PHENIX Results from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Brett Fadem for the PHENIX Collaboration Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Advertisements

Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
1Erice 2012, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University.
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
Julia VelkovskaMoriond QCD, March 27, 2015 Geometry and Collective Behavior in Small Systems from PHENIX Julia Velkovska for the PHENIX Collaboration Moriond.
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus Nikhef and TU Darmstadt.
Source Dynamics from Deuteron and Anti-deuteron Measurements in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Hugo E Valle Vanderbilt University (For the PHENIX Collaboration)
Freeze-Out in a Hybrid Model Freeze-out Workshop, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Hannah Petersen.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
K/π and p/π Fluctuations 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics February 2, 2009 Gary Westfall Michigan State University For the STAR Collaboration.
Highlight of PHENIX Results Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University Initial Stages 2014.
Third Moments of Conserved Charges as Probes of QCD Phase Structure Masakiyo Kitazawa (Osaka Univ.) M. Asakawa, S. Ejiri and MK, PRL103, (2009).
8/6/2005Tomoaki Nakamura - Hiroshima Univ.1 Tomoaki Nakamura for the PHENIX collaboration Hiroshima University Measurement of event-by-event fluctuations.
Probability distribution of conserved charges and the QCD phase transition QCD phase boundary, its O(4) „scaling” & relation to freezeout in HIC Moments.
Nu Xu1/17 24 th CBM Collaboration Meeting, Krakow, Poland, September 8 – 12, 2014 Study the QCD Phase Structure at the High Baryon Density Nu Xu (1,2)
ISMD31 / Sept. 4, 2001 Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima Univ. The 31 st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics on 1-7, Sept in Datong, China.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
Measurements of the Charge Balance Function at RHIC from √s NN = 7.7 to 200 GeV Gary D. Westfall, for the STAR Collaboration (Michigan State University)
M. Beitel, K. Gallmeister, CG, arXiv: in collaboration with: M. Beitel, K. Gallmeister and J. Noronha-Hostler - history of Hagedorn States - nuclear.
Using Higher Moments of Fluctuations and their Ratios in the Search for the QCD Critical Point Christiana Athanasiou, MIT 4 work with: Krishna Rajagopal.
Thermal Production of particles at RHIC (Test of Chemical Freeze-out at RHIC) Jun Takahashi for the STAR collaboration SQM2008, Beijing, China.
Nu Xu1/12 ”DNP“, Newport Beach, California, December , 2012 Energy Dependence of the High Moments from Transport Model Simulations Xiaofeng Luo.
Tomoaki Nakamura - Hiroshima Univ.16/21/2005 Event-by-Event Fluctuations from PHENIX Tomoaki Nakamura for the PHENIX collaboration Hiroshima University.
Nu Xu1/20 ”ATHIC2012“, Pusan, Korea, November , 2012 QCD in the Twenty-First Century (1)Higgs (-like) Particle – - Origin of Mass, QCD dof - Standard.
STRING PERCOLATION AND THE GLASMA C.Pajares Dept Particle Physics and IGFAE University Santiago de Compostela CERN The first heavy ion collisions at the.
Matter System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.
Higher moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions at RHIC energies in STAR Nihar R. Sahoo, VECC, India (for the STAR collaboration) 1 Nihar R. Sahoo,
Third Moments of Conserved Charges in Phase Diagram of QCD Masakiyo Kitazawa (Osaka Univ.) M. Asakawa, S. Ejiri and MK, PRL103, (2009). Baryons’10,
HuaZhong Normal University IWND09, August 22~25, Shanghai 1 Event-by-Event Fluctuations of Net-Baryon Distribution and Higher Order Cumulants ZHOU You,
Xiaofeng Luo1 / 26 RBRC Workshop, BNL, USA, Feb , 2015 Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in High Energy Nuclear Collisions at RHIC Xiaofeng.
Study of the QCD Phase Structure through High Energy Heavy Ion Collisions Bedanga Mohanty National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER)
M. Oldenburg Strange Quark Matter 2006 — March 26–31, Los Angeles, California 1 Centrality Dependence of Azimuthal Anisotropy of Strange Hadrons in 200.
Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus Nikhef and TU Darmstadt.
Lecture 10 : Statistical thermal model Hadron multiplicities and their correlations and fluctuations (event-by-event) are observables which can provide.
Study the particle ratio fluctuations in heavy- ion collisions Limin Fan ( 樊利敏 ) Central China Normal University (CCNU) 1.
0 Comparative study for non-statistical fluctuation of net- proton, baryon, and charge multiplicities Dai-mei Zhou (IOPP/CCNU) 2014 CBCOS Workshop for.
Probing QCD Phase Diagram with Fluctuations of conserved charges Krzysztof Redlich University of Wroclaw & EMMI/GSI QCD phase boundary and its O(4) „scaling”
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Energy Dependence of ϕ -meson Production and Elliptic Flow in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Md. Nasim (for the STAR collaboration) NISER, Bhubaneswar, India.
Search for the QCD Critical Point Gary D. Westfall Michigan State University For the STAR Collaboration Gary Westfall for STAR – Erice,
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Search for a Possible QCD Critical Point using the STAR Experiment Click to edit Master subtitle style Heavy Ion Collisions in the LHC Era, Quy Nhon, Vietnam,
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
Masakiyo Kitazawa ( Osaka U. ) Diffusion of Non-Gaussianity in Heavy Ion Collisions MK, Asakawa, Ono, arXiv: SQM, Birmingham, 23, July 2013.
Search for QCD Critical Point at RHIC Bedanga Mohanty National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER) Outline:  Phase diagram of QCD  Observables.
BB Hadronic matter Quark-Gluon Plasma Chiral symmetry broken x Exploring QCD Phase Diagram in Heavy Ion Collisions Krzysztof Redlich University of Wroclaw.
R ECENT RESULTS ON EVENT - BY - EVENT FLUCTUATIONS FROM RHIC BEAM ENERGY SCAN PROGRAM AT STAR EXPERIMENT Nihar R. Sahoo (for the STAR Collaboration) Texas.
Bulk properties of the system formed in Au+Au collisions at √s NN = 14.5 GeV using the STAR detector at RHIC Vipul Bairathi (for the STAR Collaboration)
Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,
Hyperon Polarization in Heavy ion Collisions C. C. Barros Jr. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brasil Strangeness in Quark Matter 2013 University.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
Systematic Study of Elliptic Flow at RHIC Maya SHIMOMURA University of Tsukuba ATHIC 2008 University of Tsukuba, Japan October 13-15, 2008.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO JPS RHIC symposium, Chuo Univ., Tokyo Hadron Production at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration.
QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo Saturation of E T /N ch and Freeze-out Criteria in Heavy Ion Collisions Raghunath Sahoo Institute of.
24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.
Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.
A possible signature of QGP phase transition probed by density correlation and fluctuation Tomoaki Nakamura RIKEN 2007/1/12 Heavy Ion Cafe.
PACIAE model analysis of particle ratio fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions Limin Fan ( 樊利敏 ) Central China Normal University (CCNU) 1 第十五届全国核物理大会.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook PHENIX Measurements of Correlations at RHIC 1 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
@ Brookhaven National Laboratory April 2008 QCD Critical Point and Its Effects on Physical Observables Schematic Consideration Masayuki ASAKAWA Department.
ENERGY AND SYSTEM SIZE DEPENDENCE OF CHEMICAL FREEZE-OUT
Christoph Blume University of Heidelberg
Collective Dynamics at RHIC
The Study of Elliptic Flow for PID Hadron at RHIC-PHENIX
Xiaobin Wang (for the STAR Collaboration)
Heavy Ion Physics at NICA Simulations G. Musulmanbekov, V
Presentation transcript:

PHENIX Results from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Brett Fadem for the PHENIX Collaboration Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 2016

Topics With regard to the Beam Energy Scan: – Transverse Energy and Charged Particle Multiplicity – Combinations of Higher Order Cumulants of Net Charge – Combinations of HBT Radii 2

Mapping the QCD Phase Diagram 3 Models suggest: At high T and low μ B, transition is a smooth crossover At low T and high μ B, transition is first order

Transverse energy production and charged particle multiplicity √S NN Au + Au Cu + Cu Cu + Au D + Au 3 He + Au 200 ✔✔✔✔✔ 130 ✔ 62.4 ✔✔ 39 ✔ 27 ✔ 19.6 ✔ 14.5 ✔ 7.7 ✔ Physical Review C 93,

Transverse energy per participant is not constant vs. centrality 5

Transverse energy per quark participant IS constant vs. centrality 6

Excitation Functions – No non- monotonic behavior observed 7

There is a change in the transverse energy per charged particle at LHC energies relative to RHIC Plateau 8 Transverse energy from CMS, and N ch from ALICE

Second Topic: 9 Phys. Rev. C 93, (R) (2016) Measurement of higher cumulants of net-charge multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at √S NN = GeV

Correlation Length Motivated examination of Event-by-event fluctuations of various conserved quantities, such as: Net baryon # Net charge Net strangeness at critical end-point (CEP) in the thermodynamic limit Motivation 10

Using Lattice QCD Next to leading order Taylor series expansion around vanishing chemical potentials Cumulants of charge fluctuations are sensitive indicators of a transition from the hadronic to the QGP phase 11

Variances: Net-baryon # Net-charge Net-strangeness Where N is the multiplicity, and is the mean of the distribution 12

Higher cumulants are even more sensitive to the proximity of the CEP Skewness Kurtosis 13

Lattice QCD + Hadron Resonance Gas Model Cumulant ratios are independent of volume but are sensitive to kinematic acceptance [Phys.Lett. B726 (2013) ] 14 Should show non- monotonic behavior when approaching the critical end point

Uncorrected Net Charge Distributions √S NN (GeV) Analyzed Events2M6M21M154M474M1681M 15

Efficiency corrected cumulants 16

Dependence of Corrected Cumulant Ratios on Number of Participants 17 Weak dependence on number of participants

Higher moments in net-charge Multiplicity Distributions vs. √S NN No non- monotonic behavior observed 18 ( Green triangles are from cumulant theorem for difference of two Negative Binomial Distributions) Consistent with earlier STAR result [Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, (2014)] but PHENIX points have smaller statistical error.

Extraction of Freezeout Temperature and Baryon Chemical Potential from PHENIX Cumulants + Lattice 19 √S NN T f (MeV)μ B (MeV)T f (MeV)μ B (MeV) 27166±6181±21160±6184±21136± ±5114±13156±5118±10101± ±571±8159±574±866.6± ±827±5159±825±722.8±2.6 PHENIX + A.Bazavov et al, and S. Mukherjee PhysRevLett 109, (2012) PHENIX + S. Borsanyi et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, (2014) STAR + S. Borsanyi et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, (2013)

Baryon chemical potentials match thermal statistical model using identified particle yields 20 Thermal Statistical Model from J. Cleymans, Phys. Rev. C 73, (2006)

Topic 3 21 HBT – Beam-energy and system-size dependence of the space-time extent of the pion emission source produced in heavy ion collisions. arXiv:

Define a new parameter to characterize the collision system 22 Note that, for central collisions, the initial Gaussian radius for the collision system Here, of the participants (in the x-y plane) in the collision derived from a MC-Glauber simulation. are the RMS widths

HBT Correlation Functions 23 Pair-coordinate system (Bertsch NPA498, Pratt PRD33) Correlation function: q long is along beam q out is along k T (average P T direction) q side is perpendicular to other two Coulomb corrected, and in LCMS frame:

Correlation Functions 24 Slices of the 3D two-pion (π + π + and π - π - ) correlation fcns.

Combos of HBT Radii 25 Non-monotonic behavior IS observed! arXiv: Sensitive to emission duration R long related to medium lifetime

Summary – Topic 1 Transverse Energy and Charge Multiplicities – E T per constituent quark participant is constant for all centralities, but E T per nucleon participant is not – The constituent quark model can account for all E T with no need to resort to a two part N part and N coll model – LHC E T per charged particle rises above the RHIC plateau 26

Summary – Topic 2 Measurement of higher cumulants of net- charge – No non-monotonic behavior observed in the net- charge cumulant combinations – Data are consistent with STAR Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, , albeit with smaller error bars – Lattice QCD has been combined with PHENIX cumulants to produce freezeout temperature and baryon chemical potential that matches a thermal statistical model with identified particle. 27

Summary – Topic 3 Non-monotonic behavior is seen when plotting the above HBT quantities vs. √S NN 28 and

Backup 29

30 Slide from Mike Tannenbaum:

31