Specific Learning Disability Criteria Implementation Update Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Federal Programs Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Using RTI Data to Inform Eligibility
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Division of Special Education Overview Alison Lowenthal Idaho State Department of Education Division of Special Education.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Office of Dispute Resolution Melanie J. Reese, Ph.D. Dispute Resolution Coordinator
RTI and Special Education: Making sense of it all!
Office of Dispute Resolution Melanie J. Reese, Ph.D. Dispute Resolution Coordinator
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson STATE OF THE STATE Richard Henderson Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education Idaho Association.
Special Education Overview Allison Lowenthal Idaho State Department of Education Educational Programs Division of Special Education.
SLD Eligibility Policy. Agenda Review SLD definition Models of SLD identification ID’s Revised SLD Eligibility Criteria and Procedures Questions.
Specific Learning Disability Criteria and Resources Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Special Education Division of Student.
…Promoting a collaborative partnership among families, schools and communities to create positive educational outcomes for Virginia’s school children.
SLD Eligibility Peer Review April 2011 Dr. Evelyn S. Johnson Associate Professor, BSU uL.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
SLD Eligibility Review Teresa Fritsch, Psy.S., NCSP School Psychologist
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
MPRRC U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Special Education Technical Assistance Resources for Charter Schools.
Early Childhood Councils Technical Assistance Framework May 2009 Wendy Watson.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Kathleen Smith, Director Lynn Sodat, School Improvement Specialist Jo Ann Burkholder, Student.
Specific Learning Disability Criteria for School Administrators Richard Henderson Regional Special Education Consultant Idaho State University.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013 Lee Pesky Center Dr. Evelyn Johnson SESTA Gina Hopper
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Office of Special Education: Vision Statements Parent Advisory Council – Specialized Services November 05, 2012 Gina Ross - Elementary Megan McCullough.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
Focused Monitoring November 10, 2010 Bureau of Special Education 1.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Ruth Ryder SPDG National Meeting March 5-6, 2013 ESEA Flexibility and SPDG: What’s the connection?
Improving Secondary Transition Services Through an Electronic Learning Community: An Online “Connect and Learn” Professional Development Model in Idaho.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson Shannon Dunston Division of Special Education Division of Student Achievement and School Improvement Idaho State Department.
GETTING TO KNOW YOUR PARAPROFESSIONAL Frank Howe, Southeast Regional Coordinator Beth Eloe-Reep, Southeast Regional Coordinator Gina Hopper, Associate.
Priority Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Guidance to Support SLD Listening Comprehension and Oral Expression
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Louis.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI²) June 2016 Tie Hodack & Susan Jones Tennessee Department of Education.
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2012
Idaho RESULTS Work OSEP Visit 2011
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Access, Equity, and Progress
Presentation transcript:

Specific Learning Disability Criteria Implementation Update Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Federal Programs Division of Special Education Dr. Evelyn Johnson Executive Director, Lee Pesky Learning Center Gina Hopper Center for School Improvement and Policy Studies Boise State University

Overview Brief review current SLD policy Research findings Review year 3 training plan OSEP “Results Work”

Overview of Idaho’s SLD Policy Federal & State Definition ID CriteriaEvidence 1.Imperfect ability to learn 2.Disorder in a basic psychological process 3.Not a result of other factors 1.Evidence of insufficient progress and achievement 2.Pattern of strengths and weaknesses in psychological processing skills that impacts learning 3.Student’s lack of achievement is not the primary result of other factors 1.Progress Monitoring Data, ISAT, Achievement Tests 2.Assessment of psychological processing skills 3.Team consideration of other factors (examining evidence when other factors suspected)

SLD Process Flowchart Evidence of insufficient progress in response to effective, evidence based instruction Evidence of insufficient progress relating to effective evidence based intervention Evidence of low achievement in one or more of the suspected area(s). Evidence of a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in psychological processing skills that impact learning. Parental Involvement Evaluation Trigger & Exclusionary Factors

Policy Rollout and Training Information Dissemination: Webinars, Conferences, Newsletters (BREADTH) Year 1: Pilot Peer Review Training and Action Planning Year 2: Peer Review Increase Tier 2 & PM training focus (DEPTH)

PEER REVIEW RESULTS

SLD Year 3 Plan Focus on Tier 2 Interventions and Progress Monitoring

New partnership with the Lee Pesky Learning Center to help design the trainings and offer regionally, beginning in November to support Tier 2 work.

SLD Training Rationale WHY? In order for the implementation of the SLD Criteria to become a successful system, all tiers of instruction need to be partners in the process. For this reason, the SLD face to face trainings will require teams to participate. WHO? Teams of 5 per district: General Education Teacher responsible for Tier 2 Special Education Teacher Interventionist or Title I Teacher School Psychologist and Administrative Leadership/Decision-maker for Tier 2 in district

WHAT & WHEN?

Peer Review for Year 3 Regional Peer Reviews Submittal of files to Regional Offices by March 1, 2012 Previous Peer Reviewers will receive first opportunities for spots and there will be additional spots in each region for more attendees.

Peer Review for Year 3 Peer Reviewers will follow same process for applying to be a reviewer. More information will come from Rich Henderson in January 2012 on this process. Peer Reviewers’ list will be finalized by March 1, 2012.

Topical Webinars Topical webinars will be announced shortly via and ITC to support the year 3 activities. You will register for these webinars via the ITC and each webinar will be archived under the “SLD Learning Community” at

SLD - OSEP Results Work Connection OSEP asked States to identify one performance area to improve OSEP would leverage USDOE Resources to work with States –Access to USDOE TA-D Resource Centers State develop a 5 yr Plan to targeted area

OSEP Results Work Focus on one category: SLD 2 years of SLD Implementation Data –Progressive vs. Individual Analysis Finding where we went off the road –2 main areas arise as sources Tier 2 Interventions Progress Monitoring

Idaho’s Results Goal For the past five years, Idaho has stalled or demonstrated slippage in the performance of students with disabilities on statewide assessments as noted in indicator 3A. Starting from a baseline of 34% on the school year, the percent proficient dropped to 4.62% in 06-07, 14% in 07-08, 18% in 08-09, and back down to 8% in All stakeholders believe it is important to the future of Idaho that students with disabilities meet the proficiency targets.

Idaho Results Goal Given Students with Disabilities who are identified with a Specific Learning Disability residing in Idaho districts whom have failed to achieve AYP in the subgroup of SWD, districts will increase the academic performance of SWD who have been identified with a Specific Learning Disability, through increased collaborative leadership, focused progress monitoring, targeted interventions, and greater connection of IEP Goals to General Education Standards, to 60% combined proficiency within 5 years.

Idaho Results Goal: Next Steps Need for collaborative approaches –SPED, SSoS, Federal Programs, RTI, working with leadership to give them the support and resources needed. Tier 2 and Progress Monitoring: –SESTA will focus its SLD TA resources on these 2 areas and work with both national and local experts to inform and equip Idaho districts Connection of IEP Goals to Standards: –SDE/SESTA will design and implement training.

Idaho Stakeholders: Results Work Team Richard Henderson, State Director of Special Education, SDE - LEAD Steve Underwood, Director of School Improvement Marcia Beckman, Director of ESEA Programs, Title I Lisa Kinnaman, Associate Director CSI - PS, Center of Innovation and Improvement Gina Hopper, Director of CSI – PS, Special Education Statewide Technical Asst. Evelyn Johnson, Idaho Lee Pesky Center SEAP Chair Judy Randleman and SEAP Board Member Keith Allred Jim Leinen, WRRC State Contact 3 Regional Directors from the Directors Advisory Council Alison Lowenthal, Secondary Special Education Coordinator Frank Howe, Special Education Regional Coordinator Bev Benge, Special Education Regional Coordinator Beth Eloe-Reep, Special Education Regional Coordinator

Training and Technology for Today’s Tomorrow Website to link school professionals and parents with special education training opportunities and resources across the state Supported By: –Idaho State Department of Education (ISDE), Special Education Project Team: –Cari Murphy –Shawn Wright

Special Education Statewide Technical Assistance Gina Hopper, Director Katie Bubak, SESTA Coordinator

Contact Information: Richard Henderson Division of Special Education (208) Dr. Evelyn Johnson Lee Pesky Learning Center (208) Gina Hopper Director, Special Education Statewide Technical Assistance (208)