Defence Aviation Safety Regulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPANY MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Advertisements

RECORD KEEPING Cooperative Development of Operational
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Introduction to the Concept of Continuing Airworthiness
1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.
NPA WG : Single and multiple releases
European Aviation Safety Agency
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
IFA Technical Forum & Workshop
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9110 Alignment to Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) and Original Equipment Manufacturers(OEMs)
MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS
Part-M Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA FBA introduction : insist on Standardisation.
Airworthy or Not? Pre-flight Inspections & other stuff An Engineer’s Perspective.
Certificates of Airworthiness
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
Issues regarding Acceptable Design Data Rodger Chalk & Richard Doig.
Contractor Safety Management
Downloaded from MAINTENANCEREQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND ON DEMAND OPERATIONS.
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
PBN OVERSIGHT IN AUSTRALIA
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 1 Introduction to EMAR May 2015.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 2 EMAR Part 21 – Aircraft Design, Certification and Production May 2015.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 7 EMAR Part 147 –Aircraft Maintenance Training Organisations May 2015.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 0 Introduction
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 4 EMAR Part 145 – Maintenance Organisations May 2015.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 3 EMAR Part M – Continuing Airworthiness Requirements May 2015.
What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA
Federal Aviation Administration Oversight of Contract Maintenance Presented to: U.S./ Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Dan Bachelder,
European Aviation Safety Agency
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
13. Airworthiness of Aircraft-1 Certificate of Type Approval Certificate of Type Approval A Certificate of Type Approval approves the basic design and.
The Maintenance and Engineering Organization
Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA.
Page 1 Introduction of new European Requirements on Continuing Airworthiness (Not yet published) The presentation is based on the final draft. Franz Graser,
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF DCA ON CABIN SAFETY ISSUE October 2008, 10 th Steering Committee Meeting, Macau Thipsuda Chiamcharoenvut, Department.
Regulatory Reform Program Proposed Design Approval Rules CASR Parts 21 and 146 Ian Kearsley Manager Engineering Support Section This presentation is.
1 11 December 2012E&M Sub-SSCC EASA Rulemaking Update (Continuing Airworthiness) Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA.
5/26/20161 AUDIT SERVICES PRIVATE/CORPORATE Captain Iain Tulloch tel /
Federal Aviation Administration Maintenance "Personal Minimums" Federal Aviation Administration DOT/FAA.
Maintenance "Personal Minimums"
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation
Recent Changes to Australian Regulation Engineering & Design – Parts 21 &39.
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
Lesson 15: Aircraft Inspections
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY Aircraft Certification and Delegation Update Dinh Nguyen NZ CAA Design Delegation Holders Seminar 7 th September 2007 Hamilton.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Training Standards & Guidelines Moscow September 2004
Staying Current with Regulations ! Chris MARKOU Head, Operational Costs Management, IATA October 2015.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Aircraft Fleet Management Solutions
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
02 March 2016 Defence Aviation Safety Regulation DASR Education Continuum.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
May 2016 Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation DASR- Current Vs DASR [AEO/AMO comparison]
Aircraft Maintenance Engineering
Maintenance Procedures 23.0
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
General.
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
UniKL MIAT ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Defence Aviation Safety Regulation DASR M – Continuing Airworthiness May 2016

DASR M – Continuing Airworthiness Requirements Scope DASR M – Continuing Airworthiness Requirements Overview of DASR M Expansion on Subparts Key Appointments/Organisational Responsibilities Note: there is a difference between what are CAMO responsibilities and who actually conducts the work

DASR Structure

A Minimum Airline Construct Context A Minimum Airline Construct CASA - National Airworthiness Authority Air Operator Accountable Manager CASR Part 119 Operations Aircrew Training Ground Ops Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation CASR Part 42 Quality (Including SMS) Airline must have a Relationship with: * Maintenance Org-CASR Pt145 * Design Org-CASR Pt21 Aircraft Designer and Manufacturer CASR Pt 21 G/J: * Type Certificate * Certificate of Airworthiness * Certificate of Release to Service etc

DASR M A – General B – Accountability C – Continuing Airworthiness D* – (Not Applicable – see DASR 145) E* – (Not Applicable – see DASR 145) F* – (Not Applicable) G – Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation H – Certificate of Release to Service I – Military Airworthiness Review Certificate * Subpart D, E and F are contained in EASA Part M, however have been removed from EMAR Part M and DASR M A – General B – Accountability C – Continuing Airworthiness D* – Maintenance Standards (Not used in DASR) E* – Components (Not used in DASR) F* – Maintenance Organisation (Not used in DASR) G – Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation H* – Certificate of Release to Service (CRS) (Not used in EMAR, reintroduced in DASR) I – Airworthiness Review Certificate

Subpart A SUBPART A - General Basic scope statement for DASR M Establishes the measures to be taken to ensure that airworthiness is maintained, including maintenance Specifies the conditions to be met by organisations involved in continuing airworthiness management

Subpart B SUBPART B – Accountability The Operating Organisation is accountable for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft The Operating Organisation shall be a CAMO (Subpart G) The Operating Organisation shall: have an internal DASR 145 approval or contract/task (through a CAMO) an approved 145 Master/slave relationship - CAMO is the master, AMO is the slave Contains flexibility to contract/task maintenance organisations deemed equivalent to DASR 145 Access requirements for the Authority Occurrence reporting Key Differences/Similarities to TAREG System TAREG has provisions for other than TAREG AMOs to conduct maintenance Occurrence reporting in DASR is regulated only for conditions that endanger flight safety. Key Differences/Similarities to TAREG System TAREG has provisions for other than TAREG AMOs to conduct maintenance Occurrence reporting in DASR is regulated only for conditions that endanger flight safety. TAREGs arguably require deeper level of reporting - Ref 5.3.1.c where AMOs are required to report conditions including those that do not directly endanger flight safety. M.A.201(g) - Maintenance of military aircraft, and components thereof shall be carried out by a DASR 145, or equivalent 145, AMO. AMC GM AMC 201(g) This is a placeholder for AMC that will explain those approvals considered equivalent to DASR 145 and activities to be conducted by a CAMO prior to authorising the conduct of maintenance by a DASR 145 equivalent Approved Maintenance Organisation (where the NMAA has already conducted recognition activities of an NAA or external NMAA). Where the NMAA has not conducted recognition activities of an NAA or external NMAA the AMC will clarify how equivalence should be demonstrated by the CAMO to the satisfaction of the NMAA. The NMAA expectation is that this clause will cover maintenance organisations operating under the following: A commercial 145 maintenance organisation under an ICAO based 145 maintenance approval (such as a CASR 145, FAA 145 Repair Station or EASA 145 Approved Maintenance Organisation) A military or commercial maintenance organisation under an EMAR 145 regulatory framework. Current airworthiness recognition activities within Air and Space Interoperability Council (ASIC) nations (US DoD, CA, NZDF, UKMoD, ADF) are underway to recognise maintenance structures against EMAR 145 principles . M.A.201(l) - By derogation to paragraph (g) and (h)2, the NMAA may agree to an alternative approach for a maintenance organisation to demonstrate its capability, equivalent to DASR 145, to perform maintenance of military aircraft and components thereof, in lieu of holding a DASR 145 approval AMC M.A.201(l) This is a placeholder for AMC that will explain how a CAMO can demonstrate to the NMAA the suitability of a maintenance organisation where compliance with 201(g) is not possible or feasible. The NMAA expectation is that this clause will cover maintenance organisations in the following scenarios: A military or commercial maintenance organisation operating under an NMAA construct that is not recognised against an EMAR 145 framework. A commercial maintenance organisation performing specialised maintenance activities which cannot be conducted under an existing DASR 145 AMO (using sub-contractor provisions in 145.A.75). This scenario only applies when the lead DASR 145 AMO does not have its own expertise to determine that the sub-contractor meets the necessary standards.

CAMO Tasks Aircraft Continuing Airworthiness Record System Accomplishment of Maintenance Aircraft Maintenance Program Management of Defects Airworthiness Review Pre-Flight Inspection Reliability Program Analysis of AMP CAMO Tasks Occurrence Reporting Aircraft Tech Log Airworthiness Directives Maintenance Check Flights Modification, Repair & Inspection Coordinate scheduled maintenance Weight & Balance/ Symmetry Checks From a technical perspective, the CAMO is ‘responsible’ for the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft under its control (serial numbers). The MTC Holder is accountable for the ‘continued airworthiness’ of the Military Type Certificate for that type of aircraft.. The CAMOs job is to manage the aircraft in such away to ensure it remains: airworthy (true to the MTC), fit for task usage is optimised.

DASR M – Continuing Airworthiness Management tasks Key Differences/Similarities to Current System DASR M – CAMO responsibility Current System Equivalent Aircraft Maintenance Programme (AMP) – includes error capturing methods Broadly equivalent to TMP, PSS and AMM IMIs Reliability Programme/Analysis of AMP Changes driven from failure reporting and usage data Accomplishment of Maintenance Maintenance contracts, SLA, Maintenance release Coordinate scheduled maintenance CAMM2, Maintenance Coordination, Fleet Planning Mods, repairs and inspections IA/SR, Fleet Planning, CCB Airworthiness Directives STI (mandatory) Symmetry check = aircraft boresight alignment (i.e if the aircraft is bent)

DASR M – Continuing Airworthiness Management tasks Subpart G DASR M – Continuing Airworthiness Management tasks Key Differences/Similarities to Current System DASR M – CAMO responsibility Current System Equivalent Aircraft Continuing Airworthiness Record System CAMM2, GO81, ALIS Aircraft Technical Log CAMM2 VASM screen Pre-flight Aircrew walk around Weight and Balance and Symmetry SPO manage W&B for platform AMO manage W&B for individual tails Mensuration check (is aircraft bent check) Maintenance check flights As required by AMD Occurrence Reporting CAT1&2 Defect reports, ASORs Management of Defects Carried Forward Unserviceability, Operational endorsement Symmetry check = aircraft boresight alignment (i.e if the aircraft is bent) Aircraft tech log – aircraft state fallback report

Subpart C – Deferred Defects

Subpart G DASR M – SUBPART G - CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS MANAGEMENT EXPOSITION (CAME) Scope of work Organisation chart showing chains of responsibility Procedures specifying how CAMO ensures compliance with DASR M List of approved AMPs List of all contractors/tasked organisations Names of all Operating Organisations to which the CAMO provides support Key Differences/Similarities to TAREG System CAME will consist of/reference a combination of elements contained in AMO MMP and AEO EMP. It will also detail a number of processes that are currently conducted but not regulated, e.g. fleet planning.

DASR M – SUBPART H – CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE TO SERVICE Subpart H is applicable to DASR 145 equivalent maintenance organisations DASR 145 AMO CRS issued in accordance with DASR 145 DASR 145 equivalent AMO (M.A.201(g) and (l) clauses) CRS issued in accordance with Subpart H Aircraft certificate of release to service Component certificate of release to service Key Differences/Similarities to TAREG System CRS is broadly equivalent to maintenance certification under TAREG Aircraft CRS is broadly equivalent to maintenance release

DASR M - SUBPART I – MILITARY AIRWORTHINESS REVIEW CERTIFICATE (MARC) Aircraft airworthiness review, including a review of the aircraft records and a physical survey of the aircraft Valid for one year, can be extended twice Findings MARC may be issued by a CAMO (with privileges), by airworthiness review staff (approved by the NMAA) or by the NMAA, depending on the situation Key Differences/Similarities to TAREG System Airworthiness Reviews are not conducted in TAREG system. The closest comparison is Navy’s annual husbandry checks.

CAMO Key Positions Accountable Manager Continuing Airworthiness Manager Quality Manager Airworthiness Review Staff Maintenance Programme Approval Employee

Accountable Manager The AM has corporate authority to ensure that Continuing Airworthiness activities: can be funded and that they are funded carried out in compliance with the applicable rules for continuing airworthiness (i.e. DASR M) The AM shall have the appropriate levers for human and financial resources The CAMO AM should also be the AM for the Military Air Operator’s Certificate (MAOC) holder

Continuing Airworthiness Manager Responsible for the management and supervision of continuing airworthiness activities. This person heads the CAMO Responsible for determining: what maintenance is required when it has to be performed by whom to what standard in order to ensure the continued airworthiness of the aircraft being operated. Maintain visibility and oversight of all contracted CAMO functions/activities

Quality Manager monitor compliance with, and the adequacy of, procedures required to ensure airworthy aircraft monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the contract monitoring the continued compliance with the requirements of DASR M

Military Air Operator (FEG or Equiv) Accountable Manager (FEG CDR) Operations 145 AMO Quality & Safety CAMO MDOA (Contractor) MDOA (MTCH) 145 AMO (Contractor) 19

Questions/Discussion? International Military Airworthiness Regulation Conference Melbourne, Australia. 14-15 November 2016 Presentations from Key Airworthiness Authorities and Industry on the benefits offered by an emerging global convention on military airworthiness regulation.