WRITING COMPLIANT IEP’S Department of Special Education Rina Sutaria December 10, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Legal and Practical Issues Families as Partners: School-Family Collaboration in the Education of Students with.
Rationale Participation with Peers (Section X of IEP)
SEIS – IEP Changes & Compliance
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Amy A. Peterman ADMS 625 Summer days notice to parents prior to meeting School and parents must agree on time and place of meeting. School can.
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy IEP vs Section 504 is the part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that applies to persons (including students) with.
October 14,  BUT you still need to participate in IEP meetings in a well-documented, meaningful manner.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Roadmap for Your Transition IEP:
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
At least one month before the annual review date contact your coordinator to schedule the date of the meeting. Let’s get started!
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Week 4 September 26th IEP Amendments, Exit, Written Notice, meeting notes Determining ESY, Special transportation, Alt-Assess, our paperwork, Cum files,
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Transition Assess Interests, Preferences, Strengths and Needs by age 14*** Add Post Secondary Goals and Transition Activities by age 16 At age 16 advise.
PLOP, Goals & Objectives Notes PLOP – Free of grammatical and spelling errors – Statement describing how the student is performing the annual goal currently.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Verification Review (VR) 2013−14 TRAINING.
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
MyData My School My Class MyData Modified for Robert Frost Middle School by: Tawna Montano.
Prior Written Notice (PWN) Training Rock Hill Schools Exceptional Student Education 2009.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network (TASN) Overview and Preparation for.
Compliance Training Overview Principal’s Meeting February 2012.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
SUCCESSFUL PARENTING DAY MADE POSSIBLE by Natalia Dooley SUCCESS Mentor Program Limestone County Schools.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
SAGE Coffee October 7, 2014 UNDERSTANDING THE ARD PROCESS FOR PARENTS AND CAREGIVERS.
Students with Exceptionalities
1 Evaluating Your Child’s IEP Key points for parents when reviewing your child’s IEP October
The New IDEA in Special Education
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
Individualized Education Plans SPED 461 4/4/11. IEP Components Current performance Goals Special education and related services Accommodations and Modifications.
Special Education Resources Hello, My name is Amy Mathews and I am studying to be a special education teacher. I am presenting some valuable information.
College of Education Meeting with the Professor: The Field Assignment Project (Case Study)
Please sit in the table marked for your subject area.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Special Education Webex Conference February 5 & 6, 2007.
Overview of DRA2 (Developmental Reading Assessment) Middle School Presentation Cathy Rosso Stephanie Williams May 2012.
Staten Island Integrated Service Center 1 VERIFY - NEVER LEAVE BLANK VERIFY Prior to writing on this line, contact your school’s Special Education Liaison.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
1 An Introduction to Special Education 행복 세미나 Life Care Counseling Center.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Menlo Park City School District Special Education Self-Review (SESR)
Understanding the IEP Process
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
Cowan Ave. Elementary Special Education
IEP Process.
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education
Special Education Process
12/9/2018 Notice: An Overview The MDE released documentation and a new requirement last year for districts to utilized Notices to “finalize” IEPs rather.
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Autism (ASD) and the Educational Environment
Presentation transcript:

WRITING COMPLIANT IEP’S Department of Special Education Rina Sutaria December 10, 2013

 Predictions!  Top 10 IEP Errors  Correcting the Errors  Questions TODAY’S AGENDA

TEACHER PREDICTIONS: TOP 10 IEP ERRORS

Based on IEP File Review Summer 2013 TOP 10 IEP ERRORS

1. Not including a general education teacher 2. Baselines do not have actual data that is measured by the same scale as your goals (compare apples to apples) 3. No accommodations are listed on supplementary services page 4. Areas which are not applicable are listed with an “N/A” 5. Strengths of child: Do not be vague! TOP 10 ERRORS: ACTUAL FINDINGS

6. Not justifying why a student needs to go from a less restrictive to more restrictive placement. 7. Goals must be measurable and objective! 8. Not including a signed notice of meeting with the IEP. 9. Notes page: Not documenting that the services will not occur or be made up in case of an assembly, field trip, student illness or standardized testing. 10. Goals: Can not have general education teachers responsible for goal progress for direct IEP services. TOP 10 ERRORS: FINDINGS CONTINUED

IEP FILE REVIEW MATRIX

CORRECTING THE ERRORS

 A general education teacher must sign that they attended the meeting.  If a general education teacher cannot be included, the parent must sign an excusal form.sign an excusal form. ERROR 1: NOT INCLUDING A GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHER

 Baselines have to have actual data that is measured by the same scale as your goals!  If Jonny has to write his alphabet with 80% accuracy, then tell us the baseline in percentage, not by actual data (Jonny can currently write 13 letters of the alphabet).  You have to compare apples to apples. Frequency and percentage are NOT the same thing! ERROR 2: BASELINE DATA

GOOD BASELINE DATA EXAMPLE

 Accommodations have to be listed on the Supplementary Services Page (Form 5(a)).  Preferential seating  Extra time on assignments  Modified homework (less questions)  Use of computer for in class writing assignments.  Teachers do not always read the NOTES page at the back of the IEP, therefore it is the law to include on Form 5A like this! ERROR 3: NO ACCOMMODATIONS LISTED

 If team determines no supplementary items, then state like this:  If a child needs supplementary aids/services, state like this: LIST ACCOMODATIONS ON FORM

 An IEP is written for a 1 year period. While something might not be applicable now, it does not mean that it will stay that way for the duration of the year.  Therefore, write “N/A at this time” whenever something does not apply to avoid legal ramifications. ERROR 4: WRITING N/A WHEN NOT APPLICABLE

N/A AT THIS TIME

 Do not be vague when listing the strengths and preferences of the child. You might understand what you mean, but the next teacher might not!  Bad example for student strengths: math, sports, art  Strengths and weaknesses of the student should be written in a complete sentence. ERROR 5: BEING TOO VAGUE

 When a student goes from a less restrictive to a more restrictive placement (ie general education to special day class), the following must happen:  Team must note pre-test scores for student  Student must be provided intensive intervention for at least 8 weeks. Documentation of this intervention must occur on the Intervention List  Post-test scores of student will be recorded  IEP meeting will occur at which time a team decision will be made regarding student placement.  A teacher can not suggest a student needs SDC based on a “hunch”! ERROR 6: CHANGE OF PLACEMENT

In the present level section, document like this: On the notes page, document like this: CHANGE OF PLACEMENT DATA & DOCUMENTATION

IEP goals must be measurable and objective. This includes:  Who is involved: (student)  What are the desired outcomes: (the intended behavior, knowledge, and/or skill that should result from the program)  How progress is measured: (what tool or surveys, tests, data from other sources) will be used to measure the expected changes  When will the outcome occur: One year from now See an example of a measurable and objective goal here! Why is this goal not a measurable and objective goal?? ERROR 7: MEASURABLE AND OBJECTIVE GOALS!

 The following goal is measurable. We know WHO it involves, WHAT the desired outcomes are, HOW it will be measured, and WHEN this outcome will occur. GOAL EXAMPLE

 Each IEP has to have a signed notice of meeting (NOM), even if the parent does not attend!  IEP forms are available in English, Spanish, Vietnamese, and Cantonese. If you need other languages, find a translator!  The NOM needs to be sent out by the special education teacher 10 days prior the meeting and received back signed prior to the meeting. ERROR 8: NO SIGNED NOTICE OF MEETING

SIGNED NOTICE OF MEETING

 Explicitly document the entire meeting conversation  Document that special education services will not occur and not be made up due to student illness, field trips, assemblies, or standardized testing.  Indicate if procedural safeguards were offered  Note services offered, ESY applicability, transportation etc.  Does parent agree? ERROR 9: NOTES PAGE

APPROPRIATE NOTES PAGE

 Goals: Can NOT have general education teachers or special education aides be responsible for goal progress for direct IEP services.  Ed Specialists (RSP teacher, SDC teacher, SLP, OT, OM, VI, DHH) are responsible for goals – NOT general education teachers! ERROR 10: GOAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR GOAL

 Get the IEP Writing Compliance Activity worksheet from the basket in the middle of your table.  Find a partner. Work on these questions together.  We will review the answers together in 10 minutes. LET’S PRACTICE

FUTURE IMPLICATIONS

ANY QUESTIONS?