PPAN perspective and the Science Roadmap Jordan Nash PPAN Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT in Piedmont Region.
Advertisements

Panel created in 2001 as part of restructuring of PPARC Advisory Structure One of five advisory panels: Astronomy Advisory Panel (AAP) Solar System Advisory.
Spark NH Council Member Survey October – November, 2012.
The Physics of Nuclei, Nuclear Matter and Nucleosynthesis Report of the Nuclear Physics Advisory Panel.
Strategy for Nuclear Physics Scope and Range of Physics Current Projects Future Projects Other issues Balance of Programme, Theory.
Page 1 Marie Curie Schemes Science is not the whole story! (How to write a successful Marie Curie RTN Proposal) Siobhan Harkin.
Bell Questions 11/11/10 Where are elements that are heavier than hydrogen and helium made? What do we learn from the fact that most of the galaxies are.
Uniformitarianism What is the “textbook” definition of Uniformitarianism? What geologist first came up with the concept of using the present to study the.
Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Particle Astrophysics meeting October 2010 John Womersley Director, Science Programmes, STFC.
Some thoughts on major challenges ahead for AGIS 27 June 2008 AGIS Collaboration Meeting Rene Ong.
The Uncertain Nature of Gravity An Illustration of Science as a Process of Investigating Nature.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (OFES) Perspective Gene Nardella, Acting Associate Director of Science for Fusion Energy Sciences
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
Fundamental Physics and the Decadal Survey Quantum to Cosmos 3 Airlie, VA 7 July 2008 Michael Salamon NASA HQ/Astrophysics Div.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
Philip Burrows IoP HEPP Conference, Oxford 7/4/09 Particle Physics Advisory Panel Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.
1 Opinions on How to Reduce the Decline Rate for SRC Proposals Kenneth K. O December 3 rd, 2012.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar 1 David Toback Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar September 2012 Cosmology.
How to get your proposal funded Tony Readhead - Astronomy.
Strategic Planning and Goal Setting: Overview In this lesson you’ll learn about the: – Importance of Strategic Planning and Goal Setting – Factors that.
Dark Matter Masses of Galaxies Gravity and Light Black Holes What is Dark Matter?
Managing Up Board Governance from the Staff Perspective © MAP for Nonprofits.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Science and Society - the example of the LHC Mike Green Royal Holloway University of London.
Research in Astronomy Prof. David Cohen Swarthmore College January 30, 2004 Resources and Information for Students Sponsored by SWAP.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous - RALIoP HEPP Conference, UCL 29 th March Particle Physics Advisory Panel C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous Rutherford.
Exo-Planet Task Force (ExoPTF) Jonathan Lunine (LPL) Stephen Ridgway (NASA)
Technology planning* … is the process of identifying the ideal role of technology in an organization and mapping the evolution of that role into the future.
Starter/Practice: Next slide 12/17/ /17/2014 Application: Notes Connection: After taking notes on the formation of the universe, how do you.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
SYNTHESIS Unsolved Mysteries 1.Elementary particles patterns? 2.Where is all the anti-matter? 3.Dark Matter? 4.Dark Energy?
What’s going on John Womersley. Outline Particle Physics Grants Round Financial Situation STFC Strategy Why our science matters more than ever.
Particle Physics Advisory Panel Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.
EPSRC Chemistry Grand Challenges ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL Alex Berry, Physical Sciences Portfolio Manager
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
UNITAR SEMINAR – February 22, 2012 Paul Balogun- Consultant
PPAN Programmatic Review Presentation to PP town meeting Jordan Nash.
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
Overview of the Physics R&D Roadmap for Innovative Confinement Concepts S. Woodruff 14th July 2005 Presenting at the PSI-Center Kick-Off Meeting.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Earth and Space Science: What are the Implications and Opportunities for Education? Programmatic decisions Definition of new scientific and education.
Particle Physics Advisory Panel Report to 2013 Town Meeting Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.
Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
S cience M ission D irectorate Research Solicitation Overview.
Philip Burrows PPAP Community Reviews, Birmingham 13/7/09 Community PP science reviews Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford.
News from HOGS Programmatic review Nuclear Physics Travel Meeting with Wakeham Meeting with Ian Pearson STFC Nuclear Physics Advisory Panel Student Travel.
ST9 TPWS OSS Science Needs Overview Robert M. Nelson Lead Scientist New Millennium Program Offcie California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion.
John Womersley PPD Staff Meeting 12 October 2005.
ANNOTATIONANNOTATION Critical Reading Strategy. Why annotate? How many times have you had to read something more than once to comprehend it? How many.
Module 4 Unit 1. Lesson 1 Reading and Talking with Peers: A Carousel of Photos and Texts about…
1 Analyze Top Savings Opportunities Step #7. 2 After completing the screening & sizing tools, you may use the Deep Dive tracker to identify the biggest.
SCI 151 Academic Success /snaptutorial.com For more course Tutorials
Dave Wallace ANDREA CHAPPELL IST September 13, 2012
Presentation to PPAP meeting
for new people new churches in new places for new people in new places
Critical Reading Strategy
P4 : Stellar system formation and life appearance conditions
Community PP science reviews
IT Governance Planning Overview
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Particle Astrophysics Advisory Panel
A Brief History of Cosmology
Community PP science reviews
The Robert Carr Fund’s Strategic Planning Exercise
Building Strong Partnerships
Critical Reading Strategy
Presentation transcript:

PPAN perspective and the Science Roadmap Jordan Nash PPAN Chair

A PPAN Roadmap as input to an STFC roadmap  We are producing an overall roadmap of PPAN science  Use this as a document to put in front of policy makers  highlight opportunities  There will be future spending reviews  Outline our scientific strategy  Much of the work for this has already been done by APs  They have produced excellent documents in consultation with the communities  We wanted to use these as the starting point  We want to put the information in a uniform format  We asked their help in doing this

Advisory Panel Reports Panels identified major scientific challenges, the facilities which could attack these, and some idea of timescales - roadmaps

Advisory Panel reports – Roadmaps

Key elements of the roadmap  The key science questions/themes  About 3-4 for each Advisory Panel  PPAN synthesized distilled  The facilities/experiments/activities for answering these questions  A timeline over the next 20 years of how these could be/will be available  This is often a matrix  The enabling technologies  Any key decision points  Science driven  Funding driven (perhaps external partners)  Technology driven

What we asked the APs to provide  A one page summary  Science questions identified – this is the key to identify  Timeline of facilities/opportunities – potential ways to answer the questions  A few paragraphs of description on the timeline elements

Science Roadmap – the Plan Victoria Wright PPAN 24 th March 2010 Advisory Panels to distil reports to 1 page formatted summary by end of May PPAN to produce draft PPAN science roadmap by end July STFC to produce draft overall science roadmap by September Consultation with community (via APs) on draft science roadmap end September – end November

Advisory Panel questions  The advisory panels provided 18 key questions to PPAN  Many of these questions overlapped  PPAN looked at all of these and condensed these into a smaller set of questions  Identified the overlaps

FUAP Questions  What is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?  When did the first stars, black holes and galaxies form?  Do our laws of physics work under extreme conditions in the Universe?  How do galaxies evolve?

NUAP Questions  How do the Sun and other stars affect their planetary environments?  What controls the properties and evolution of stars, including the Sun?  How are stars born and how do planetary systems in which life may emerge, form and evolve?  What fundamental processes operate in astrophysical sources, including the Solar System?

PAAP Questions  What is the origin and composition of the universe?  What is the nature of space-time?  What is the role of high energy particles in astrophysical environments?  What happens to the laws of physics in extreme environments?

PPAP Questions  What are the elementary constituents of the Universe that were produced in the Big Bang?  Can the forces between elementary particles be understood in a unified framework?  What unknown properties of particles and forces drove the evolution of the Universe from the Big Bang to its present state?  Why is there more visible matter than antimatter in the Universe and what is the origin of this asymmetry?

NPAP Questions  What are the Origins of the Elements?  What is the Nature of Nuclear and Hadronic Matter?

PPAN Mission Statement  The PPAN programme is to understand and explore…  Constituents  Forces  Fabric  Origin and evolution of our universe  and our place in it!  The PPAN programme is to understand and explore…  Constituents  Forces  Fabric  Origin and evolution of our universe  and our place in it!

Questions  Likely to be 4 “Big questions” from PPAN as input to the STFC exercise  They are being wordsmithed, but are likely to cover  Origin and Evolution of the universe  Planetary systems and life  Constituents of universe, fabric, and their interactions  Physics in extreme conditions

Roadmaps  We received 5 roadmaps  Varied style and quantity of content  Don’t want to get caught in the “either your project is on this map, or it is not in the picture” trap  Identify science questions we want to answer  Possible facility/facility classes which can provide answers  Timelines/decision points which influence choices of facilities

PPAP Roadmap

NUAP Roadmap

PAAP Roadmap

NPAP Roadmap

FUAP Roadmap - 1

FUAP roadmap - 2

PPAN Roadmap  For next PPAN (in two weeks) meeting, will work to synthesize the roadmaps  Try and produce a single side of paper which identifies science opportunities in the next two decades which answer our science questions.  We will feed this back for comments

Future Spending Reviews  We have all seen the budget and can read the newspapers.  It is clear the pain we have been feeling in the Science Programme is not yet over  Likely that we will be asked once again to prioritize the science we do.  We probably will have to make even deeper cuts into our highest priority activities  But we have to find some way to keep future activities possible.  Perhaps how the grants are awarded and “ring-fenced” needs to be discussed (Mark will be discussing)  Much will depend on how the numbers actually are settled on in the CSR – lots of variables (STFC/UKSA/Facilities/Subscriptions…)