2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios January Contents Purpose of Test Scenarios3 Completed Work4 Current Work5 Using a Narrative Test Case Scenario to Develop.
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.
2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
The Standards Rule and the NPRM for Meaningful Use John D. Halamka MD.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Presented By: HCN Clinical Operations. The goal of this presentation is to demonstrate how to correctly document within Intergy EHR v9 to: Improve Patient.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division Proposed Rule Standards & Certification Criteria 2014 Edition.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
TWS July 2011 New Crop eRx Comprehensive Electronic Prescribing System.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 7 Introduction to Practice Partner Electronic Health Records.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup February 21, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Jessica Jacobs September 15, Ambulatory providers are physicians who perform the majority of their services outside the hospital – No more than.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Maine Health Information Technology (HIT)Status Report for MaineCare and Office of the State Coordinator for HIT Project Team: Andy Coburn Cathy McGuire.
Your Guide. Table of Contents Welcome to MyChart…………………………….…..3 How to Sign Up………………………………… MyChart Homepage (navigating through MyChart)……...
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division 2014 Edition Standards & Certification Criteria Final Rule.
Special Topics in Vendor-Specific Systems EHR Functionality This material (Comp14_Unit4) was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department.
© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Electronic Health Records Lecture a – Introduction to the EHR This material Comp3_Unit15 was developed.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
History of Health Information Technology in the U.S. The HITECH Act Lecture b – Meaningful Use, Health Information Exchange and Research This material.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Special Topics in Vendor-Specific Systems
Presentation transcript:

2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT

Contents Development3 Workflow Review4 Overview5 Overview: Workflow6 Overview: Workflow Descriptions7 Overview: Workflow Assumptions8 Group 1: Scenarios9 Encounter: Intake Workflow10 Encounter: Interoperability Intake Workflow11 Encounter: Care Ordering Workflow12 Encounter: Care Results Workflow13 Encounter: Post-Care Workflow14 Example: Encounter: Intake15 Group 2: Scenarios16 Next Steps17 2 ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT

Development 3 ONC plans to develop the 2014 Edition Test Scenarios in two groups ONC released the Group Edition Draft Test Scenarios in September They are available on ONC’s websiteONC’s website Group 2 will be developed in 2014 ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps Script Development Proof of Concept Group 1 Draft Scenarios Released Pilot Approved Group 1 Scenarios Available Group 2 Development DRAFT

Workflow Review 4 After the test scenario pilot this spring, ONC outlined a larger workflow for the 2014 Edition Test Scenarios The workflow follows a patient from their initial contact with a provider’s office or hospital through their care and follow up It also follows a provider or hospital through public health and clinical quality measure reporting The workflow is a framework for testing products using a series of clinically-plausible scenarios ONC has outlined what criteria could be met by each scenario The pilot scenario is included in this workflow The workflow was reviewed with ONC clinical experts ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps ONC is asking for your feedback on the concept, structure, and usability of the following Group 1 Draft Test Scenarios. DRAFT

Overview 5 Group 1 #Scenario Name Criteria Included 1Encounter: Intake a3, a5, a6, a7, f1, a11, a13, a17, f5, a4 2Encounter: Interoperability Intakeb1, b4 3Encounter: Care Ordering a1, a2, b3, a10, a16 4Encounter: Care Results a12, b5, a8, a15, a9, e2 5Encounter: Post-Carea14, b7, b6, e3, e1, b2 Development: July 2013 – February 2014 Group 2 #Scenario Name Criteria Included 6Reporting c1, c2, c3, f2, f3, f4, f6 7Privacy & Security d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6, d7, d8, d9 8System g1, g2, g3, g4 Development: 2014 ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT

Overview: Workflow ONC has drafted a clinically-plausible workflow to guide the development of the 2014 Edition Test Scenarios This workflow is intended to represent one way that all of the 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria could be included in a clinically-plausible workflow The draft workflow includes 8 scenarios 6 ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps Considerations: It does not represent the only way unit tests could be linked in a clinical workflow It does not imply anything about how providers should use CEHRT It only addresses the 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria Future editions of the certification criteria could allow ONC to develop scenarios addressing other concerns DRAFT

Overview: Workflow Descriptions 7 Group 2 Group 1 scenarios represent activities that are largely towards the clinical end of the spectrum and could be performed by members of the care team and/or patient Group 2 scenarios represent activities that are largely towards the administrative end of the spectrum and could be performed by administrative users ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps Scenario 1 Encounter: Intake Scenario 2 Encounter: Interoperability Intake Scenario 3 Encounter: Care Ordering Scenario 4 Encounter: Care Results Scenario 5 Encounter: Post-Care Scenario 6 Reporting Scenario 7 Privacy & Security Scenario 8 System Group 1 Development: July 2013 – February 2014 Development: 2014 DRAFT

Overview: Workflow Assumptions 8 ONC has outlined what criteria could be included in each scenario In the outlines on the following slides, ONC assumes that testing will proceed sequentially through each scenario The test scenario procedures provide additional guidance for what additional criteria are required if a scenario is not tested in sequence Workflow is the core of each test scenario procedure and guided the development of the test scenario data ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT

Group 1: Scenarios 9 Group 1 includes five scenarios Group 1 Scenario 1 Encounter: Intake Actions which could be performed by any member of the care team or patient before the patient sees a provider. 10 criteria Scenario 2 Encounter: Interoperability Intake Actions which could be taken to incorporate a summary of care document received from another provider or hospital before treating the patient. 2 criteria Scenario 3 Encounter: Care Ordering Actions related to ordering care for the patient (medications, laboratory or imaging) during the care episode. 5 criteria Scenario 4 Encounter: Care Results Actions related to the results of earlier care orders for the patient, provision of resources for the patient and provider, and visit notes. 6 criteria Scenario 5 Encounter: Post-Care Actions which could be performed after the encounter with the patient has ended, but are directly related to the provision of care to the specific patient, including the creation of summary of care records. 6 criteria ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT

Encounter: Intake Workflow 10 The Patient arrives for a visit with a Provider (ambulatory) or at a Hospital (inpatient). The following information about the Patient is recorded in the Provider’s or Hospital’s EHR: Scenario 1 Encounter: Intake Actions which could be performed by any member of the care team or patient before the patient sees a provider. 10 criteria Workflow: Demographics Vital signs, BMI, and growth charts Problem list Medication list Medication allergy list Smoking status Family health history Advance directives Immunization information Cancer case information Tests: Demographics Medications Medication allergies Problems Immunization information Smoking status Family health history Inpatient only: Advance directives Ambulatory only: Cancer case information Vital signs, BMI, and growth charts DRAFT

Encounter: Interoperability Intake Workflow The Provider or Hospital receives a transition of care or referral summary for the Patient from a recent Hospital admission (ambulatory) or ambulatory visit (inpatient). The transition of care / referral summary for the Patient is received, displayed, and incorporated in the Provider’s or Hospital’s EHR. Clinical information reconciliation is performed between the medication, medication allergy, and problem lists stored in the EHR and those contained in the transition of care / referral summary Workflow: Transitions of care: receive, display, and incorporate transition of care / referral summaries Clinical information reconciliation Tests: Scenario 2 Encounter: Interoperability Intake Actions which could be taken to incorporate a summary of care document received from another provider or hospital before treating the patient. 2 criteria 11 DRAFT

Encounter: Care Ordering Workflow 12 During a visit (ambulatory) or admission (inpatient), the following orders are recorded for the Patient: Workflow: Computerized provider order entry Drug-drug, drug-allergy interaction checks Electronic prescribing Drug-formulary checks Electronic medication administration record Tests: Scenario 3 Encounter: Care Ordering Actions related to ordering care for the patient (medications, laboratory or imaging) during the care episode. 5 criteria The EHR indicates drug-drug, drug-allergy contraindication interventions. The Provider or a member of the care team generates prescriptions for electronic transmission, and checks whether a drug formulary exists for the Patient and given medication. In the inpatient setting only, a member of the care team administers medication and documents the medication administration in the Patient’s record in the Hospital’s EHR. Medication Laboratory Radiology/imaging orders DRAFT

Encounter: Care Results Workflow 13 During a subsequent visit (ambulatory) or at a later point in the hospital admission (inpatient), the following occurs: The EHR indicates that image results for the Patient are available, and they are accessed. Clinical laboratory tests and values/results for the Patient are received and accessed. The EHR electronically identifies diagnostic and therapeutic reference information for the Provider and education resources for the Patient. Electronic notes for the Patient’s visit or admission are recorded in the EHR, and, in the ambulatory setting only, a clinical summary for the Patient is created. Workflow: Image results Incorporate laboratory tests and values/results Clinical decision support Patient-specific education resources Electronic notes Clinical summary Tests: Scenario 4 Encounter: Care Results Actions related to the results of earlier care orders for the patient, provision of resources for the patient and provider, and visit notes. 6 criteria DRAFT

Encounter: Post-Care Workflow 14 In the ambulatory setting: After the visit, the Provider exchanges messages with the Patient In the inpatient setting: A member of the care team sends the Patient’s electronic laboratory results to the Patient’s ambulatory providers In both settings: The Patient views, downloads, and transmits health information to a 3rd party A transition of care / referral summary for the Patient is created and transmitted A list of patients including the Patient is created, as well as a set of export summaries for all the patients in the EHR. Workflow: Patient list creation Data portability Transmission of electronic laboratory tests and values/results Secure messaging View, download, and transmit Transitions of care – create and transmit Tests: Scenario 5 Encounter: Post-Care Actions which could be performed after the encounter with the patient has ended, but are directly related to the provision of care to the specific patient, including the creation of summary of care records. 6 criteria DRAFT

Example: Encounter: Intake 15 Cover Page Workflow / Script ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT

Group 2: Scenarios 16 Group 2 will include three scenarios ONC has outlined the workflow for these scenarios, and plans to develop them in 2014 Group 2 Scenario 6 Reporting Actions which relate to reporting to CMS and other bodies, and which could be performed by administrative users of the EHR. 7 criteria Scenario 7 Privacy & Security Privacy and security requirements to be fulfilled by EHR systems. 9 criteria Scenario 8 System Automated actions to be performed by EHR systems and actions related to system design. 4 criteria ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT

Next Steps 17 November Feedback on draft test scenarios to Scott Purnell-Saunders before November Please include “2014 Edition Test Scenarios” in the subject line Copy Seon Davis ONC can work with Michelle Consolazio to schedule a follow-up meeting depending on the volume of feedback received before November 15 December ONC revises the draft test scenarios for use in pilots ReviewOverviewGroup 1Group 2Next Steps DRAFT