IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process 2015 www.iup.edu/middlestates www.iup.edu/middlestates 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Advertisements

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Middle States Periodic Review Report Campus View SUNY Cortland PRR Committee SUNY Cortland Cortland, New York.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
MIDDLE STATES COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION: REACCREDITATION D ECENNIAL S ELF -S TUDY P ROCESS A CADEMIC S ENATE S EPTEMBER 17, 2015 Anne Wahl Michael.
Preparing and Planning for Self Study Washington & Jefferson College November 2010.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Middle States Self-Study Process : 2013 College Senate SUNY Oneonta October 15, 2012.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Review, Reflection, and Renewal MSCHE and NJCU Decennial Self-Study SELF-STUDY FALL 2009 SITE VISIT SPRING 2010.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 4: A Learner-Centered Campus Standards 8 and 9 Chapter 5: A Vibrant Faculty Standard 10.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
The NJIT Accreditation Process: Launching the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Self Study Presentation to Committee on Academic Affairs September.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
Self-Study 2010: Review, Reflect, and Renew. The Accrediting Process  A means of self-regulation  Intended to strengthen and sustain the quality higher.
2018 Institution Self Evaluation Report (ISER) Joanne Whitaker and Sunny Pai Co-Chairs for ISER September 12, 2016.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process

Co-Chairs of IUP MSCHE Steering Committee Hilliary Creely Laura Delbrugge 2

What is Middle States? The Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and improvement through accreditation via peer evaluation. Middle States accreditation instills public confidence in institutional mission, goals, performance, and resources through its rigorous accreditation standards and their enforcement. 3

Middle States Accreditation at IUP Consecutive MSCHE accreditation at IUP since its first review in 1941; most recent review in IUP will address fourteen MSCHE Standards of Excellence as part of a thorough and engaged process of institutional reflection, the Self Study. 4

Goals of the Self Study Process Earn reaffirmation of accreditation after a meaningful and participatory review process. Address the 14 Standards of Excellence as defined by Middle States in an IUP context. Review analytically, and with a balance between positives and negatives. Keep university strategic visioning and planning processes in mind during the Middle States review. 5

IUP since the last MSCHE review in 2005 Since 2005 there has been significant turnover in University leadership, including five presidents and five provosts. The Residential Revival and KCAC have changed the campus landscape. New academic buildings, dining halls, and parking areas will continue this development trend for years to come. In 2005, IUP had only recently been “wired” in all offices. Many IUP employees did not yet use on a regular basis. In 2005, there was no IUP Daily or “Beyond Expectations.” (Facebook was only one year old). Student enrollment was 14,081. IUP enjoyed more financial flexibility due to greater support from PASSHE and a relatively easier economic environment. 6

Self-Study Participants Co-Chairs of Steering Committee Self-study writer Steering Committee (members also can serve as Subcommittee co-Chairs) Subcommittees (diverse membership from across campus constituency groups) Data Collection Point Person Students, Staff, Faculty, Administration University leadership University community and Indiana community 7

Middle States 14 Standards of Excellence 1.Mission & Goals 2.Planning, Resource Allocation, & Institutional Renewal 3.Institutional Resources 4.Leadership & Governance 5.Administration 6.Integrity 7.Institutional Assessment 8.Student Admissions & Retention 9.Student Support Services 10.Faculty 11.Educational Offerings 12.General Education 13.Related Educational Activities 14.Assessment of Student Learning 8

Grouping Standards Comprehensive Review (like 2005) 2005 Review had 14 Subcommittees Review will have 7 Subcommittees Subcommittees will have people and appointments will be made with cross-campus representation in mind. 9

IUP MSCHE Subcommittees SUBCOMMITTEETOPICCO-CHAIRS Subcommittee 1 (Standards 1 & 6) Mission, Goals and IntegrityBill Balint & Fredalene Bowers Subcommittee 2 (Standards 2 & 3) Planning, Resource Allocation, Institutional Renewal and Institutional Resources John Kilmarx & Shari Robertson Subcommittee 3 (Standards 4 & 5) Leadership, Governance, and Administration Edel Reilly & Yaw Asamoah Subcommittee 4 (Standards 8 & 9) Student Admissions, Retention and Support Services Kate Linder & Jack Makara Subcommittee 5 (Standards 10 & 11) Faculty and Educational OfferingsRamesh Soni & Steve Hovan Subcommittee 6 (Standards 12 & 13) General Education and Related Educational Activities Terry Appolonia & Gail Wilson Subcommittee 7 (Standards 7 & 14) Institutional Assessment and Student Learning Assessment Tim Runge & Barbe Moore 10

Timeline TERM STEERING COMMITTEE FORMS Spring 2013 PRE-PLANNING  Steering Committee Formed  First meeting of Steering Committee May 7, 2013 Summer 2013  Self-study organizational model chosen  Subcommittees Chairs selected; appointments to Subcommittees begin  Some draft research questions created by Co-Chairs  IUP Middle States website created  Data sharing wiki chosen (Confluence) YEAR 1SUBCOMMITTEES FORM AND WORK BEGINS Fall 2013  MSCHE 2015 Review Process communicated to IUP community  Subcommittee appointments finalized  Steering Committee and Subcommittees finalize Research Questions; Communication plan finalized  Initial meetings of Subcommittees (September/October)  Self-Study Design finalized by Steering Committee before December 15  Self-Study Design sent to MSCHE staff liaison by December 31 (will be revised in Spring 2014 during visit from MSCHE Staff liaison ) 11

Spring 2014  Site visit by MSCHE Staff liaison to review Self-Study Design; revisions made  Subcommittees request Data and begin analysis YEAR 2DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS BY SUBCOMMITTEES/ CREATION OF DRAFT SELF-STUDY REPORT Fall 2014  Subcommittees continue to collect and analyze data  MSCHE Master Survey conducted via Qualtrics to IUP community  Subcommittees submit drafts of Chapter Outlines to Steering Committee Spring 2015  Subcommittees finalize data analysis  Steering Committee makes recommendations to Faculty writer by May 15 Summer 2015  Faculty writer synthesizes report and drafts Self-Study Report YEAR 3 CREATION OF THE FINAL REPORT AND ON-CAMPUS MSCHE TEAM VISIT Fall 2015  Self-Study Report (revised draft version) shared with IUP Community  Final Self-Study Report Submitted to MSCHE by November 30  MSCHE Evaluation Team Chair visits IUP campus (December) Spring 2016  MSCHE Evaluation Team site visit  MSCHE sends its evaluation report to IUP 12 Timeline (Con’t.)

Ways to get involved Consider submitting your name for a subcommittee by responding to the campus-wide invitation (sent in early September). If you are a supervisor encourage members of your team to participate. Participate in surveys Participate in public forums Review draft documents when made available to the public and offer feedback Read updates in the IUP Daily Visit the website for info 13