Corneal Biomechanical Changes Following Surface Keratorefractive Surgery Teeravee Hongyok, MD, Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, Ajoy Virdi, MBBS, Elisabeth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD
Advertisements

Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons.
Statement of Commercial Interest: RDJ: None DRH: honoraria from Reichert for educational lectures on corneal biomechanics Multiple studies have shown ex.
Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.
Comparison between Dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and Ehlers-corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes after Laser In.
World Cornea Congress VII – Electronic Poster Season Tse Wing Yeung, MBBS, FRANZCO Ronan Conlon, MD; Joshua Teichman, MD, FRCSC; Setareh Ziai, MD, FRCSC;
Corneal Biomechanics, Pachymetric Progression Profile and Corneal Volume: Indices for Detecting Ectasia and Screening Refractive Candidates Renato Ambrósio.
E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Comparative Study of Corneal Biomechanical Properties.
INTRAOPERATIVE FLAP COMPLICATIONS IN LASIK SURGERY PERFORMED BY OPHTHALMOLOGY RESIDENTS IN TRAINING Arturo Gómez-Bastar MD Arturo Ramirez-MirandaMD Lorena.
Application of Quantitative Method for Prospectively Identifying Risk for Ectasia After LASIK in Normal, Suspect, and Ectatic Eyes Mujtaba A. Qazi, MD.
Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes
PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series
Elvin H. Yildiz, Elisabeth J. Cohen, Ajoy S. Virdi, Kristin M. Hammersmith, Peter R Laibson, and Christopher J. Rapuano Cornea Service, Wills Eye Institute,
Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. David Zadok, MD, Yakov Goldich, MD, Yaniv Barkana,
A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.
Dr Umang Mathur, Dr Archana Gupta, Dr Suma Ganesh
INTRA OPERATIVE ONLINE PACHY METRY –A SAFETY TOOL Dr. KUMAR J DOCTOR DOCTOR EYE INSTITUTE MUMBAIINDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST.
Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.
TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.
Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanics and Wavefront Aberrations Alejandro Rivera, MD Private Practice Mexico City The author has no financial interest.
Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2009 ISRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Refractive Subspecialty Day San Francisco - October 24, 2009.
Authors: Jaroslav Madunicky, MD Katerina Buusova Smeckova, MD, MBA Col. Assoc.Prof. Jiri Pasta, MD, PhD. Iveta Nemcova, MD, PhD. Eva Vyplasilova, MD Kristina.
Relationship between Pachymetry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements Alejandro Rivera MD.
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS. Corneal and Refractive Surgery Service, The Dubai Mall Medical Center, Dubai- U.A.E. Tel: ; Mob
Prospective Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus Scott X. Stevens, MD Bend Ophthalmology, LLC Author has no financial interest.
Topical Cyclosporine for Postoperative use in PRK and LASIK: Preliminary Results LCDR David D. Hessert, M.D. Ophthalmology Chief Resident Naval Medical.
SK Kwok, MD Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong The author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster ASCRS 2011 San Diego, US.
Photorefractive Keratectomy in Posterior Polymorphous Dystrophy [CONTROL ID: ] Edward W. Trudo 1, Kraig S. Bower 2, Charles D. Coe 2, Denise A. Sediq.
Evaluation of Long-Term Keratoconus Progression Using Scanning-Slit Topography First Author: David Galarreta, MD Contributing Authors: Nestor Cortes, MD,
Clinical outcomes of Epi-LASIK : 1-Year-Long Results of Flap ON/OFF with Mitomycin-C ON/OFF Gil-Joong Yoon (MD/PhD) 1 Seong-Taeck Kim (MD) 2 Jae-Woong.
Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.
Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana,
ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.
Pattern of Pain and Analgesic use after Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus Ramon Coral Ghanem, MD, PhD. Renan Ferreira Oliveira, MD. Vinicius.
M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
A New Technique for Precise, Predictable SBK Surgery Using the B&L Zyoptix XP Microkeratome David R. Shapiro, MD Shapiro Laser Eye Center Ventura, California.
REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.
Naomi R. Goldberg, MD PhD Kenneth J. Wolf, MD Eric J. Wolf, MD FACS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Comparison.
E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group The study of the correlations of the optic disc size with Cornal Geometry and Biomechanical.
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Ahmed El-Massry, M.D. Professor of Ophthalmology - Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria Egypt long-Term Results of Corneal Biomechanical Changes.
Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,
Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,
Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Analysis in the Ectatic Corneas: Correlation of the New Corneal Biomechanics Parameters and Severity of Keratoconus Kristin.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in different eyes of the same patient. Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, Faik Orucov, MD*,
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
Corneal Hysteresis Role of Corneal Biomechanics in Refractive Surgery Luis Rodriguez, MD Anny Villegas, MD Clínica de Córnea Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad.
Mathematical Description of the Ocular Response Analyzer Applanation Signal in Post-LASIK Ectasia Mujtaba A. Qazi, M.D. 1,2 David A. Luce, Ph.D. 3 Jay.
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.
BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE CORNEA IN PSEUDO-EXFOLIATION SYNDROME Aylin Kılıç Ertan, MD Özgür Bilen, MD Kudret Eye Hospital, Ankara, Turkey There is.
Corneal CXL in Pediatric Patients with Progressive Keratoconus Stephanie Wise, Christian Diaz, Karolien Termote, Paul J. Dubord, Martin McCarthy, Sonia.
Influence of UVA-Riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking on biomechanical properties of keratoconic eyes David Zadok MD, Yakov Goldich MD, Yaniv Barkana.
Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on Ocular Response Analyzer waveform-derived variables in keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia Spatial treatment.
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
Three-Year Follow-up after LASIK in Eye with Extremely Thin Corneal Bed Hidemasa Torii, MD, Kazuno Negishi, MD, Murat Dogru, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD,
Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
Bruno Valbon, Ana Caiado, Ricardo Louzada, Renato Ambrosio Jr *.
Optical Coherence Pachymetry with the ESIRIS DOCTOR EYE INSTITUTE
Yakov Goldich MD,Yaniv Barkana MD, Isaac Avni MD, David Zadok MD,
Corneal Biomechanics after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Samer Hamada MRCOphth FRCS(Ed)1,3 Louai.
Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt
Hyuck Jin Choi, Joo Youn Oh, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim,
Jun Her MD. PhD, Sung-wook Kim MD, Jae-hwan Ahn MD
The Effect of Corneal Thickness on Ocular Drug Penetration
Retrospective Study of 4 Cases That Developed Ectasia After LASIK (Intralase flaps) with Low-Risk Based on Ectasia Risk Score System Allan Luz, MD Colin.
Presentation transcript:

Corneal Biomechanical Changes Following Surface Keratorefractive Surgery Teeravee Hongyok, MD, Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, Ajoy Virdi, MBBS, Elisabeth J. Cohen, MD, Kristin M. Hammersmith, MD Cornea Service, Wills Eye Institute Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia, PA The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter for this poster. World Cornea Congress VI, Boston, MA, USA, April 7-9, 2010

Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) Pictures from The ORA is the only machine that can perform direct clinical assessment of corneal biomechanical properties. 4 main parameters are measured by ORA: Corneal Hysteresis (CH) is the difference in inward and outward applanation pressures (P1 and P2). CH may reflect viscoelasticity of cornea. Corneal Resistance Factor (CRF) may reflect elasticity of cornea Goldmann Correlated IOP (IOP G ) Corneal Compensated IOP (IOP CC ) The signal peak height and multiple oscillations are changed in post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) keratectasia eyes compared to the normal post-LASIK eye (Glass DH, et al., ARVO 2008; E-abstract 646). Using the new ORA software (version 2.04) launched in 2009, the device can mathematically describe the ORA waveform characteristics with 38 new parameters including height, slope, area-under-the curve and waveform score.

Corneal Biomechanics in Keratoconus and after Refractive Surgery CH and CRF have been found to be significantly reduced in patients with keratoconus 1,2 and post-LASIK corneal ectasia 3 LASIK was also found to decrease CH and CRF. 4-8 The significant alteration of corneal biomechanics may play a critical role in development of this serious ectatic complication after refractive surgery. We hypothesized that surface ablation, which has no stromal flap and leaves a thicker residual stromal bed, would result in less change in corneal biomechanics than LASIK. 1 Luce JCRS 2005, 2 Kirwan Ophthalmologica 2008, 3 Kerautret JCRS 2008, 4 Pepose AJO 2006, 5 Ortiz JCRS 2007, 6 Chen JCRS 2008, 7 Hamilton JCRS 2008, 8 Kirwan JCRS 2008

Purpose To evaluate pre- and post-operative changes in corneal biomechanical properties using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) in patients who undergo surface keratorefractive surgery.

Methods Prospective, non-randomized clinical trial Inclusion: patients over the age of 18 who planned to undergo surface keratorefractive surgery on the Cornea Service at Wills Eye Institute from November 2008 to February 2009 IRB approved Data collection: before surgery, 1 and 3 months after surgery –Corneal thickness: U/S (Accupach V) and optical (Galilei) –Corneal topography: and Galilei (Ziemer) –Corneal topography: Atlas 995 (Carl-Zeiss) and Galilei (Ziemer) –Reichert ORA hardware version 3.0, software version 2.04 Basic biomechanics parameters and new waveform parameters were analyzed.

Results 9 eyes of 5 male patients underwent custom off-flap myopic epi-LASIK and completed 3 month F/U (age: 36 ± 7.8 years). PreoperativePostoperative 1 month 3 months UCVA [logMAR ± SD] (Snellen) 1.20 ± 0.17 (20/316) ± 0.1 (20/20+) ± 0.05 (20/17) MRSE (D) -4.4 ± ± ± 0.36 Mean keratometry (mean ± SD, D) Atlas ± ± ± 0.99 Galilei ± ± ± 1.08 Laser ablation depth (μm) ± ± 17.2 Pachymetry (mean ± SD, μm) U/S (Accupach V) 549 ± ± ± 27 Optical (Galilei) 560 ± ± ± 34

Basic Corneal Biomechanics Parameters Changes after Epi-LASIK * P < 0.05 (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test) * * * * ** *

Corneal Hysteresis Changes after Laser Refractive Surgery: compared to other studies No. of Eyes

Corneal Resistance Factors Changes after Laser Refractive Surgery: compared to other studies No. of Eyes

New Waveform Parameters: Significant Changes in 9 of 38 (p<0.05) Sample of Signal Overlay of Preoperative ORA and Postoperative ORA Decreased overall Waveform Score Decreased Peak 2 parameters Uslope2) Upslope of peak2 (Uslope2) Maximum single step increase in rise of peak1 (Mslew2) Maximum single step increase in rise of peak1 (Mslew2) Aspect ratio (height/width)of peak 2 (Aspect2) Aspect ratio (height/width) of peak 2 (Aspect2) Aspect ratio of downslope (height/width)(Slew2) Aspect ratio of downslope (height/width) (Slew2) Decreased Peak 1 parameters Height of peak1 (H1) Height of peak1 (H1) Height of peak1 at 50% applanation peak (H11) Height of peak1 at 50% applanation peak (H11) Absolute value of monotonic decrease on downslope part of peak1 starting at the peak value (Dive1) Absolute value of monotonic decrease on downslope part of peak1 starting at the peak value (Dive1) Area under the P1 curve (P1area) Area under the P1 curve (P1area) Preoperative ORA signal Postoperative ORA signal

Conclusions Epi-LASIK, a surface ablation procedure, significantly reduced corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor. Unexpectedly, the magnitude of reduction seems to be similar to LASIK from previous publications. –It appears that corneal thickness is more important than the flap creation on the corneal biomechanics. Waveform analysis also found significant changes in both peak 1 and peak 2 and a decrease in overall waveform score after surface ablation.

Conclusions A marked decline in these parameters may reflect changes in the viscous and elastic qualities of the cornea after surface ablation. Future work is needed to determine whether differences in these corneal biomechanical parameters are useful in detecting patients who are at risk to develop post-refractive surgery ectasia, even after surface ablation.