Use of IM & NEI Data Trends to Improve Vehicle Emissions Models IM Solutions Salt Lake City April 2014 Jim Lindner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
Advertisements

EPA’s Plan for MOVES: A Comprehensive Mobile Source Emissions Model John Koupal, Harvey Michaels, Mitch Cumberworth, Chad Bailey, Dave Brzezinski U.S.
Impact of MOVES2014 on Emission Inventories from On-road Mobile Sources Alexis Zubrow, Darrell Sonntag, Harvey Michaels, David Brzezinski, Alison Eyth.
European approaches to transport data collection and analysis for strategic policy and impact evaluation TRB 92 nd Annual Meeting Session 824: Transport.
Steve Schwabe Woolpert Project Manager
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
North Queen Anne Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan November 2004.
SEE (Spatial Emissions Estimator): A New Tool for Estimating Link & Zone Emissions with MOVES Presentation for Southeast Texas Photochemical Modeling Technical.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Modelling Motor Vehicle Emissions
Mobile Source Inventories for SIPs Matt Laurita Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section EPA Region 4.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
COPERT 4 Training 3. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
Improvements in Emissions and Modeling of OC and SVOC from Onroad Mark Janssen – LADCO, Mike Koerber – LADCO, Chris Lindjem – EVIRON, Eric Fujita – DRI.
1 Current Issues And Problems Encountered For Projections In The United States And Canada Presented by Ms. Rebecca Lee Tooly USEPA Office of Air Quality.
Emission Factor Development in Thailand Panya Warapetcharayut Director of Automotive Air Pollution Section Air Quality and Noise Management Bureau Pollution.
0 WRAP Member Offroad Retrofit Program Workshop January 27-28, 2005 San Diego, CA.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
“Green” PORTAL: Adding Sustainability Performance Measures to a Transportation Data Archive Emissions Modeling.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
Emission Inventory System Reports Course Sally Dombrowski
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Impacts.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Draft Report Public Workshop #2 August 7, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
MOBILE6 On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Model 5-Day Training Course Presented in Seattle the week of September 10, 2001 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Alexis Zubrow 1, Chris Allen 2, and James Beidler EPA OAQPS and Region 1; 2. CSC.
Overview of Load Reduction Estimates for Atmospheric Sources of Pollutants Richard Countess Atmospheric Deposition SCG Lead September 10, 2007.
Houston-Galveston- Brazoria Conformity Commitments Shelley Whitworth H-GAC.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Sunil Kumar and Eulalie Lucas MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG August 18, 2009 Development of Inputs, Outputs, and Procedures for EPA’s Draft MOVES2009 Model.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Presents/slides/alison/awmapaper1.ppt Alison K. Pollack ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California Rich Wilcox U.S. Environmental Protection.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
WRAP Emission Inventory Status For the Attribution of Haze Project Workgroup Presented by Jeffrey Stocum Oregon DEQ Emissions Inventory Specialist as a.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
European Union emission inventory report 1990–2011 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) EU LRTAP inventory team.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
22 nd CRC Real World Emissions Workshop March 2012 Constance Hart David Hawkins.
1 Air Pollution Automobile Emissions: An Overview Emissions from an individual car
Michael St. Denis, D.Env., Joe Roeschen - Revecorp Inc. I/M Solutions May 20 – 24, 2012 Sacramento, California.
Sunil Kumar MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG January 19, 2010 Review of MOVES2010 Local Data Inputs.
So, I Failed My OBD Inspection! Now What? Or, What is GCAF going to do for ME? (my tag is due tomorrow!), Or I believe in clean air BUT I need to register.
Eastern Research Group Cindy Palacios Tim DeFries Sandeep Kishan Jim Lindner IM Solutions Training Forum Sacramento May 20-23, 2012.
To provide safe, reliable, low cost vehicle solutions assisting our customers to effectively and efficiently meet their mission requirements. Mission.
Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.
I/M Solutions Hyatt Regency Schaumburg Hotel New OBD Parameters & What They Tell Us Gary Beyer, Environmental Engineer Oregon Vehicle Inspection.
Improving Local Inputs to MOVES
Overview of WRAP Emissions Projections
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
MOVES-Based NOx Analyses for Urban Case Studies in Texas
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
CTR Performance 2015/2016 Cycle Aggregate Report
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories
WRAP Technical Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, UT December 5, 2018
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
George Noel and Dr. Roger Wayson
Presentation transcript:

Use of IM & NEI Data Trends to Improve Vehicle Emissions Models IM Solutions Salt Lake City April 2014 Jim Lindner

th CRC Workshop Presentations   Preliminary Analysis on Long Term Deterioration of Tier 2 Vehicles –EPA/OTAQ- Carl Fulper, James Warila, Connie Hart –ERG- Sandeep Kishan, Meredith Weatherby, Michael Sabisch, Tim DeFries, Cindy Palacios –CDPHE- Jim Sidebottom, Jim Kemper  Four State OBD Evap Analysis –EPA/OTAQ- Carl Fulper, Connie Hart, Glenn Passavant, Dave Hawkins –ERG- Sandeep Kishan, Meredith Weatherby, Michael Sabisch, Tim DeFries, Cindy Palacios

Overview  GA Data Trends –2007 through 2012 annual report data  Evaluation & Sensitivity Analysis of MOVES Input Data –2014 TRB Annual Meeting January 13, 2014

GA Data Trends  Multiple years of data ( ) on MY1996+ vehicles –Identify vehicles with both a high failure rate and large number of total inspections as these should be driving the overall OBD failure rate –Individual vehicles that fail in consecutive years would provide information regarding the prevalence of onroad MIL-on

Top 25 M/M/MY Groups with Highest Number of Fails  Highest number of inspections used rather than highest failure rate CY –Capture most frequent failures –And also the more common vehicles in the fleet –Initial test only for this filter  Other –Track individual vehicles using all tests –Track specific DTCs for M/M/MY groups

Calendar Year 2003 MakeModelMY# Insp # Fail % Fail Rank for # Fail Rank for # Insp FORDEXPLORER4-DR %111 FORDEXPLORER %28 HONDAACCORD %32 FORDTAURUS %436 FORDTAURUS %531 TOYOTACAMRY %613 FORD F150SUPERCABSH ORT %729 HONDAACCORD %86 FORDEXPLORER %95 FORDWINDSTAR %10100

CY03 Top 10- % Fail with # Inspected Rank for # Fail % Fail

Calendar Year 2008 MakeModelMY# Insp # Fail % Fail Rank for # Fail Rank for # Insp FORDEXPLORER %130 FORDEXPLORER4DR %241 HONDAACCORD %32 FORDEXPLORER %417 HONDAACCORD %516 HONDAACCORD %610 HONDAACCORD %71 FORDEXPEDITION %831 TOYOTACAMRY %928 NISSANMAXIMA %10100

CY08 Top 10- % Fail with # Inspected Rank for # Fail % Fail

Calendar Year 2012 MakeModelMY# Insp # Fail % Fail Rank for # Fail Rank for # Insp HONDAACCORD %111 HONDAACCORD %27 HONDAACCORD %332 TOYOTACAMRY %441 HONDAACCORD %540 FORDEXPLORER %650 TOYOTACAMRY %713 FORDEXPLORER %8109 NISSANMAXIMA %975 FORDEXPEDITION %10100

CY12 Top 10- % Fail with # Inspected Rank for # Fail % Fail

Evaluation & Sensitivity Analysis of MOVES Input Data  NEI is compiled by EPA every 3 years, covering major pollutants for all sectors and U.S. counties  Draft 2011 estimates recently released  2011 is the first NEI relying solely on MOVES for onroad (outside CA)  States given option to submit complete emissions, or MOVES County Database (CDB) inputs  States are not required to follow EPA’s SIP/Conformity guidance for NEI

Study Objectives  CRC A-84: “Study of MOVES Information for the National Emissions Inventory” –Complete CRC Report:  Task 1: Evaluate state-submitted data –Task 1a: How do methods states used to gather data compare with EPA best practice? –Task 1b: What is the range of data submitted, and how do they compare to MOVES defaults?  Task 2: MOVES sensitivity based on range of state data  Task 3: Recommendations for improvement

MOVES CDBs Analyzed (Dark blue = submitted) Texas CDBs provided by TCEQ 30 states provided data in 1 st round (~1,400 counties)

What is Submitted? MOVES County Data Manager County Data Manager (CDM) allows custom input for following parameters, through MS Excel tables Data entered through CDM“Best Practice” Sources Vehicle Miles TravelledHPMS, Travel models Temperature & HumidityMeteorology data Vehicle PopulationRegistration data, fleets Average Speed DistributionTravel models Vehicle Age DistributionRegistration data, fleets Fuel Properties/Market SharesFuel surveys, fuel regulations Road Type DistributionHPMS, Travel models (VMT source) Fuel Technology MixRegistration data, fleets I/M Compliance/Waiver RatesOperating program data & history CDM interface 15

Analysis of Submitted Data  Focused on 5 primary inputs project to have the largest impact on annual emissions –VMT, Vehicle Population, Age Distribution, Average Speed, Road Type Distribution  Following Examples –Age Distribution –Speed Distribution

Age Distribution Example Distribution of submitted data for Passenger Cars

Speed Distribution: Clusters Cluster analysis of EPA’s Tom Tom data found 13 unique groupings of average speed distribution across roadtype, hour and weekend/weekday MOVES default clusters were similar.

Sensitivity Analysis  Evaluate sensitivity to changes in 5 inputs, while holding other inputs constant –Average Speed & Road Type analyzed in conjunction  Vary inputs based on spread of data submitted by states in first round of 2011 NEI –10 th percentile inputs –Median –90 th percentile inputs –Inputs chosen from submitted county databases  Assess impact on total daily emissions of HC, CO, NOx and PM –Typical July day, Montgomery County, TX

Comparison Across Inputs Change in emissions from 10 th  90 th percentile inputs All source types / clusters

Most influential inputs by source type/cluster >30% Increase >20% Increase

Recommended Improvements  NEI Process –More outreach to states that did not provide data, or provided mostly MOVES defaults –Template for documentation –Sharing of best practices between states  MOVES Inputs –Assist in developing data sources for states –Mine national databases of local data e.g., vehicle registration databases are compiled nationally –Develop capacity with emerging data sources e.g. telematics datasets for speed, trip data

Acknowledgments  GA Repair Data Trends –GA EPD- Pam Earle, Tim Smith, Steve Leydon  Evaluation & Sensitivity Analysis of MOVES Input Data –ERG- John Koupal, Timothy DeFries, Cindy Palacios, Scott Fincher, Diane Preusse