JAN PFEIFFER EUROPEAN DI EXPERT GROUP MEMBER OF CPT COUNCIL OF EUROPE Transforming care for children.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Rights Toolkit Comprehensive Toolkit To Address Children's Rights In Development & Humanitarian Cooperation And Government Programming.
Advertisements

System-wide issues in child care reform Clare OBrien, Consultant For UNICEF 2 nd Child Protection Forum Bishkek, 12 May 2009.
Comprehensive family assessment as a prerequisite of individualized planning, monitoring and evaluation of family-visitation program in Croatia Professor.
DENSTITUTIONALISATION OF CHILDREN IN BUGARIA – REAL AND IRREVERSIBLE Darinka Yankova Deputy Chairperson of the State Agency for Child Protection.
International Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children Policy orientations for children aged 0-3 Nigel Cantwell International Consultant on Child.
1 Child Rights Departments role in ensuring development of gate-keeping and referral system SECOND CHILD PROTECTION FORUM: Building and Reforming Child.
CHILDREN UNDER THREE YEARS IN FORMAL CARE IN CEE/CIS COUNTRIES THE BIG PICTURE IN THE REGION Presentation by Jean-Claude Legrand Senior Regional Advisor.
| | Learning from EuroHealthNets Health Inequalities Projects.
Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.
Report on Belgium EU Presidency Conference Who cares? Roadmap for a recommendation to fight child poverty Hugh Frazer National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
The EU & Child Poverty & Well Being – Where Do We Go from Here? Margaret Wachenfeld, UNICEF Brussels Office 26 November 2009.
Inclusive Education and Systemic Reform Conference on Inclusive Education, Moscow, September Diane Richler.
Deinstitutionalization perspective EU Structural Funds as an instrument for social innovation: Bulgaria in action Zagreb, 24 October 2013.
Strengthening Child Protection Systems in Viet Nam
Brief Introduction to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Children, Young People and Families Division Welsh Assembly Government.
The introduction of social workers in the primary health care system and its impact on the reduction of baby abandonment in Kazakhstan 10 September 2014,
The UN Convention and the National Disability Strategy Eithne Fitzgerald Head of Policy and Public Affairs.
Ending institutionalisation Ensuring better outcomes for children.
Child Care Systems Reforms In Eastern Europe and Central Asia Why we need to focus on children below three years Sofia conference November 2012 Jean-Claude.
ONE STEP FURTHER WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM DI IN BULGARIA AND HOW TO DEVELOP PREVENTIVE SERVICES IN COOPERATION WITH MUNICIPALITIES RADOSTINA PANEVA SOS CHILDREN`S.
CHILD WELFARE REFORMS: HOW?
Examples from the WHO Information and Training Package on the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Professor Kevin Browne and Dr Cecilia Pritchard WHO.
Respecting the Best Interests of Children in Transnational Child Protection Cases Jyothi Kanics, Advocacy & Policy Specialist Child Rights Advocacy & Education.
UNICEF Turkey Country Programme
Early Childhood Development as Entry Point for Social Inclusion of Roma Children Gordon Alexander Senior Advisor Economic and Social Policy UNICEF CEE/
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: METHODS AND APPROACHES Valentin CRUDU Valentin CRUDU,
Belgrade, 24 April 2015 Sabrina Ferraina Senior Policy Officer
Child Care Systems Reforms In Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Why we need to focus on children below three years October 2012 Jean-Claude Legrand Regional.
Vision and regional perspectives for child care system reforms in CEE/CIS International conference “Commitment, Partnership and Action” Moldova November.
TWO PROPOSALS (1) Scaling up WASH from the Start with UNICEF (2) OMEP’s CRC Monitoring Initiative.
Council of Europe and its work on child participation: Building partnerships By Maarit Kuikka Programme Officer Building a Europe for and with children.
Senior Management Team : Children’s Safeguarding and Child Protection Briefing This briefing will cover: What is safeguarding and child protection Policy.
“Using this approach, we can compare country reforms and progress with an eye towards strategic cooperation.” Mariana Ianachevici ChildPact President.
FAMILY STRENGTHENING PROGRAMME An approach to prevent children from losing care of their families of origin.
What is participation? How would you describe what it is to participate? How does it make you feel when you get to participate?
Hope and Homes for Children Working group 5 - Targeting, forecasting and planning the establishment of continuum of services.
CCT for kindergarten and school programs – opportunities and limits Maria Herczog Florence, 19 March 2013.
Hope and Homes for Children Romania  Hope and Homes for Children Romania.
Conference Tartu December 7-9, 2005 ”Youth Participation and Quality Management”
Integrated Approach towards Investing in Children
From de-institutionalization towards an inclusive society for all: Outcomes and challenges regarding the rights of children with intellectual disabilities.
FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION SOME HINTS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROCESS IN THE BACAU COUNTY Presentation by Sorin Brasoveanu.
Donor Coordination Forum 16 October, key challenges Poverty Social exclusion Functional gaps and system weaknesses in social services.
Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies Conference 2006 Improving Care Through Accreditation- The Role of the NSW Children’s Guardian.
INTERMEDIATE BODY: AGENCY FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007 – 2013.
De-institutionalization & social inclusion Lessons learned, remaining challenges and steps to accelerate the reform in CEE/CIS.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Safeguarding and Looked After Children’s Services Early Intervention and Prevention.
Common European Guidelines and Toolkit on the use of European Union Funds for the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Ines Bulic, UN.
Redistribution of Resources in the Process of De-institutionalization Halyna Postoliuk Director of “Hope & Homes for Children” in Ukraine Chisinau November.
Closing Institutions Romania’s case Infant Homes = 9,309 children 58 Infant Homes = 9,309 children 230 Children Homes = 35,165 children 230 Children.
Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) Program in Georgia From Institutionalization to Social Integration of Children with Special Needs in Georgia 1 Maia.
De-institutionalisation in the EU context DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission Egbert Holthuis, Head of Unit, Finland, Latvia,
Search wearelumos.org. Lumos model for deinstitutionalisation: improving the lives of marginalised children Forum on Investing in Young.
1. 2 Ensuring Respect for the Best Interests of Children on the Move in Europe Jyothi Kanics 20 th November 2015.
23 rd November, 2015 Franz Wolfmayr, EASPD president eb.at
Investing in Children’s services - Improving outcomes across Europe 26 November 2015, Paris, ChildONEurope seminar esn-eu.org.
The European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Claire Champeix, Coordinator European Expert Group on the Transition.
Protecting the Rights of Children with Disabilities
The right of the child to a family in the context of the UN and EU policies Dr (habil) Maria Herczog, Ph.D. Senior Technical Advisor, BCN President of.
How to improve the availability and quality of community-based services? Zagreb,23 November 2010 Dr.Vasilka Dimoska Specialist in social medicine and health.
European Commission 1 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020.
THE CRISIS CHARACTERIZES THE CONTOURS OF POVERTY 12 APRIL 2016 BRUSSELS MARIA HERCZOG PRESIDENT OF EUROCHILD BCN SENIOR TECHNICAL ADVISOR The impact of.
Standards and Competences for Social work Education for working with children and youth Prof dr Nevenka Zegarac Ass MA Anita Burgund.
Combating poverty in Europe People2People Programme Workshop: Child Poverty Mieke Schuurman 20 October 2009 DG Enlargement workshop Child Poverty.
Deinstitutionalization – “Still muddling, not yet through” Goals, Pitfalls, Learning, Challenges Radostina Paneva Andro Dadiani SOS Children`s Villages.
ENOC 18th Annual Conference
ICTPSP Call 2007 ICT for ageing well
Disability Rights and the United Nations: Developing Hard Law
Common European Guidelines on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care and Toolkit on the use of European Union funding Ines Bulic, Researcher.
Deinstitutionalization strategy and implications for south asia
Presentation transcript:

JAN PFEIFFER EUROPEAN DI EXPERT GROUP MEMBER OF CPT COUNCIL OF EUROPE Transforming care for children

Arguments for change 1. Emotional neglect and lack of specific components of relations with a primary caregiver are the factors causing damage of children’s development. 2. Institutional care is a violation of right of children under three years of age 3. Institutional care for children is much more costly then its alternatives. The harm caused to children from spending substantial parts of their childhood in care inevitably has consequences for society as a whole. The human, social and economic costs of denying children’s rights to live in family environment are enormous and unacceptable.

Legal framework UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (Articles 9 and 20 CRC) Right not to be separated from family and rights of children deprived of family environment. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons Disabilities (CRPD). WHO European Declaration on Health of Children and Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and their Families Council of Europe Recommendation on deinstitutionalization and community living of children with disabilities UN Guidelines on the Alternative Care of Children. (Adopted by 2009 when the UN General Assembly).

Paragrap h 21: “In accordance with the predominant opinion of experts, alternative care for young children, especially those under the age of three years, should be provided in family- based settings. Exceptions to this principle may be warranted in order to prevent the separation of siblings and in cases where the placement is of an emergency nature or is for a predetermined and very limited duration, with planned family reintegration or other appropriate long-term care solution as its outcome.”

Damaging effects of early institutional care Goldfarb (1945) and Bowlby (1951) The pioneering publications about the damaging effects of early institutional care for the social and behavioral development of children as well as for their cognitive development. Johnson, Browne and Hamilton- Giachritsis (2006) Quality of development of structures of the human brain is closely related with the quality of human relations in early childhood. The Bucharest Early Intervention Programme (2009) Compared the developmental capacities of children raised in large-scale institutions with non- institutionalized and fostered children

Cost effectiveness Analyses of children of all ages in Romania, Ukraine, Moldova and Russia show that institutional care is: 6 x more expensive than providing social services to vulnerable families or voluntary kinship carers. 3x more expensive than professional foster care 2x as expensive as community residential/small group homes. Analyses of data from 13 countries in Western and Central Europe demonstrated: Institutional care was twice as expensive as foster care for young children with disabilities. Three times more expensive than foster care for young children without any disabilities.

Basic principles of care Best interest of the child has to be always on a first place. Family is only natural environment for a grow of human being. All children have to live with their family, if not it is extreme exception and family links has to continue. Parents are primary responsible for care of their children. State is responsible to support a family to be capable to care.

Steps on a way to a change 1. Experiments alternatives 2. Neglection of the problem 3. Scandals 4. Natipnal platform for change 5. DI pilot projects 6. National policy 7. National action plane 8. General condition for the change 9. Pilot project 10. National vide change of the system

De-institutionalization initiatives EU Ad Hoc Expert Group Report on Transition of institutional to Community Based Care (2009) Trainings of DGRegio- DG Empl Intervention in the countries Guidelines and toolkits on DI EU Office HCHR Forgotten Europeans – Forgotten Rights(2010) Structural Funds and Human Right. April-May Brussels. Sub-Regional Workshop on Rights of Children Aged 0-3 Years. 22 November Prague UNICEF Report At Home or in a Home (2011) UNICEF and OHCHR Call to Action: End placing children under three years in institutions together with( 28 June 2011)

UNICEF’s Call to Action: END PLACING CHILDREN UNDER THREE YEARS IN INSTITUTIONS 1. Legislative changes limiting to last resort, and setting strict conditions for, the placement into institutional care of children below three years; 2.Allocation of resources giving priority to the development of appropriate local services allowing alternative solutions for children below three with special attention to the needs of children with disabilities; 3.Proper budget allocation for supporting vulnerable families through the development of appropriate family-based responses and services; 4. Capacity-building and standards of practice for maternity ward and paediatric hospital staff to support parents of newborns with a disability and parents from most vulnerable groups, in order to discourage institutionalisation; 5. Partnership with media and civil society to promote social inclusion of children deprived of parental care and children with disabilities. The 5 core interventions:

Crossroad Changing a view Gate keeping system Cat pipelines to institution. Close down institutional capacity

Changing a view on What is “Best interests of the child”. Parents’ ability to care for and ‘keep’ their children. People with certain lifestyles Myths about foster care Defectology model Myths of “Good” institutions

Gate-keeping system Comprehensive methods for assessment and diagnostic tools. Objective multi- disciplinary decision- making process. Referral to appropriate services. Regular review of cases.

Cat pipelines Policies promotes family life and helps parenting Access to quality general service as health, housing. Services which helps to overcome short- term difficulties in parenting Services tailored to the specific needs To target at-risk groups or individuals with particular care problems. Improving early intervention to mitigate the effects of a disability Contact between the pregnant woman and the care system Development of child-centered and family-focused services

Elements of transformatio n of institution Awareness of all stakeholders Analysis of the existing general situation, needs and resources Planning of needed alternative services Preparation staff and children for moving on Moving staff and children to new services Monitoring and evaluation Logistic

Traps Investment to institution Parallel services Closure without alternative Alternatives with institutional culture

Shift from de-institutionalization to child care reform UNICEF Regional office CEE/CIS 17 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK RESEARCH AND DATA ANALYSIS PREVENTION CAPACITIESCAPACITIES BUDGETBUDGET SUPERVISORY BODIES HEALTHEDUCATIONSOCIAL WELFARE JUSTICE / COURTS SECURIT Y FAMILY SUPPORT / EARLY INTERVENTIO N DETECTION - REPORTING RESPONSE, REINTEGRATION – ALTERNATIVE CARE GATE KEEPING ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

Deinstitutionalisation Requires a number of general actions to support the strategic approach at national level involving all stakeholders. Deinstitutionalisation being a long-term process, a well-planned and structured transition process is necessary. The planning should involve government representatives covering all policy areas that affect the lives of children with disabilities.

Main obstacles in DI of children Renovation of buildings Low political will for DI Strong lobby of institutions, professionals Not enough awareness in general public Social and schooling problems as reason of I Most vulnerable group are Roma families Misconception of foster care Gaps and fragmentation in the service system Gate keepers / SW, L/ do not understand new approach

History counts Europe and the Cold War ( ) Europe and the Cold War ( ) Structural Funds allocation ( ) Structural Funds allocation ( )

Importance of SF in DI process Wrong use of SF can fixed institutional care and block development for many years. Right use of SF can bring a changes which will most likely without it did not happened. SF can help to start process more massively and can play a role of bridging fund.

Everybody needs Think creatively Act pragmatically Feel as human being Thanks for your attention