APPROVED CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP Evaluation

EVALUATION PROCEDURES w Clinical Site w ACI Performance w Student Performance Overall student assessment Clinical proficiency skills

ACI PERFORMANCE EVALUATION w Assists in the evaluation of the ATEP w Informs the ACI of performance expectations w Determines the ACI’s competency w Examines the ACI’s teaching style w Identifies strengths and weaknesses

ACI PERFORMANCE EVALUATION cont. w Defined rating scale w Opportunity to make general comments w Report major strengths and weaknesses w Appropriate signatures

ACI PERFORMANCE EVALUATION cont. w Formal Evaluation by the ATS w Formal Evaluation by the CIE

CLINICAL SITE EVALUATION w Provide information regarding the general quality of the clinical site w Included on the ACI Performance Evaluation tools

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT w Information regarding general performance w Feedback for the student Expectations w Feedback for the ACI Discussions w Objective information for grading purposes

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont. w Goals Sheet w Interaction Forms Weekly Physician w Self- Evaluation w Formal Evaluation w Continuous Evaluation

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont. w Methods of scoring and recording student performance Checklists Rating Scales Anecdotal Records Mental Records

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont. w Defined rating scale w Opportunity to make general comments w Report major strengths and weaknesses w Appropriate signatures

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont. w Technical Standards Observation Communication Motor Conceptual-Integrative and Quantitative Analysis Behavioral/Social Attitudes w Documentation achieved through the Formal Evaluation tools

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS w Documentation of skill acquisition w Level of ability w Progression over time w Feedback on instructional techniques and the quality of clinical instruction

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont. w Inform students of the following: the skills that will be evaluated how the skills will be evaluated the grading criteria

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont. w 6 Levels Observational Level Level I (Clinical Education I) Level II (Clinical Education II) Level II (Clinical Education III) Level IV (Clinical Education IV) Level V (Clinical Education V) w Academic credit

Fall SemesterSpring Semester Observational ATS Management of Medical Emergencies Acute Care and Injury Prevention with Lab Medical Documentation and Pharmacology Level I ATS Orthopedic Assessment I – Lower Extremity with Lab Therapeutic Modalities with Lab Clinical Education I Level II ATS Orthopedic Assessment II – Upper Extremity with Lab Rehabilitation Techniques in Athletic Training with Lab Clinical Education II Level III ATS Orthopedic Assessment III – Head, Spine, and Trunk with Lab Intervention and Referral for the Physically Active Diseases and Disabilities in the Physically Active Clinical Education III Level IV ATS Administration and Professionalism in Allied Health Clinical Education IV Level V ATS Clinical Education V

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont. w Skill performance criteria required elements are described and prioritized explanation of each element critique a sample skill performance w Lickert scale passing score is 3 or greater

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont. w Structured assessment controlled environment 1:1 w Natural assessment clinical setting includes cognitive, psychomotor, and affective skills w Holistic Scoring most basic scoring least objective w Analytical Evaluation based on cognitive, psychomotor, and affective skills

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont. w 5 = SUPERIOR - The ATS performs the skill at a superior level including all of the following: selects appropriate methods of stabilization applies an effective stabilization device to prevent further injury demonstrates confidence in abilities possesses general knowledge of the skill w 4 = GOOD - The ATS performs the skill at a good level by selecting an appropriate and effective method of stabilization and they possess general knowledge of the skill, however; they lack confidence in their abilities. w 3 = FAIR - The ATS performs the skill at a fair level by selecting an appropriate and effective method of stabilization but they lack confidence and general knowledge of the skill. w 2 = POOR - The ATS performs the skill at a poor level by selecting an inappropriate and ineffective method of stabilization. w 1 = The ATS is unable to complete the skill.

QUESTIONS???