Community Choice Aggregation A Local Government Tool to Green the Grid, Create Jobs, and Boost the Local Economy March 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
Advertisements

American Solar Transformation Initiative Program Overview Tyler Espinoza, Senior Project Manager, Optony Inc. Ben Foster, Senior.
Community Choice Aggregation Renewable Energy for your Home and Business July 16, 2013.
Community Choice Aggregation In San Mateo County San Mateo County Board of Supervisors February 24, 2015.
CaliforniaFIRST Kelley McKanna| 4/1/10. PACE: Simple, Effective Tool Property owner repays bond through property tax bill (up to 20 years) Proceeds from.
 PACE & RECAP: Financing Renewable Energy Michelle Hickey, ISEA Program Coordinator Illinois Solar Energy Association 1.
4 “Buckets” -- Political, Community, Technical, Financial
Sonoma Clean Power Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer Steve Shupe Deputy County Council.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide Customer Choice and Boost Local Economies April 26, 2015 Presented by: Jim Eggemeyer.
Community Choice Aggregation A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Offer Consumer Choice, and Boost Local Economies January 28, 2015 Presented by Seth.
Energy and Electricity Markets 101
Q1 UPDATE Local Energy Cooperative Formation {Ambassador} | {Phone Number}
Expanding Local Energy Options through Community Choice Aggregation National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) December 18, 2012.
Greening The Grid Through Community Choice Aggregation US EPA Webinar March 6, 2012.
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
Community Choice Energy In San Mateo County County CCE Advisory Committee May 28, 2015.
Channel Islands Clean Energy
Sonoma County CCA Feasibility Study Summary Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer.
1 Managing Renewables Integration Valerie Fong Utilities Director Power Association of Northern California September 17, 2013.
Renewable Energy in New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program Scott Hunter Renewable Energy Program Administrator, Office of Clean Energy in the New Jersey Board.
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
Partnering with Our Customers in Demand Side Management Mark Wallenrod Director DSM Program Operations Southern California Edison Southern California Energy.
Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide Customer Choice and Boost Local Economies [Date] [Location/Organization] Presented.
Climate Change Actions taken by the California Public Utilities Commission.
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (c) 2013 New Jersey Government Energy Aggregation P.L c. 24 “GEA Act” Gary E Finger Ombudsman New Jersey Board.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
California’s Renewable Energy Credits (REC) Market Update
1 Clean Energy, A Strong Economy, and a Healthy Environment William J. Keese Western Governors’ Association June 1, 2007 European Insulation Manufacturers.
KATHRYN E. MEOLA, CHIEF DEPUTY SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE SHAWN MARSHALL, DIRECTOR LEAN ENERGY PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY.
CCA For Monterey Bay Powering your future through Community Choice Aggregation.
Political Factors Affecting the Renewables and Energy Efficiency Remarks of Ron Binz, Chairman Colorado Public Utilities Commission October 15, 2010 IPPAI.
Overview: San Diego Climate Action Plan & Community Choice Energy.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Community Choice Energy as a Community Development Strategy for Oakland March 30, 2010.
Community Choice Aggregation A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Offer Consumer Choice, and Boost Local Economies January 8, 2015.
Creating A Cleaner Energy Future For the Commonwealth Massachusetts Clean Energy Programs, Polices and Goals Meg Lusardi, Director Green Communities Division.
CIPCO Central Iowa Power Cooperative Iowa Industrial Energy Group April 9, 2013.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
Kirsten Pringle, Office of Sustainability Gordon Tong, Office of Sustainability Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide.
CONSUMER CHOICE AGGREGATE Presented to the Counties General Services Association - August 13, 2015.
Marin Clean Energy Choice and Competition - Driving Innovation towards Environmental Goals May 2015.
Community Choice Energy (CCE) In Contra Costa County Public Workshops December 10, 14 and 16 7:00 -9:00 pm.
Renewables Portfolio Standard Status Report California Public Utilities Commission February 26 th, 2008.
Community Choice Aggregation in Marin. Marin Clean Energy Basics Local governments purchase power for their communities Local governments purchase power.
Community Choice Energy for Alameda County Status Update City of Newark Thursday, April 14, 2016.
Imperial Irrigation District 2016 Integrated Resource Plan: Imperial Irrigation District April 18th, 2016.
2016  1 Community Meeting  2 Welcome 2016  3 Agenda I.Introduction to CCE II.Community Feedback III.Overview of Progress & Study Results IV.Next.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Community Choice Energy In California May 24 and June 9, 2016.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
Village of La Grange Municipal Aggregation Hearing January 28, 2013 and February 11, 2013 What is Electricity Aggregation?
June 22, 2006 Development of the Marin County Community Choice Aggregation Project Agenda Background Project Overview Schedule.
PARTNERSHIP INTRODUCTION | 1 Introducing the Silicon Valley Community Choice Energy Partnership Saratoga City Council Wednesday, November 4, 2015 Melody.
Community Choice Aggregation A Local Government Tool to Green the Grid, Create Jobs and Boost the Local Economy City of Lafayette October 8, 2014.
California Energy Efficiency Policy and Goals Beena Morar Southern California Edison June 14, 2016.
Community Choice Aggregation Update
City and County of San Francisco Local Agency Formation Commission
San Francisco’s Community Choice Program
A local, not-for-profit electricity provider
Community Choice Aggregation
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Operational CCAs
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
DC State Community Solar Policy Trends National Conference of State Legislatures Webinar June 7, 2018 Autumn Proudlove Senior Manager of Policy Research.
Presentation transcript:

Community Choice Aggregation A Local Government Tool to Green the Grid, Create Jobs, and Boost the Local Economy March 2014

WHAT IS CCA? CCA leverages the market power of group purchasing, consumer choice, and local decision-making. It enables local governments to procure and/or develop power on behalf of their public facilities, residents and businesses. CCA creates a functional partnership between municipalities and existing utilities. It has the proven ability to lower electricity rates and rapidly green the grid.

IOU Procures Power Muni Procures Power IOU Maintains Transmission Lines JPA/Local Govts Procure Power IOU Provides Billing & Customer Service IOU Maintains Transmission Lines Muni Provides Billing & Customer Service Muni Maintains Transmission Lines IOU Provides Billing & Customer Service IOU Investor-Owned Utility CCA Community Choice Aggregation Municipal/ Public Utility (also Co-ops) A HYBRID APPROACH Roughly 70% of U.S. electricity is supplied by vertically integrated investor- owned utilities (IOUs), with much of the balance coming from publicly-owned municipal utilities and co-ops. CCA offers a third, hybrid option, where the supply and transmission functions are split between a public entity and the IOU.

WHY IS CCA SO POWERFUL? Responsive to Local Environmental and Economic Goals Offers Consumers a Choice Revenue Supported, Not Taxpayer Subsidized Stable, Often Cheaper, Electricity Rates Allows for Rapid Switch to Cleaner Power Supply Leverages Public and Private Sector $$ and Opportunities New local programs, renewable generation, jobs creation, and economic development

CA POLICY FRAMEWORK CCA Responds to California State Climate & Clean Energy Policy 2002/2011AB 117 and SB CCA Legislation 2006AB 32 – Global Warming Solutions Act 15% below 1990 levels by 2020 Revised 2011CA State RPS and RA requirements Laws governing utility renewable energy standards and resource adequacy (RPS = 33% by 2020) 2011/2012Governor’s Renewable Energy Mandate - 12,000 MW local/distributed RE by

CCA ACROSS THE COUNTRY CCA By the Numbers:Illinois – 650Massachusetts - 26 (as of 10/2013) Ohio – 260California – 2+ Rhode Island – 42New Jersey – 6

CCA STATUS & STATS IN CA CCA STATUS IN CALIFORNIA (as of 3/2014) CEC usage data provided by County only 2012 ELECTRICITY USAGE EST. ANNUAL REVENUECA RPS (33%) Million kWh$MillionsMillion KWh (Residential/C&I).074/kWh* OPERATIONAL Marin County/Marin Energy Authority (2010)1376$ Richmond, City of (joined MEA in June 2012)additional to Marin stats PLAN CERTIFIED, CONTRACT NEGOTIATED San Francisco, City & County of/SF-PUC5,878$4351,940 Sonoma County/Sonoma Clean Power (2014)2,879$ INVESTIGATING OR UNDER DEVELOPMENT Alameda County/East Bay Cities10,536$ Arcata, City of/Humboldt County888$66293 Benicia, City of/Solano County3,237$2401,068 Contra Costa County9,200$6813,036 Davis, City of; Yolo County1,694$ Lake County457$34151 *.074/kwh is Marin’s average E-1 residential rate (2013)

CCA STATUS & STATS IN CA (cont.) CCA STATUS IN CALIFORNIA (as of 3/2014) CEC usage data provided by County only 2012 ELECTRICITY USAGE EST. ANNUAL REVENUECA RPS (33%) Million kWh$MillionsMillion KWh (Residential/C&I).074/kWh* INVESTIGATING OR UNDER DEVELOPMENT Mendocino County584$43193 Monterey County (Partnered w/ Santa Cruz, San Benito)2,643$ Napa County (may join Marin's program)1,039$77343 Palmdale, City of/Lancaster, City of (Northern LA Co)info N/A San Benito County (partnered with Monterey, Santa Cruz322$24106 San Diego: City & County (regional study underway)19,443$1,4396,416 San Joaquin County5,430$4021,792 San Luis Obispo/City & County (CCA in CAP)1,677$ San Mateo County4,502$3331,486 Santa Barbara3,305$2451,091 Santa Clara County16,492$1,2205,442 Santa Cruz, City & County (w/ Monterey, San Benito)1,259$93415 TOTAL 92,841$6, , CEC County Usage Data *.074/kwh is Marin’s average E-1 residential rate (2013)

KEY PROGRAM FEATURES “CCA: The Biggest Change You’ll Never Notice” JPA or special district can operate a CCA in CA; local governments participate by passing an ordinance Utility continues to provide billing, customer service, line maintenance and repair; codified in Service Agreement CCA electricity charges appear as a new section of the utility bill – all other charges the same CCA is an opt-out program; Customers receive 4 opt-out notices over 120 day period and can return to PG&E any time. CPUC certifies CCA plan; oversees relationship between utility/CCA

10 Sample Bill – Marin Clean Energy

CCA AS A LOCAL ENERGY STIMULUS Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) w/ optional buy-out provisions CCA-sponsored energy projects; team with private company to leverage investment tax credits Local Feed-in-Tariff and Net Energy Metering programs for small projects and residential/commercial solar Community solar gaining in popularity; EV charging stations Energy Efficiency funding is available; on-bill repayment for building upgrades, solar installs Organizational partnerships for local job training, energy audits, building upgrades and installations

WHAT ARE THE RISKS… And how are they mitigated ? Rate Competition: Market expertise and well crafted power RFP is essential; Long vs. short term contracts; Diversified supply portfolio and integrated energy plan Customer Opt-Out: Competitive rates are a must; Articulate additional consumer and community benefits; Opt-outs in CA typically in 10%-20% range Political: Align CCA to state and local policy objectives; Appeal to both progressive and conservative minds; Local education and advocacy is key Regulatory/Legislative: Track influencing statues and legislation; Participate in the CA regulatory process

GETTING STARTED: 3 LEGS OF THE STOOL 1. Political/Community Resolutions of support and participation Community education/endorsements JPA Ordinance Marketing and outreach/opt-out notices 2.Technical Technical Study - load and rate analysis, economic impacts, environmental attributes and supply options JPA - legal formation, vendor contracts Implementation Plan, Service Agreement, etc. 3. Financial Considerations Technical study and community outreach CCA formation costs Bridge financing from 1 st contract to 1 st revenue Remember: All development and formation costs are reimbursable from early program revenue!

Case Study: Marin Clean Energy 14 May 2010: service starts for Phase I customers As of 2014: 125,000 customers; 77% of customer base Service area includes City of Richmond and Marin County 13-Member Board of Directors 67,500+ tons of GHG reductions to date

Marin Clean Energy: 3 Electricity Choices PG&E Opt-out to stay with standard service 19% Renewable MCE Light Green (Cost competitive) 50% Renewable MCE Deep Green (.01/kwh premium) 100% Renewable 15

MCE Power Sources power supply contracts with 13 energy suppliers Shell Energy North America contract will expire in MW of NEW power is being built for built for MCE MCE customers – 46 MW of solar – 8 MW of biogas – Enough clean power for 22,500 homes per year 16

Residential Cost Comparison 17 PG&E 19% MCE Light Green 50% MCE Deep Green 100% Electric Generation$46.74$40.13$45.21 Added PG&E Fees-$5.89 Electric Delivery$36.26 Total Electric Cost$83.00$82.28$ kWh, E-1/Res-1 MCE proposed rates effective April 6, 2014 PG&E proposed rates effective May 1, 2014

Commercial Cost Comparison 18 PG&E 19% MCE Light Green 50% MCE Deep Green 100% Electric Generation$138.44$112.29$ Added PG&E Fees-$12.19 Electric Delivery$ Total Electric Cost$269.94$255.98$ ,182 kWh, A-1/Com-1 MCE proposed rates effective April 6, 2014 PG&E proposed rates effective May 1, 2014

SUCCESS AROUND THE COUNTRY First CCA in Ohio to go 100% green with RECs Key Partnerships Board of Supervisors Vote 36 MW New Solar 54 MW New Renewables Local Feed in Tariff No coal contract; 5% wind; 16% reduction in climate emissions San Diego Marin County Chicago

For More Information: Shawn Marshall, Director (415) Now is the time to take control of your local energy future. CCA is the path forward.