UCF_USLI 2010-2011 Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Advertisements

BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA I NTIMI GATOR PDR. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Component Testing Subscale Flight.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
RezRiders. Mission statement Through the USLI program the Northwest Indian College Space Center’s RezRiders Team enhances its involvement in science,
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
 All teams are provided with a “kit” – set of (mostly cardboard) templates to assist with rocket assembly  Our kit will be a “North Star” design seen.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
Science Fiction. Rocket flight Centre of Mass or Centre of Gravity (CM or CG) Centre of mass is the mean or central location of all the mass of an object.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
UCF_USLI Flight Readiness Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida 1.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Critical Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida 1.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Target Altitude Safety Document
Presentation transcript:

UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida 1

2

” 24” 13.78” 30.78” 14” 4.5” Diameter Total Length of Rocket 97.5” 7.6” 12”

 Carbon Fiber Sleeves & Rolls for custom body, nosecone, and fins.  Nomex Honeycomb for fin structure.  Epoxy/Hardener University of Central Florida 4

 Center of gravity from the nose cone: X CG = in  Center of pressure from the nose cone: X CP = in  Rocket diameter: d=4.5 in  Static stability margin: SM= University of Central Florida 5

 Hazards: Ammonium Perclorate (APCP) used for propellant in a motor Electronic match with pryogen coating To start the motor Hazard of premature ignition Gunpowder (Black powder) University of Central Florida 6

7 In the case of windy conditions. In the case of calm conditions.

 Selection of Solid over Hybrid Motor Simple and easy start system Thrust schedule can be dictated by grain geometry Reasonably high specific impulse Sacrificing University of Central Florida 8

9 breakdown of weights for all items used in the simulation of the rocket.

University of Central Florida 10 Trust curve for the Cesaroni Technologies Incorporated (CTI) L585-2G engine with a total impulse of Ns.

 Total weight of the simulated rocket With a payload of 160 oz. : oz. With a payload of 200 oz. : oz.  Cesaroni Technologies Incorporated (CTI) L585-2G engine Total impulse: Ns Maximum Thrust: lbs ( N) Average Thrust: lbs ( N) Max thrust to weight ratio  160 oz. payload: / = lbs/oz  200 oz. payload: / = lbs/oz Average thrust to weight ratio  160 oz. payload: / = lbs/oz  200 oz. payload: / = lbs/oz University of Central Florida 11

 Motor Purchase Plan NAR certified motors purchased by L2 certified TRA member  Motor Storage All components will be locked in flammable marked cabinet  Motor Transportation Responsibility of TRA advisor to drive motors. University of Central Florida 12

University of Central Florida 13 Batteries GPS Telemetry System SMD Sensor Package Camera

Avionics: University of Central Florida 14 ComponentModelQty.Image Flight Computer PerfectFlite MiniAlt/WD 2 GPS System Ozark Aerospace ARTS TT2 Ozark Aerospace ARTS RX

Sensors & Camera: University of Central Florida 15 ComponentModelImages Microcontroller Arduino Duemilanove 3-Axis AccelerometerADXL345 Pressure Transducer/ Temperature Sensor BMP085 Humidity SensorHIH-4030 Solar Irradiance Sensor BPW34 Silicon Photodiode Ultraviolet RadiationUV12-R1-A Magnetism SensorHMC5843 CameraVD80 Mini

University of Central Florida 16  Design Completed A complete SMD payload including temperature, relative humidity, UV radiation, solar irradiance, pressure, acceleration, and magnetism sensors with a camera and GPS system has been designed. The Arduino has been designed for the addition of flash memory. Both the Arduino microcontroller and the camera system have USB connectivity capability for data recovery.  Full Scale Test Launch The full scale test launch will include all SMD Payload components. If the SMD Payload is recovered in good working condition, it will be deemed structurally stable for reuse. If the data recorded during the launch is recoverable, the SMD Payload design will be verified.

 Panel Schematic A payload bay panel schematic has been drawn outlining the layout of the SMD Payload verifying that it can be integrated into the payload bay.  Calibration and Testing All SMD Payload sensors and systems will be verified through calibration and testing. University of Central Florida 17

 Design Completed A complete recovery system including electric matches, a primary and secondary flight computer as well as drogue and main chutes has been designed.  Flight computer programming The primary and secondary flight computers will be programmed to eject the drogue chute at apogee and the main chute at 1000 ft.  Parachute ejection locations Structure design includes a separation point between the lower and mid sections for the main chute and another separation point between the mid and upper section for drogue. University of Central Florida 18

 Parachute ejection testing Recovery system shall be assembled to launch configuration. Static tests will be performed to verify that the ejection charges are capable of separating the structure sections and pushing out the parachute. Once verified on the ground, the parachute ejection system will be tested dynamically during the sub-scale launch.  Parachute descent rate test Both the drogue and main parachutes will be tested by securing a mass (equivalent to the launch vehicle and payload) to the chute and dropping it off a tall building. A stopwatch will be used to calculate the time to landing. The descent rate will then be calculated. University of Central Florida 19