C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Advertisements

Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
Contributions to ELI-NP on RF accelerator activities Andrea Mostacci Università di Roma, Sapienza The joint Sapienza/INFN-LNF group is active in the field.
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Damped C-Band structures for ELI_NP proposal D. Alesini (LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy) CERN, 18 July 2012.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
FAST KICKER STATUS Fabio Marcellini On behalf of LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
X-Band Deflectors Development at SLAC
PROPOSAL G.I.A.F. (HYBRID GUN AT HIGH FREQUENCY) INFN-LNF – UNIVERSITY OF ROME “LA SAPIENZA”- UCLA D. Alesini (T), M. Ferrario (R), A. Gallo (T),
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
WP8-HGA High Gradient Acceleration M. Biagini (INFN-LNF) WP8 coordinator Tiara Kickoff Meeting, CERN, Feb , 2011.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
UPDATE ON KICKERS LNF David Alesini for the LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
X-band Based FEL proposal
1 st TIARA Steering Committee A. Gallo – INFN Frascati deputy of TIARA WP8 leader STATUS OF TIARA WP8.
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
CTF3 PROBE BEAM LINAC COMMISSIONG AND OPERATIONS
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
NC Accelerator Structures
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
on behalf of the HCP_AF team
BUNCH LENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR 500 KV PHOTOCATHODE DC GUN AT IHEP
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Recent high-gradient testing results from the CLIC XBoxes
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
Electric Field Amplitude (MV/m)
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
SuperKEKB required (e+ / e-)
Presentation transcript:

C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)

Slice parameter measurements by RFD: principle K cal resolution RFD OFFRFD ON High res. Low res. The different types of measurements that can be done with RFDs are based on the property of the transverse voltage (V DEFL ) to introduce a linear correlation between the longitudinal coordinate of the bunch (t B ) and the transverse one (vertical, in general) at the screen position (y S ).

Slice parameter measurements by RFD: principle RFD OFF RFD ON Typical SPARC parameters Self calibrated meas. The coefficient K cal can be directly calculated measuring the bunch centroid position on the screen for different values of the RFD phase resolution

 N =1 [mm*mrad] f RF =2.856 [GHz]  S =1 m   yB  18  m GeV)   yB  58  m MeV) L Defl-Screen =4 m RF Deflecting structures: SW vs TW performances TW SW or TW SWTW Efficiency per unit lengthHighLow Filling timeslowfast Maximum number of cells1580 CirculatoryesNot Beam impactlowHigh Because of the higher surface electric field, SW multi-cell devices can be used with input power below MW giving V DEFL <10 MV

E, B field profiles RF Deflecting structures: SW case (SPARC RFD) RFD in the LNF oven RFD installed in SPARC Input coupler Active cells SW structures are multi cell devices working, for example, on the  - mode. Theses structures have, in general a higher efficiency per unit length with respect to the TW ones but the maximum number of cells is limited to few tens because of mode overlapping. They requires circulators to protect the RF source from reflections.

P RF Beam deflection f RF =2.856 GHz MODE 2  /3 H Field E Field 2a Backward (H coupling) Forward (E coupling) RF SEPARATORS RFD DIAGNOSTICS CTF3 RFD TM 11 -like RF Deflecting structures: TW case y Direction of deflection Transverse position along the iris [mm] x As in the case of accelerating sections, we have TW and SW cavities. In general RFDs are multi-cell devices working on the TM 11 -like mode. Both the E and the B field contribute to the total deflection. The transverse force is uniform over a wide region inside the iris aperture In TW devices the iris aperture (a) is the most important parameter to fix the deflection efficiency and group velocity

GUN Klystron N°1 ≈ 13 MV/m ACC. SECTION 20 ÷ 22 MV/m ≈ 130 MeV ACC. SECTION PULSE COMPRESSOR ATT 3 dB splitter C-band Station C-band ENERGY COMPRESSOR C-band acc. structures > 35 MV/m 5712 MHz – 50 MW 1.4 m ≈ 90 MW ≈ 180 MW/0.20 μs 2.5 μs Klystron N°2 C/S band RF deflector for post interaction: POWER SOURCES (1/2) Present situation of power distribution

GUN Klystron N°1 ACC. SECTION 20 ÷ 22 MV/m ≈ 130 MeV ACC. SECTION PULSE COMPRESSOR ATT 3 dB splitter C-band Station C-band ENERGY COMPRESSOR 5712 MHz – 50 MW 1.4 m ≈ 90 MW ≈ 180 MW/0.20 μs 2.5 μs Klystron N°2 1  s, f RF =2.856 GHz P in max =15 MW 0.2  s, f RF =5.712 GHz P in max =15 MW After the C-Band energy upgrade C/S band RF deflector for post interaction: POWER SOURCES (2/2)

S-BAND RF DEFLECTOR SW OPTION 1  s, f RF =2.856 GHz P in max =15 MW PS ATT PARAMETERS f [GHz]2656 Number of cells11 Length [m]0.60 Q0Q R T [MΩ]5.5 Input coupling  2.5 Filling time  [ns] 477 Pulse duration T pulse [ns]1100 RF input power [MW]13 Deflecting voltage [MV]9.7 Resolution [fs]29 SWITCH COST [k€] deflector40 Waveguides (~15 m)20 Phase shifter15 Attenuator20 Circulator25 Switch/attenuator25 TOTAL145

C-BAND RF DEFLECTOR SW OPTION PS ATT PARAMETERS f [GHz]5712 Number of cells11 Length [m]0.30 Q0Q R T [MΩ]3.85 Input coupling  3 Filling time  [ns] 150 Pulse duration T pulse [ns]200 RF input power [MW]13 Deflecting voltage [MV]6.5 Resolution [fs]21 SWITCH COST [k€] deflector40 Waveguides (~15 m)20 Phase shifter15 Attenuator20 Circulator25(?) Switch/attenuator20 TOTAL140 (?) 0.2  s, f RF =5.712 GHz P in max =15 MW IF CIRCULATOR AVAILABLE

C-BAND RF DEFLECTOR TW OPTION PS PARAMETERS f [GHz]5712 Number of cells29 Length (with couplers) [m]0.6 Z T [MΩ/m 2 ]12.7 Filling time  [ns] 50 Pulse duration T pulse [ns]200 RF input power [MW]13 Deflecting voltage [MV]6 Resolution [fs]23 COST [k€] deflector40 Waveguides (~15 m)20 Phase shifter15 Attenuator20 Switch/attenuator20 TOTAL  s, f RF =5.712 GHz P in max =15 MW ATT SWITCH

S-BAND VS C-BAND PRO S-BAND SW -standard technology, easy procurement, probably lower cost BUT -nothing new… PRO C-BAND TW -exploring the new technology -synergies with PSI ($?) BUT -spill-out power from acceleration (about 15 MW) -probably critical procurement of standard components C-BAND SW…. similar to TW BUT require Circulator (?)…. NB. Circulator is necessary for C-BAND gun unless to consider other compensation schemes…