Early and Late Stent Thrombosis Rates in 5,054 Real-World Patients from XIENCE V USA With and Without Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruptions James Hermiller,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPIRIT IV A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Advertisements

OPTIMIZE: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of 3 Months Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Fausto.
Complex Lesion Subsets: Indications for DES Andreas Baumbach, MD, FRCP, FESC Bristol Heart Institute.
FFR vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
Five-Year Follow-up of Safety and Efficacy of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program in Approximately.
Randomized Comparison of FFR-guided and Angiography-guided Provisional Stenting for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI trial Shao-Liang.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
New-generation drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet therapy: overview Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, MD Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies.
Meredith ● EVOLVE Primary Endpoint ● TCT 2011 ● San Francisco, CA Slide 1 Meredith ● EVOLVE overview ● TCT 2010 ● Washington, DC Slide 1 Clinical and Angiographic.
TITAX AMI Trial Y. Giraud-Sauveur on behalf of P.Karjalainen, MD, PhD : Principal Investigator BCIS 2009 London, UK A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing.
Richard Melsheimer Director, Medical Affairs Europe Centocor Eli Lilly and Company Coordinated Use of ReoPro and Drug Eluting Stents: Rationale and Evidence.
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes Yan Li MD., PhD. On behalf of FIREMAN Investigators Associated Professor of Department of Cardiology of Xijing Hospital Fourth.
The REALITY Study Results. REALITY Study Design The REALITY Study : Prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CYPHER®
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
TAXUS Landmark Analysis Impact of Long-Term Clopidogrel Usage on Death, Myocardial Infarction and Stent Thrombosis Gregg W. Stone, MD Stephen G. Ellis,
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up Peter Smits Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands.
M. Valgimigli, MD, PhD University of Ferrara, ITALY On behalf of the PRODIGY Investigators PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced.
Is there any role for intravascular ultrasound in bifurcation lesions? Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, MD University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Two-Year Outcomes in Real-World Patients Treated With a Thin-Strut, Platinum-Chromium, Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the PROMUS Element Plus US Post-Approval.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Disclosures Speaker’s bureau: Research support: Consulting: Equity
Stent Thrombosis and Optimal Duration of DAPT
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
XIENCE V vs TAXUS: Game Over! The Studies are Definitive
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
Second Generation DES Associated with Less Late and Very Late Stent Thrombosis Compared to First Generation DES Donald E. Cutlip, MD Beth Israel Deaconess.
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Stenting of Coronary Arteries in Non Stress/Benestent Disease
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
How and why this study may change my practice ?
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Long Term Safety and Effectiveness of XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in a Real-World Population: Three-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
STENT THROMBISIS Insights on Outcomes and Impact of DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Permanent Discontinuation SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV and COMPARE.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
Potential conflicts of interest
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
Ahmed A. Khattab, MD For the German Cypher Registry Investigators
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Presentation transcript:

Early and Late Stent Thrombosis Rates in 5,054 Real-World Patients from XIENCE V USA With and Without Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruptions James Hermiller, MD Heart Center of Indianapolis Indianapolis, USA On behalf of the XIENCE V USA Investigators

SE Rev. A Disclosures Research Consultant for – Abbott Vascular Consultant for – St. Jude Medical, Inc. – Boston Scientific Corporation Speaker Bureau for – Eli Lilly and Company 2

SE Rev. A Background XIENCE V in the SPIRIT II, III and IV trials has shown superior reductions in late loss, TLR and MACE, as well as significant reduction in stent thrombosis (ST) compared to Taxus Express; this was confirmed in COMPARE, a large, single-center, real-world prospective randomized trial of XIENCE V vs. Taxus Liberté. In addition to randomized controlled studies, large, prospective postmarket single arm studies are important to provide clinical outcomes in real-world patients reflecting both real-world medication adherence and physicians with a range of coronary stenting experiences. Previous studies have shown that dual antiplatelet therapy interruption prior to 6 months is associated with a high risk of stent thrombosis. More data is needed to address this practical problem clinicians face daily. 3

SE Rev. A Study Design XIENCE V USA is a prospective, multicenter, post-approval study designed to examine the safety of XIENCE V in an all-inclusive, consecutive, real-world patient population from real-world clinical settings. Primary Endpoint: ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis at 1 year adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee – Overall population – Standard risk population Study Monitoring Plan – 30% of randomly selected patients monitored with source document verification – 100% source verification of all site reported endpoint events – 100% source verification of patient Informed Consent forms 4

SE Rev. A Study Organization 5 Principal Investigator James Hermiller, MD Heart Center of Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN Co-Principal Investigator Mitch Krucoff, MD Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC CEC Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY DSMB Axio Research Seattle, WA CRO Covance Periapproval Service, Inc. Conshohocken, PA Sponsor Abbott Vascular Santa Clara, CA

SE Rev. A One-Year Follow-Up 6 Total Enrolled N = 5,054 Total Enrolled N = 5, ± 42 Days N = 4,887 (96.7%) 365 ± 42 Days N = 4,887 (96.7%) 30 ± 7 Days N = 5, ± 7 Days N = 5, ± 14 Days N = 4, ± 14 Days N = 4,935 1-Year Follow-up † Patients Who Terminated the Study Prior to 1-year* Lost to Follow-Up56 Withdrawal49 Patient Death59 Other3 *Early terminated patients without any ST event † Patients will be followed up yearly through 5 years 162 U.S. sites with patients enrolled

SE Rev. A Patient & Lesion Distribution 7 AMI 18.1% ACS 37.5% Renal Insufficiency 11.1% Multivessel Disease 40.8% EF < 30% 3.4% Multivessel Treated 13.8% Left Main 1.6% Graft Lesion 4.8% CTO Lesion 2.5% Direct Stenting 38.7% Restenosis Lesion 9.5% Ostial 11.9% Bifurcation 9.0% Diabetes 35.6% A Real-World Population

SE Rev. A DAPT Compliance 8 AspirinThienopyridineDAPT Baseline91.9%97.1%89.7% 14-day Visit91.5%96.5%89.2% 30-day Visit91.1%95.9%88.6% 180-day Visit87.9%92.9%85.0% 1-Year Visit83.0%87.3%79.4%

SE Rev. A 1 Year ST Rate (ARC Def/Prob) Overall Population 9 XIENCE V USA XIENCE V 0.84%

SE Rev. A 1 Year ST Rate (ARC Def/Prob) Overall Population 10 1 Kedhi E. et al Lancet. 2010; 375 (9710): COMPARE 1 XIENCE V USA XIENCE VTAXUSXIENCE V 0.84% 0.7% 3% p = 0.002

SE Rev. A 1 Year ST Rate (ARC Def/Prob) from Real-World Single-Arm Trials ST (ARC Def/Prob) (%) XV USAE-Five 2 N = 4,887N = 517 OLYMPIA Phase I 4 N = 7,832 ARRIVE 3 N = 7,274 Registry XIENCE VEndeavorTAXUS LibertéTAXUS EXPRESSStent 1 Urban PM et al. JACC 55 (10A), 2010; 2 Lotan C. et al. JACC 2 (12), 2009; 3 Lasala JM et al. Circ Cardiovas Interv 2 (4), 2009; 4 Ahmed AH et al. J Interven Cardiol 21(6), 2008` N = 15,147 E-SELECT 1 Cypher 11

SE Rev. A STANDARD RISK COHORT 12

SE Rev. A Standard Risk Cohort Standard Risk Cohort (N = 1,827, 36% of Total) Lesion length ≤ 28mm RVD between 2.5mm and 4.25mm None of the following: – CTO – Graft lesion – Bifurcation with side branch ≥ 2mm – Ostial – LM – ISR – > 2 lesions stented in the same vessel – > 2 vessels treated – AMI – Renal insufficiency – EF < 30% – Staged Procedure 13

SE Rev. A 14 XIENCE V 0.34% 1-Year ST Rate (ARC Def/Prob) Standard Risk Cohort *XIENCE V USA patients who have lesion length ≤ 28mm, RVD between 2.5mm and 4.25mm and do not have any one of the following: CTO, graft lesion, bifurcation with side branch ≥ 2mm, ostial, LM, ISR, > 2 lesions stented in the same vessel, > 2 vessels treated, AMI, renal insufficiency, EF < 30%, staged procedure. †The number of standard risk patients who have reached 1 year for ST analysis. Total number of standard risk cohort is 1,827, with 54 patients terminated before 1 year without ST event and therefore excluded in this analysis. XIENCE V USA Standard Risk* (N = 1,773 † )

SE Rev. A 15 SPIRIT III & SPIRIT IV** XIENCE VTAXUSXIENCE V 0.34% 0.4% 1.0% p = 0.03 *XIENCE V USA patients who have lesion length ≤ 28mm, RVD between 2.5mm and 4.25mm and do not have any one of the following: CTO, graft lesion, bifurcation with side branch ≥ 2mm, ostial, LM, ISR, > 2 lesions stented in the same vessel, > 2 vessels treated, AMI, renal insufficiency, EF < 30%, staged procedure. †The number of standard risk patients who have reached 1 year for ST analysis. Total number of standard risk cohort is 1,827, with 54 patients terminated before 1 year without ST event and therefore excluded in this analysis. ** Presented by Dr. James Hermiller at SCAI 2010 XIENCE V USA Standard Risk* (N = 1,773 † ) 1-Year ST Rate (ARC Def/Prob) Standard Risk Cohort

SE Rev. A REAL-WORLD DAPT INTERRUPTION ANALYSIS 16

SE Rev. A Temporary Interruption % (N) 5.6% (N = 243) Number of Interruptions1.1 ± 0.5 (N = 243) Days to First Interruption (days)134.3 ± (N = 243) Duration of Interruption (days)20.3 ± 46.9 (N = 243) Top 3 Reasons for Interruption Surgical Procedure = 35.4% Adverse Event** = 30.5% Patient Non-compliance = 9.5% Permanent Discontinuation % (N) 8.5% (N = 366) Days to Discontinuation (days)239.2 ± (N = 366) Top 3 Reasons for DiscontinuationAdverse Event** = 21.9% Surgical Procedure = 10.7% Increased Bleeding Risk = 9.6% DAPT Interruption Pattern* 17 *Out to 1 year **Adverse Events include all events regardless of their severity and/or relationship with drugs or device

SE Rev. A Late ST Rates (30 Days - 1 Year) After DAPT Interruption Subsequent Late ST (ARC Def/Prob) (%) No InterruptionInterruption After 30 Days* 13/35000/292 Interruption After 180 Days* 2/435 Interruption After 90 Days* 1/378 Overall 18 *Out to 1 year

SE Rev. A Late ST Rates (30 Days - 1 Year) After DAPT Interruption Subsequent Late ST (ARC Def/Prob) (%) No InterruptionInterruption After 30 Days* 13/35000/292 Interruption After 180 Days* 2/435 Interruption After 90 Days* 1/3782/12720/1570/1470/120 Overall Standard Risk 19 *Out to 1 year

SE Rev. A Summary XIENCE V demonstrates low rates of 1 year stent thrombosis (0.84%) and late stent thrombosis (0.39%) in the overall real-world cohort XIENCE V demonstrates low rates of 1 year stent thrombosis (0.34%) and late stent thrombosis (0.11%) in standard risk patients. XIENCE V demonstrates an absence of stent thrombosis in standard risk patients with DAPT interruptions after 30 days and in the overall real-world cohort after 6 months. 20

SE Rev. A Conclusions In a complex real-world population of ~5,000 patients, XIENCE V USA demonstrates very low stent thrombosis rates for the XIENCE V stent In a real-world experience of unanticipated DAPT interruption, XIENCE V had an observed zero ST event rate for DAPT interruption beyond 6 months. 21

SE Rev. A 22