County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference Date.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Organizational Learning for System Improvement. The Philadelphia Department of Human Services mission is to provide and promote safety, permanency, and.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
QSR/Practice Overview © Human Systems & Outcomes, Inc., 2010 Reviewing & Refining Our Practice: Applying Disciplined Inquiry to Case Practice to Improve.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
521: Fall 2013: Supervisor Training Event: Supporting Your Staff in the Quality Service Review Process.
PCCYFS Children’s Services Policy Day PCCYFS Children’s Services Policy Day Office of Children, Youth and Families Richard J. Gold, Deputy Secretary October.
Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.
Overview of the Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center.
ACO Mapping Group Recommendations 1. Are the subclass members being identified? 2. Are the subclass members being assessed? 3. Are the subclass members.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Quality Services Reviews: A process for understanding and promoting best child welfare practice Florida Department of Children and Families Quality Assurance.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. Next Steps Meeting Purpose: The Next Steps Meeting is designed to be a starting point for the county’s efforts to.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
521: The Quality Service Review Process. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Day 1 - Agenda Training Overview Overview of the QSR Process Overview.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Continuous Quality Improvement CQI One Way to Grow and Sustain Change.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and Quality Service Review (QSR) Process.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Family Findings: Making Successful Kin Placements and Connections for Children in Care Presenter: Elisa Esh, Diakon Adoption and Foster Care.
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI).
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Common Goals: Child Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Citizen Review Panel National Conference May 21-23, 2008 St. Paul, Minnesota Christeen Borsheim,
207 : Developing Family Leadership: Using Data to Help Develop Practice The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program 207: Developing Family Leadership:
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. County Name Welcome!! And…Congratulations on receiving your full licensure!! Give yourselves a round of applause.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. Next Steps Meeting Purpose: The Next Steps Meeting is designed to be a starting point for the county’s efforts to.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Continuous Quality Improvement: Our Desired State The Vision for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
Office of Children's Services
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and Quality Service Review (QSR) Process Pennsylvania's QSR Manual Version 4.0 Appendix 5a.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Insert Meeting Date and Presenters
Leadership Academy Conference September 29, 2010
The Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group
The Qualitative Service Review Process Overview
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference Date

Next Steps Meeting/ Licensing Exit Conference Purpose: The Next Steps Meeting is designed to be a starting point for the county’s efforts to begin the CQI process of developing an action plan for enhancing case practice and system performance. Purpose of Licensing Exit Conference:

Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Effort Mission: “Pennsylvania’s Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) effort is the vehicle that will sustain positive change for our child/youth and family outcomes...”

Compliance Quality Defining quality practice is a key component in shifting PA’s quality improvement efforts beyond compliance based requirements. If quality practice is not defined, it is too easy to fall back into a compliance based way of evaluating practice. “True CQI goes beyond basic compliance and focuses on continuous learning about practice and outcomes” (Casey Family Programs, 2005).

Key Components of CQI Effort Quality Service Review (QSR) and Licensing Review ◦ Onsite Review – Case Reviews, Focus Groups, Exit Conference ◦ Licensing Review ◦ Next Steps Meeting Establishment of a County’s “Sponsor Team” and “Improvement Team(s)” County Improvement Plan (CIP) Technical Assistance (TA) Collaborative

Quality Service Review (QSR) Onsite Review: Case Reviews In-depth review of small sample of cases - interviews with family team members Rating 23 indicators and providing rating rationale Oral presentations of QSR case-specific findings (team debriefings) Immediate feedback to caseworkers & supervisors on case-specific findings Focus Groups and Key Stakeholder Interviews Exit Conference Final Report

Licensing Review Review focused on themes of: Safety Assessment and Monitoring; Family Engagement Practice; Family Service Planning; Casework Visitation with Family; Permanency Activities; Placement Settings; Fostering Connection Activities; and Shared Case Responsibility

Period Under Review Quality Service Review Period Under Review Dates Licensing Period Under Review Dates

Case Sample QSR # In-Home # Out-of-Home Licensing Add Sample Size for each category (type and # of cases reviewed)

Areas of Strength QSRLicensing

Opportunities for Growth QSRLicensing

Sponsor Team and Improvement Team(s) Sponsor Team: ◦ Provides high-level oversight; ◦ Assures resources; and ◦ Sets expectations of the county’s continuous quality improvement efforts Improvement Team(s): ◦ Initiate and manage continuous improvement efforts and maintain hands-on responsibility for continuous improvement efforts

Plan of Correction 1. Who is Going to do What 2. When will it be Done by 3. How is it going to be Monitored

County Improvement Plan (CIP) The County Improvement Plan (CIP) outlines the priorities the County agency chooses to focus on to improve specific outcomes as a result of a comprehensive review of their practice. This review is not limited to the QSR findings, and may also include a review of additional data such as the County data packages provided by the State, quantitative measures produced by the county, as well as the results of other qualitative data.

Statewide TA Collaborative A cohesive group of Technical Assistance providers who work in collaboration with child welfare agencies to improve outcomes for children, youth, and families.

County-Specific TA Collaborative Collaborative members which could include: OCYF Regional Office SWAN CWRC ABA AOPC

Questions/Discussion/Next Steps… Questions Discussion Next Steps: Sponsor Team will meet County Improvement Plan will be developed and submitted in 120 days from the last day of the onsite QSR Improvement teams will take action and monitor the work outlined in the County Improvement Plan

Thank you for coming today and for all you do for the children, youth and families served by County Name CYS/DHS!