Gas Electron Multiplier

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Triple-GEM detector operation for high-rate particle triggering W. Bonivento, G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, C. Deplano, P. de Simone, F. Murtas, D. Pinci,
Advertisements

GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Standard GEM Charging Up Simulation: First test of the approach Matteo Alfonsi, Gabriele Croci, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Rob Veenhof, Marco.
1 MUON TRACKER FOR CBM experiment Murthy S. Ganti, VEC Centre Detector Choice.
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University 4/10/ th RD51 collaboration meeting.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
GEM Detector Shoji Uno KEK. 2 Wire Chamber Detector for charged tracks Popular detector in the particle physics, like a Belle-CDC Simple structure using.
E-field calculations for the TPC/HBD N. Smirnov Upgrade Working Group Meeting 05/13/03, BNL.
1 VCI, Werner Riegler RPCs and Wire Chambers for the LHCb Muon System  Overview  Principles  Performance Comparison: Timing, Efficiency,
Proportional Counters
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
RF test of the GEM detector prototipe Detector description RF test area (LINAC3) detector working conditions RF field measurement Detector measurements.
Status of simulation studies of IBF for GEMs
TRAINING COURSE ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY: Instrumentation 1 – Gas detectors / Part 1 Anthony WAKER, University of Ontario Instutute of Technology Wed. 21/11/2012,
Chamber parameters that we can modify and that affect the rising time Number of ionisation clusters produced in the drift gap: Poisson Distribution Probability.
1 Small GEM Detectors at STAR Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
June 9, 2008What’s a Drift Chamber? Mac Mestayer Drift Chambers: The Science behind the Art What are they? how do they work? ionization of the gas by particles.
Prototypes For Particle Detectors Employing Gas Electron Multiplier
GEM: A new concept for electron amplification in gas detectors Contents 1.Introduction 2.Two-step amplification: MWPC combined with GEM 3.Measurement of.
Test Beam the μ-RWELL Test Beam the μ-RWELL G. Bencivenni (a), R. de Oliveira (b), M. Gatta (a), G. Felici (a), G. Morello (a), M. Poli Lener (a) (a),
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
High Energy Physics Group Department Of Physics Banaras Hindu University Prakhar Garg (A. Kumar, A. Prakash, B.K Singh, V. Singh & C.P Singh)
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
Development of a TPC for the Future Linear Collider on behalf of the LC TPC groups Aachen, Berkeley, Carleton, Cracow, DESY, Hamburg, Karlsruhe, MIT, Montreal,
Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) S. Dalla Torre, Elena Rocco, L. Ropelewski, F. Tessarotto May – August 2007.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
マイクロメッシュを用いた 高増幅率型 μ-PIC の開発 Development of  -PIC using micro mesh 1. Introduction 2. Test operation of prototype 3. Simulation studies 神戸大学 越智 敦彦、桂華.
マイクロメッシュを用いた 高増幅率型 μ-PIC の開発 Development of  -PIC using micro mesh 1. Introduction 2. Test operation of prototype 3. Simulation studies 4. Summary 神戸大学.
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
PNPI R&D on based detector for MUCH central part (supported by INTAS ) E. Chernyshova, V.Evseev, V. Ivanov, A. Khanzadeev, B. Komkov, L.
Summer Student Session, 11/08/2015 Sofia Ferreira Teixeira Summer Student at ATLAS-PH-ADE-MU COMSOL simulation of the Micromegas Detector.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
CLAS12 Drift Chamber Prototyping
Quality control for large volume production GEM detectors Christopher Armaingaud On behalf of the collaboration GEMs for CMS.
A.Ochi*, Y.Homma, T.Dohmae, H.Kanoh, T.Keika, S.Kobayashi, Y.Kojima, S.Matsuda, K.Moriya, A.Tanabe, K.Yoshida Kobe University PSD8 Glasgow1st September.
Construction and beam test analysis of GE1/1 prototype III gaseous electron multiplier (GEM) detector V. BHOPATKAR, E. HANSEN, M. HOHLMANN, M. PHIPPS,
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
Report on very preliminary measurements of 10x10cm 2 Triple-GEM detectors with New Single Mask technique Overview Hole geometry Experimental setup Transparency.
Results on a Large Area triple-GEM Detector at LNF 5 th RD51 Collaboration Meeting Freiburg, 25 May 2010 D. Domenici - LNF.
Single GEM Measurement Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci and Bat-El Pinchasik June 25 th 2008 GDD Meeting 1.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
GEM-MSTPC for direct measurements of astrophysical reaction rates H. Ishiyama 1, K. Yamaguchi 2, Y. Mizoi 3, Y.X. Watanabe 1, T. Hashimoto 4, M.H. Tanaka.
Thorsten Lux. Charged particles X-ray (UV) Photons Cathode Anode Amplification Provides: xy position Energy (z position) e- CsI coating 2 Gas (Mixture)
Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
First results from tests of gaseous detectors assembled from resistive meshes P. Martinengo 1, E. Nappi 2, R. Oliveira 1, V. Peskov 1, F. Pietropaola 3,
Comments on 2mm MWPC pitch
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
GEM and MicroMegas R&D Xiaomei Li Science and Technology
Activity of CERN and LNF Groups on Large Area GEM Detectors
Dept. of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology
Single GEM Measurement
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
Same geometry, but different size of the rim
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
TPC Paul Colas Technical meeting, Lyon.
Ion Detectors and The Proportional Detector
MWPC’s, GEM’s or Micromegas for AD transfer and experimental lines
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Work report Miao NanNan
Engineering Design Review
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Gaseous detectors at the LHC experiments: GEM technology (lesson #3)
Presentation transcript:

Gas Electron Multiplier GEM DETECTORS Gas Electron Multiplier Bat-El Pinchasik, Technion Israel

GEM detectors main element GEM foil Terminals 10 cm Kapton (polyimide) copper-clad on both sides Millions of holes!

GAS ATMOSPHERE CO2+ Argon GEM CATHODE ANODE DRIFT REGION INDUCTION REGION segmentation Tracking, Triggering Etc..

Field lines Induction field Drift field GEM foil Electrons follow the field lines Drift field GEM foil In the holes: high density of field lines 500 volts 50μm Induction field Electrons gain energy!

Electrons are shared between bottom GEM and anode Simulation: Ions CATHODE Electron-Ion pair Drift field Top GEM Bottom Electrons are shared between bottom GEM and anode Induction field Gain of the detector ANODE

Area covered by a detector Advantages Detector Area covered by a detector Cost (per area) Rate capability Aging process GEM detector $$ Low aging Wire chamber $ Gain loss and discharges increase Silicon detectors Noise and leakage current increase

Standard GEM Conical GEM First invented in 1998 Double conical geometry Used already in several experiments Conical GEM 42.5µm 98.9µm copper kapton Recent development! Easy to produce larger detectors low cost per area

Glance from above Standard GEM Conical GEM- Top Conical GEM-Bottom Internal & External diameter 140 µm Conical GEM- Top Conical GEM-Bottom Larger diameter smaller 140 µm

Does a conical GEM have the same characteristics? See the difference Large conical GEM foil 60 cm 10 X 10 cm Does a conical GEM have the same characteristics?

GAS ATMOSPHERE CO2+ Argon CATHODE Voltage over the GEM ANODE Drift field ANODE Induction field Anode current

Electrons end up in Top GEM Drift field scan GEM voltage: 500 volts E induction: 3 (kv/cm) plateau Recombination Electrons end up in Top GEM

Integration over distance Gain vs. GEM voltage Gain Integration over distance Townsend coefficient Field & gas properties α Gain of the detector Log scale E induction: 3kv/cm E drift: 2 kv/cm Gem voltage (volt)

Electrons distribution Induction scan Electrons distribution I anode (normalized) Increasing induction field More electrons get to the anode Higher signal E induction (volt/cm)

Conclusions Results Conical GEM has similar performance as standard GEM Advantages Low cost Larger area Easy to fabricate Conclusion Conical GEM is an attractive candidate to future LHC upgrades

Current applications COMPASS TOTEM LHCB LHCB muon And the future?