A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 IEEE MBWA Standard Project Contribution: C xx Date: May RF Performance Evaluation Criteria Dan Gal

Advertisements

New Radar Technology MHz Band

Presentation to Radiocommunications Agency 16 June 2000 BFWAtg(00)39.

11th February 2000 BFWAtg(00)12. Structure of the presentation u Study objective and approach u BFWA characteristics u Interference analysis (worst case)

7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)

IUCAF SUMMER SCHOOL 2002 MITIGATION TECHNIQUES MITIGATION FACTORS - what is it? what is it good for? by Klaus Ruf.

Introduction to Wireless Communications. Wireless Comes of Age Guglielmo Marconi invented the wireless telegraph in 1896 Communication by encoding alphanumeric.

Summary of Path Loss in Propagation

COPS-GOP-WS3 Hohenheim 2006_04_10 Micro- Rain- Radar Local Area Weather Radar Cloud Radar Meteorological Institute University Hamburg Gerhard Peters.

ECE 5233 Satellite Communications

Ron Milione Ph.D. W2TAP W2TAP InformationModulatorAmplifier Ant Feedline Transmitter InformationDemodulatorPre-Amplifier Ant Feedline Receiver Filter.

SSC Page 1 Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies Presentation to FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003 Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company.

TRANSMIT SPECTRUM ISSUES MANUFACTURERS MEETING AUGUST 2004 Peter Woolner Mitretek Systems

Multiple Criteria Optimisation for Base Station Antenna Arrays in Mobile Communication Systems By Ioannis Chasiotis PhD Student Institute for Communications.

Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.

EMI in an RQZ: the need for buffer zones Carol Wilson, CSIRO Research Consultant RFI2010, Groningen.

Korea University Ubiquitous LAB. Chapter 2. RF physics Ph.D Chang-Duk Jung.

Microwave Filters Filters allow some frequencies to go through while block the remaining In receivers, the system filters the incoming signal right after.

Remote Sensing Microwave Remote Sensing. 1. Passive Microwave Sensors ► Microwave emission is related to temperature and emissivity ► Microwave radiometers.

Doc.: IEEE /0402r2 Submission May 2012 Haiming Wang, Xiaoming PengSlide 1 Date: Authors: Overview of CWPAN SG5 QLINKPAN.

Device Noise Two figures of merit for noisy devices

Calculator functions 1 WRAP 0966B. Calculator functions in WRAP Different calculation functions in different dialogues Geographical calculations General.

10. Satellite Communication & Radar Sensors

Frequency Sharing Study between FWA & FSS in the band MHz David Bryant Wireless Networks Presentation to UK W-LAN Advisory Group (Sharing &

Doc.: IEEE /0143r0 Submission January 2004 Steve Brunson & Bob Soranno (JHU/APL)Slide 1 Improved Adjacent Channel Rejection Parameters to solve.

Airborne RLAN and Weather Radar Interference Studies at C Band Paul Joe 1, Frank Whetten 2, John Scott 1 and Dennis Whetten 2 1 Environment Canada 2 The.

Amplitude Modulation 2.2 AM RECEIVERS

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.

CHAPTER 2 Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS. Introduction AM demodulation – reverse process of AM modulation. Demodulator: converts a received modulated-

1 Emerging issues Titus Spoelstra ESF Committee on Radio Astronomy Frequencies P.O.Box 2, 7990AA Dwingeloo, Netherlands

Dept. of EE, NDHU 1 Chapter Five Communication Link Analysis.

By Ya Bao1 Antennas and Propagation. 2 By Ya Bao Introduction An antenna is an electrical conductor or system of conductors Transmission - radiates electromagnetic.

Oct. 23, 2006 Midterm Marked. –Average: 73%. 6 below, 9 above –Answer Key posted: s/nten216/Tests/NTEN216_Midterm1WithAns.

Charles L Wrench RCRU FMCW radar performance and cost.

RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.

CHAPTER 2 Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS. Introduction AM demodulation – reverse process of AM modulation. Demodulator: converts a received modulated-

EumetCal Examples.

AM RECEPTION Introduction

BASIC LINK BUDGETS SATELLITE LINKS

Microwave Motion Sensor Modules (DNS-000 Series) ■ Features - X-Band Microwave Motion Sensor Module - * Used a RF the Microwave Sensor. * The up-to-date.

Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.

Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue

Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:

RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.

From you host … Dr. H. Introduction Communications design requires us to think about the following issues: Communications design requires us to think.

Doc.: IEEE RR-02/036 Submission March 2002 Rebecca Chan, Industry CanadaSlide 1 Simulation on Aggregate Interference from Wireless Access Systems.

1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.

1) A binary transmission system uses a 8-bit word encoding system. Find the Bandwidth and the SNR dB of the system if the channel capacity is bps.

8.5 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

 This chapter describes how the link- power budget calculations are made.  In this text [square] bracket are used to denote decibel quantities using.

Aero3G PROPOSED GENERIC MASKS FOR DA2GC Objective:

Radar Range Equation.

Noise Figure vs. IP3 Skip Crilly CTO, Cellular Specialties, Inc.

Ultra Wideband UK Test Results Presented by John Mettrop UK CAA

A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,

Satellite uplink and downlink Analysis and Design

LRTC 3.4 – 3.8 GHz Ericsson input PT1 XO 29 – 31/

Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS

Point-to-Multipoint Coexistence with C-band FSS

Net425:Satellite Communications

Net425:Satellite Communications

5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service

Submission Title: Link Budget for m

Feed & Front End PDR—Sys. Reqts

Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)

KFPA CDR R. Norrod Feb 27, 2008.

RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China

Presentation transcript:

A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil 1.Dutch C-band radars 2.Radar characteristics 3.Criterion 4.DA2GC transmission characteristics 5.DA2GC Aircraft Station influence on radar 6.DA2GC Ground Station influence on the radar 7.Conclusions

1. Dutch C-band radars EADS – TRML-3D/32 Raytheon – PATRIOT Weather radars

2. Radar characteristics Specific radar features are not used in the study, rather parameters from ITU-R M.1638 [1], in particular Radar N and Radar O CharacteristicsRadar NRadar O FunctionInstrumentation Platform typeGround Tuning range (MHz) ModulationPulse/chirp pulseChirp pulse TX power into antenna1.0 MW165 kW Pulse width (µs) (plain) (chirp) 100 Pulse rise/fall time (µs) Pulse repetition rate (pps) Chirp bandwidth (MHz) RF emission bandwidth (MHz) at: -3 dB -20 dB Antenna pattern typePencil Antenna typePhased Array Antenna polarizationVertical/Left-hand circular Antenna main beam gain (dBi) Antenna elevation beamwidth (degrees)1.0 Antenna azimuth beamwidth (degrees)1.0 Antenna rejection (1st SLs and remote SLs) (dB) -22 Antenna height (m)20 Receiver IF 3 dB bandwidth (MHz)2-88 Receiver noise figure (dB)115 Minimum discernible signal (dBm)-107,

P n = F k T s B [W] F : receiver noise figure k : Boltzmann’s constant (1.38× [J/K]) T s : system noise temperature [K] B : instantaneous bandwidth [Hz]. 3. Criterion ITU recommendation on allowed I/N ratio was followed: Interference level 6 dB below the receiver noise power level Radar agility band DA2GC Radar in-band has been investigated (DA2GC out-of-band)

Characteristics Aircraft StationGround Station Maximum transmit power (dBm) 2825 Maximum antenna gain (dBi) 1723 Max EIRP (dBm) 45 Antenna height (m) 3000 – Automatic transmit power control (dB) 30 Channel bandwidth (MHz) 20 (TDD) 10 (FDD) 20 (TDD) 10 (FDD) 4. DA2GC transmission characteristics

5. DA2GC Aircraft Station influence on the radar An additional suppression of 24 dB is required to avoid interference of the radar to occur due to DA2GC Aircraft Station out-of-band transmissions (-40 dB is not good enough) Several worst case assumptions have been followed.

6. DA2GC Ground Station influence on the radar The separation distance has been determined, assuming Propagation loss, using the ITM Ground Station Antenna Elevation Pattern A distance separation of at least 9.5 km should be taken into account.

7. Conclusions 1.Unwanted emissions in radar instantaneous band has been considered. 2.Blocking should also be considered (out-of-radar-band), as known from experience with 2.65 GHz UMTS-LTE and ATC-radar (2.7 – 2.9 GHz). An additional band-pass filter appears to be effective. 3.An additional suppression of the OOB DA2GC emissions of 19 – 24 dB is required. 4.Interference potential within10 km around every DA2GC Ground Station. 5.Is there a spectral mask for the DA2GC Aircraft Station? 6.Interference potential is significant.