Machine-Detector Interface 2 Applying G4beamline Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. June 27, 2011 TJR1Machine-Detector Interface 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

December 10, 2008 TJRParticle Refrigerator1 The Particle Refrigerator Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. A promising approach to using frictional cooling for reducing.
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
TJR 12/12/2004G4BeamlineSlide 1 G4Beamline A “Swiss Army Knife” for Geant4 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
June 13, Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology June13, 2003.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
14 User Documents and Examples I SLAC Geant4 Tutorial 3 November 2009 Dennis Wright Geant4 V9.2.p02.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
TJR 11/03/2003Slide 1 g4beamline A “Swiss Army Knife” for Geant4 Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology.
14 Overview of Geant4 Examples 2 nd Finnish Geant4 Workshop 6-7 June 2005 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
14 User Documents and Examples II SLAC Geant4 Tutorial 17 May 2007 Dennis Wright Geant4 V8.3.
Prajwal T. Mohan Murthy Laboratory for Nuclear Science, MIT νDM Group Spin-Light Polarimeter for the Electron Ion Collider EIC Users Meeting 2014 Jun 2014.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
Dec 11, 2008S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. Muon Collider Design Workshop.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
User Documents and Examples I Sébastien Incerti Slides thanks to Dennis Wrigth, SLAC.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
MINERVA Identifying Particle Tracks nneLynne Long University of Birmingham With thanks to Tom McLaughlan & Hardeep Bansil An exercise for students in the.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
1 Muon Collider Backgrounds Steve Geer Fermilab Steve Geer MC Detector & Physics DOE June 24, 2009.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Accelerator Based Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Mar 2, 2011 MAP Winter Meeting at JLAB 3/2/20111S. Kahn--Backgrounds at a Muon Collider.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Status of Beam Halo/Gas Simulation A.Stradling(Wisconsin) P. Steinberg(BNL) G. Usai (Chicago) Standard Model Group 6 December 2006 A.Stradling(Wisconsin)
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Muons, Inc. TJR NuFact06 August 28, 2006G4BeamlineSlide 1 G4Beamline A “Swiss Army Knife” for Geant4 Tom Roberts Muons,
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
SoLID Background Update Zhiwen Zhao UVa 2013/11/08 1.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
Backgrounds in the Muon Collider Experiments Adam Para, Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting, SLAC, March 8, 2012.
G4beamline Introduction and New Features A “Swiss Army Knife” for Geant4. Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Januaary 23, 2014 TJRG4beamline1.
Mitchell Yu Carol Guimaraes Arturo Fiorentini York University 2013/11/22 NuStorm Near Detector Flux Study.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
MINERVA Z Mass Exercise
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
MAP 2014 Spring Workshop Fermilab May, 2014
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Machine-Detector Interface 2 Applying G4beamline Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. June 27, 2011 TJR1Machine-Detector Interface 2

Outline Quick Introduction to G4beamline –Why use it for MDI simulations G4beamline Capabilities Relevant to MDI Simulations –All the major physics processes –Extensibility Validation of G4beamline, comparison to MARS Initial Background Studies Neutrino-Induced Backgrounds Neutrino-Induced Physics Opportunities Conclusions June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 22

Quick Introduction to G4beamline - 1 G4beamline is a particle-tracking simulation program based on the Geant4 toolkit [ All of the Geant4 physics lists are available, modeling most of what is known about particle interactions with matter. It is capable of very realistic simulations, but of course the effort required increases with the detail involved. G4beamline is considerably easier to use than setting up a C++ program using the Geant4 toolkit. The program is optimized to model and evaluate the performance of beam lines. –It has a rich repertoire of beam-line elements. –It has general-purpose geometrical solids and fields so you can construct custom elements (e.g. an electrostatic septum, multi-function magnets, complex absorbers). –It lets you easily lay out elements along the beam centerline. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 23

Quick Introduction to G4beamline - 2 The system is described in a simple ASCII file: # example1.in physics QGSP_BERT beam gaussian particle=mu+ nEvents=1000 \ meanMomentum=200 \ sigmaX=10.0 sigmaY=10.0 \ sigmaXp=0.100 sigmaYp=0.100 # BeamVis just shows where the beam starts box BeamVis width=100.0 height=100.0 \ length=0.1 material=Vacuum color=1,0,0 place BeamVis z=0 virtualdetector Det radius= color=0,1,0 place Det z= rename=Det1 place Det z= rename=Det2 place Det z= rename=Det3 place Det z= rename=Det4 Visualization is included out-of-the-box Includes a user-friendly histogram tool: HistoRoot. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 24

Quick Introduction to G4beamline - 3 Several tutorials and many examples are available on the website. Extensive documentation and online help. Its user interface is designed to be easy to use by physicists. G4beamline is Open Source, and is distributed for Windows, Linux, and Mac. It is currently in use by hundreds of users around the world. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 25

Why Use G4beamline to Simulate Backgrounds? It provides a new perspective independent of MARS. Its input is flexible and straightforward, designed to make it easy to explore alternatives. –Command-line parameters make it easy to scan values Geant4, and thus G4beamline, already has the major physics processes. –Missing are those related to the intersecting beams. G4beamline is highly extensible: –Detailed and complete internal documentation –Internal modularity makes it easy to add new features –Register/callback structure – most new features are wholly contained in a single source file June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 26

Outline Quick Introduction to G4beamline –Why use it for MDI simulations G4beamline Capabilities Relevant to MDI Simulations –All the major physics processes –Extensibility Validation of G4beamline, comparison to MARS Initial Background Studies Neutrino-Induced Backgrounds Neutrino-Induced Physics Opportunities Conclusions June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 27

Validation of G4beamline G4beamline is based on Geant4, which has extensive validation efforts. G4beamline Validation is documented in The physics processes most important to modeling backgrounds have been validated in various ways: Particle transportNeutron transport Hadronic interactionsElectromagnetic interactions Particle decaysSynchrotron radiation Photo-nuclear interactionsPair production Bethe-Heitler mu pairsNeutrino interactions Minor discrepancies remain for some physics processes. This is an ongoing effort. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 28

Comparison of G4beamline and MARS June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 29 G4BL neutron data should fall off as the Mars data does. We are looking into this. Work in progress Particle fluxes as a function of radial position.

Outline Quick Introduction to G4beamline –Why use it for MDI simulations G4beamline Capabilities Relevant to MDI Simulations –All the major physics processes –Extensibility Validation of G4beamline, comparison to MARS Initial Background Studies Neutrino-Induced Backgrounds Neutrino-Induced Physics Opportunities Conclusions June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 210

Background Sources Electrons from muon decays. –8.6×10 5 muon decays per meter for each beam ( GeV, 2×10 12 each). –These electrons are off momentum and will hit beam elements and shower. Synchrotron radiation from decay electrons. Photo-nuclear interactions. –This is the source of hadron backgrounds. This is largely neutrons. Pair production: γ A ➞ e + e − X –Source is every surface exposed to γ from the beam. –Geometry and magnetic fields are designed to keep them out of the detector. Incoherent pair production: µ + µ − ➞ µ + µ − e + e − –Source is the intersecting beams –~3×10 4 pairs expected per beam crossing. –Detector magnetic field should trap most of these. Beam halo. Bethe-Heitler muon production: γ A ➞ µ + µ − X –Source is energetic photons on beam elements and shielding material. Neutrinos from muon decays interacting in the detector and surrounding shielding. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 211

Strawman Detector Concept June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 212 One quadrant is shown.

TOF Histograms at Selected Planes TOF for particles at planes –N2 (r=5) near nose cone –N6 (r=47) in middle of tracker –N9 just inside calorimeter June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 213 e+e−γne+e−γn (Vertical axis is particle type: e +, e −, γ, n.)

Particle Fluxes (r=47 cm) as a Function of Cone Angle June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 214 Particle fluxes at r=47 cm Minimum particle kinetic energy: 200 keV

Particle Fluxes vs. Radius for a 10° Cone June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 215

Synchrotron Radiation from 500 GeV Electrons June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 216 There will be ~8.6×10 5 muon decays per meter for each beam, per crossing. Fortunately, they are highly collimated and good design can control them. This is a major reason for the tungsten cones in the forward directions.

There is LOTS more to do This is a major, ongoing effort that is just starting. MANY details need to be explored. Some background sources still need to be examined. Halo muons are particularly challenging –They penetrate anything in their path –They depend on the details of the storage-ring lattice –The fields in magnet return yokes are important –Need to consider several hundred meters around the crossing, perhaps the entire ring Etc. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 217

Outline Quick Introduction to G4beamline –Why use it for MDI simulations G4beamline Capabilities Relevant to MDI Simulations –All the major physics processes –Extensibility Validation of G4beamline, comparison to MARS Initial Background Studies Neutrino-Induced Backgrounds Neutrino-Induced Physics Opportunities Conclusions June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 218

Neutrino-Induced Backgrounds New physics process in G4beamline: neutrino interactions It interfaces to the Genie Monte-Carlo generator It applies an artificial interaction length to specified materials, and sets the weight appropriately. This code can also model neutrino-induced radiation, energy deposit in magnets, etc. A 1,000 GeV ν μ has a mean free path in Pb about 10 earth diameters (large, but not light years!). June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 219

Neutrino Interaction Rate Estimate Simple geometry: a ring with a 10 T uniform field. Assume a detector 5 meters in radius and 12 meters long, 50% iron (this is mostly the calorimeter). Assume 2×10 12 muons per beam. Muon-decay neutrinos are tracked into the iron cylinder, accounting for the ring’s path length pointing at the detector, and the weights of interactions. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 220 Beam EnergyRing RadiusNeutrino Interactions per Crossing GeV250 m27% TeV500 m38%

Basic Characteristics of the Neutrino Background Interactions appear anywhere near the midplane, proportional to mass (including calorimeter, rock, supports, shielding, etc.). They cannot be shielded. They are in-time with the crossing to within tens of ns. –Actual timing depends on the detailed geometry. –All are early, but some can be very close to in time. They are centered on the plane of the storage ring, with a vertical sigma of ~1.3 cm at 1.5 TeV (~1.8 cm at 750 GeV), plus the beam divergence. The neutrinos come in from the end caps, and do not point at the crossing; they can interact anywhere, not just the end caps. Every one I looked at has a hadronic + EM shower. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 221

A “Typical” 1 TeV Neutrino Interaction in Fe This is a TeV ν μ coming in from the left. Its shower is ~3 meters long, ~½ meter in diameter, and contains ½ million tracks. This is a charged-current interaction, with 56% of the energy leaving in a single muon. It has 39 delayed neutrinos from stopping π + decay (green tracks). All neutrons are omitted. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface GeV μ + Tracks: Positive Neutral Negative

Dealing with the Neutrino Background Good timing will help a lot – a 1 ns cut will identify most of them. Location will also identify most of them – essentially all are within a few cm of the midplane, on the outer side. Interactions that occur in the downstream end cap with small radius will be challenging: –Very close to in time –Point reasonably close to the crossing –The only clue may be that they are near the outer midplane Robustness of the detectors should be considered, as these multi- hundred-GeV showers could approach MHz rates, in a relatively small volume near the midplane. Need to apply the background Monte Carlo to various detector design(s). June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 223

Neutrino-Induced Physics Opportunities A muon collider is also a neutrino factory on steroids. –But it’s difficult to get significant L/E for oscillations. A small neutrino detector near a muon collider could exceed the world’s supply of events in just a few hours. These will be very high-energy neutrino events, in significant numbers –For a TeV collider, 19% are above 1 TeV. Indeed the calorimeters of the muon collider detector(s) may be all that is needed (with a neutrino trigger). June 27, 2011 TJR24Machine-Detector Interface 2

Conclusions G4beamline is a useful tool for exploring backgrounds in a muon collider detector. G4beamline (Geant4) is reasonably accurate and realistic, and getting better. The backgrounds at a muon collider are highly challenging, and need to be well understood early enough to influence many aspects of detector design. Neutrino interactions can be studied at very high energies with high statistics using a muon collider as a source. June 27, 2011 TJRMachine-Detector Interface 225