments for procurement and VPP transfers. CTs determine if a scheduled cash transfer should be modified, stopped or postponed based on: –Low cash burn rate, –Critical risks identified during on-going grant monitoring, –Minimum Standards not being met by the PR (i.e. audits outstanding), –Actions taken in response to findings and recommendations of the OIG, –Failure to comply with conditions linked to the annual disbursement decision, –Increased cash needs due to accelerated implementation. Simple release procedure (one page approval with FPM & FO signature only)

Detailed Budget & Cash Needs Forecast: What is submitted from the PR: Disbursement request that covers the remaining period of the annual reporting period (i.e. remainder of the program year). Detailed forecast (a Cash Requirement Forecast of 12 months plus buffer). Schedule of when the cash is needed split by quarters Cash Requirement Forecast: The template is given as guidance, the format and the level of details to be refined by CTs; Should be based on latest revised workplan & budget and take into account spending patterns Level of details and depth of review depends on risk, absorption rates, material historical revisions If good forecasts already submitted, adapt for additional information if necessary CTs will evaluate the annual forecast, considering absorption rates, overall performance and capacity of the PR, the risks and mitigation measures before recommending an ADCD amount.

Changes to the Grant Agreement: For those grants that have transitioned, the Grant Agreement and related documents have been amended through an IL. The ILs have been counter-signed by the PR prior to the commitment decision being made. The IL updates, at a minimum, the following: –Face Sheet –Performance Framework –Annex A Updating “Anticipated Disbursement Schedule” and “The Global Fund Staggered Funding Commitment Policy”, Conditions revisions for grants with PUDRs NOT processed in Q1 of If a Board condition needs to be modified for the transition, EGMC approval is required. All other conditions that were tied to the previous disbursement cycle must be reviewed by the CTs and should be modified, if needed, to be: –time-based with specific deadlines –a condition precedent to annual disbursement decision, or –a condition precedent to the use of funds

What is the impact on the LFA? For those grants that have transitioned to ADCD: –The disbursement requests are submitted by the PR annually rather than every 6 months. –The PR’s PUDR includes a 12 month forecast plus, if applicable, a buffer that will range from 3 to 6 months. LFA now reviews a minimum 12 month forecast and makes recommendations on the following: –What the PR can feasibly implement taking into account the PR’s programmatic performance rating, burn rate and associated risks (OIG issues, CP/SCs unfulfilled, audits outstanding etc), –Verification of opening cash balances and commitments, the recommended disbursement amount and when the PR should theoretically require cash transfers stating the individual amounts and expected timing. During the implementation period of the approved ADMF, the CT may request the LFA to confirm the following: –PRs absorption of funds / bank account balances and outstanding commitments, –Outstanding CP/SCs holding up cash transfers have been fulfilled.