Chris Feltham Head of Road Safety Engineering London Road Safety Unit Transport for London Road Safety Audit and Pedestrian Guardrailings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A34 Corridor Strategy Strategic Route Improvements 25 th November 2004 working together with.
Advertisements

A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Forest Practices Code Transition Roads With Ron Davis Chief Engineer, MOF.
Mitigation for Air Quality in the Planning System: case study and lessons learnt Dr Clare Beattie.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY What needs quick thinking and concentration? Intersection, junctions, roundabouts & U turns all require your.
Sidewalk Bikeways: A Safety Problem, Not a Safety Solution.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Workshop for Setting Regional and National Road Traffic Causality Reduction Targets in the ESCWA Region 16-17June, 2009 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Advancing Active Transportation In Toronto ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility and Healthy Communities Summit December 2, 2014 Carol Mee, Toronto Public Health.
SPEED LIMITS 2011 Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Jody Colvin.
6-1 Lesson 6 | Practice RSA. Perform a practice-RSA of a design-stage or an in-service road. Analyze data acquired from site visit or design plans and.
1 Diagnosis of road accident problems Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 6 hrs.
Wimbledon Station - a station fit for Chris Chowns (Principal Transport Planner) Nick Greenwood (Transport Planning Manager) LB of Merton Transport.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration Road Diet (Roadway Reconfiguration) Every Day Counts 3 Innovative Safety Initiative.
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date SCOOT MMX (Multi-Modal 2010) Presented by Alan Stevens TRL.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
Lec 14, Ch.8, pp : Intersection control and warrants (objectives) Know the purpose of traffic control Know what MUTCD is and what’s in it Know what.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
TRANED2010TRBPPTjgs MOBILITY SCOOTERS AND USER CHARACTERISTICS AT CROSSINGS AND INTERSECTIONS John G. Schoon University of Southampton, Transportation.
Welcome to London Head of Delivery Planning, TfL Lilli Matson.
Research | consulting | technology safety and efficiency in transport through knowledge Moving people and freight in the urban.
Diagnosis of Sites with Potential for Safety Improvement 1 Module 4 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise,
1 Development of countermeasures Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 6 hrs.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Center for Advanced Transportation Education and Research University of Nevada, Reno Presenter: Cui Zhou University of Nevada, Reno Center for Advanced.
FHWA10/1/ MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REWRITE AND OUTREACH EFFORT TARGET DATE: 2001.
Embedding Travel Planning in the Development Process Sarah Cummings Behaviour Change Transport for London.
Enhancing Highway Safety: Applications of the Human Factors Guidelines (HFG) for Road Systems Presentation to the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Western Association.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 13 (Some of these pictures show bicyclists not wearing.
Town of Cobourg Division Street Improvements Public Information Centre October 1, 2015 Image Courtesy of Google 2015.
Scrutiny Presentation Local Transport Plan and Active Travel Strategy 24 th October 2013 Andy Summers and David Burt.
Introduction Study area Existing problem Objective Methodology Results and Conclusions Recommendations.
E MESE MAKÓ, PhD Associate professor Department of Transport Infrastructure Szechenyi Istvan University, Gyor, Hungary Evaluation of Human.
Safety Signs. Traffic Light Ahead Slow down and prepare to stop.
Traffic Signs Part Two. What do these 2 signs tell you?
Improving Streets and Public Spaces In SE15 Presentation by Southwark Living Streets to Nunhead & Peckham Rye Community Council 8th November 2010 Presentation.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Using Key Performance Indicators for traffic management and Intelligent Transport Systems as a prediction tool Vienna, 23 October 2012.
Incorporating Road Safety Audit into Development Control Kevin Nicholson Principal Consultant.
Introduction Training. Training contents Introduction What is LXRMTK? How can LXRMTK be used? Where can LXRMTK be used? Who can use LXRMTK? History of.
Presenter’s name Presenter’s title. Contents The current situation Reducing collisions in London [INSERT ORGANISATION NAME]’s policy How we’re helping.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Delivery and Servicing Plans Central London FQP 16 th February 2011 Ian Wainwright – Freight Policy Officer Better Routes and Places Transport for London.
Overview Interim Advice Note 85/06 Minor Improvements to Existing National Roads Development of Approach / Issues Identified NRA TA 85/11 Guidance on.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY PROBLEMS WITHIN ROAD TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Nikolay Georgiev eng. Violina Velyova ‘Todor Kableshkov’ University.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
Chris Kennedy, Martin Sachs, Mark Stephenson
Peckham & Nunhead Community Council: Important Issues For Pedestrians
International Good Practices in Global Overview of Road Safety Initiatives, Targets, and Indicators Soames Job June 2017.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Identify/define problem
Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP) (OIF/OEF)
Tasnim Rabee’ Nagham Dmaidi
Discussion Topics How does the traffic engineer solve traffic problems? Why do we say traffic engineering is a “3E” technique? Responsibility, ethics,
Effects of Oncoming Vehicle Size on Overtaking Judgments
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
GATE SAFETY Traffic gates on JMU campus are for vehicles only. Do not cross beneath gates that are up as they may come down without warning. James Madison.
Promoting Walking in Bermondsey
Establishing Safe and Realistic Speed Limits
Safety Audit Components
Road Infrastructure Design for Older Road Users
CE Typical crash rates and distributions
Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP) (OIF/OEF)
Proposed Driscoll Expansion Brookline, Massachusetts
New Zealand Transport Agency
Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP) (OIF/OEF)
The Use Of Hard Shoulders As A Turning Lane: A Safety Evaluation
Project Location: 35th Ave HSIP8
Presentation transcript:

Chris Feltham Head of Road Safety Engineering London Road Safety Unit Transport for London Road Safety Audit and Pedestrian Guardrailings

Pedestrian Guardrailing Southampton University TSG carried out research for TfL, measuring the safety benefits of guardrails at a variety of sites.

There were situations where guardrails appeared to have a measurable positive effect, particularly for pedestrian collisions at pedestrian crossings. At other situations benefits were not so clear. Pedestrian Guardrailing

TfL engineers have discussed the results with and have produced guidelines for the installation/removal of guardrails Pedestrian Guardrailing

A ‘risk sheet’ has been developed to identify and provide a systematic assessment of main factors (e.g. pedestrian flow, carriageway width, casualty history) The completed assessment will indicate whether removal or provision of guardrail is:  not advised  could be removed (intelligently)  is not a problem

Testing of the assessment method was conducted at real sites. Discussions are still continuing on the design, weightings and conclusions drawn by the ‘risk sheet’. Collision rates are difficult to incorporate. The balance between ‘prescriptive guidance’ and ‘engineering judgment’ is critical to the success of the ‘risk sheet’. Pedestrian Guardrailing

Our policy is to encourage the use of the 3M’s when reviewing pedestrian guardrail

Pedestrian Guardrailing Managed: There is an auditable process trail.

Pedestrian Guardrailing Measured: Issues such as flows and casualties are monitored before and after any change.

Pedestrian Guardrailing Guardrail Risk Assessment Form Form A : Site Collision Analysis

Pedestrian Guardrailing Guardrail Risk Assessment Form Form B : Site Characteristics

Pedestrian Guardrailing Guardrail Risk Assessment Form Form C : Site Specific Analysis 1.Nature of Area 2.Level of Service 3.Existing Crossing Facilities 4.Crossing Usage 5.Carriageway Width 6.Road User Inter-Visibility 7.Number of Traffic Lanes 8.85 th Percentile Speeds 9.Peak Two-Way Traffic Counts 10.Turning Movements

Pedestrian Guardrailing Guardrail Risk Assessment Form Form D : Site Summary

Pedestrian Guardrailing Mitigated:If safety is likely to be degraded by removal, then other measures should be used to mitigate this (e.g. measures to reduce average vehicle speed)