1 Diesel Risk Assessment & 1 st Level Screening Worksheets Joel Leon Bureau of Technical Services October 16, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Mistakes by Carrie Schroeder. Emission Factors Where did they come from? How old are they? If you changed it in your spreadsheet, make sure to.
Advertisements

NJHEPS CO 2 Calculator Worksheet Overview Fall /27/2011.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
The Undertaking Is Calling… A surprising potential minor source story Brandy Toft Air Quality Specialist Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe National Tribal Forum.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
Rule 208 – Permit and Burn Authorization for Open Burning, and Rule Open Burning April 16, 2009 Smoke Management Workshop.
New Source Review for Air Toxics November 2, 2005 Peter J. Moore Yorke Engineering x24.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life Small Boiler Permits State of Delaware DNREC - Air Quality Management William K. Harris.
Classification of Air Pollutants
Tuesday, 19 April Cleaner Fuel and Testing of Fuel Types John Christensen, Acting Maintenance Director Washington State Ferries Washington State.
Frank Steitz Air Quality Permitting Program 10/12/2012
R esidents A gainst P olluting S tacks A voluntary,non-political, community organisation.
POWER TAKE OFF’s 5 5 Engine Dependent: 1. Engine mounted
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits Joel Leon, Bureau of Technical Services April 9, Presented by – ACE academy New Jersey Department.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
Health Based Compliance Alternatives (HBCA) under MACT (Maximum Achieveable Control Technology): Permitting Challenges Cindy Phillips, P.E. FDEP Bureau.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Toxics Rule Changes Stakeholder Meeting March 20,
RICE Air Toxics Health Effects and Development of Standards Matt Fraser Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
2007 Grant Programs to Reduce Air Pollution Public Workshop Feather River Air Quality Management District August 10, 2007.
Inventorying and Assessing the Values of Urban Trees in Kingston, PA using CITYgreen ® 5.0 Brian Keating, Elizabeth Roveda, Megan Smith, Kenneth Klemow,
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
 Biodiesel Christian Andry. What is it?  Clean burning alternative fuel made from renewable resources.  Does not originally contain petroleum, but.
SIP Steering Committee Meeting March 29,  In October 2011, EPA issued draft SIP and modeling guidance related to the 1-hour SO2 standard issued.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life DNREC Air Quality Management Air Permitting Seminar Natural Minor Permitting.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life NESHAPs Jim Snead October 8, 2008.
1 June 23, 2004 Sacramento Thermal Spraying ATCM Second Public Workshop.
2003 Hot Spots Annual Report Program Overview Program Overview  Four Basics: Quantify, Assess, Notify and Reduce Significant Risk Sources – Success! Significant.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Standard 4 – Inspection Audit Program
1 May 4, 2004 Sacramento Thermal Spraying ATCM Public Workshop.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
HF Modeling Task Mike Williams November 19, 2013.
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
Public Workshop Proposed RACT/BARCT Determination for Stationary Spark-Ignited Internal Combustion Engines August 29, 2000 California Environmental Protection.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
1 NEW RISK SCREENING TOOLS Joel Leon September 16, 2011.
30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
2012 Emissions Inventory Workshop 1. 2  The owner or operator of any facility that is a source of air contaminants shall submit a complete emission.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
NJDEP Air Toxics Program Olga Boyko NJDEP Division of Air Quality Health Effects of Air Pollution Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Meeting: United States Steel Corporation-Keetac Air Emissions Permit Owen Seltz Industrial Division September 13, 2011.
-1- Danaos Technical Application Technical Support Department Piraeus 02/06/2016 User Meeting 2016.
Solver Feature Excel’s KY San Jose State University Engineering 10.
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits
Veolia Rye House Energy Recovery Facility
First in Service First in Value
MODULE 4 Resource Estimation
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Industrial Assessment Center Database
NEW General Permit-005A Emergency Generators
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
Simple but Complicated Air Quality Permitting for Generators
Registrations.
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
NACAA Fall Membership Meeting October 1, 2012
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
Dispersion Models Dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere Models
Presentation transcript:

1 Diesel Risk Assessment & 1 st Level Screening Worksheets Joel Leon Bureau of Technical Services October 16, 2012

Health Risk Assessments Health Risk Assessments are conducted for all Hazardous Air Pollutants listed in a permit application Negligible risks are considered to be: Carcinogens (Cancer-Causing Chemicals) Total incremental risk less than or equal to 1 x 10 -6, (1E-6, or 1 in a million) Noncarcinogens Total hazard index less then or equal to 1 2

3 1 st Level Screening Worksheets Worksheet can be found at –Excel spreadsheet –Several documents at website related to risk assessments Worksheet inputs needed: –Stack height (feet) –Distance to the nearest property line (feet) –Annual emission rates for carcinogenic HAP (tons per year) –Hourly emission rate for HAP with short term health effects (pounds per hour)

4 1 st Level Screening Worksheet Example #1 –Stack height – 20 feet –Distance to the nearest property line – 100 feet – Benzene (carcinogenic) annual emission rate tons per year – Incremental cancer risk (3.7x10 -6 significant) Options to lower risk: –Install a better control device/upgrade control device –Reduce hours –Increase stack height –Move source further away from property line

1 st Level Screening Worksheet Example #1A – Double stack height to reduce risk - Stack height – 40 feet - Distance to the nearest property line – 100 feet -Benzene emission rate tons per year - Incremental cancer risk (0.89x10 -6 insignificant) 2 nd level assessment necessary if 1 st level is not determined to be negligible - 2 nd level takes into account unique stack parameters and facility outlay - Department or facility can conduct 5

1 st Level Screening Worksheet If 2 nd level risk is still greater than 1x : –Facility is contacted to see if HAP emissions can be reduced. –Internal Risk Management Committee meeting is held Includes air quality modeling, permitting, and enforcement staffs Evaluate what else can be done to lower risk Consider the facility as a whole and any unique aspects of the facility 6

Diesel engine risk screening worksheet Can be used in lieu of 1 st level risk screening worksheet Several advantages -Automatically calculates diesel particulate emissions. -Includes plume rise based on engine capacity -Indicates whether engine could be approved if a 2 nd level risk assessment is conducted 7

Diesel engine risk screening worksheet Diesel engine risk screening input: -Engine Tier (1-4) or year of manufacture -Engine’s rated horsepower -Maximum annual hours of operation -Distance to the property line Diesel engine risk screening outputs if risk level is: -Less than 10 in a million, risk is shown in GREEN and should be approvable -Between 10 and 100 in a million, risk is shown in YELLOW and may be approvable -Greater than 100 in a million, risk is shown in RED and is most likely not approvable 8

Diesel engine risk screening worksheet Some examples: 9 Engine rated capacity (horsepower) Tier Level or Date of manufacture Annual hours of operation Distance to Property Line (ft) Incremental Cancer Risk x x x 10 -4

Diesel engine risk screening worksheet Ways to reduce risk from Diesel Particulate Emissions - Install air contaminant control device - Use ultralow sulfur diesel fuel (15 ppmw) - Minimize annual operating hours - Move engine away from property line - Conduct a 2 nd level risk assessment Access worksheet, instructions, and background information at 10