WLTP-08-12 1 01.11.2014 OIL #6, section 2 Use of the gearbox, auxiliary gearboxes, exception of crawler gears.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Advertisements

Working Paper No. WLTP-09-07e 1 Agenda item 5: Progress report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IG meeting, 14.
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
WLTP rev1e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
Default Road Load issue Initial Dutch proposal for a Update Progress report Annex 4 Open Issues: WLTP-07-07e 5. Default road load parameters (OIL.
WLTP-08-19e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, section 2 Use of the gearbox, required data.
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
WLTP-10-11e 1 By H. Steven Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written in.
Working Paper No. WLTP rev1e 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IWG meeting,
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e short 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written.
1 GRPE Informal Working Group on Heavy Duty Hybrids UNITED NATIONS Report to GRPE 69 Geneva, 05 June 2014 Informal document No. GRPE (69th GRPE,
WLTP N/v tolerance Simulation results and conclusion BMW,
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
GTR amendments Japan #14 WLTP IWG at Paris WLTP-14-08e.
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
WLTP-11-5e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
WLTP Informal Working Group
WLTP - GTR No. 15 WLTP-13-15e ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRPE e
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
IVG Driver Training Performance Monitoring.
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Improvement of Family definitions
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Current status of WLTP-DHC
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Draft WLTP Phase 2 – carryover from 1b – Annex 4 Starting note on split runs in coast down testing WLTP-14-18e Within phase 1b, practically all tolerances.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
Japan contributions on Transposition TF
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Boundary conditions - Status
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
WLTP-27-03e gear shift issues
OIL# 52: End of PEV range criteria
Additional discussion points from the gearshift issues task force
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Presentation transcript:

WLTP OIL #6, section 2 Use of the gearbox, auxiliary gearboxes, exception of crawler gears

Detailed issue descriptions 2 OIL #6, use of the gearbox, required data can be split into the following subsections: 1.Add requirements, how to deal with vehicles with a two range transmission (low and high), 2.Introduce the possibility to exclude crawler gears from the gear use calculation. With respect to #1 the TF proposes to add a new subsection 1.4 to section 1 of annex 1 as follows: 1.4 For vehicles equipped with a two range transmission (low and high), only the range designed to normal on road operation is considered for the gear use determination. This proposal should be adopted at WLTP IG #8.

Exclusion of auxiliary gears 3 Issue #2 is still under discussion. The crawler gear is an occasional use gear for heavily laden conditions, steep hill starts or maintaining a very slow controlled speed when laden. A crawler gear is very similar to the ‘low range’ transfer boxes used on off road vehicles (see issue #1). The main problem is to define delimination criteria for the crawler gears and the 1. gear for normal operation, that are performance based rather than design based. Special attendance has to be drawn to prohibit, that the requirements enable to skip the 1. gear for high powered sports cars.

Exclusion of auxiliary gears 4 The first proposal from Ford was based on pull away requirements for the gross trailer mass (GTM) and 50% of GTM and on a borderline for the ratio between engine speed and vehicle speed for the crawler gear. The 1. gear would be a crawler gear and the 2. gear would be the 1. gear for the WLTP gear use calculation, if the following requirements are fulfilled: 1.The vehicle with the trailer, both fully laden (GTM), cannot pull away at an incline of 20% in 2. gear within 4 s, 2.The vehicle laden to 50% GTM or unladen mass + 27% maximum payload, whichever the higher, is able to pull away at an incline of 20% in 2. gear within 4 s,

Exclusion of auxiliary gears 5 3.The vehicle speed in 1. gear at 75% of rated engine speed < 20 km/h. JASIC made a counter proposal with similar pull away criteria, but based on 28% of GTM. Since the discussion was controversially in the TF, it was agreed that Ford and JASIC should continue informal discussions, including other interested members of the TF and should come back to the TF once a compromise would be achieved. In addition to that, the transmission based criterion (3 rd bullet point) needs to be amended in order to cover also class 1 and 2 vehicles.

Exclusion of auxiliary gears 6 The TF concluded that more time for further discussions is needed, the chairman should ask for an extension of the timeframe (till end of February 2015) for this issue at WLTP IG #8.