USING STUDENT EVALUATIONS AT STOCKTON Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Writing January 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Take PLAN? PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college.
Advertisements

ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
You can use this presentation to: Gain an overall understanding of the purpose of the revised tool Learn about the changes that have been made Find advice.
 Goals: 1. To help faculty respond critically to student generated course evaluation; 2. To help faculty improve student learning.  Outcomes: Faculty.
By taking the PSAT and the PLAN, you have already taken your first steps toward college. Both tests show you the kinds of reading, math and writing skills.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: Adjunct Workshop Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott Fall 2009 Semester.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Update Carrie Ahern and Lynette Molstad Selected slides reproduced with permission of Dr. Amy Gross from The IDEA Center.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
My Math Lab A New Way to Learn Mathematics George Patton “Accept challenges, so that you may feel the exhilaration of victory.”
Evaluation of Teaching at Stockton Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development August 2010.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Insight Improvement Impact ® Loyola University of Chicago April 10-11, 2013 Steve Benton, PhD Senior Research Officer.
Making Numbers Work… NHSAA: Living with the NCLB Act Ann Remus September 21, 2004 To Improve Instruction.
Advanced Care Paramedic Program Hospital Practicums Intermediate Ambulance Practicum Final Ambulance Practicum.
Interpreting Student Evaluations Heather McGovern, Fall 2011.
Interpreting IDEA Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development November 2009 add info on criterion vs. normed scores Add info on.
Evaluation of Teaching Excellence, a Guide for Administrators Heather McGovern, PhD Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
Robert delMas (Univ. of Minnesota, USA) Ann Ooms (Kingston College, UK) Joan Garfield (Univ. of Minnesota, USA) Beth Chance (Cal Poly State Univ., USA)
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form
Assessment Overview: Part 1. Overview Overview of IDEA Data – Not other college assessments like AACP surveys, experiential results, dashboards, etc.
Techniques for Improving Student Learning Outcomes Lynn M. Forsythe Ida M. Jones Deborah J. Kemp Craig School of Business California State University,
Contact Claire Wilson
I Am Almost Ready to Graduate!….or Am I? What to Do In Order to Be Ready for Graduation Hannah Yohn, M.S.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Accessibility Resources: An Introduction to the Memo Professor and student sitting and talking.
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
How to Administer Constructive and Effective Feedback to Online Students Denielle R. Vazquez, M.S.Ed – 2014 Teaching and Learning.
Evaluation of Teaching at Stockton Bill Reynolds, PhD, LCSW Associate Professor of Social Work Director, Institute for Faculty Development August 26, 2015.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Prepping for the Semester Bill Reynolds, PhD, LCSW Director, Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Social Work The Richard Stockton.
Robert Barnoski (Barney) Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
Renewal of Secondary Mathematics A Presentation and Discussion with High School Administrators.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Evaluation of Teaching at Stockton Heather McGovern, PhD Associate Professor of BASK and Writing Director of the Institute for Faculty Development August.
1 Welcome New and Returning Faculty The ITU management wants you to have a successful, effective and productive Spring 2013 trimester.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.
 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Texas A & M University February 2013.
Scale Scoring A New Format for Provincial Assessment Reports.
Last Updated 9/15/2008.  Fall 2007 and Spring 2008.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Summary of CPHS Course Evaluations: AY and Chuck Phillips August 2009.
Custom Reports: SCGs and VCGs. Standard Comparison Group (SCG)
Chancellor’s Diploma Update -ELA – 4 Credits -Math – 3 Credits (to include Alg II and beyond) -Science – 3 credits -Social Studies – 3 credits -Physical.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Home Screen Grade Book Setup Before setting up the grade book, we need to setup the preferences. Select Preferences.
CE Unit Four Seminar: Psychosocial and Cognitive Development of the Infant Please chat amongst yourselves, seminar will begin at 9 PM.
DEVELOPED BY MARY BETH FURST ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BUCO DIVISION AMY CHASE MARTIN DIRECTOR OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA UNDERSTANDING.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION How can my PSAT score help me prepare for my future?
The collections  SERC: Science Education Resource Center at Carleton College  SERC office and staff helps develop and manage web resources for many projects.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
INTRODUCTION TO COLLEGE WRITING Writing Workshop September 24 & 25, 2015.
Tennessee Association for Student Success and Retention Developmental Studies and Teaching Methods for Enhanced English Composition 1010 Barbara Lee Gray.
Data Conventions and Analysis: Focus on the CAEP Self-Study
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Evaluation of Teaching at Stockton
Evaluation of Teaching at Stockton
Assessing and Reporting Children’s Progress
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Evaluation of Teaching at Stockton
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Presentation transcript:

USING STUDENT EVALUATIONS AT STOCKTON Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Writing January 2012

What you need to do 1) Select objectives soon. Use the terminology w/students. 2) Allow time on your syllabus for evaluations, last 2 weeks of class in the spring term for paper evals, 5 days near the end of the term for online evals, and shorter times for paper evals in fall and summer terms. 3) Through the Stockton portal, officially indicate which learning objectives are relevant to each class. Your deadline for doing this is the 2 nd precepting day. Directions will follow in from Heather McGovern. 4) When you select learning objectives, double check your disciplinary comparison code; me about changes.

Selecting Objectives I: Your objectives affect your scores In the Progress toward Relevant Objectives scores, items of minor importance do not count at all. Items that are “essential” count double items that are “important.”

Selecting objectives II: Which objectives should I select?  Pedagogy and assignments help students progress on the objective  A significant portion of a student’s grade is comprised of a meaningful measurement of how well students have achieved that objective

Selecting objectives III: Consider program requests Your program may have suggestions. E.g., the writing program and first year seminars suggest objectives for W and first year seminar classes, and science lab courses often have a supervisor who suggests objectives. Programs cannot force selections upon you, but program guidance can help.

Selecting objectives IV: How many objectives should I select? Usually, 1-5. Selecting too many objectives is usually problematic  It is hard for students to make progress on any one objective when the class has many objectives  IDEA research says as larger numbers objectives (over 5) are selected, student ratings tend to decrease

Selecting objectives V: Myths about IDEA objectives  I have to choose 3. No.  I have to have at least one essential or I have to have at least one important. No.

Selecting a disciplinary code I Ideally, your code is as good a match to your class as possible. A match has been selected for you. If it is reasonable, do nothing. If you think it could be better, contact me about a possible new one.

Interpreting Results I: What do results report and 3 major factors Student evaluations gives you students’ perceptions, which is not always the same as student learning or as reality. Three things that can affect scores: 1) Outliers 2) Error of central tendency 3) Halo effect

Interpreting Results II: Use whichever (adjusted or raw) scores are higher Adjusted scores adjust for “student motivation, student work habits, class size, course difficulty, and student effort.

Interpreting Results III: Norming sorts into broad categories (Graph, pg. 1) Scores are normed. Therefore, it is unrealistic to expect most people to score above the similar range. Statistically, 40% of people score in the similar range and 30% above and 30% below that range.

Improving Teaching I Look to the information on page three to see what steps you might take to improve student progress on various objectives. Research strongly indicates that teachers who consult with someone about results are more likely to see improvement in their results in the future.

Improving Teaching II  Consider collecting midterm feedback, especially in your first term at Stockton or when teaching a new or revised course. I’ll a form, but use whatever format you find helpful. And talk to someone about the results!  The IFD (F227) has resources—books, me, video cameras, etc.

Improving Evaluations I Students will more likely perceive progress if you relate to them, early and often, what goals they are working on and use vocabulary similar to that on the IDEA form. This means that your syllabus, assignments, and in-class discussion/lecture should refer to the goals and help students see how activities are intended to help them make progress on the goals.

Improving Evaluations II  Use page four on your IDEA forms to track student feedback over time—the items in bold should match the items on which you’re receiving the highest scores if your students perceive that they have made progress on the learning objectives you selected for the class. High scores in items you didn’t select may point to things you might add later. Low scores in items you did select point to a need to make a change.

References  “Interpreting Adjusted Ratings of Outcomes.” 2002, updated terpretingAdjustedScores.pdf terpretingAdjustedScores.pdf  Pallet, Bill. “IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction.” Stockton College, May  “Using IDEA Results for Administrative Decision- making.” dministrative%20DecisionMaking.pdf dministrative%20DecisionMaking.pdf