TEACHER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. 2 Employer powers BOT to control management of school, subject to the law (Education Act 1989, s 75) BOT to control management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Corrective Actions.
Advertisements

Teacher Regulation in British Columbia BCCPAC AGM May 5, 2013.
Managing Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace Andrew Ermer Manager – National Construction Services.
It was unfair to me It was unfair to me External Student re Assessment by Marker who had never met the student. External Student re Assessment by Marker.
How to Effectively Conduct Investigations and Disciplinary Hearings in a Town Council Presented by Rachel Fraser Employment Law Adviser (Additional.
Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
T. 8 Grievance and discipline D. Borisova Human Resources Management.
IER Workplace Issues 23 March Employment Act 2008 In force 6 April 2009 repealed Statutory Dispute Resolution Procedures Overview of main changes:
10/09/01 Overview Purpose of this presentation:
2. 12 Resolving disagreements Resolving disagreements Disagreements between employers and employees  May occur rarely, if ever  May be minor,
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT SECTION 59 GRIEVANCE PROCESSES Terry Lisson Director Promotion Appeals & Grievance Reviews 22 April 2010.
Agreement on a Procedure for the Resolution of Grievances Presentation by the The Staff Union Committee 26 May 2000.
EMPLOYMENT LAW & MANAGING STAFF. What’s new? Repeal of statutory disciplinary and grievance procedures New ACAS Code of Practice Extension of flexible.
NGSU Regional Councils – Oct/Nov 2014 Fair Treatment at Work Nationwide Group Staff Union.
1 Discipline, Capability and Grievance resolution: for those with responsibility for others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division.
The 10 Golden Rules in Managing Complaints & Discipline.
WEEK 9: DISMISSAL AS A RESULT OF MISCONDUCT 1. LEARNING OUTCOME The students will be able to; 2 1 Discuss the issue of dismissal as a result of misconduct(C4,P2,
A LEADING LAW FIRM WITH A ISTINCTIVE APPROACH Performance Management James Wilders and Laura Daniels.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Employment Matters Reducing Risk and Improving Employment Relations Presenter Rebecca McBeath.
Understanding Discipline in the Workplace
School Development Planning Initiative
Chapter Nine Discipline at the Workplace
Terms of Employment Sources of terms and conditions Express terms
The OIA’s remit and review process The OIA’s remit and review process ONLINE SEMINARS – JUNE/JULY 2015 Felicity Mitchell – Deputy Adjudicator Hilary Jones.
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
Child Protection Guidelines Department of Education and Science DES1.
CORRECTIVE DISCIPLINE A Brief Overview of Effective Employee Discipline.
Progressive Discipline. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives Apply progressive discipline steps fairly and consistently Identify laws.
Workers Compensation Commission Sian Leathem Registrar 29 September 2008.
Disciplinary Policy INCA Community Services. Purpose O Every employee has the duty and the responsibility to be aware of and abide by existing rules and.
The Employment Act 2008 – A Critical Overview Dispute Resolution & Tribunal Procedures: Overview of the New Procedures IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
 VASSP Managing Education Support Staff Underperformance Presenter : Robyn Buckeridge Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals.
Discipline and Dismissals Lecture 15
DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.
How to … use the new Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures Heidi Gibaut, Law At Work 5 March 2014.
Progressive Discipline
1 Effective Internal Workplace Investigations Best Practices.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Serious Untoward Incidents -The role of the GMC - Dr Colin Pollock GMC Employer Liaison Adviser (Y&H) Y&H Deanery School of Surgery Conference 26 th April.
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
1 PLAGIARISM The OIA’s experience Ruth Deech & Michael Reddy.
Discipline and Dismissals Lecture 12.  Must be fair.  RSA courts have decided that “Fairness” constitutes: 1.Substantive Fairness - Pertaining to reason;
Protection offered by employment and equal opportunities legislation OCR Diploma.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Disciplinary Procedures
Vice-Principal Conference NAHT Thursday 12 th November 2009.
Employment Act 2008 IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
Performance Management of Staff Disciplinary Process Richard Walsh Manager – Human Resources.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
LAW SOCIETY OF ZIMBABWE Managing labour Disputes G Makings Legal Practitioner.
Safeguarding the public: Through ensuring Fitness to Practise.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment pr/students/smspr021/
IPPN Conference 2005 Addressing Underperformance Michael Farrell.
1. On a blank sheet of paper… Write down one reason why you may be disciplined (written up) at work.
Public sector whistleblowing: Ombudsman Victoria’s experience 10 June 2010 Glenn Sullivan, Director Ombudsman Victoria.
Using the Disciplinary Procedure Human Resources.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Staff Underperformance/Disciplinary
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
SSSC Fitness to Practise Calum Davidson Intake and Engagement Officer.
Professional support guides
RSL Management Seminar Speaker: Sascha Cook
IER Workplace Issues 17 November 2010.
WEEK 9: DISMISSAL AS A RESULT OF MISCONDUCT
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

2 Employer powers BOT to control management of school, subject to the law (Education Act 1989, s 75) BOT to control management of school, subject to the law (Education Act 1989, s 75) Principal to comply with BOT’s policy directions and to manage day-to-day administration of the school (Education Act, s 76) Principal to comply with BOT’s policy directions and to manage day-to-day administration of the school (Education Act, s 76)  Principal both CEO and employee of BOT BOT to be a good employer (State Sector Act, s 77A) BOT to be a good employer (State Sector Act, s 77A) BOT has full employer powers to appoint and dismiss staff (State Sector Act, s 77E) BOT has full employer powers to appoint and dismiss staff (State Sector Act, s 77E)

3 Teacher conduct and discipline: A myriad of standards Legal requirements: Legal requirements:  Categories of conduct to be avoided in CAs  Professional standards in CAs  Teachers Council criteria for registration and Rules  Local requirements set by BOTs Expectations Expectations  Teachers Council Code of Ethics  PPTA Code of Ethics  Community  Cultural differences lead to different expectations Guidelines, e.g. from MoE Guidelines, e.g. from MoE

4 Choosing the correct procedures School complaints policy? School complaints policy? Competence or discipline? Competence or discipline? Teacher conduct and discipline Teacher conduct and discipline  CA provisions

5 Teacher conduct and discipline (cl 3.4, STCA;2.4, ASTCA ) CA lists categories of misconduct, e.g. CA lists categories of misconduct, e.g.  Disobedience of lawful orders / instructions  Negligence, carelessness or indolence in carrying out duties as a teacher  Gross inefficiency as a teacher  Misuse or failure to take proper care of school property or equipment  Absence without valid excuse  Conduct in her / his capacity or otherwise unbecoming to a member of the teaching service (3.4.5, STCA; 2.4.7, ASTCA)

6 Serious misconduct: Teachers Council Serious misconduct is conduct that Serious misconduct is conduct that  adversely affects, or is likely to adversely affect, the well-being or learning of one or more students; or  reflects adversely on the teacher’s fitness to be a teacher; and  is of a character or severity that meets the TC’s criteria for reporting serious misconduct.

7 Disciplinary procedures Principal deals with minor complaints informally Principal deals with minor complaints informally Where breach of discipline appears to have occurred, employer to determine whether to initiate procedures Where breach of discipline appears to have occurred, employer to determine whether to initiate procedures  Disciplinary matters to be handled in a way which protects mana and dignity of teacher  Teachers may seek whanau, professional and/or PPTA support. When an allegation of misconduct is received, teacher to be informed of specifics in writing and advised of right to have Association (FO) representation at any stage When an allegation of misconduct is received, teacher to be informed of specifics in writing and advised of right to have Association (FO) representation at any stage Employer shall make initial enquiries, if considered appropriate. Initial enquires conducted by principal, if authorised by BOT. Matter may be resolved by agreement. Employer shall make initial enquiries, if considered appropriate. Initial enquires conducted by principal, if authorised by BOT. Matter may be resolved by agreement.

8 Formal investigation If not resolved, complaint may be referred to BOT for a formal investigation If not resolved, complaint may be referred to BOT for a formal investigation  BOT writes to teacher re: reason for investigation, invites teacher to respond in writing, advises of right to PPTA (FO) representation  BOT provides all relevant material to teacher (natural justice) If student/staff welfares so requires, BOT can suspend teacher (on pay, except in exceptional circumstances) or transfer teacher to other duties If student/staff welfares so requires, BOT can suspend teacher (on pay, except in exceptional circumstances) or transfer teacher to other duties

9 Formal investigation (cont.) BOT to conduct investigation. Teacher / rep invited to attend and make submissions BOT to conduct investigation. Teacher / rep invited to attend and make submissions If complaint upheld, teacher / rep informed and invited to make further submissions (e.g. about penalty/mitigating circumstances, contribution to school) If complaint upheld, teacher / rep informed and invited to make further submissions (e.g. about penalty/mitigating circumstances, contribution to school)

10 Possible outcomes Possible outcomes: no further action, apologies, PD, warning, dismissal Possible outcomes: no further action, apologies, PD, warning, dismissal Appeal mechanism: PG Appeal mechanism: PG If dismissal, BOT reports to Teachers Council If dismissal, BOT reports to Teachers Council Teacher can face double or triple jeopardy Teacher can face double or triple jeopardy

11 Resolving conflict in a Maori context (3.5, STCA; Conflict resolution: 2.5, ASTCA) Employee to be advised in writing of specific matters causing concern Employee to be advised in writing of specific matters causing concern  Agreement of employee and employer needed to use process  Can take place on marae  Can have whanau support for all  Guidance and advice often provided by kaumatua and kuia for all  If a resolution, it is recorded in writing, signed by parties. Copy kept on employee’s file.  Parties may withdraw from process at any time. Competence and/or discipline procedures may then be used.

12 Problems which have arisen: What to avoid Acting on verbal or anonymous complaints Acting on verbal or anonymous complaints Pre-determination; bias Pre-determination; bias Principal the complainant, but conducts initial enquiries Principal the complainant, but conducts initial enquiries Unreasonable time frames Unreasonable time frames Students interviewed in groups Students interviewed in groups

13 Problems which have arisen: What to avoid (cont.) Not giving teacher full complaint / witness statements Not giving teacher full complaint / witness statements Not providing opportunity for teacher / rep submissions before BOT decides on suspension Not providing opportunity for teacher / rep submissions before BOT decides on suspension BOT basing decision on gut reaction, BOT basing decision on gut reaction, not “on the balance of probabilities” Taking into account past warnings to uphold complaint Taking into account past warnings to uphold complaint

14 Lewis v Howick College BOT Case heard in ERA (dismissal justified) and EC (dismissal unjustified) Case heard in ERA (dismissal justified) and EC (dismissal unjustified) Chief Judge Colgan (EC) stated that Chief Judge Colgan (EC) stated that  employers of teachers must act to a high standard (because teachers face double jeopardy – reporting to the Teachers Council; possible loss of a career)  Employers are expected to abide by statutory requirements, collective or other employment agreements and to comply with their own unilaterally promulgated procedures  Errors made by the employer included bias and not providing all information to the teacher (bad faith)  While the dismissal was held to be unjustifiable, the teacher was not reinstated because of his contributory conduct  The procedural domination by lawyers in this case was at the expense of educational input. The involvement of the PPTA, NZEI and NZSTA is preferred.

15 Meads and Pukekohe High School Case determined in the ERA. Case determined in the ERA. Issues which arose: Issues which arose:  previous incidents  dealing with complaints after final written warnings  removing units from the teacher (dismissal; then reinstatement with demotion) when the issues were in his role as a teacher, not as a unit holder Process found to be unfair, as matters were taken into account which should not have been. A reasonable employer would not have dismissed Mr Meads. Process found to be unfair, as matters were taken into account which should not have been. A reasonable employer would not have dismissed Mr Meads. The teacher was reinstated to his position, with units, but with a warning and support programme. The teacher was reinstated to his position, with units, but with a warning and support programme.

16 Fairness and reasonableness “Dealing with inadequate performance or other unsatisfactory employment issues is not a no-win legal minefield for employers, to be avoided only by buying off employees. It is an area of employment relationships in which, because of the potential consequences to employees, the law expects employers to meet standards of fairness and reasonableness in all the circumstances of any particular case.” Chief Judge Colgan, “Law only requires fairness and balance”, NZ Herald, 20/2/2008

17 Teacher disciplinary issues can be managed well Good faith, good will, natural justice, consultation and effective communication needed Good faith, good will, natural justice, consultation and effective communication needed Contestable advice given: Bots accountable for their decisions Contestable advice given: Bots accountable for their decisions Parties and advisors should seek to agree on processes which do not compromise parties’ rights, are consistent with legislation, CAs and the principles of natural justice to minimise the risk of / need for legal action. Parties and advisors should seek to agree on processes which do not compromise parties’ rights, are consistent with legislation, CAs and the principles of natural justice to minimise the risk of / need for legal action.